How the televised leaders' debates will work
Peter Hoskin 5:11pm
The various parties involved in the televised leaders' debate have finally come to an agreement on how they will work. You can read full details here, courtesy of Sky. But the main points are:
i) Topics and locations. The first debate will be hosted by ITV's Alastair Stewart, in Manchester, and will cover domestic affairs. The second will be Sky's Adam Boulton, in Bristol, and will cover foreign policy. And the third will be the Beeb's David Dimbleby, in Birmingham, on the economy.
ii) Structure. The rather rigid structure of each programme will be as follows:
iii) Audience. The audience will be chosen by the polling firm ICM to be politically and demographically balanced. Around 20 percent will be "undecided" voters. The audience will be asked not to applaud during the debate."Each leader will make an opening statement on the theme of the debate lasting for 1 minute. After the three opening statements the moderator will take the first question on the agreed theme. There will be closing statements of 1 minute 30 seconds from all three leaders at the end of the 90 minutes.Each leader will have 1 minute to answer the question. Each leader will then have 1 minute to respond to the answers.
The moderator may then open the discussion to free debate between the leaders for up to 4 minutes on merit.
Questions will be taken on the theme until around half way through the programme, depending on timing and ensuring fair treatment of all three leaders.
At the end of the themed period, the moderator will open the debate to general questions selected by the broadcaster’s panel from the audience or via email.
The same timing format will apply to the general questions i.e. each leader will have 1 minute to answer the question. Each leader will then have 1 minute to respond. The moderator will then open the discussion to free debate between the leaders for up to 4 minutes on merit."
iv) How the questions are selected. Each broadcasting company has an internal selection panel to pick the questions that will be put to the party leaders.
v) No breaks. There'll be no ad breaks, nor interruptions for breaking news coverage.
vi) Regional debates. The BBC will put on separate party leader election debates in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Details yet to be agreed.
vi) Handshakes. And, erm, the leaders will shake hands at the end of the debate. The John Terry and Wayne Bridge situation must have made producers jittery about that...



Previous







wrinkled weasel
March 2nd, 2010 6:04pm Report this commentWill they ban the use of autocues? I like my leaders to actually think and believe what they are saying.
Austin Barry
March 2nd, 2010 6:05pm Report this comment"The audience will not be "asked" to applaud during the debate."
Should that be asked not to applaud?
Pete Hoskin
March 2nd, 2010 6:14pm Report this commentAustin: yes, it should be. Corrected now.
Jonathan Hall
March 2nd, 2010 6:30pm Report this commentI can't believe that the Tories have been foolish enough to allow the BBC and David Dimbleby in particular, to host the third and probably decisive debate on the economy. Will they never learn? Throw into the mix the fact that Clegg will side with Brown on most matters, and I can foresee trouble ahead.
Still the rules of engagement can’t be changed now. It is imperative that Cameron’s prep debate includes a dossier on Brown’s favourite Brownies. He must be ready to rebut each and every single one, because you can guarantee that Brown will lapse into his usual routine.
However, my greatest fear is the post-debate spin operation. In the last two weeks we have already seen that the Labour machine is far more effective in this department than Central office. We need to forget the Marquis of Queensberry rules and fight dirty just like Labour.
On final observation – the Tories should work on the assumption that the audience and the questions (especially in the BBC debate) will be rigged against them. Cameron should make his plans accordingly.
Robert Eve
March 2nd, 2010 6:35pm Report this commentIs the audience allowed to boo the one-eyed idiot?
Richard
March 2nd, 2010 6:37pm Report this commentHow do you get the be a member of the audience?
I hope the chair will not allow obfiscation and will demand replies to the questions and not allow fillibustering.
euro-zone
March 2nd, 2010 6:41pm Report this commentand are they live, or will they be redacted (censored)?
lawrence greek
March 2nd, 2010 6:42pm Report this commentgiven how utterly biased the BBC and Sky have been the last few months, what guarantee do we have the questions will actually be fair?
Tarquin Superbus
March 2nd, 2010 6:43pm Report this commentGiven the current standing of politicians in the country, "not asked to applaud" is probably right.....
Ed B
March 2nd, 2010 6:54pm Report this commentThe audience will be asked not to applaud during the debate.
