The Labour leadership contest continues
James Forsyth 5:22pmWith the Coalition facing its first major test, it is easy to forget that there is a Labour leadership contest going on. But there are two interventions in that race worth noting this Bank holiday weekend. First of all, Jon Cruddas and Jonathan Rurtherford have anessay in the New Statesman sketching out a ‘new covenant with the electorate.’ It would be based around the ideas of an ethical economy, reciprocity and liberty. The piece will make Cruddas’ many admirers in the Labour movement regret that he’s not running. What’ll be interesting to see is which of the declared candidates picks up his ideas and runs with them.
The other is Ed Balls’ comments in an interview with The Guardian that the truth of the last election was that Labour maintained its middle class support but didn’t get sufficient support from lower income voters worried about the recession and immigration. If it is the latter group that Balls think Labour needs to encourage most of all, we can expect far more of a bread and butter emphasis from him than the other candidates.



Previous






Dimoto
May 31st, 2010 5:45pm Report this comment"ethical economy" eh? Yet another meaningless soundbite.
Since all three candidates are up-to-their-necks compromised with the thoroughly unethical Blair-Brown regime, would anyone really take this seriously ?
Anthony Francis
May 31st, 2010 5:48pm Report this commentIt doesn't matter a joy what their personal manifestoes or their principles are, because as shown by the last thirteen years every one of them will lie in their teeth to get into a position of power.
(Balls will say, "So what?")
wrinkled weasel
May 31st, 2010 6:00pm Report this commentYes, I keep hearing that they "failed to listen". What they failed to do was to buy enough people off, especially the sponging classes. Creating Four Million public sector jobs and dreaming up ways of gerrymandering the vote in marginals by tarting up railway stations was never going to swing the great unwashed, was it? As for working people, do you mean all those who do it the honest way, e.g, working nine to five, paying taxes, seeing most of their salary going on simply getting to work?
No, what the Labour party got wrong was that it ran out of money and could no longer finance the cushion it provided for its core vote, which is made up of those who do nothing, and those who are paid as consultants to those who do nothing.
David Lindsay
May 31st, 2010 6:30pm Report this commentSince this, good though it is, contains not a single specific policy, might Jon Cruddas be standing for Labour Leader after all?
ollie
May 31st, 2010 6:49pm Report this commentI'm coming round to thinking that Miliband snr would be better for the Tories than Balls as Labour leader. Balls has some fight in him - but miliband is a machine politician with vacuity at his core. The pregnant pause would sound great at pmqs.
Moraymint
May 31st, 2010 7:07pm Report this commentIn the end, socialists always run out of other people's money.
Repeat, ad nauseam.
Snowman
May 31st, 2010 7:35pm Report this comment‘Each person has the right to be human in his or her own way’. Please, read the short sentence again and think about it for a while. What does it mean? Does it mean something one can relate to, something one can observe, feel its relevance in every day life? If so what? Or could it mean anything anyone wants it to mean? You know, I’m a person and my own way of expressing my humanity is through sitting on my arse 24-7 except for the visit to the local Post Office to pick the Giro. Will it pass? How about ‘each human has the right to be a person in his or her own way’. Any practical or philosophical difference between this and the original quote supplied from the New Statesman’s essay by Jon Cruddas, the Labour thinker of whom James says that ‘many admirers in the Labour movement regret that he’s not running’.
Decades ago, plodding through volumes of dreary writings by Marx, Engels, Lenin and other lesser scribblers of the communist creed I thought ‘God, what a lot of drivel’ for often the stuff was totally devoid of any tangible meaning, here and there, however, the voluminous maledictions on the bourgeoisie did provoke a thought, mostly against the one intended by the author. How wrong of me then to think that dear boring Karl could write nothing but crap. Within just few decades, and some help from James, Karl’s followers are obligingly furnishing the real thing.
TrevorsDen
May 31st, 2010 7:38pm Report this comment'Ethical economy' ... that should see the nation bankrupted then.
Balls is being truly duplicitous if he thinks labour kept its middle class support. Take a look at the electoral map of england. Labour does not exist in its middle class areas and it holds precious few seats in Scotland outside of the Strathclyde belt.
Balls has spent 13 years and predicated his entire economic policy to destroying the staples of working class employment. His last 3 years was spent making sure the young were as ill educated and ill prepared as possible to do any better.
We must wish Balls well - he would be the cement that holds the coalition together. We doubt the Telegraph will re-dredge his expenses record though.
Andrew SW18
May 31st, 2010 7:42pm Report this comment"Dear Leader of the Labour Party, I'm afraid there are no more ideas. Kind regards - and good luck! Gordon."
John Bracewell
May 31st, 2010 8:09pm Report this comment'The Labour leadership contest continues'
- So what.
westymorlander
May 31st, 2010 8:12pm Report this comment@Andrew SW18
Gordon?
Gordon who?
Olaf Rye
May 31st, 2010 10:03pm Report this commentOh Lord, the 'covenant with the electorate' was drivel from Clinton. Why do politicians use these vapid slogans ?
2trueblue
May 31st, 2010 10:52pm Report this commentEthical economy, reciprocity, liberty. Liebore will surely struggle to understand the meaning of any of the above.
We had 13yrs of Liebore destroying all that was good in our society, who cares what happens to them?
TGF UKIP
May 31st, 2010 11:08pm Report this commentSo where's the all the rancorous splits and factional infighting you so confidently and frequently predicted, James?
Glyn H
June 1st, 2010 8:06am Report this commentI have just heard Johnathan Baume of the First Division Association defending senior civil servants earning mote than the PM on the basis that Mr Cameron is already a millionaire. Truly has the baleful spirit of Brown and Balls become a cancer in our society.
stephen
June 1st, 2010 8:55am Report this commentAn amusing side show to main stream poltics!
Just imagine it was running at the same time as a Lab Lib coalition government!
RMH
June 1st, 2010 9:08am Report this comment@glyn H
the FDA are clueless chumps, they know their cash and pensions are excessive and will be cut, as will their members.
Vulture
June 1st, 2010 10:12am Report this commentBalls is right (God I never thought I'd write that: it feels all wrong). There IS a huge section of the Middle Class that is still gripped by infantile Leftism and hatred of the 'Tories'. You can bet your bottom dollar that when the cuts start to bite they will squeal like hogs caught under a barn door.
The tragedy of the last electioon was that Dave did not stick it hard enough that Liebore had totally F****d the country and turned it into an overflowing toilet. The 'working class' certainly know it - since they are feeling the consequences in terms of crime and imigration.
The horrible smug chattering classes are still sheathed in illusion and I don't know what will shatter it. Horrible scared that in a few years thy will vote Liebore back in again.
Woody
June 1st, 2010 5:51pm Report this commentI don't give a toss, which of the gruesome bunch becomes the next Labour leader, there is absolutely nothing inspiring about any of them.
Labour are really in a bad way if this is all they have got. Even the new MPs' look as though they have come of some conveyor belt. listening to some of them on the radio, they come out with all the old tribal soundbites. Truly depressing.
Back to top