Hope springs eternal
James Forsyth 2:44pm
The Tory press conference this morning, launching their plan for National Citizen
Service, shows how they hope to run a two track campaign. On the one hand, they want to be hammering Labour over their plans to increase National Insurance — Cameron called it a ‘a
recovery killer, an economy killer, a job killer’ and said that Labour wanted people to pay ‘taxes for government waste’. On the other, they want to be presenting hopeful,
optimistic ideas like a National Citizen Service. This fusion campaigning enables the Tories both to be attacking Labour and presenting themselves as the party that is offering a positive
alternative.
National Citizen Service is very Cameron. He’s been toying with the idea since 2005. It reflects his brand of social conservatism; it’s telling that this will not be state provided. Intriguingly, the government money that will go towards these pilot projects will come from the DCLG’s contribution to PREVENT, the government’s anti-radicalisation programme for young Muslims.
It will not be compulsory to do National Citizen Service. The Tory aim is to make people want to do it; this does raise the question of how, for example, they are going to get Muslim girls from strict families to take part. Judging from the briefing note they put out at today’s press conference, there will probably be extra funding for schemes that take on disabled children or those from difficult backgrounds. The Tories also want people to raise some of the money for the courses themselves through sponsorship.
One intriguing aspect of the scheme is that the Tories say they are particularly keen for it to reach ‘people who have been through the criminal justice system.’ One could argue that this is sensible, that these people are particularly in need of an experience that would teach them self-discipline and respect for others. But one can imagine that some parents might not be so keen to send their children away with a youth offender. (I’m waiting to hear back from the Tories on whether there are any offences that would disqualify people from receiving state funding).
In this first week of the campaign proper, there has been a major effort to recapture the ‘let sunshine win the day’ spirit of the first phase of Cameron’s leadership. Gone is talk of an ‘age of austerity’ and in is ‘putting joy in people’s souls.’
PS: Sir Michael Caine gave a surprise endorsement to the Tory campaign. Here's what he had to say at this morning's press conference:



Previous






Verity
April 8th, 2010 3:01pm Report this commentWell, the Americans put a fast stopper on Obama's "citizens' army" of community organisers (why would a community of any kind need an organiser? If it's already a community, it's already organisesd, organically. But naturally, Dave loves it because it just sounds so ... well, Obama-ish. Content free.) But the Americans picked up on the authoritarian undertones to this little idea and put a quick end to it.
Dave, the East Germans had community organisers. They were called the Stazi.
If you don't have anything other than cast-offs (pre-shredded by the American voters) from your hero Obama to offer, Why don't you spend one day without opening your mouth which Vulture claims, I am sure on good evidence, looks like a hen's arse?
"Community organisers" is a fascist idea. Why does a community - community being a bunch of people who are associating with one another freely, without central direction from the state, need an organiser when the word "communitiy" tells you that this group of people is already organised? Why are you so stupid? And so facile?
I used to think you were patronising and dismissive and had low regard for the intelligence of the voters, but now I realise that you have actually bought into all these outmoded communist ideas and think dressing them up with a pregnant wife will make people feel soft, fuzzy and welcoming.
Not in a hundred years, Dave. Count me out.
JohnPage
April 8th, 2010 3:11pm Report this commentVoluntary national service? Tripe. Let the sun shine out ....
Hawkeye
April 8th, 2010 3:14pm Report this commentNothing motivates like self interest. If you want young people to "do" citizen service then operate a scheme like in the US where those who perform military service can get a help with university fees.
What about "Do a year of citizen service and we'll pay £3500 towards your student fees". Or NVQ or apprenticeship costs, or a certification to help get an employer to consider you for a job.
Dave B
April 8th, 2010 3:18pm Report this commentIt's possible I've misunderstood something, but everything I've read about this 'National Citizen Service' makes it sound like the Duke of Edinburgh Award, but run by Whitehall.
http://www.dofe.org/
I thought that the Conservatives wanted to strengthen non-government institutions, so I find this apparent state takeover odd, and unwelcome.
