Subscribe to The Spectator

Saturday 26 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Wednesday, 16th June 2010

PMQs Live blog

David Blackburn 11:55am

Stay tuned for coverage from 12:00

12:03: Cameron pays tribute to the 3 soldiers killed in Afghanistan this week.

12:04: Tory backbencher Phillip Davies opens proceedings by calling for prisoners to be denied access to Sky TV. Cameron's response is true blue: too many prisoners, too many of them in Britain illegally and not enough money.

12:05: Harman rises, talking on unemployment, which has risen this morning. It's effectively cuts now versus cuts later. Cameron regrets the situation (to much noise from the opposition) and pledges that back to work initiatives will be enacted in next week's budget.

12:08: Harman re-iterates her point. Cameron responds by saying that Labour hasn't given any concrete spending plans of her. Evenly matched so far and not very revealing.

12:09: Now Harman uses the OBR's findings that the economy is not as bad as expected. Cameron dodges the question by appealing to his government's transparency, which doesn't answer the question. But Cameron responds with the other side of the story: growth is slower than Darling forecast.

12:11: Harman says the Tories are talking down the economy to facilitate cuts at the expense of business confidence. That's a powerful argument and Cameron responds by pointing out that Labour has got us into the mess.

12:12: Now Harman strikes at the 'blame Labour' line that Cameron takes - if Labour's spending plans were so bad, why did Cameron follow them until the end of 2008? 'It's a magic roundabout with him,' she quips ineffectively. Cameron calls once more for Labour to reveal where it will cut.

Labour may have been inept, but the Tories backed them most of the way; I think Harman edged that exchange.

12:15: In response to a question from Margaret Hodge, Cameron suggests that he may bring forward the Cancer Drugs Fund.

12:17: Labour MP John Woodcock wants the Astute Class submarines, which are being built and maintained in his constituency, will be preserved from the Defence Review. Cameron says they won't because, like Labour when in government, everything has to be reviewed, no matter how important to a region and the defence of the country.

12:19: The second question of the day of RDAs - Cameron says that those which offer essential services will be protected and those that serve a political purpose (2/3rds are found in Labour marginals) will go.

12:21: Douglas Carswell wonders why there is a referednum on AV, which did not feature in either coalition's manifesto, when there is not a referednum on all matters EU. Cameron says that there will be a lock-down on further EU treaties - well deflected.

12:23: Sir Alan Beith asks about protecting upland farming by extending affordable housing and broadband to ensure that the young remain. Cameron agrees, but target driven housing schemes are failing communities.

12:27: Urgh... A Tory plant: how much is the debt for each household? £22,000.

12:29: Graham Brady wants protection for savers in the Budget. Cameron says that keeping inflation low will be essential. Nothing on CGT, but is this the new accord between Cameron and the Tory backbenchers?

12:32: Great moment. Tory Harriett Baldwin has a plant about ring-fenced health spending to jeers from Labour. Bercow intervenes with a twinkle sayong: 'A government backbencher supporting the government is not that extraordinary'. Cameron repsonds 'Indeed Mr Speaker, we all remember you doing that.'

VERDICT: I seem to be a minority of one, but Harman edged the main battle. The exchanges were heated, and her strategy was well rehearsed and I think we've seen the weakness in Cameron's blame Labour strategy: it doesn't bear repetition. Cameron was far better against hostile backbenchers, particularly from Tories Davies and Carswell. The good natured quip at Bercow's expense showed his brilliance at the dispatch box. The advantage about the new format is that you tend to forget the leader of the opposition's questions after the backbench deluge.

Filed under: PMQs (254 more articles)

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (9) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Peter From Maidstone

June 16th, 2010 12:10pm Report this comment

Well? Where is it?

DavidDP

June 16th, 2010 12:10pm Report this comment

Come on-sort this place out-every time I click on the link I get "stay tuned for coverage."

Peter From Maidstone

June 16th, 2010 12:28pm Report this comment

You have misspelled the link. This working page is pmq-.... and the link on the site is pmqs-...

I found this page only by guessing what you had done wrong. Please change the links or no-one else will be able to follow the live blog.

David Blackburn

June 16th, 2010 1:06pm Report this comment

Apologies for the delay in the appearance of this article - the automatically created link seems to have been faulty.

Verityred

June 16th, 2010 1:49pm Report this comment

Poppycock, Harman was as useless as ever.

toni

June 16th, 2010 2:07pm Report this comment

Harman was good today, very persistent and calm, with the bluster and non replies coming from Cameron as you demonstrate.
Also, what was that question he blanked and you haven’t recorded here, in regard to his own constituency?
He really needs to stop asking Labour what their concrete spending plans were/are; it’s immaterial now and when in opposition you oppose not give helpful answers, as he used to remind the previous PM frequently.
Harman won this exchange and I’m looking forward to the Spekkie pointing out regularly Cameron’s non answers at PMQ’s, a sport much enjoyed at the previous administration’s expense.

JONNY

June 16th, 2010 2:40pm Report this comment

No David Blackburn and sorry
Harriet Harman didn't edge it.
Are you feeling alright?

Dorothy Wilson

June 16th, 2010 4:09pm Report this comment

Harman didn't edge it. The questions asked were just a silly trap. Everyone with any sense knows that unemployment is likely to go up in the coming months. Everyone with any sense knows the blame for that lies with the mess Labour has landed us in.

Harman came over as someone who only had a very superficial understanding of the questions she was asking. She also claimed unemployment had come down. On the BBC just after PMQs it was reported that total unemployment had gone UP in the quarter to April. The claimant count had gone down but that's different.

Chuck Unsworth

June 16th, 2010 8:27pm Report this comment

It was a damn-fool question. Nobody in their right minds would offer any such guarantee. And once she'd said it, she'd used all of her ammunition. Harman is incapable of thinking on her feet. She should have chosen at least two other topics to follow up, if she had any sense. But then anything which requires her to ski off-piste is disastrous. Still, the Bacofoil jacket was interesting - made a nice change from the Giraffe.

Actually I think you're wrong. The Conservatives can and should continue to blame Labour for the forseable future - for everything. After all, you can't just turn the nation's finances and fortunes round in weeks or even months. We're in trouble for years - decades possibly. The Government needs to hammer that home whenever and wherever possible - not necessarily for political reasons but to change the profligate mindset of so many. What is needed is a complete change of culture - particularly in the Public Sector.

We cannot continue to be an irresponsible, spendthrift, society. Attitudes and expectations must change. It's going to be really tough for everyone, and nobody should expect otherwise.

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

Tag Cloud

Coffee House archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk