Labour leadership candidates move towards the Cruddas position on immigration
James Forsyth 4:47pmOne striking feature of the Labour leadership contest so far is how a new more honest line on immigration is emerging. At the Fabian Society conference this morning, Ed Miliband declared that ‘immigration is a class issue’. Pointing out that, “If you want to employ a builder it’s good to have people you can take on at lower cost, but if you are a builder it feels like a threat to your livelihood. And we never had an answer for the people who were worried about it." In the Guardian, Ed Balls sounds a similar note. He tells Patrick Wintour and Nick Watt that Labour did not, in the eyes of voters, do enough on immigration.
But there has been one figure in the Labour party who has been pointing out that immigration is a ‘class issue’ for years’ and warning that Labour’s failure to address it was costing it the support of the white working class: Jon Cruddas. If you go to Cruddas’ constituency of Dagenham and Rainham and talk to people there, you find out just how much of a sense of dislocation and alienation has been produced among the old Labour core vote by the immigration levels of recent years.
In an interview with Propsect, Cruddas talks about how you can reweave the social fabric. He mentions one really interesting project, Eyesore Gardens. The idea behind this is that front gardens that have been turned into dumping grounds for furniture or building rubble destroy peoples’ sense of pride in their neighbourhood, their sense of attachment to place. So, what they are doing in Dagenham is placing an obligation on people to keep their front gardens tidy. If you don’t, the council will come and clean it up—and bill you for it.
It might seem a small example. But on a trip to Dagenham a few months back, I was struck by the difference between the neighbourhoods where the scheme was operating and those were it wasn’t. Strikingly, most people change their behavior voluntarily; suggesting that there is an appetite for a community out there.



Previous






Jez
May 15th, 2010 5:01pm Report this commentRubble in gardens.
Not 250,000 immigrants a year and a ever increasingly undermined host culture?
It's 'Rubble'.
(We're all f*cked.)
glenlivetguy
May 15th, 2010 5:04pm Report this commentAh so that is what our PM meant by " The Big Society!" Brilliant penny has dropped.
Occasional Ostrich
May 15th, 2010 5:21pm Report this commentThe question should really be, "WHY did they not do enough on immigration?" But maybe the answer's obvious; unless and until they take their eyes away from the distorting lens of socialism they're never going to be able to come to any decision that puts the nation's needs first.
Mike
May 15th, 2010 5:22pm Report this commentIt takes a lost election for Labour to realise that human nature isn't quite what it thinks or wants it to be. There is a natural pride in keeping your house in a good condition & the garden outside and that applies to both owners with a vested interest like a mortgage but also to most council tenants. The problem with 13 years of Labour rule is that pride has been knocked to hell and back by the minority spoiling it for the majority under 'uman rights' legislation. My ex-father in law who rented a new 3 bed room maisonette in Stepney during the 70's looked after his house & garden as well as any home owner with a vested interest in the property. He & his neighbours were given this housing as they previously lived in slum accommodation and maybe there's a clue here. Many of today tenants in housing association property have little respect for the property and certainly not the garden that looks like a council tip. As MacMillan once said, you've never had it so good and thats so true with Labours low lifes.
I lived next door to one such family in Denham, Bucks in the 80's & 90's and the husband next door was a lazy shite who despite having a large garden he rarely mowed the grass. As a consequence his unruly kids played football in the street damaging our cars and even their mother didn't give a damn over their behaviour. It strikes me that when you give too much to benefit scroungers they lose track of personal values and expect the state to provide for everything.
Its time to roll back the benefits and make these people understand true values for once in their lives and then perhaps their off spring will behave better as well.
Minnie Ovens
May 15th, 2010 5:23pm Report this commentWell, yes. It's just that suddenly the high socialist mucky mucks, looking at their failure in the last election, have taken a bite of the reality apple, for once.
I was told by a real labour party member before this election that the two issues on the C2DE's minds were Housing and Immigration.
Nothing else.
Mr Cameron, the ultimate pragmtist, has immediately forgotten most of his vague manifesto promises in his haste to groove like a LibDem. One of those was upon immigration.
If the Millibands, and Labour, fasten upon immigration they are going to come back on a far stronger footing than before.
Beware Mr Cameron. If you don't atend to immigration prepare to hand back to Labour sooner rather than later.
That's if you leave the Constitution as is. Was that another Manifesto promise I missed?
O'Harlan
May 15th, 2010 5:29pm Report this commentLabour simply has no political interest in stopping either immigration or welfare dependency.
It will not have escaped their notice that Tories did badly in areas with a large ethnic bloc. If Labour can increase the size of these blocs and increase the number of welfare dependents, they increase their chances of staying in power.
Expect immigration to rocket up again next time Labour is in power.
Aberdeen Angus
May 15th, 2010 6:06pm Report this commentHow very convenient. Now that Labour are out of power and unable to do anything about it they are suddenly concerned about the effects of immigration.
Osred
May 15th, 2010 6:14pm Report this commentWithout doubt some Labour MPs have taken note of the immigration issue. What they will do is construct a convincing appearance of concern and action because real action is just too difficult and too late to address current grievances.
