A note of caution over Cameron’s welcome attack on lobbyists
James Forsyth 1:52pm
The Tories will be happy with their start to the week. David Cameron’s speech this morning has succeeded in highlighting how Labour had not suspended the whip from the three MPs charged by the CPS and drawn one of the Tories’ favourite contrasts, decisive Cameron versus dithering Brown. It was also refreshing to hear Cameron take a tough line on lobbying, proposing to double the waiting period before ministers leaving office and taking private sector jobs to two years.
Lobbyists already have far too much influence on our politics. But there are risks to Cameron in this Obama-style play. As one Tory insider said to me just before party conference, ‘we’ve very vulnerable on the lobbying front.” Their concern stemmed not only from the number of candidates who were working for lobbying and PR firms but the social connections that link some of those at the top of the party with lobbyists.



Previous








Patricia Shaw
February 8th, 2010 1:58pm Report this commentNasty echoes of the Channel 4 Dispatches and Peter Oborne's revelations about Tory links with the Israeli hard right.
Pricky Gayes
February 8th, 2010 2:09pm Report this commentQuite.
Geoff
February 8th, 2010 2:28pm Report this commentVunerable?
All the more reason to make a pre-emptive strike, before Mandelson & the labour / BBC / Guardian spin machine get into gear.
patrick
February 8th, 2010 2:45pm Report this commentMore importantly, where do we start the petition for a referendum on the EU constitution?
A million signatures and we get a vote in the commons.
Verity
February 8th, 2010 2:52pm Report this commentCould David Cameron please put on his jacket. What's he going to appear in next to prove that he is just a regular fella - his pajamas?
THX1138
February 8th, 2010 2:53pm Report this commentI note Cameron "bottled" his well trailed "disgusting sight" attack on Brown.. He's need to toughen up.
In2minds
February 8th, 2010 3:02pm Report this commentLobbying and lobbyists, does this include the trade unions?
Maggie
February 8th, 2010 3:08pm Report this commentPoliticians are elected to govern on behalf of the electorate. It is an outrage that anyone is allowed to interfere with the business of parliament by lobbying, or offering incentives, on behalf of vested interests seeking special treatment. The current government is corrupted beyond salvation and the parasites who hang around Westminster seeking influence through their chequebooks bear a large responsiblity for that. Cameron must ignore all fainthearted doubers. He's come up with a brilliant solution to another of our multifarious national problems and I hope he sticks with it.
denis cooper
February 8th, 2010 3:18pm Report this commentpatrick, we've already had a vote in the Commons about a referendum on the EU Constitution, aka the Lisbon Treaty, and as you can see here:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmhansrd/cm080305/debtext/80305-0023.htm
the answer was "no".
DavidDP
February 8th, 2010 3:19pm Report this comment"Nasty echoes of the Channel 4 Dispatches and Peter Oborne's revelations about Tory links with the Israeli hard right."
You mean this article is a lie too?
TrevorsDen
February 8th, 2010 3:27pm Report this commentIsraeli hard right?
And all Verity could find to talk about this time was Camerons shirt.
She and UKIP are going to have to 'toughen up' their attacks or risk derision.
Lobbyists will like the poor and bent scientists always be with us.
Blofeld's Cat
February 8th, 2010 3:37pm Report this commentVerity - over here it's spelt pyjamas.
And it really doesn't matter to me what he wears.
Chuck Unsworth
February 8th, 2010 3:40pm Report this commentNext up Verity will be complaining about Cameron's choices of tailor, neck-tie, colour of shirt, aftershave, underwear, shoes and socks.
Personally I couldn't care less if Cameron stands at the podium dressed only in a chamois leather thong. It's what he says and does which I find of interest.
Ian Wiseman
February 8th, 2010 4:35pm Report this comment"Next up Verity will be complaining about Cameron's choices of tailor, neck-tie,.... and socks."
Ah yes, what you might call the eternal Verity.
Marcus Cotswell
February 8th, 2010 4:39pm Report this commentAs (ahem) a lobbyist (full disclosure there) can someone please explain to me what exactly is wrong with lobbying? "Quod omnes tanget ab omnibus approbari debet" and all that. It stands to reason, does it not, that businesses operating in the United Kingdom will have (entirely legitimate) interests, and also a wealth of expertise in the provision of various goods and services, and in most cases far better knowledge of their customers (aka the great British public) than government departments. We all live in a far, far better world as a result of lobbyists, acting on behalf of these business interests, ensuring that bureaucrats and know-nothing ministers don't just go off and make policy on the hoof without reference to people who actually have some knowledge of the real world. Lobbying does not have to mean corruption - and of course there should be safeguards against ministers (and senior civil servants for that matter) abusing their position. But the vast majority of lobbyists are just earning an honest crust helping their clients to understand the import of government policy and, where necessary, try to influence it in a way which helps them carry on doing business profitably.
Maggie
February 8th, 2010 5:03pm Report this comment(Lobbyists have)..far better knowledge of their customers.."
I don't think so. No-one wants GM crops grown in this country. No-one wants to be lied to about the origin of their food. No-one wants tiny little houses/flats with tiny little rooms. No-one wants unfettered immigration. No-one wants every town and city filled with identical chain shops. No-one wants supermarkets to destroy local trade in villages and market towns. No-one wants shops on every High Street stuffed with badly-made third world tat. No-one wants them - but we've got them anyway because lobbyists ensured the perversion of laws designed to protect us from sleazebags.
patrick
February 8th, 2010 5:11pm Report this commentbut denis cooper, we can win a vote after the election when labour have been kicked out
Verity
February 8th, 2010 5:12pm Report this commentMy point is that Cameron's eagerness to appear to be what he's not, a salesman in a computer store, make him look weak, weak, weak.
He is not the type of man who would go out without a jacket and pretending that he is to - in his febrile mind - make "ordinary" people think he's one of them is weak. He's leading, God help us, the Conservative Party. No one minds a toff. It's Labour that's full of class hatred. Cameron is, as always, fighting the wrong battle.
Liz Brown
February 8th, 2010 5:29pm Report this commentI think that Verity needs to get out more. Mr Cameron is attacking her beloved Leader and she can't accept that he is right
Chuck Unsworth
February 8th, 2010 6:05pm Report this commentBy contrast Brown looks as if he's never been able to get his jacket off. He must wear it in bed. Certainly looks that way. Never seen an iron since the day it was screwed together. Sketchleys probably refused to tender.
Anyway, how would people here like to see Brown 'deshabille' - even if only very slightly?
I think I feel slightly nauseous....
Holly ......
February 8th, 2010 6:34pm Report this commentYou can always tell when DC done good.
The trolls come out in force.
Verity,Verity, Verity.
Your liking of him is becoming way too obvious.
No use denying this.
You must 'inspect' every picture put up.
What is wrong with you.
Yes he is gorgeous,and if I was younger & single,yes I would.
I had to scroll back up to have a look, I never even noticed what he was wearing.
I will post a comment on Conservativehome that he should take his shirt off whenever he takes his jacket off,so you have less to drool over.(Well,we'll see).
denis cooper
February 8th, 2010 6:55pm Report this commentpatrick, Cameron has already ruled out a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, on the specious grounds that it no longer exists. Even though the EU seems to think that it does still exist, and lists it here along with the other treaties:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/treaties/index.htm
and even though Section 2 of the European Union (Amendment) Act 2008 has added it to list of treaties in Section 1(2) of the European Communities Act 1972. If Cameron was right and the Lisbon Treaty no longer existed, then of course that Section 2 would have been rendered meaningless.
Paddy
February 8th, 2010 7:34pm Report this commentBrown looks like a door to door salesman.
Go for it Cameron - don't hold back.
Make him angry so we can see his temper again.
quadratus
February 9th, 2010 7:27pm Report this commentIf things go pear-shaped for Portugal,Lisbon will no longer even be in the Euro zone.What happens to the status of the treaty then?.Perhaps they will give it to Gord as a keepsake to put with his compass?
Back to top