Why the Tories' internal polling matters
James Forsyth 6:09pmIain Martin and Tim Montgomerie are both reporting that the Conservatives have hired YouGov to do polling for them. This might seem like the ultimate Westminster insider story but it will actually have ramifications for the election campaign as a whole.
I understand that the Tory deal with YouGov will mean that they will get polling within the day on their morning announcements and the like. They will also have numbers on which moments in the leaders’ debates resonated with the voters about two hours after these debates finish, enabling them to have whole ad campaigns ready to go for the next morning.
The nature of the party’s polling has been controversial in Conservative circles for a while. As I reported a few weeks ago, Steve Hilton doesn’t use the party’s polling in formulating strategy. There are also criticisms of it from the right, some of which Tim vocalises in his post. But my information is that Populus will carry on polling for the party and that YouGov’s work is additional polling for the election campaign.



Previous






Sally Chatterjee
March 5th, 2010 6:16pm Report this commentI shall sound old fashioned but is constant polling the right way to go? Either you have some good ideas to put forward or you do not, a party aspiring to govern must aspire to lead as well.
It's like trying to drive a car by looking in the rear-view mirror, polls will tell you what people thought of something you've already done.
ollie
March 5th, 2010 6:21pm Report this commentI find this development very odd indeed. YouGov are losing much of their hard earned credibility by changing their weighting procedures.
Anyone who follows Political Betting will know this maore than anyone. YouGov are overstating Labour's polling quite dramatically - in fact, unweighted samples show the tories leading by at least 10%.
Very strange.
Carroll Barry-Walsh
March 5th, 2010 6:32pm Report this commentHere's a novel suggestion: why not try talking to actual voters and listening to what we have to say? Too many politicians on "broadcast" mode these days; not enough on "receive".
Chuck Unsworth
March 5th, 2010 6:36pm Report this commentAnd the real deal is?
Richard
March 5th, 2010 6:42pm Report this commentIt's all too late Shameron has missed the boat. Better to save the money for swish parties to attract the next non Dom. The old one may have the money but is now morally bankrupt now.
Polling last night puts Davis as a better Tory leader perhaps it will happen after the election and they can have another go in 5 years.
Tim W
March 5th, 2010 6:42pm Report this commentSally Chatterjee, I assume that private polling can tell you things which public polling doesn't as you can choose which questions to ask.
I don't know for sure but you can maybe ask about opinions of policies before they've been announced. For example, if you were thinking about bringing back the death penalty (its only an example) you could ask: "would you be more/less likely to vote for a political party if they said they would bring back the death penalty." If you got massive amounts in favour then you could push ahead with announcing the policy. If it was unfavourable then you could rethink and maybe not choose the policy. No one would know you were considering it supposing it didn't get leaked.
I tend to agree with you on the principles of policy formation in that your beliefs and what you think is best should take precendent over what an opinion poll says. In my opinion a politician who can persuade the public to take his/her view is much better than one which follows the public's view all the time.
jsfl
March 5th, 2010 6:57pm Report this commentFully agree with Ollie. Yougov have rolled out Peter Kellner to answer questions on politicalbetting.com and Kellner failed completely to placate critics (in fact his avoidance of the issues probably made things worse). Now Anthony Wells on UKPR is trying to explain it and Stephan Shakespeare on Conhome also.
People aren't buying it. Big problems for Yougov credibility as now Mike Smithson is suggesting they change their methodology.
I hope CCHQ are watching.....
Norman Dee
March 5th, 2010 7:20pm Report this comment"He who pays the Piper etc" perhaps we are about to see a redefinition of the weighting. We need to "weight" and see.
John David Barnett
March 5th, 2010 7:35pm Report this commentI'm tired of this election already. Wake me up when it's over.
Irene
March 5th, 2010 7:37pm Report this commentollie - agreed.
What YouGov have been doing with their daily polls since last September seems very odd IMO - they seem to weight Labour up and Conservatives down, for some reason!
TGF UKIP
March 5th, 2010 8:07pm Report this commentA bit like asking Kim Philby to commission a poll on the public's perception of Soviet intentions.
Who get's the result first, Downing Street or the Kremlin?
Governing Principles
March 5th, 2010 8:20pm Report this commentOllie: Surely, the Tories would want the more conservative data possible? Wouldn't this be produced by the YouGov poll's Labour bias? I realise its not good polling for printing in the news but it might help the Conservatives make better decisions.
www.governing-principles.com
TrevorsDen
March 5th, 2010 8:34pm Report this comment"why not try talking to actual voters" -- they do. Its called canvasing.
I think that this polling is more like fine tuning than anything else. As the report says tories are still using Populus.