Absolutely nothing substantial would come of it in numeric terms.
As for an immigration 'cap' this will only apply to non-EU people who are applying for work here. Those claiming asylum, entry for family or marriage reasons, illegals caught but not immediately deported, overstaying 'student' visa holders, or those legitimised by the current Home Office undeclared amnesty (currently called a review), will be unaffected. In other words no change to the numbers because real action will be too difficult and nasty to handle - let the 1.5-2m sleeping dogs lie.
Andy Ritchie
May 15th, 2010 6:29pm Report this commentThe point about rubble in Dagenham gardens is part of a broader point about the ultimate failure of the 'right to buy' policy instituted by Thatcher in the 1980s.
In the Thatcher/Blair ideological worldview, right to buy would promote a greater sense of responsibility because people owned their own homes.
In reality it helped destroy communities, with private landlords and speculators cashing in, and prevented councils from addressing housing need with any rational policy.
Simon Stephenson
May 15th, 2010 6:34pm Report this comment"Strikingly, most people change their behavior voluntarily; suggesting that there is an appetite for a community out there."
It's only "voluntary" in the 21st Century sense of the word. Previously, it would have been recognised that doing something to avoid an arbitrarily-imposed fine or bill did, in fact, involve a degree of coercion.
EyeSee
May 15th, 2010 6:42pm Report this commentThe obvious point, very,very obvious and shouting out from even this article, is that immigration isn't a class issue at all. Most things aren't. It is 13 years of Labour propaganda that makes you think otherwise, nothing else at all. No substance to the claim whatsoever. Mass immigration was deliberately used by New Labour to undermine and destroy British society. And I'm sure that the best way to run a society, front gardens and all, is to get the state to tell us what to do. Can it be that some are missing the stupidity of New Labour already?
SUSAN HILL
May 15th, 2010 7:03pm Report this commentImmigration was always about numbers not about race. I lived in Leamington Spa in the late 60s/70s when a large number of Pakistanis arrived. Ditto Coventry where I had lived and to which I returned regularly. Whole neighbourhoods changed in short time and you constantly heard people saying what they objected to was so many from whatever country in one place together, altering the balance. When people spread out so that they make a mixed area there is never the same objection. The other thing the English minded was the refusal to integrate but instead to become a little Pakistan with language, shops, places of worship, apparel etc. all being entirely foreign. But the Ugandan Asians and the Vietnamese boat refugees, for example, not only spread through the country but integrated, learning English and mixing, not creating large ghettoes.
David Lindsay
May 15th, 2010 7:17pm Report this commentWe cannot deliver the welfare provisions and the other public services that our people have rightly come to expect unless we know how many people there are in this country, unless we control immigration properly, and unless we insist that everyone use spoken and written English to the necessary level.
Past Labour Governments took action to arrest the importation of a new working class whose members understood no English except commands, knew nothing about workers’ rights in this country, could be deported if they stepped out of line, and, since they had no affinity with any particular locality here, could be moved around at will. Such action was also taken against the enforced bilingualism or multilingualism that transfers economic, social, cultural and political power to a bilingual or multilingual élite, to the exclusion of the English-speaking working class, black and white.
The trade union-based No2EU – Yes To Democracy list at the 2009 European Elections was headed both in the East Midlands and in Yorkshire and the Humber by leaders of the Lindsey oil refinery workers. This recalled the historic role of the trade union closed shop in preventing such abuses, as surely as in guaranteeing to working-class Tories a moderating influence in the selection of the Labour parliamentary candidates for the safe Labour constituencies in which they lived.
Barbara
May 15th, 2010 7:21pm Report this commentWell this is a bit rich for me, looking at gardens, and community. They should come here I can give them a fine example; after spending some £20,000 on our house for our retirement we then had new neighbours, from Asia, and what a mess we now look upon, its like a Islamabad tip, sorry there's nothing else to describe it. Can we get them to have 'community spirit' like hell we can. So we are left with our nice tidy garden and the garden from hell next door to us, the rubbish is unbelieveable. I wish we had a scheme like the one mentioned I'd use it like a shot, but round here your branded racists if you speak out. That's the big society we've developed and Cameron as a lot to do to alter that. Anger as gone to depression and hoping they move or eventually we will, with reduced price for all the years work and money. They've a lot to say and alter before I vote Labour again.
Catesby
May 15th, 2010 7:36pm Report this commentWell, it will be interesting to see that now Labour are saying things that yesterday they would have loudly denounced as racist, will they retain the loyalty of ethnic minorities?
call me dave
May 15th, 2010 7:46pm Report this commentCruddas supports an amnesty for illegal immigrants.
TrevorsDen
May 15th, 2010 7:56pm Report this commentWill Lanour now admit the social engineering reasons behind mass immigration and their electoral calculations?
There are so many ways in which labour has shafted the country over the last three years that one wonders where to start. But the mass importation of migrants and the sidelining of the white working class is one of the most savage and callous. Huge damage has been done to the fabric of British society- its facile to expect the incoming govt to be able to do anything rapidly about it. I for one wonder where the flaming hell one begins to start.
