The return of Chris Grayling
Peter Hoskin 3:53pmAdam Boutlon's interview with Chris Grayling this afternoon felt like a pressure valve being released. Grayling's recent low profile had already become a rolling story, and his absence from the speaking line-up at his party's manifesto launch was bound to fuel more murmuring and speculation – so the Tories clearly decided to wheel him out in front of the cameras to calm things down a bit. As it happened, Boulton was on combative form – arguing that elected police commissioners would just add "another layer of bureaucracy" to society – but Grayling sounded quite reasonable in response. Here's the video, so you can judge for yourselves:



Previous






GDS
April 13th, 2010 4:24pm Report this commentIt was ok from Grayling but I feel the Tories need to finesse this great argument a little better. Boulton kept on about what is the role of the government if people are making their own local decisions and Grayling was, er, unclear.
To me (military) it is obvious that what the Conservatives want to do is delegate TACTICAL and some local STRATEGIC decision making to the people who know best but retain the capacity and will to make NATIONAL STRATEGIC and GRAND-STRATEGIC decsions on behalf of the country as a whole. Logical, sensible, consistent, cogent! Where's the problem? Boulton's argumet becomes immediately irrelevant.
Why didn't he just effing say that?
I like what you say Chris but you need to be smarter about how you say it.
Yosemite Sam
April 13th, 2010 4:28pm Report this commentI saw this interview and I was struck with the fact that Boulton could not get his head around the fact that there may be different ways to do things. This came over also with three 'experts' rolled out on WATO. Their pitch was nobody wants to be involved, and, even if they were, it would be the wrong people or they would get their priorities wrong. The Criminologist had the gall to say that wanting more police on the beat was a wrong proity! What blinkered arrogance.
Ivy Eileen
April 13th, 2010 4:29pm Report this comment"combative" ? Thought Bolton was struggling at times as to what intelligently to say. Made a bit of a prat of himself, methinks.
Sunder Katwala
April 13th, 2010 4:31pm Report this commentWasn't it absolutely remarkable that there was no reference whatsover to the Grayling B&B controversy or his absence from national media since?
It seems a very reasonable hypothesis that Sky may well have agreed to that as the terms of the interview, as the only alternative explanation would be that they saw no journalistic interest in that? Worth investigating.
luke
April 13th, 2010 4:35pm Report this commentGrayling doesnt have to worry about it, he wont ever have to implement it
Will J
April 13th, 2010 4:43pm Report this commentGood job - well done Chris. Handling a very sceptical line of questioning calmly and with strong responses. Now let's just hope they do it.
GeoffH
April 13th, 2010 4:56pm Report this commentThis isn't interviewing by Boulton. It's arguing.
There's a subtle distinction and Boulton and his counterparts have forgotten that their role is to enlighten through debate and interrogation and not to sneer by constant contradiction.
david
April 13th, 2010 5:07pm Report this commentThe man is an arse!!
Will Rees
April 13th, 2010 5:13pm Report this commentThe Wire highlighted the problems with elected Police Commissioners- a series Chris Grayling complained the UK already resembled too much
Richard of York
April 13th, 2010 5:19pm Report this commentGrayling will have to do a lot better than that.....he also has to catch up he is a lap behind everyone else.
Unfortunate gaff on the B&B issue compounded by the fact as any fisherman will tell you)the Grayling is a well known bottom feeder......oops
woundup
April 13th, 2010 5:31pm Report this commentWasn't Bolton aweful? Sulky, childlike and aweful. Needling and objurate.
Grayling did well.
Nicholas
April 13th, 2010 5:34pm Report this commentIn the context of 13 years of unrelenting infantilisation it is a difficult message but even Boulton revealed the general disdain for the stifling layers of bureaucratic and moral management pressing down on the British, but particularly the English who have no devolutionary escape from grasping Scots communists Welsh Labour windbags and unpredictable Irish extremists.
That disdain is the danger because the risk for the Tories is that to the oppressed English their ideas appear to be more of the same. I realise they want to promote a positive, constructive message but in reality they need to think in terms of sweeping away, as Cameron so passionately promised in a recent speech, before the construction stuff. Otherwise there is a real risk that the chip on the shoulder brigade, career socialists, grievance peddlers, meddlers and nose-pokers will merely sidestep into a new quangocracy for economic survival. Those parasites need to be sacked and burned, cauterised from our public life and sent packing, never to inflict their cant-driven misery on us again.
Verity
April 13th, 2010 5:36pm Report this commentGrayling had the intestinal fortitude to voice an opinion - an opinion with which around 80 per cent of the British people would probably agree - on the forcing of homosexual guests on people who run B&Bs whether the owners of the home like it or not. (My God, once we go down that route, we'll have people like Tony & Cherie Blair, Gordon Brown and that weird wife and Jack Straw being forced on harmless B&B owners!)
Chuck Unsworth
April 13th, 2010 5:41pm Report this comment@ Richard
Spelling.
Gaff? What, boat or drum?
GeoffH
April 13th, 2010 5:43pm Report this commentYorkist Richard claims the Grayling is a 'bottom feeder' in an attempt to make a weak joke.
Actually, the Grayling is a member of the Salmon family and is far, in the angling sense, from being a bottom feeder.
But then, urban Socialists rarely know anything of the natural world, except how to despoil it.
Victor Southern
April 13th, 2010 5:51pm Report this commentRichard
Your lack of education prevents you from being able to distinguish between a gaffe and a gaff. The former is a disaster in speech or conduct, like Miliband Major and the banana. The latter is a hook such as that which Labour has had in our bodies and souls for 13 years. Some, like you, are happy to be on the hook and incapable of independent thought. Other, older and wiser, fish always evaded being caught.
Boulton was not conducting an interview. He does not do interviews. If a Labour politician is around he is obsequious, the straight man who sets up the lead-in for a peroration. If a Tory politician is in the studio he is a rather toothless and overweight Rottweiler.
Grayling was unwise to get into the B&B controversy which was set up by a Labour activist. He was however right in his instincts which told him that people must still have the right to free association and independence of thought and moral values. Labour believe in forced association and total adherence to a grey pall of political correctness.
David Ossitt
April 13th, 2010 8:06pm Report this commentBlunkett a pompous fool with a penchant for other (better) men’s wives; Charles Clarke a weak feeble and silly man, Jacqui Smith a serial thief who is married to an onanist, Alan Johnson a post man in a shiny suit with a quiff.
Chris Grayling an honest and honourable man.
Back to top