Joe
April 8th, 2010 4:16pm Report this commentWhat has this opposition been doing all this time? They create a "broken Britain" narrative and then the best they can come up with is Scout camps for truculent 16 year olds. Surely the conservative narrative is that government should never interfere in those areas of life that people can arrange themselves. If we want to volunteer, than volunteer we will, but it won't be under the prompting of a nagging Prime Minister.
The Conservatives are creating a problem for themselves. In a desperate attempt to look busy and fresh, they are going to deluge us with one scheme after another. No doubt they sound harmless and jolly, but all will beg the funding question, and all risk accusations of Nanny Statism.
Policies like this also look worryingly like a reprise of Major's warm beer and cricket on the village green theme.
Tim W
April 8th, 2010 4:40pm Report this commentI agree totally that this is "very Cameron."
But whilst it is a worthy idea, elections are won and lost on the big issues which people are talking about. Nobody on the street will tell you they are talking about the Big Society, National Citizens Service, etc. They will say they want to know the parties' policies on the Economy, Healthcare, Education, Defence.
The reason the poll lead waned in January was because Cameron was unveiling daily policies on things like, "War Cabinets". Voters aren't interested in these things. By all means do them in government but they don't win you elections.
Verity
April 8th, 2010 5:06pm Report this commentSurely the conservative narrative is that government should never interfere in those areas of life that people can arrange themselves.
Well said, Joe!
Naomi Muse
April 8th, 2010 5:21pm Report this commentVoluntary doesn't equal national service.
Engendering a sense of community is a different thing and won't be organised or instilled by community organisations.
Sounds good but is a no,no.
Community is effected by attitude, attitude determines how you act and react. Quite a lot of work to do then, but not pushed by centralist dictats.
Ron Todd
April 8th, 2010 6:00pm Report this commentThe best line to take might be.
Is it not better to leave the money in the wealth creating part of the economy where it can be used to create jobs, rather than mover it to the non productive part of the economy where the governments ability to spend wisly has been shown to be rather poor.
John Woolman
April 8th, 2010 6:00pm Report this commentit sounds like being sent to an Open Prison without the benefit of a trial.
This isn't the sort of idea that makes me happier about voting Conservative.
jaybs
April 8th, 2010 6:05pm Report this commentWe are being attacked on both sides by Broon and Clegg and we totally waste a press conference on such a weak subject! yes it may appeal to a select few but it is not what people are talking about on the steps!
Fergus Pickering
April 8th, 2010 6:20pm Report this commentThe point about this is that it is not meant to enthuse you lot, who will vote Tory anyway, exdcept Verity who is mad as the mist and snow. The people Cameron is after are people who previously voted Labour or didn't vote at all. Different animals. Will they like this? I think they like Michael Caine. Dammit, I like Michael Caine.
Verity
April 8th, 2010 6:29pm Report this commentTim writes re community organisers: "But whilst it is a worthy idea ...".
No, Tim. It is not a worthy idea, except insofar it is worthy of Mao or Stalin. It's a horrible, nightmareish idea.
Communities organise themselves organically, just by existing and evolving and having loose, amiable arrangements with their neighbours.
Cannot you see that this is a horrible, socialist idea? The idea is to get people reporting on each other and reprimanding people who tell them to bugger off.
Britain did just fine in evolving over 2,000 years to one of the most sophisticated and desirable societies in the history of the world. All without "community organisers". Dear God!
Tanuki
April 8th, 2010 6:49pm Report this commentThis "National citizen's service" thing is appalling. It just shows how much Cameron has swallowed the communitarian pills. It smacks of a 'big paternalist government' and I want nothing of it - indeed when it comes to recruiting future staffers I'll look negatively upon anyone who admits on their CV to having been duped into participating in such nonsense.