David Lindsay
May 15th, 2010 8:12pm Report this commentAndy Ritchie, even Thatcher's most stalwart defenders are usually too embarrassed to mention the sale of council housing.
The State gifted considerable capital assets to people so that they entered the housing market ahead of private tenants who had saved for their deposits. What on earth was conservative about that?
In so doing, the State created for itself the whole Housing Benefit racket, which even if it were fraud-free (and it is anything but) would still be colossally more expensive than simply maintaining a stock of council housing and renting it out.
Jeremy
May 15th, 2010 8:36pm Report this commentI see. So the answer to the immigration problem is to tidy up the front garden.
If only I had realised this sooner...it would have saved me a lot of unnecessary anxiety.
Language Police
May 15th, 2010 10:48pm Report this commentWe still spell "behaviour" with a 'u'.
Jez
May 15th, 2010 10:52pm Report this commentYou're right Jeremy.
I was quite worried about the major changes that could inevitably engulf my town within the next 20 years- like what's been seen in certain places here in Yorkshire.
But i can now rest easy. First thing Monday morning, a trawl through the yellow pages; Landscape Gardeners.
Nulab and the MSN have created that elusive magic-wand we've all been scrambling about for down here in the dirt.
Thanks guys. You're really great.
Derek
May 15th, 2010 11:16pm Report this commentTrevorsDen
One amendment to your post:
"Will Labour and Fraser Nelson now admit the social engineering reasons behind mass immigration and their electoral calculations?"
2trueblue
May 15th, 2010 11:29pm Report this commentLiebore, says it all. They spent 13yrs. telling us about their initiatives. Remember, they were announced every day by the BBC and did the BBC ever follow up what actually got done???? No.
Liebore, don't let us be lied to, don't listen to them. Same old, dame old. They have had their turn and wrecked our future. We will put it back, we will pay, not the politicians. Thebest thing we can do is ignore the negativity that they spread for 13yrs.
Ruby Duck
May 16th, 2010 1:48am Report this commentDamned if I'm going to tidy up my front garden.
Ron Todd
May 16th, 2010 6:46am Report this commentIt was typical that one of the last acts of Gordon Brown was to cut back on immigration servises at Dover.
TomTom
May 16th, 2010 7:28am Report this commentTories did badly in areas with a large ethnic bloc.
and postal votes
Liz Brown
May 16th, 2010 8:08am Report this commentso the Labour leader candidates are now running, like bats out of hell, from the policies they have foisted on us over the last 13 years, Same old mantra "nothing to do with us, Guv" Bastards the lot of them
terence patrick hewett
May 16th, 2010 8:43am Report this commentLabour middle class radicalism has more than a tendency to regard the working classes as merely an abstraction to be used up and disposed of at will; or as the Spanish liberal philosopher Ortega y Gasset put it; "the inert matter of the historical process." Labour have learnt nothing: mass migration is not a class issue but a human issue, and there we have it: Labour really still regard us as a lower order of humanity to be treated kindly, but fit only to be run by competent experts, i.e. themselves.
anne allan
May 16th, 2010 11:50am Report this commentAndy Ritchie - when I am in what for convenience I will call council estates, it is painfully obvious which houses have been bought and which are still council owned. When I think how carefully the buyers have worked and budgeted to afford and improve their former council house, while next door is some waster who uses his garden as a rubbish tip, I get blood before my eyes.
Straight Talk
May 16th, 2010 12:05pm Report this commenthttp://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/mobile.do?load=wapDetay&link=210271
"New UK government unlikely to oppose Turkey's EU bid"
“In fact, the appointment of David Cameron as British prime minster will have no impact on Turkey’s relationship with the EU because the Conservatives, as Labour and Liberal Democrats, all support Turkey’s accession to the EU. Therefore, there will be a continuation of policy,” Amanda Paul, an analyst at the European Policy Center in Brussels, told Today’s Zaman in an interview."
Has anyone, anywhere got a clue why we need to add more members, like Turkey, to the EU and thus increase the number of people with open door access to Britain.....
Madness, complete and utter madness.
Uncle Vanya De Caesaromagus
May 16th, 2010 1:49pm Report this commentWhat we have to be most concerned about now after the new Tory-Lib-Dem coalition government is now in office. Is just how bad the UKs public finacial mess is!!
Did Brown and his Labour Pals try to hide the true nature of the fiscal mess, or did they really not know just how much their spendthrift ways were undermining a economic/financial reovery of the UK?
Can Blair, Brown and New Labour be likened to a bunch of Drunks who found a wallet of cash on the street, then go on an enourmous drunken spending spree around the Pubs of the area. We will never know now, unless people close to Blair and Brown break ranks and publish 'Kiss and Tell' memoirs about New Labour and its wastefull ways.
Fergus Pickering
May 16th, 2010 4:58pm Report this commentAndy Ritchie, what utter balls you do talk. Do you believe any of it yourself? Oh, and where do you live?
Back to top