Success for Cameron
David Blackburn 11:45am
Finally, Brown has withdrawn the whip from Chaytor, Morley and Devine. This is a significant victory for Cameron in the latest battle over expenses. Once again, the Tories are streaks ahead on this issue. As Henry Macrory notes, it took Cameron 86 minutes to reach the obvious conclusion that Lord Hanningfield should be suspended; Brown agonised for 4305 minutes. Truly, this is the man who can be trusted to ‘take the tough decisions’ on the economy when needed – my guess is that most of us all will die at a Keatsian age in Dickensian penury.
One point that occurs to me is that it's been clear for some time that Chaytor et al were personae non grata. Why therefore has Chaytor been used as a government plant at PMQs twice this year? The MPs’ expenses scandal is the one Village obsession that resonates with the public; Brown’s judgement on the whole issue has been staggeringly naive.
PS: Brown beginning to get his act together - Laura Kuenssberg reports that a spokesman has not ruled out a change in the law on parliamentary privilege if Chaytor et al declare themselves immune. The day is already Cameron's, who called for such an act this morning, though I still think he'd be advised to calm his ad hominem tone in the long-run - of course Brown is of Westminster's ancien regime, don't throw away the advantage with the 'bad old politics'.



Previous






Slim Jim
February 8th, 2010 11:53am Report this commentBrown's judgement 'staggeringly naive'? More like partisan, incompetent and reckless.
toco
February 8th, 2010 11:54am Report this commentWell done David Cameron!You have forced the cowardly and snivelling Brown out of his bunker for once.The next question is are the Labour Party's lawyers acting for the three accused and if so will they desist?
JohnOfEnfield
February 8th, 2010 11:57am Report this commentBrown is shown, once again, to be part of he problem.
Bob Dixon
February 8th, 2010 11:57am Report this commentWhat does withdrawing the whip mean when you are facing court action. I want to see suspension of redundacy pay & pension until the court's judgement. If found guilty no redundacy or pension.
Nash
February 8th, 2010 12:01pm Report this commentMaybe Gordon Brown should now withdraw the "whip" from himself.
toco
February 8th, 2010 12:03pm Report this commentIt is good to see that when Cameron the organ grinder commands Brown the monkey jumps!
Gawain
February 8th, 2010 12:04pm Report this commentT'would seem that ad hominem attacks on the PM have the desired effect. Couldn't happen to a nicer chap !
denis cooper
February 8th, 2010 12:17pm Report this commentBack in the old days if an MP was whipped it was usually because he'd behaved very badly and had to be punished. (Or so we used to read in some of the more lurid Sunday newspapers, although as I recall the reporter would normally make an excuse and leave before it was his turn.) Now if an MP behaves very badly his punishment is that he'll no longer be whipped. Just shows how social mores can change over time.
bigmacsub
February 8th, 2010 12:33pm Report this commentThe point of order has worked for Cameron but the ad hominme isn't going down too well in the MSM.
The narrative will return to the Nasty Tories on the back of this. Mandy sharpening his tounge now.
Heads I win Tails you lose.
hmmm
February 8th, 2010 12:35pm Report this commentWell done Cameron.
Now we can all laugh at the nauseating sight of Labour in a full-blooded, humiliating, ignomious retreat.
AAE
February 8th, 2010 12:39pm Report this commentCameron hasn't a leg to stand on concerning the expenses issue. Why are we paying for his and Osborne's country piles, designated as second homes so we pay for them, when it would seem more reasonable for them to have a small flat from which to conduct constituency business. Osborne repaid about £1,700 recently because he was claiming for a mortgage which was 5% more than the price of the house, (shouldn't our future Chancellor be a bit more fastidious with numbers?) but has still claimed, so far, more than £100,000 doing the place up! I hope at least he was getting the wallpaper at cost price.
toni
February 8th, 2010 1:33pm Report this commentAAE is right, but there's mileage in this expenses scandal and yet more to be revealed. It's dangerous territory for Cameron to lacerate GB over this, and his ad hominem comments will just hark back to Tory malice. Why, there's even a thread on that very subject on ConHome just to remind us of it!
Labour will exploit high living Cameron and Osborne at taxpayers expense, nearer to the GE, be assured of that.
As for Cameron’s dash to be first to suspend his greedy Lord, that too should be exploited as hasty, potentially to be u-turned later like much of his policy.
The PM will be portrayed ‘thoughtfully thinking things through properly’ in consultation with appropriate ministers, the correct behaviour for a PM.
General Zod
February 8th, 2010 3:20pm Report this commentIf you believe that Gordon governs by consensus, you probably believe in fairies at the bottom of your garden too.
TrevorsDen
February 8th, 2010 3:21pm Report this commentAAE is talking a load of Horlicks.
The main houses of both Osborne and Cameron are in London. Osborne's constituency is in Cheshire and Cameron's in West Oxfordshire. They are both entitled like most MPs to an allowance to cover a home in their constituency. The limit I believe is £25k per year.
So there is no funding of their actual home as you imply.
The fact is that the highest profile MP who receives money for funding his own home is Gordon Brown, who despite having 2 grace and favour homes and a London flat let out to rent, still manages to claim for his real home in Fife.
So keep a cap on it AAE.
TrevorsDen
February 8th, 2010 3:22pm Report this commenttoni - you should be on the London Palladium. Give Bernard Delfont a ring.
Victor Southern
February 8th, 2010 3:41pm Report this commentIs this the same Brown that referred to David Cameron as a "second-hand car salesman" and as "dodgy" and "economically incompetent"?
Surely such a paragon of politeness and honesty should be protected against ad hominem attacks by that nasty Mr. Cameron.
Unfair to Brown!
Rhuarc
February 8th, 2010 4:07pm Report this commentpersonae non gratae, surely?
dvj
February 8th, 2010 4:58pm Report this commentwhat I want to know is this: why is the number of MP's being prosecuted only four?
David Lindsay
February 8th, 2010 6:11pm Report this commentCharacter? Is this the same David Cameron who took out probably the first mortgage in his family's history because he knew that, although himself worth thirty million pounds and already the outright owner of two houses, he could have it paid by the rest of us?
Is this the same David Cameron who wants the position of Chancellor the Exchequer to be occupied by George Osborne?
Holly ......
February 8th, 2010 6:53pm Report this commentOMG!!!!
CAMERON HAS GOT A COAT ON AND HIS HANDS ARE IN HIS POCKETS!!!!
My mum would NEVER let us do that.
Never did find out why putting your hands in your pockets was a mortal sin.
quadratus
February 9th, 2010 7:40pm Report this commentGame,set & match to 'Trevors Den'!
Back to top