A welcome return of defence diplomacy
Daniel Korski 4:43pm
Shadow Defence Secretary Liam Fox has given an interview to the Sunday Express, where he talks about overcoming a sense of "colonial guilt" bestowed by revisionist historians and the need for a new government to forge defence links with commonwealth nations, such as Australia and New Zealand, but he also cited India and Saudi Arabia. They have a “strong appetite” for closer defence links with the UK, he argues.
Looking at variable defence relationships with countries like India, and non-NATO partners like Australia makes good sense. Nicolas Sarkozy has done the same – and even invited Indian troops to march down the Champs-Élysées last year on Bastille Day. A parade down the Mall with Indonesian, Indian, Pakistani, Brazilian, Chilean troops would be a powerful – and colourful – show of “Fox Doctrine”.
But this policy is not without problems, even when it comes to close allies. Having worked with the Australian Army in Basra, I have the utmost respect for their commitment, and effort. But NATO-Australian defence links are not always as smooth as one might hope for. NATO commanders have recently expressed frustration over the restrictions imposed on the deployment of Australian troops in Uruzgan. At the same time, as more and more non-NATO governments join NATO missions, they naturally seek more involvement in decision-making, making NATO’s committee-based process even more cumbersome. If every representative of every troop-contributing country speaks, it will take more than seven hours to finish.
Defence relations are about a lot more than operational cooperation. Liam Fox is on to something by eluding to the diminution of defence diplomacy over recent years. Where once the Ministry of Defence had independent funds in order to advance defence ties, these were taken away and pooled together with money from other departments. Recent changes have given some funds back to the MoD, but looking at ways in which Britain can enhance its security diplomacy -– and the MoD’s role within this – is very welcome.
As part of this, a new Tory government should help NATO re-think its links with other countries. NATO has relationships with countries from Central Asia to the Middle East, but many of these are now outdated or perfunctory. NATO will need the help of the British government, an early champion of 'Partnership for Peace', which brought the Warsaw Pact into the Alliance, to rethink its “bilateral” links.
One way to advance these links might be for Liam Fox to appoint a senior diplomatic adviser, perhaps a former senior Foreign Office mandarin like Charles Crawford, who can help rebuild the MoD’s role in advance Britain’s diplomatic clout.



Previous







Billi
March 14th, 2010 5:02pm Report this commentDo you for one moment think that people like me who served, do not know what the EU is up to and your place in it Bill. You are in for a real surprise. We know this story is a cover for the closing down of light armour production in Britain. We know you are a Reichist, we know you your political career is important to you. We know. We want you to know that, we know. Traitor.
inigo jones
March 14th, 2010 5:12pm Report this commentMr Korski : for eluding read alluding.
Occasional Ostrich
March 14th, 2010 5:16pm Report this comment"by eluding to the diminution of defence diplomacy"
Daniel, your spell-checker needs an english lesson. But why do you need to use one anyway?
YA
March 14th, 2010 5:24pm Report this comment"..Indonesian, Indian, Pakistani troops.."
What a delight, who is next, - Sudan? Hamas?
Is that supposed to be serious article?
Noa Zrk
March 14th, 2010 6:50pm Report this commentAs his fist priority Liam Byrne needs to address the progressive destruction and demoralisation of the UK's armed forces and the erosion of an effective military capability which 13 years of Labour government has achieved.
This is the result of a £28b annual defence budget v the £98b poured into the black hole of social benefits.
The government's reliance on export sales to subsidise its arms purchase has resulted in serious under investment in equipment development. The consequences are twofold; a progressive erosion of UK defence industry capability and a commensurate reduction in our ability to compete in export markets.
as with cotton and ship-building so with defence.
The military protection of the UK must be built on a foundation of military capability firmly focused on the primacy of the UK's interests.
Alliances which directly reinforce our sovereign ability to do this, with Australia and the US, are to be welcomed. Other alliances which may draw us into non productive peace keeping roles or tertiary conflicts are not.
stephen
March 14th, 2010 8:24pm Report this commentThe comment about Indian[troops] is very offensive the sub-continent suffered more fatalities than anyone in WW1[apart from native British] A fact Liam Fox recognised by attending the recent Commonwealth Veterans Memorial Ceremony in London; no such recognition from Bob Ainsworth!
TomTom
March 14th, 2010 8:27pm Report this commentBritain was only a serious land power when it had the Indian Army to provide manpower in both World Wars, but now the tiny British army fights India's wars in Afghabnistan......truly bizarre !
Back to top