Subscribe to The Spectator

Saturday 26 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Monday, 29th March 2010

Chancellor's debate: live blog

Peter Hoskin 7:52pm

2057, PH: We'll sign off for now. I'll be back with a summary post shortly.

2057, JF:
Osborne gets his closing statement just right, sounding humble and emphasising this is the voter's choice. I expect Osborne will be very satsified with his night's work.

2055, PH:
And Osborne has the closing word.  He's not quite as direct as Cable - saying that the Lib Dems won't be in government, and that the Tories have "shown, under the leadership of David Cameron" that they've got what it takes - but its a neat enough closer.

2054. PH: Punchy stuff from Cable, who says that you can't trust Labour because they got us into this mess - and that you can't trust the Tories because they presided over recessions in the past.  It's slightly worrying for the Tories that he gets a round of applause for saying the Tories want to look out for their rich friends.

2053, PH:
Darling says that the government has made the "right call," and that they will do all they can to create jobs.

2052, PH: And that's it with the questions.  All three have a minute to make a final pitch to the audience.  Darling first...

2051, JF: Osborne fires off an effective zinger against Vince who has been claiming to be the Cassandra of this recession all night.
 
One thing to note, Darling makes the quite remarkable claim that Northern Rock was a conventional bank.It wasn't, it was borrowing from the money market to fund further borrowing. That was an innovation and one that went terribly wrong.

2049, PH: A twenty-something in the audience asks what the parties would do for young people.  Cable, Darling and Osborne all talk about apprenticeships, job schemes and the like.  It all sounds a bit vague, though.

2048, PH: Cable says that not everyone "failed to spot the problems" in the financial sector.  Can you guess who he's suggesting did?

2046, PH: Osborne's setting out the Tories' regulatory reform plans - a kind of de facto Glass-Steagall act.  It's good policy, but I'm not sure this will connect with viewers.

2045, FN:
Darling using the phrase "statutory powers" - I think about a fifth of the viewers will have taken this as a queue to see what's on ITV. I'd love to see the audience dropoff rates from these things.

2044, PH: Osborne says that the Tories, contra Labour, really want to change banking regulation.  The Tories' regulatory framework is a radical policy that they don't get enough credit for, to my mind.

2042, PH: Good line from Osborne - he says it's wrong that state-owned banks are paying out big bonuses when small businesses are struggling to get credit.

2042, PH:
All agree that bankers' bonuses need to be controlled.  Cable adds that the banks need to be broken up.

2041, JF: Just after the half-hour mark and no decisive moment so far. Vince is having the best showing but Osborne is turning in an effective performance.

2041, FN: Osborne is asked about a "brain drain". Osborne repeats his economically bogus line about it being "difficult to avoid" the 50p tax. "The tax rises on the many are the ones I will avoid, not the tax rises on the few." It's the many who must pay extra tax, when the cash raised from the richest declines due to the 50p tax.

Vince Cable talks about "pinstriped Scargills" - reprising Clegg's line to The Spectator. Evidently seen as a success in retrospect.

Darling talks about progress "to eradicate child poverty" - how's that battle going, eh, Darling? What do the latest figures show? Amazing how Labour can still talk about this with a straight face. Osborne picks up on this, saying social mobility has declined and child poverty is worse.

Cable says that his "top tax priority" is taking millionaires out of inheritance tax. Osborne have him this death stare, and rightly so. Would those be dead millionaires, Vince?

2039, PH: Now it's Cable's turn to be political.  He says that Osborne's "tax priority" is to "reduce inheritance tax for millionaires."  Perhaps worrying for the Tories, he gets a round of applause for that.

2037, PH:
Alistair Darling is being the most bluntly political performer tonight.  He's currently caricaturing the Tory position on tax credits as something that will worsen child poverty.

2035, PH:
On a presentational level, at least, Vince Cable sounds strong on tax, as he sets out the Lib Dems' tax package.  Osborne and Darling are just left agreeing that the tax system should be fair.

2034, PH: All three don't ruel out a rise in VAT.  Ed Balls, who wanted to create a dividing line around it, won't be amused...

2033, FN: The question is on the scandal of public sector pension reforms. Osborne offers the olive branch, saying that if the three parties agree on a deal then we "might be able to get some progress". Not in the British political system: a government majority means the Tories could do what they want without any cross-party alliance.

Osborne goes on the offensive, saying he pulled out of talks with the govermment after it found out about a 10% "death tax". Cable calls that a "perfectly legitimate option". "I just don't think it's fair to add a 10% death tax on people to pay for the plan" says Osborne: a clear, firm point that pours some clear blue water. He repeats "10% death tax" again for good measure. Darling does a pretty bad job of denying that was on the cards.

