Subscribe to The Spectator

Thursday 9 February 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Wednesday, 23rd June 2010

The EU must face cuts too

Mark Wallace 12:00pm

This is a balancing act Budget. At every stage and on almost every topic there's a bit of good news and a bit of bad news for taxpayers.

Spending cuts are (finally) on the way, but at over £30 billion by 2014-15 they aren't large enough, and there is plenty of dead wood that the Coalition intends to leave in place. Similarly, the rise in the income tax threshold is extremely welcome, but the VAT hike will hit the poorest hardest of all.

And so it goes down the list of Government financial activities. Indeed, the theme the Government are keen to communicate is one of leaving no stone unturned, looking at every item of expenditure and every tax for ways to raise or save money....except for one area.

Buried within the Emergency Budget documents is a table that shows what our net contributions to the EU will be over the coming years.


 
Even after taking into account the money that the EU graciously gives back to us (which is often misspent), the amount we pour into Brussels is going to grow from £6.4bn last year, to £8.3bn this year and then goes on to peak at an eye-watering £10.3bn in 2014-15.

This is absurd. If the Government are cutting spending and raising taxes in Britain, surely they should cut the amount of money we pay to the EU? We cannot afford such extortionate sums, and to add insult to injury the EU has been shown time and time again to waste plenty of it and spend the rest eroding our national sovereignty. 

The EU is often treated as an issue for enthusiasts, which is about high principles and complex legal wranglings. Not so - as the above chart makes clear, the EU is an issue of hard cash.

It is already deeply unpopular as an institution because of its interfering, overbearing and undemocratic behaviour. If it continues to suck money from British taxpayers at a time when in every other sphere we are cutting back, its unpopularity will plumb new depths. It would be wrong if the Coalition Government was to turn a blind eye on this due to ideology, whilst implementing cuts driven by pragmatism elsewhere. It must be dealt with.

We produced a video highlighting exactly this issue last week - I'm sure it will be the first of many times that the disparity between cuts in Britain and business-as-usual in Brussels will be raised:

Mark Wallace is campaign director at the Taxpayers' Alliance

Filed under: Budget (143 more articles) , Europe (698 more articles) , George Osborne (686 more articles) , Public finances (704 more articles) , Spending cuts (600 more articles) , Spending plans (81 more articles) , UK politics (4908 more articles)

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (6) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Stephen Bowers

June 23rd, 2010 12:53pm Report this comment

Just where are the benfits from being in the EU. I cannot see any tangible benefit. The fact it is run by unelected commissars who do not publish accounts beggars belief. Switzerland gets on just fine without the , without the human rights act farce, and without having to fund the ongoing junket.

Verity

June 23rd, 2010 2:06pm Report this comment

Stephen Bowers says Switzerland gets on just fine without the EU. Indeed it does. It prospers. And it runs its own country.

So does Norway, which was also canny enough to have a pretty canny idea of what the EU is all about.

Re the bland little self-serving nonentities pictured above, the last line of the sign being carried at the rear of this student rabble reads "Put students first".

The left in a capsule, is it not?

Typical self-righteous fascism which they are fortunately powerless to enforce.

I have never seen rabble looking so bland. Never mind politics, marching with signs is show business for ugly people.

Boudicca

June 23rd, 2010 2:22pm Report this comment

Our contribution to the EU shouldn't be cut - it should be stopped. We derive no benefit from belonging to the EU that we wouldn't get from EFTA. It's time to leave the bureaucratic, anti-democratic Socialist nightmare and become 'whole-worlders' again.

Verity

June 23rd, 2010 3:44pm Report this comment

Well said to Boudicca!

I cannot remember anyone ever having put one cogent argument, that stood up under close inspection, for our forced membership of this parliament of unelected whores and rabble.

In2minds

June 23rd, 2010 4:00pm Report this comment

The benefits of the EU; who else would employ Neil Kinnock and Peter Mandelson?

TGF UKIP

June 23rd, 2010 10:39pm Report this comment

It's a toss up which is the greater scam and fraud on the British people, the EU or the "climate change" theft and imposition. Certainly on both there is a massive democratic deficit for which the Cameron Tory Party stands principally accused - they are, or more accurately were, supposed to be the sensible party and the party for UK sovereignty.

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

Tag Cloud

Coffee House archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk