Subscribe to The Spectator

Wednesday 8 February 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Saturday, 15th May 2010

A lesson for all new MPs

Fraser Nelson 5:20pm

Ed Miliband has given a surprisingly good speech this morning: free from all the junk language that his older brother has a weakness for. But he raises an interesting question:

Why did Gisela Stuart win in Birmingham Edgbaston?

Why did Karen Buck win Westminster North?

Why did Andy Slaughter win in Hammersmith?

Might it have been because all three of these politicians were, at one point, thorns in the flesh of their government? That they all at times campaigned, on principle, against the Labour government? As I said in The Times yesterday, the German-born Ms Stuart was a committed foe of the EU Constitution - who denounced it, and the Lisbon Treaty, as loudly as she could. She shared platforms with Conservatives fighting it, she supported calls for a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty which she said would create a "democratic deficit". Ms Buck withdraw her son from one of Labour's flagship City Academies saying the standards there were too low and that her son had lost an "entire year" of education. Andy Slaughter has defied the government on Heathrow expansion. (That, and the local Tory-run council was accused of taking away secured tenancy on council houses, provoking a massive backlash which conspired to keep Shaun Bailey out of the House of Commons - for me, one of the most disappointing results of the evening)

There was no uniform swing on election night. The British electorate rendered redundant the BBC swingometers. It was a victory for principled politics. Being a rebel, rejecting the party machine, seemed to protect you. Graham Brady, the only Tory to resign over a Cameron policy, almost doubled his majority and may well be elected to the chairmanship of the 1922 Committee (ie, chair of the Tory backbenchers) next week.

All this will serve to make life difficult for the whips in this coalition. Ms Stuart has herself issued advice to new MPs - many of whom will be very interested to learn the art of defending a seat with a small majority:

"Beware when a whip comes up to you and with a big smile, makes a friendly and helpful suggestion. Just ask yourself: why me and why now. If you can be bullied, you will be bullied. If you can be bought, you will be bought. If you stick to your guns, then they will respect you. But don't expect too many favours."
So why did Gisela Stuart win that night? Because she fought for what she believed in. The lesson will not be lost on the 232 new MPs who were elected last week.

UPDATE: I have corrected the line about H&F council and their tenancy: this was a Labour accusation. But some of those involved in Shaun Bailey’s campaign certainly feel that the council’s intervention on this issue was unhelpful, and open to the misrepresentation Labour put on it. Their council’s response is here.

Filed under: Ed Miliband (630 more articles) , Labour (2012 more articles) , Lisbon Treaty (55 more articles) , Speeches (65 more articles) , UK politics (4903 more articles)

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (32) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Ed T

May 15th, 2010 6:05pm Report this comment

Fraser, I find it very disappointing that an editor of the Spectator should, within a few days of the appointment of a Conservative Prime Minister, be frequently inciting his backbenchers to rebel.

Furthermore, Graham Brady was a long way off doubling his majority, and the Lab-Con swing in his favour was 4.5%, LESS than the national average. This is at least the second time you've erroneously cited him as a huge electoral success story.

Charlie T

May 15th, 2010 6:19pm Report this comment

Once again knowingly or not mainstream media and politicians fail to comment on the obvious. Its a fact that people who aren't white vote overwhelmingly for parties of the left. Its the same for Britain as for the USA as for any other country in western Europe.Thats the prosaic truth why the Tories failed to capture the 3 mentioned seats. And its why the Tories will struggle to win in many parts of urban England for the foreseeable future.Bradford,Leicester,Birmingham,Leeds all returned Tory MP`s in the 80`s.I doubt if they ever will again.

Simon Stephenson

May 15th, 2010 6:25pm Report this comment

Persuasively written, Fraser, at least to those who don't need much persuasion. Like you, I suspect, I would like to see more free expression from MPs, but if I happened to be one, I'd require a lot more evidence than you have given that consituency popularity and contra-Party campaigning go hand in hand.

I'd be worried that what's really being displayed here is the continuing distrust of the Party machines, with the votes for Stuart, Buck and Slaughter being more a protest at the Party than an endorsement of contrarianism, per se. Come the day when people return to voting Labour because they support Labour policy, I wonder whether independent rebels will be treated quite so sympathetically.