BROWNIE ALERT: Darling claims the G20 members all agree on deficit financing, except the Conservatives. Mark Wood wrote an excellent piece for The Spectator about the axis of cutters, led by Germany including Spain and about to include the Cameron government. Osborne switched it back to death tax, though, so Darling's little porkie went nowhere.

2030, PH: Osborne starts a good attack - saying that the government introduced a (stamp duty) tax cut last week, that the Tories proposed two years ago.  But Darling defuses it by making a joke about "cross-party consensus".

2029, PH: Cable sets out the Lib Dem plans for tax cuts - including making the first £10k of income tax-free.  Osborne says that there are some taxes the Tories can't avoid - including 50p tax.  But he then deploys his trump card: the Tories' NI plan would leave 7 out of 10 people better off.  Darling asks, "how come you can do this when there isn't any money in the bank?"

2026, PH:
Darling says that the "death tax" can be "ruled out" for the next Parliament.  Most unequivocal statement we've heard on that, if so.  But Darling seems to stumble a bit as he says it.

2024, PH: Cable says that the death tax is a "reasonable option".  That takes some of the bite out of Osborne's attack.

2023, PH: Osborne is sounding measured, as he says he hopes for a "cross-party consensus" on pensions.  Darling claims that maybe the Tories should have done that over social care.  Osborne says this was because the government were considering a "death tax". 

2020, PH: Darling offers a few platitudes on pensions, and Osborne hits back saying that the Tories offer specifics like put a cap on high-end public sector pensions.  So far, Cable is getting the most airtime.

2019, PH:
Once again, Alistair Darling denies the IFS's calculations over cuts.  He calls them "predictions" - but they're actually taken from the Red Book.

2017, JF:
Vince is going for the honesty vote, refusing to tell a doctor that there won't be cuts that affect patient care.

2015, PH: Now onto NHS efficiency.  All three men say that there's room for more efficiency - but Osborne and Cable make more of this, natch.  Cable says that no-one can offer guarantees.

2014, PH: Everyone agrees that cuts will need to be deeper than during the Thatcher era.  Pretty meaningless, that.

2013, PH:
Unsurprisingly, Cable rounds on Osborne too over national insurance.  He says that the Tories have lamented Labour's "efficiency savings" - but are now saying the same themselves.  THis gets him the first round of applause of the evening.  You can tell that the audience are on Cable's side.

2012, FN: This is my kind of campaign coverage. Sitting here, free beer in hand, curried chicken on sticks in the Channel Four press room (or "spin room" as the many spads here are calling it). There's a kind of festive spirit, like the opening of the Edinburgh festival. Strange seeing the spads eye each other nervously, a lot of them have not laid eyes on each other before. No bloggers here, as far as I can see. But, mind you, why would there be? The only difference to being here is that you get free beer and free access to spin doctors. We journalists see no more than you, the viewer, see on your TV. So, comfortable as it is, this "spin room" does seem a bit pointless.

2011, PH: Ohh, it's kicking off now.  Darling calls the Tories' NI policy "terribly irresponsible".  Osborne hits back extremely well, saying that Darling has admitted to waste - so why not cut it?

2010, JF: Whoever did George Osborne's make up deserves a commendation from CCHQ. They have managed to make Osborne look far less pale than he usually does. This might sound trival but, sadly, image matters in modern politics.

2009, PH: Now, the deficit. Darling says that you don't want to risk the recovery, but the next spending review will be "tough".  Osborne says that he was the "first politician to say that spending needs to be cut" - hm, I think the Lib Dems got there first - and continues that "we've got to do this together."  Cable has a shopping list of cuts: Trident, ID cards, computer systems, etc.

2007, PH:
Osborne says that his values are rooted in a sense of "responsiblity".  This is all very civilised so far.

2006, PH: Darling says that he has "tenacity" (and how), and has "made the right calls".

2005, PH: Perfect first question for Vince, as it lets him build up Brand Cable.  "What personal qualities do you have for being Chancellor?"  He says that he repeatedly warned the government about the signs of the downturn.

2003, PH: Darling's pitch is, unsurprisingly, all about "protecting the recovery".  He says that we need to get the deficit down without harming "frontline services".

2002, PH: Cable is trying to wound inclusive - says "we" a lot.  His main point: we need a "new economy," based on "fair taxes" and a wider economic base.

2001, PH: Osborne first.  He's clear and precise, and concentrates on debt.  As he puts it: "Five more years of the debt, waste and taxes that got us into this mess aren't going to get us out."

2000, PH:
And here we go.  Each contender gets to make an opening pitch for a minute.  Osborne first...

1958, PH: Final ad break before it all kicks off.  Just time to make a cup of tea.

1947, PH: We're still waiting for the main event to begin at 2000, but there's already been almost an hour of build-up on Channel 4.  So what have you missed?  Well, some tours of the rather psychadelic set; shots of each of the three contenders walking around; and Fraser debating Polly Toynbee on spending cuts.

Oh, and there has been a poll, as well, which has Cable ahead of Darling and Osborne as "best Chancellor".  Cable's on 26 percent, with Darling on 17, and Osborne on 13 percent.  But there's better news for the Tories below the headline figures: 52 percent of repondents want spending cuts this year.

Filed under: Alistair Darling (198 more articles) , Conservatives (2312 more articles) , Election 2010 (599 more articles) , George Osborne (798 more articles) , Labour (2143 more articles) , Liberal Democrats (1155 more articles) , Live blog (83 more articles) , Public finances (753 more articles) , Television (181 more articles) , TV debate (71 more articles) , UK politics (5407 more articles) , Vince Cable (228 more articles)

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (28) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Right On

March 29th, 2010 8:24pm Report this comment

Cable seems confused - he thinks he's the moderator!

Ian, Essex

March 29th, 2010 8:34pm Report this comment

Vince Cable is able to say what he likes. We (and he) knows he will not be the chancellor and so will not be held to account. I agree we should not cut the NHS but we should change the way the money is spent.

Robert Williams

March 29th, 2010 8:46pm Report this comment

Osborne is criticised by both other politicians for giving up revenue for NI thus reducing the ability to reduce the deficit, however Cable remains unchallenged on funding the increase in the tax allowance to £10,000

Tiberius

March 29th, 2010 8:46pm Report this comment

James: so that's 0-0 at half time, with referee Cable determined to get a mention from Motty?

Tiberius

March 29th, 2010 8:54pm Report this comment

Pete: the answer to the twenty-something should have been an adaptation of Kennedy, as in, "get off your backside and do something for yourself".

AP

March 29th, 2010 8:55pm Report this comment

Well, the clear line is drawn I think, Darling thinks you have to expand the public sector to replace the 'suppressed' private sector, The Tories want to boost the private sector rather than bloating the public sector any more than it is.

Vote Cameron

TrevorsDen

March 29th, 2010 8:56pm Report this comment

"One thing to note, Darling makes the quite remarkable claim that Northern Rock was a conventional bank.It wasn't, it was borrowing from the money market to fund further borrowing."

Err... thats a labour politician telling blatant lies in public. Is that new?

boulay

March 29th, 2010 8:59pm Report this comment

have you ever seen Osborne and dmitry medvedev in the same room. Labour better be careful about targetting the wrong one!

I think I hate cable more than any other politician. He just spouts his homespun economics bull with populist claptrap whilst completely ignoring reality.

Nicholas

March 29th, 2010 9:01pm Report this comment

Hmm. I thought that audience clapping was not going to be permitted?

I thought Osborne was being given a hard time and the whole thing struck me as manipulative with Channel 4 apparently borrowing the BBC QT audience. The clapping that Cable got for referring to the Tories looking after their rich backers was disgustingly partisan.

Fragmeister

March 29th, 2010 9:01pm Report this comment

More or less neck and neck. St Vincent of Humility sounding irrelevant but prickly. Dearest Darling sent out to play out of position on the right wing, with lines he didn't sound convinced about himself. Georgy Porgy sounding as if he could do the job. Like one of those strange interviews where the interviewees get interviewed as a panel, just know that Darling won't be in the job come May/June 7th.

Bob.India

March 29th, 2010 9:04pm Report this comment

Peter. Can you give us an idea of the audience profile? Does it looks as if have members been hand picked by Channel 4 with the intention of making life difficult for Osborne and somewhat easier for Darling and Cable? It certainly reads as though they have an anti Tory bias.

valerunner

March 29th, 2010 9:05pm Report this comment

Osborne certainly held his own but he missed a golden opportunity to correct the myth that his IHT policy will only benefit millionaires (another one that got St Vince an undeserved round of applause).

And Cable made an odd comment early on about saving money by abolishing biometric passports. I've had one for 3 years!

Sacre Bleu

March 29th, 2010 9:09pm Report this comment

We get used to BBC and its 'hand picked audiences but this was the clearest picture of the Annual Outing for the Vincent Cable Admiration Society one could imagine. Pity Channel Four, hoped for better.