TGF UKIP
April 8th, 2010 7:02pm Report this commentAs the Speccie's arch Camerloon, James, we know you feel obligated to try to sell all the Mekon's daft ideas but I have to tell you, it is doing absolutely nowt for your credibility.
Indeed, when you say "National Citizen Service is very Cameron" you are of course quite correct just as "The Big Society", which you and your comrades have also waxed lyrical about, is very Dave/Mekon. Trouble is, though, that all these daft wheezes do, is feed the notion of Dave as being nowt more than PR spin.
National Citizen Service and The Big Society are exactly the sort of New Labour phrases which the Original specialized in and Joe Voter is now completely cynical about, so it profiteth the Heir precisely nowt to trot them out and I expect Mandelson to be turning his guns on PR man Dave any day now.
Quite apart from which in an economy election Labour will be fully justified in asking how much and where from. My very quick calculation got the community organizers at a very bare minimum of half a billion pa and Whitehall never ever works on bare minimums Dave or no Dave.
Additionally Verity and Joe are dead right and the last thing Brits are likely to want is another set of do-gooding busybodies manipulating them and pushing them about. The whole thing, though, does say a lot about the quintessentially left wing mind set that Cameron has.
Richard
April 8th, 2010 9:34pm Report this commentPoor old Tebbit must be chewing on his bindings by now. What next? Uniforms with matchstick men logo's and the words Cameron youths under it. Perhaps they should be called the sky blue shirts.
Barbara
April 8th, 2010 9:56pm Report this commentLiving in the UK's second city, this would not be welcomed at all, he's aiming at those who are considared not 'in society', who are probably not educated to well, and unemployable. Does he really think they would come forward to work for nothing? I don't think so, in Thatcher's government they introduced the youth training scheme, for then £27 per week for a 40 hour week, not to good and this smells of the same, no, the young will want something more positive than what Dave's suggesting, and with a reasonable wage attached to it for it to make an impression. For me it sounds like a scheme to control the wayward youth of today, but they have to be interested and community ideas won't wash at all. Sounds great, but in practice probably unatainable, for you need the youth to be engaged and have incentive, to get most of them out of their beds each morning will be the first task! Cameron should be concentrating on more serious things like getting them educated, apprenticeships, and jobs, that might just work, that or no benefits.
Michael Booth
April 8th, 2010 10:51pm Report this commentCommunities do not need organising, they need minimal interference from central government - as do individuals. Government is - or should be - the servant of the people not the other way around, though Brown's Freudian slip on the steps of Number 10 the other day said it all about how Labour regard the British people. Under Ed Balls, schools are charged with 'promoting community cohesion' and will fail inspection unless they can demonstrate they are doing this - it's total bollocks.
Michael Booth
April 8th, 2010 10:53pm Report this commentBack in 1945 Churchill lost the elction because his warnings about a socialist Gestapo were thought crude and over the top. Well, let's be honest, he was spot on in the long term, wasn't he?
Ruby Duck
April 9th, 2010 1:32am Report this commentCould work - open software projects attract thousands of voluntary contributors because it is a way of gaining experience and getting a paid job.
The PC-speak is scary, but maybe that'll be dropped after the election ...
Vulture
April 9th, 2010 8:51am Report this commentIn previous elections Tories always promised beefed up boot camps and then did nothing in office. This is the same sort of empty waffle that sounds good but is actually quite sinister if you examine it closely. (As Verity says, it is warmed up Marxism borrowed from Saul Alinsky/Gramsci and re-heated by horrible Hungarian Steve Hilton and the ludicrous Oliver "Are you a burglar? Then please use my loo" Leftwing.)
But we don't need to examine it since it ain't gonna happen.
I'm with Hawkeye: let's folow the US and put kids through education in return for a stint in the armed forces. Which, by the way, should be withdrawn from Afghanistan right now and re-deployed here at home. Karzai is a treacherous Taliban in a funny hat and coat and our boys are dying daily to prop this clown in power.
Back to top