Commentator

May 15th, 2010 6:49pm Report this comment

I have long had a great respect for Gisela Stuart. Likewise Kate Hoey, both of whom have fought courageous and often lonely fights against the kind of goons and control freaks who disfigure the leadership of both our major parties. If I lived in their constituencies, I would happily vote for either of them. Good to see that other voters feel the same. Karen Buck's survival and the defenestration of Joanne Cash was David Cameron's richly-deserved Blaenau Gwent moment.

TGF UKIP

May 15th, 2010 6:51pm Report this comment

Fraser, this morning I read your weaselly and disingenuous Leader in this week's mag entitled "Victory". It inevitably prompts the question - when are you going to drop the pretence and simply insert the strapline "The House magazine of the David Cameron 'Conservative' Party" on the front cover.

SUSAN HILL

May 15th, 2010 6:54pm Report this comment

Yes, there times when Ms Stuart, a sound woman,did not seem to be a Labour MP at all and that, of course, is why she did not achieve serious promotion. She was way brighter and more competent than most of the other NuLab women and could have made a good Minister. Strange that.

ollie

May 15th, 2010 7:36pm Report this comment

I would like to see a breakdown of the percentage of postal votes in those seats you mention, Fraser.

Edgbaston staying red was as fishy a result as I can ever remember.

JohnPage

May 15th, 2010 7:53pm Report this comment

The piece you reference says she had 5 lessons for new MPs but mentions only one. Even then she does tell them not to pick fights with their own side.

Do you know what the other four were?

Quietzapple

May 15th, 2010 8:11pm Report this comment

Its positive attitude, we can.

Also they got out and put themselves about.

Communities like attention.

djw2009

May 15th, 2010 8:13pm Report this comment

Labour is doing well in the polls. Today's poll in the DT has Conservative 38, Labour 33, Libs 21. Plugging these figures into electoralcalculus.co.uk, Labour would be the largest party in an election now with 284 seats.

Tim W

May 15th, 2010 8:49pm Report this comment

You are right about MPs being best when they refuse to be bullied about. But the problem then is that their chances of becoming a minister are very slim. I suppose its a choice they must make.

As for Ed Miliband - I have never been so bored watching a speech. He and his brother will bore everyone to pieces. Plus his campaign team are in a right pickle. If they use 'Ed for leader' posters like today then when Ed Balls starts up it will be redundant. Also when they make 'Miliband for leader' posters its also useless. He's got to use 'Ed Miliband' everywhere!

Rabyrover

May 15th, 2010 9:25pm Report this comment

The vast majority of Conservatives gains were in small and medium sized English towns and cities. The swing was less in major Metropolitan areas.

A demographic breakdown will show large concentrations of Labour supplicants in our big cities, e.g. state employees, benefit claimants and immigrants. Therefore, it is unsurprising that Labour did not do as badly in Metropolitan areas as elsewhere.

NicholasV

May 15th, 2010 9:36pm Report this comment

In the Telegraph poll Labour may be up at LibDem expense but the Tories are up too. 64% (more than the combined Tory-LibDem figures) approve the coalition. Which suggests polls at this stage can mean anything and nothing.

On Fraser Nelson's main argument: until the integrity of the British electoral process is restored, especially in the inner cities, I am not wholly convinced by general extrapolations based on these results.

Victor Southern

May 15th, 2010 9:37pm Report this comment

djw2009

Plug the figures in when 2015 arrives - they may then be of some relevance. At the moment they are only wet logs on the fire of your Cameron hatred.

Fergus Pickering

May 15th, 2010 9:56pm Report this comment

But djw, what is the point of those electoral calculations? That particular skewed election will never happen again because Cameron will redraw the boundaries of the seats, and with 38% of the poll he would have a very fat majority. So what exactly is your point?

RMH

May 15th, 2010 10:22pm Report this comment

You forgot Charles Clarke.