But I agree with the comments about YouGovs methodologies. We are getting to the state with pollsters that their methodologies are so complex that you may as well 'add the number you first thought of'. YouGov claim to be finding too many tory respondents. Or more respondents from a demographic that are supporting the tories. The bottom line is they are discounting far more tory votes than they were a year ago. Who are we mortals to argue.
TrevorsDen
March 5th, 2010 8:47pm Report this comment"why not try talking to actual voters" - they do its called canvassing.
I think as pointed out - these polls are fine tuning.
The points about YouGov's methodology are well made. They are finding more tory votes than expected, than they expect, so making an adjustment. Maybe they are right, but this was not happening a year ago.
Wight Tory
March 5th, 2010 8:59pm Report this commentJust a though like, but could it be some wag in CCHQ has nobbled YouGov in the past week or so to get the Flunking Cyst to pop and see Lizzy...
Jimmy
March 5th, 2010 9:13pm Report this commentWill they be paying VAT this time?
Beer Moth
March 5th, 2010 9:17pm Report this commentSo if the Tories (or any party) say something in the morning, and they are informed, that afternoon by polls, that what they said is deeply unpopular, they might then set about stating its opposite the next day? Or they say the same thing in a different way?
Forgive me, but these people are our political leaders, yes?
Tim W
March 5th, 2010 9:37pm Report this commentThose blaming Yougov for the poll lead need to face facts that other companies are also predicting a hung parliament. If they were understating the lead then what benefit would it be to the Tory party for it to be rectified? More people will think they need to vote Tory to kick out Brown.
And what happened to those 6 election themes? The Tories should copy Labour and just repeat the same thing until all of Westminster is bored. Then it might get through to the voters.
I agree that canvassing is best though but could do with some snappy attractive policies from the top to help.
Jez
March 5th, 2010 9:38pm Report this commentNo. No. No.
The Tories have NOT been derailed by Ashcroft... they are failing because they are being advised by people that are failures.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/leading_article/article7051889.ece
You can only lose a 100 sprint with an opponent that has no legs- if your going in the wrong direction.
This is not rocket science.
No one outside of your Westminster bubble gives a f*ck about this Ashcroft.
Wake up.
DavidDP
March 6th, 2010 1:08am Report this comment"they will get polling within the day on their morning announcements and the like."
Well that's a waste, since it normally takes a few days for things to percolate through the system.
DavidDP
March 6th, 2010 1:09am Report this comment"Here's a novel suggestion: why not try talking to actual voters "
What, like polling organisations do?
strapworld
March 6th, 2010 7:36am Report this commentWell said Jezz and also Richard.
I am now firmly of the opinion that Cameron tried to feed Lord Ashcroft to the vultures.
There is a power struggle going on at CCHQ and those incompetents advising the would be leader, and who have had him heading in the wrong direction,obviously do not like the influence and thoughts of Lord Ashcroft.
It has been written by many but it is worth repeating. Cameron had better bring in an experienced BRITISH individual to take over this campaign. Place BoyGeorge in the playroom and ignore him, Get Ken Clarke, Boris,Malcolm Riffkind, Micheal Howard, John Redwood. Hague out in the frontline shouting the odds. Bring back David Davis quickly and get him out kicking the labour backsides. Ask Lord Tebbit to help, Lord Baker, Lord Hurd men people have respect for and who will be listened to.
Action this day.......but that would be what a leader would do. I am of the opinion that Cameron is not up for the fight!
stephen
March 6th, 2010 8:32am Report this commentI hope they pay the VAT this time Ha Ha
What an uttef shambles of a campaign at least John Major got his soap box out.
IMHO the campaign is being run in a very poltically immature manner then what do you expect with a Boy[George] running it. Dave needs to get some strong political adults around him to fight a traditional campaign on tradtional values not Boy George inspired gimmicks
Tiberius
March 6th, 2010 12:43pm Report this commentTories take an 8 point lead with TNS-BMRB (39%-31%).
teledu
March 6th, 2010 3:48pm Report this commentSo DC's spending some of his dosh by commisioning YouGov polls.
Why doesn't he spend some of that cash finding out if a hard-line Eurosceptic policy would be popular?
Why not ascertain if Joe Public (or should that be Mohammed Public?) wants action against unchecked immigration and multucultralism?
Spend a few bob to see if the average Joe or Ali wants decisive action on the economy; a reduction of the client-state; an end to the illiberal policies of the state/councils/police/quangos etc.?
And if such a survey said such policies were winners would DC take any notice?
Don't hold your breath.
There are popular policies out there for the British to support but unfortunately no major party wants to be grasp them - or the BBC and MSM talk about them.
Back to top