Good luck with that.
ollie
March 2nd, 2010 6:59pm Report this commentquestion - why is Clegg allowed to participate? It is a statistical impossibility for him to become PM. He should not be allowed to take part.
2trueblue
March 2nd, 2010 7:19pm Report this commentI will certainly not watch it. The audience will be selected, the questions will be selected........ Yes we know how these things are done. Bolton married to one of Gordons own, so why would anyone expect balance from the media when so far we have seen little for the past 13yrs., and more recently none at all.
David Ossitt
March 2nd, 2010 7:35pm Report this commentIt all sounds very anaemic to me.
David Ossitt
March 2nd, 2010 7:41pm Report this commentAlastair Stewart, Adam Boulton, David Dimbleby, each and every one a labour lovey.
mitcheltj
March 2nd, 2010 7:46pm Report this commentI hope these broadcasts do not interfere with televising of the final stages of the European Champions League. Would you rather watch football or Messrs Brown, Cameron and Clegg trying to fool all of the people some of the time? Let's get our priorities right eh?
Ludwig von Crises
March 2nd, 2010 8:32pm Report this commentHow the leaders' debates will work:
A planted question will be asked by a political activist pretending to be a disinterested voter.
Brown will ignore it, forget his Campbellson-supplied lines, lie about his record, shoe-horn in gratuitous references to his wife/father/grandfather/late child/all the above; and attack the Tories using invented statistics.
Cameron will offer vague and nebulous concepts, and triangulate desperately, leaving no one except conservatives offended, and no one quite sure of what he's actually said.
Clegg will huff indignantly, posture and chew the scenery, flattered that he's been given equal airtime with people who stand a chance, however richly undeserved, of achieving government.
Complex domestic, foreign and economic policy concepts will have been violated in a bid to reduce them to simplistic thirty-second soundbites tailored to ill-informed and uninterested 'news consumers'. The broadcast media will congratulate themselves on their crucial contribution to the democratic process. Nothing will have been achieved, a great deal of money and time will have been wasted, and the already imperilled dignity of British politics will have been brought yet lower. Well done everyone. See you again in four or five years.
Simon Stephenson
March 2nd, 2010 9:37pm Report this commentRichard : 6.37pm
"I hope the chair will not allow obfiscation and will demand replies to the questions and not allow fillibustering."
This will depend upon the quality of the questions. If the producers decide to ask tabloid-style black or white, good or bad questions, then we won't get answers to those questions. We'll get statements from the politicians that are related to the subject of the questions, but don't even attempt to answer them. This is because, in reality, top-level politics is not a process of choosing between two stances, of which one is outstandingly good, and the other outstandingly bad.
No one will become a serious politician, let alone a party leader, if he allows a loaded question to put him on the spot. Asking such questions is a totally pointless exercise other than as a demonstration of how much of a smart-arse the journalist is.
Simon Stephenson
March 2nd, 2010 10:35pm Report this commentLudwig von Crises : 8.32pm
A pretty good forecast, I should say.
Your final paragraph is excellent, but what has to happen before it dawns on people that, far from being the cutting edge of social progress, the mass media approach to "political" debate degrades it to the extent that its contribution to such progress is totally worthless?
Bob Dixon
March 3rd, 2010 8:26am Report this commentDoes no one get it! Its the economy stupid!
The debate needs to start with the gap in the tax take & other income less government spending.
What plans do the leaders have in addressing the gap?
Who out there is prepared to fund the gap and what interest rate will they demand until such time the gap is closed?
Olaf
March 3rd, 2010 8:43am Report this commentWill the Sky debate be broadcast for terrestrial viewers?
Rhoda Klapp
March 3rd, 2010 9:57am Report this commentIf I coin the acronym WOFT, who can guess what it stands for?
Any Colour but Brown
March 3rd, 2010 11:43am Report this commentWill we, at least, get a definitive number of tractors produced or will Brown obfuscate, as usual?
Thomas Widmann
March 3rd, 2010 12:27pm Report this commentWhen will the SNP take steps to make sure the debates aren't broadcast in Scotland? Now that the format has been decided, I guess there is nothing preventing them from going to court now.
Back to top