DavidDP

May 15th, 2010 10:30pm Report this comment

You don't like coalition governments, Fraser. We get that. The real world however doesn't always let us operate in total purity.

The public are always willing to love one or two dissident MPs, but they quickly punish a party that clearly lacks unity.

2trueblue

May 15th, 2010 11:31pm Report this comment

The best thing that new MPs can do is realise that we are watching.

djw2009

May 15th, 2010 11:42pm Report this comment

Victor Southern, I wouldn't call it "hatred"; more "contempt".

WASHBROOK

May 15th, 2010 11:47pm Report this comment

Coffee House should be changed to Politics House.
Do we ever get anything different.

Tom FD

May 16th, 2010 12:37am Report this comment

The Tories failed to win Birmingham Edgbaston because while the Labour candidate successfully presented herself as outside of the machine, the Tory one presented herself as a councillor on the unpopular Tory-led City Council (a prime example of why formalising the coalition is probably a wiser political maneuver than the messier options).

Given the party received 18,000 votes in that constituency in 1997, and didn't actually need to gain all that many over last time (when they fielded the same candidate, who only managed to pick up 500 new votes despite Stuart losing over 2000) to overtake Stuart, there is clearly an internal problem...

canonalberic

May 16th, 2010 6:58am Report this comment

I went abroad immediately after the election and have been in contact with events only ocasionally.

One thing that stands out is the impact of the right. The clowns in UKIP abetted by the tories very own (and equally unelectable) right wing commentariat (implying over the years that he and Osborne are unprincipled lightweights) cost Cameron this election; as much as the deeply dodgy postal votes ("Game ON" I hope this is being invetsigated) laboursocket borough hinterland serfs, and the frankly de haut en bas tone of the big society silly idea.

Even though peole eventually saw through Clegg they still got him the culmination of Lord Peters stratagems in part underway during the excruciating Parliamentarian of the Year award when you and other useful idiots fawned in front of him to his delight and your immense discredit.

I used to buy the magazine you edit, because it was very well edited and consistently loyal to the only hope of strong tory government.

I know there are those who think you are Adam Smith come again amongst us in the guise of a NOWT Columnist but I think you are a disloyal person with a grudge against Cameron. More a thinking persons James Delingpole than a trenchant but partisan critic like the excellent Lord Tebbit - who also has the virtue of having done a few real jobs, many of them in actual politics not writing about it for Andrew Neill.

I dont take kindly to being told by you what "The Spectator" will stand for; I hate the decline in standard of the magazines critical and political writing (not to mention its hideous covers) and my subscription has just been cancelled.

Your silly treacherous article in the NOWT today was the last straw.

Snowman

May 16th, 2010 10:26am Report this comment

Fraser, the three candidates should have been a hint to Cameron and his crew before the polling date. If only they had followed what the three were saying the Tories would be sitting pretty, on their own.

alexsandr

May 16th, 2010 10:41am Report this comment

I think the failure to get a decent tranche of independant MP's in this parliament is sad. But it is the moving to making the elections more presidential in style. We need to destroy the medias agenda to make elections presidential, so people vote for their MP, not the leader.

Jeremy

May 16th, 2010 10:54am Report this comment

The Conservative Party in Britain has this curious ability to periodically throw up great national leaders who also tend to be unusual and highly idiosyncratic individuals. Think Disraeli, think Churchill, think Thatcher and now think David Cameron - for he is one such. A great national leader who has arrived by the skin of his teeth and just in the nick of time. I watched him on the Andrew Marr Show this morning and I can see the greatness in him. Perhaps, being an artist, one is more sensitive and quicker to see this quality - the quality of greatness - than other people. David Cameron has it. If he can hold this coalition together - and for that he will need the support not only of Nick Clegg but also of people of goodwill from across the political spectrum - then our country is indeed destined for better things and for better days under his stewardship. And yes, inequality in modern Britain is a serious issue which needs to be addressed by this Liberal Conservative government - for the benefit and wellbeing of the country as a whole. Unless, that is, we wish to go the same way as Thailand...

Mike A

May 16th, 2010 11:48am Report this comment

Fraser - H&F Council has not abolished secure tenancy and to read this allegation in your article is quite incredible.