Snowman

March 29th, 2010 9:09pm Report this comment

TrevorsDen @ 8.56:

You tell us which bank or building society didn’t borrow money on the money market, please, when the insanity was in full swing.

YouCannotBeSerious!

March 29th, 2010 9:11pm Report this comment

Cable won hands down.

Osborne started off nervously (saying his experience for the job has been watching other people do it was poor), and never really responded to the effective Cable attack on the inheritance tax. Also appeared that the NI tax cuts did not have the positive effect the Tories were hoping for in its first public outing.

Anan

March 29th, 2010 9:15pm Report this comment

Well done Georgie. Knew he'd do well when called to the plate.

perdix

March 29th, 2010 9:25pm Report this comment

Ref 20.54 PH : The Libdems have presided over nothing in the last 100 years.

charles hercock

March 29th, 2010 9:30pm Report this comment

ALTHOUGH WE LIKED GEORGE'S CONTENT,SADLY HE APPEARS LIGHTWEIGHT.-AFRAID WE WILL NEED TO CALL FOR KEN

Snowman

March 29th, 2010 9:34pm Report this comment

The one aspect of the bank tax not one of the three musketeers mentioned was what will happen to the cash after it lands in the Treasury coffers. Will it be invested in any of the asset classes big enough to absorb it (land, property, gold, stock, gilts), or will it be used to prop up current Government spending? If the answer is the former, then the danger is that in any meltdown similar to the one we are crawling out of now, the assets in which the money has been invested will have depreciated, and will certainly get hit as the investment is cashed out. Hence there will not be enough money to bail the insured parties anyway. If the money were to be spent as part of the routine Government expenditure it will be the taxpayer again, who will have to do the bailing out.

The only way to ensure that any bank, big or small, one that does a vanilla lending only or one that engages in massive ‘casino’ operations behaves 'responsibly' is to let it go belly up.

Swiss Bob

March 29th, 2010 9:36pm Report this comment

Expat anoraks can view it here on YouTube: The Chancellor's Debate.

OK, Osborne got a few laughs out of Darling but how can Osborne fail to slaughter him given Labour's track record. Either it's either all a vast conspiracy, or . . .

david morris

March 29th, 2010 9:36pm Report this comment

'scuse me,

But (in reference to the obligatory Banker bashing) weren't Barclays a bank that didn't seek direct taxpayer assistance, and as such bonuses are a matter for them & their shareholders......

(George missed an open goal there)

Liz Brown

March 29th, 2010 9:37pm Report this comment

I thought that clapping wasn't permitted - but looking at the numbers who were, it didn't appear to be a large proportion of the audience and I suspect that LibDem supporters had been identified and placed next to microphones. Boulay@8.59 re Cable, I heartily concur - he positively makes me squirm

TrevorsDen

March 29th, 2010 9:39pm Report this comment

From the clip I saw Cable was blatantly twisting and confusing and inventing tory policies to knock down.

Its clear libdems would let labour in if given a chance.

2trueblue

March 29th, 2010 9:52pm Report this comment

Hand picked audience, just like the BBC. Cable went unchallenged on his assertion that he saw it coming. Darling is going to invest in the public sector until the private sector can produce the necessary growth to sustain us, fantastic!

Osbourne did well to hold the line and get his points across. He sounded measured, rational, and competent.

Cynical Dude

March 29th, 2010 10:42pm Report this comment

To all those commenting about the audience; the programme was produced by *exactly* the same production company (Mentorn Media) as BBC Question Time and The Big Questions shows, so yes the liberal bias should not come as any great surprise.

Tiberius

March 29th, 2010 10:56pm Report this comment

Lots of people "saw it coming", but no one could predict exactly what and when it would come, which is the crucial consideration if you're formulating policy for a GE. Even Mystic Vince admitted he didn't see the scale of the banking collapse.

Dean Lacey

March 30th, 2010 1:55pm Report this comment

I've no doubt there is a legitimate need to debate care for the elderly and there is a lot of heated election debate going on currently over proposals referred to by the Tories as a "death tax". I've heard these arguments several times now on the BBC. Very rarely is it mentioned of course that this issue only relates... to ENGLAND - a point ignored by most commentators and never ever challenged by the BBC. This is not a matter for the UK Parliament - its a matter for the English people alone!

Steven Vincent

March 30th, 2010 9:46pm Report this comment

I notice that it seems not worthy of mention that Darling laughably implied that removing tax credits for people earning over £50K pa would harm the fight against child poverty! However, at least you picked up on the point about Northern Rock - if its business model was regarded as conventional by government and regulators, is it any wonder that the banking system went down the pan?

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

Tag Cloud

Coffee House archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk