What the election that never was tells us about the Brownite future
James Forsyth 1:38pm
About six months ago I was at an away day discussing the prospects for the first year of a Tory government. Most people present were on the right but a senior figure from Blair’s Downing Street was also there to provide a Labour perspective on things. At one point in proceedings we were discussing who would be the next Labour leader and someone was making the case for Ed Miliband. The figure from Blair’s Number 10 interrupted, ‘He’s not bad. But he’s a Brownite so he’s incapable of making a decision.’
This anecdote came back to me reading Andrew Rawnsley on the election that never was in The Observer. Rawnsley reveals how as Brown was trying to decide whether or not to cancel the election or not he summoned together Douglas Alexander, Ed Balls, Ed Miliband, Spencer Livermore, Damien McBride and Sue Nye. He asked each of them what they thought he should do. As Rawnsely writes, ‘No one expressed a clear view. No one wanted responsibility for the decision. “So we are not going to do it then?” asked Brown morosely. Everyone avoided his gaze.’
The other striking detail in Rawnsley’s account of the election that never was, is about it how destroyed relations between the next generation of Brownites. Livermore caught McBride briefing against him and Douglas Alexander and Ed Miliband, trying to pin the blame for the whole disaster onto the three of them when others--including Ed Balls--had also been responsible. When Livermore confronted McBride about this, he responded, ‘I’ve been told to by Ed.’ The two men then got into a screaming match of such epic proportions that Sue Nye had to get them out of the room.
This rupture between Balls and the others is going to be very important in any future Labour leadership contest. It means that Balls’ support base in the parliamentary party really will be confined to the Brownite ultras.



Previous






Vulture
February 21st, 2010 2:03pm Report this commentYet again, Speccie pundits are back on their favopurite hobby horse: the future leadership of the Liebour party.
Guys, it may have escaped your attnetipon but the sodding Liebour party still has a leader : he's big, he's mad, he's ugly, and his name is Bruin.
And the way things are going, he might be still in place after May 6th to see off the two Eds and complete his masterplan of ruining Britain.
Please concentrate attention of how best we can rid ourselves of the worst Prime Minister in our history, of which Rawnsley's revelations are further evidence of what we already knew.
PS. Hattie Hatpin on TWAO described Rawnsley's revelations as 'Hurtful and unfair' ...but not UNTRUE.
wrinked weasel
February 21st, 2010 2:06pm Report this commentThis all has the smell of truth. Oh my God. These people are running the country and telling us what to do, and taking our money and destroying out culture. Expletive withheld.
DZ
February 21st, 2010 2:07pm Report this commentCan we discuss this after the election, chaps? I'm not sure how many Brownies will be left standing and available to join in the autopsy. And, frankly, as a subject, it's less interesting than musing over the number of angels that can dance on the head of a pin.
emma_b
February 21st, 2010 2:15pm Report this commentSeriously, how hard is it to proofread a post prior to publication?
Ben
February 21st, 2010 2:53pm Report this commentDear Vulture,
Brown is the joint second worst with Ted Heath. Blair wins the prize, for his attempts to destroy parliamentary accountability, Iraq, generally lying and devaluing politics further, and most especially for putting Brown in a position of damaging the country as Chancellor, which is where the catastrophe all started. If he'd sacked him when he wanted to, but lacked the balls, we'd all be better off.
Roger Davies
February 21st, 2010 2:54pm Report this commentThe objective should be the complete annihilation of the Labour Party. Nothing less. Cameron needs to get street wise, put on his Doc Martins and practice some arse kicking as this Mr Nice Guy image is not going to get him far. The Female X on the ballot papers will be for the one that sounds like he has the gonads, not the one that shoots the longest cuffs and has the whitest teeth.
Beer Moth
February 21st, 2010 2:55pm Report this commentThe Thick of It.
2trueblue
February 21st, 2010 3:01pm Report this commentVulture, spot on. The trouble is people find it easier to be negative than positive. I love the bit about Hattie!
Frank P
February 21st, 2010 3:08pm Report this commentTo try to counteract the derision of Brown's hanky session with the revolting Piers 'The Tears' Morgan, it seems Rawnsley has now been teed up to give the impression that Brown is a macho bully who manhandles his NuLab arselickers -"Get you, Jummy!"
If the public believed it, he might go up in their estimation. But who could believe that a man who minces around on built up heels, smiles like Danny La Rue when someone stage manages a smile for PR purposes and brings Mandelson back into his cabinet have him close to his bosum, is really capable of putting the frighteners on anyone.
I think Mandleson 'outing' him during one of their estrangments, is much nearer the mark. These extended bachelorhoods are always sussy, Particularly when political expediency demands a 'family' front and someone from the office gets lumbered with the job,
paulg
February 21st, 2010 3:20pm Report this commentJust what we have always thought the only two balls Mr Brown has for a fight is Ed and Yvette sitting next to him.
Anna
February 21st, 2010 4:45pm Report this commentI'm not a political wonk but I think everyone here and on other blogs is missing an essential point. Brown has so hugely expanded the client state, for God's sake the public payroll has EXPANDED during the recession while the private sector has taken all the hits, that it will be VERY hard for the Conservatives, with the built in election bias against them, to achieve a victory. And it seriously isn't helped by Conservatives producing a policy I cheer, hotly pursued by a policy that makes me think WTF?
Ben
February 21st, 2010 4:51pm Report this commentHo ho Frank P, you're implying something else that the press seem to know but we don't get told. Fraser, you should be bold!
Pot Head
February 21st, 2010 5:18pm Report this commentI see even Heseltine is saying Tories can't win..
Tiberius
February 21st, 2010 6:28pm Report this commenthttp://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2010/02/hung-parliament-tory-lead-poll
Please read this to get the Heseltine and other matters in context.
James (and Fraser): for goodness sake, stop being so shrill about the state of the election outcome. I know this a blog, which has a greater thirst than a weekly or even a daily publication but, please, demonstrate some perspective.
mitch
February 21st, 2010 6:35pm Report this commentBrownite and future should never appear in the same sentence.
Fergus Pickering
February 21st, 2010 7:59pm Report this commentPeople who bully their staff are usually not up to the job. IDS did it when he was Tory leader. Now he has a job more suited to his talents he is a pussy cat. Going back a fair bit, Anthony Eden used to throw wobblies. Rathet like Brown, he had waited for the job he saw as his by right, and when it came, he couldn't do it. So Brown can very easily be a bully (of people who can't hit back) and a coward (when dealing with those who can). Ordinary people - like my good self- can easily relate to that. We have all come across Browns at our places of work. We know what they are like.
TGF UKIP
February 21st, 2010 10:37pm Report this commentNot getting a bit rattled are we Tiberius?
Major Plonquer
February 22nd, 2010 3:21am Report this commentI don't see what the big deal is. A little bit of violence never hurt anyone.
Major Plonquer
February 22nd, 2010 3:22am Report this commentIts people like Gordon Brown who give violence a bad name.
Back to top