Andy Slaughter and the local Labour Party conducted a totally disreputable campaign full of similar scare tactics which unfortunately did have an effect on the Hammersmith parliamentary result, although the Conservative Council administration was re-elected with an emphatic majority, against the trend in west London.

Cllr Mike Adam

FaustiesBlog Libertarian

May 16th, 2010 12:28pm Report this comment

It seems that nobody got the government they voted for.

It is clear that David Cameron is a Liberal - he said so himself. So now, the centre-right is unrepresented.

There is trouble ahead, and I suspect that the centre-right will rebel determinedly, or even splinter off and form a new party. Surely, business leaders will be tempted to back such a new party.

Richard of York

May 16th, 2010 12:32pm Report this comment

Change the name from "Coffee House" to "Cameron boy Fanzine".
As for Shameron being a great leader....wot after 5 days...perrrleeease!
Lets see how he deals with the 55% issue. Hedge funds, Iran, Tory right wing and the unemployment figures to come,
Middleclass backlash ref tax credits and the poor waiting for their £750 quid will make for interesting times.
Real hardship and people driven to despair will be the headline news ahead in the next five years.

Sue Jennings

May 16th, 2010 1:03pm Report this comment

This is great news for democracy - the electorate is engaged and principled. It has been really exciting to watch learn more about our new MPs. Dods just released a fascinating press release about them: http://www.pressport.co.uk/pressrelease/Dods-Research-reveals-new-Parliament-dominated-by-primarily-one-generation-Generation-Jones-9958.aspx It's the usual high standard of the chroniclers of Parliament who have been around forever. Anyway, it shows a generational breakdown of the new Parliament, with the striking discovery that almost half of the MPs in the new Parliament are all from just one generation: the generation between the Boomers and Xers which is called Generation Jones. I’ve seen several articles this week about how Cameron and Clegg are both members of Generation Jones, as is over half of the new cabinet. We’ve gone from a Boomer-dominated government to a Joneser-dominate government. Generational transitions like this are rare and important.

Verity

May 16th, 2010 4:03pm Report this comment

Canon Alberic: "The clowns in UKIP abetted by the tories very own (and equally unelectable) right wing commentariat (implying over the years that he and Osborne are unprincipled lightweights) cost Cameron this election."

The UKIP are not clowns. They are principled conservative patriots. Thank God they stopped the greedy, not over-bright, but overly-ambitious, given his mental wattage, Cameron from getting a mandate. The people who stood for UKIP are heroes, as are Lord Pearson and Nigel Farage.

Your second point in your rather flaccidly argued sentence above: "... abetted by the tories very own (and equally unelectable) right wing commentariat ...". Err, I hadn't realised that the right wing commentariat were standing for election. Do you feel you have a firm grasp of the British electoral process?

"... implying over the years that he and Osborne are unprincipled lightweights...".

Implying? Implying Most of us were downright Anglo-Saxon in our expressions of disapproval of Cameron and wossname.

I do take your point about the vapidity of the mag's cover illustrations, though. Dire.

Simon Stephenson

May 16th, 2010 6:55pm Report this comment

Jeremy : 10.54am

I'm sorry if this is a rather rude awakening for you, but if this country isn't taken by the scruff of the neck and forced to restrict its consumption broadly to the value of its production, then in a few years it will be wrecked for evermore, and you will be able to kiss goodbye to social welfare, equality and all the other delights of Liberal Conservatism over which you seem to be salivating.

just Louise

May 19th, 2010 8:11am Report this comment

Watching the installation of Bercow as Speaker yesterday was a surreal and woesome experience - Tapsell and Rifkind delivering encomiums to this Flip-Flop-Flipper and Call Me Dave having the cheek to proclaim that it was a "new" House of Commons. New? When the nakedly ambitious little man (who didn't even have the decency to pretend to be dragged to the Speaker's Chair - he was hauling his "dragger" there!)is as tainted by the expenses scandal as the duckhouse and moat MPs who were given their marching orders by Dave?

Puh-leese.

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

Tag Cloud

Coffee House archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk