Saturday 21 November 2009

Jobs at Telegraph

Monday, 14th April 2008

Brown shouldn't fear the stalking horses

Matthew d'Ancona 12:47pm

It is a modern ritual that when a party political leader's fortunes plummet - and Gordon Brown's certainly fit that category - there is talk of a leadership contest and, specifically, of a "stalking horse" candidate.

Here's an entertaining look in Slate at the origins of the phrase. But, for most of us, the words trigger memories of Sir Anthony Meyer's challenge to Margaret Thatcher for the Tory leadership in 1989 - doomed in itself, but the key that turned the lock to her downfall a year later.

The Conservative leadership rules in those days were sufficiently flexible to make such a challlenge meaningful, and enabled contenders to step into the second round of a contest. In the Labour context, talk of "stalking horses" is completely meaningless.

A prospective challenger has to secure a whopping 20 per cent of Labour MPs - namely 70 of the 352. Would, say, Charles Clarke receive such backing? Come off it: no serious challenger to Gordon Brown when he was candidate for the post-Blair vacancy - rather than the incumbent - could muster more than 25 names.

But let us follow through the rules, anyway. This imagininary "stalking horse", having implausibly secured 70+signatures, writes to the Labour general secretary announcing his or her intention to challenge Brown.

Then - and this is where we stray into the realm of fantasy - a special conference is held to resolve the matter. Constituency parties and unions are expected to ballot their members on which candidate they favour. The electoral college is split three equal ways between Labour MPs, party members and members of affiliated trade unions, with the one member one vote system introduced in 1993 in operation. The process is lengthy, expensive and utterly disastrous to Labour's prospects at the next general election. Think of the headlines: Never mind the economy, this lot can't even decide who should be in charge.

Can you imagine the Labour machine allowing this to happen? Dream on. Trust me: Gordon will lead Labour into the next general election.

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (10) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Mike

April 14th, 2008 1:15pm Report this comment

Agreed. No chance. Entertaining media copy though. Lots of bored political hacks looking for different ways to spin the Labour disintegration

Alex R

April 14th, 2008 2:18pm Report this comment

What about Mike Smithson's idea that Brown himself will opt to go rather than be defeated? A Michael Howard style fix up with no leadership or deputy leadership contest?

Faceless Bureaucrat

April 14th, 2008 2:30pm Report this comment

True, Matthew - but you ignore the Resignation possibility. If Brown should fall of his own accord, then none of the shenannigans you speak of are relevant. I suspect this is the prospect that really drives the the leadership hopefuls, rather than all this ridiculous 'stalking horse' nonsense. If Brown is forced into a situation where his position really is untenable (and it would need to be something other than simply the economy in free-fall), he may well take the decision to cut and run. If this this scenario appears fanciful at first glance, remember Harold Wilson...

ChrisD

April 14th, 2008 4:13pm Report this comment

I would be very surprised to see the Labour party oust Brown, they did not have the courage to make sure that he faced a leadership contest a year ago.
But, I do think that its entirely plausible that Brown will do what he has always done, back off from a real contest especially if its one he is likely to lose.
I would rate the chances of him going of his own accord as much higher than that of the Labour party asking him to go through a challenge to his leadership. And Gordon Brown will pick a time when he knows that defeat is inevitable, and without any regard for the disaster that timing will cause his party.
I don't have any sympathy for the predicament the Labour party is in, they chuckled their way through too many Conservative leaders and still did not realise just how beneficially that last contest was for David Cameron. It gave him a momentum and springboard that none of his predecessors enjoyed.
People talk about Brown having no empathy with the voters, or the voters not understanding what he stands for. That's one major problem a confident and courageous politician would have been able to address during such a contest.
If you are so scared of even fighting an internal party contest that you do everything in your power to avoid it, then I am not convinced that you will have the inner strength to face a gruelling GE campaign when the result could be defeat for the first time since 97'.

Ian C

April 14th, 2008 4:54pm Report this comment

Equal fantasies are Brown going voluntarily (he's only just tgot the job he thought was his by rights) and that it matters. The public knowledge that Labour is stuck with him (and the infighting that will result) will be utterly corrosive and almost as damaging as an actual challenge.

Fergus Pickering

April 14th, 2008 5:35pm Report this comment

I always understood Harold Wilson went because he had early Alzheimers. You're not siggesting...

DougS

April 14th, 2008 6:08pm Report this comment

It just reminds you, though, how unlikely the figures behind Brown are: Miliband comes off as a graduate student; none of the women have much substance; and, Clarke . . . well, no.

I guess that leaves the execrable Balls, who is rapidly destroying any chances he has as the British public finally gets a real dose of him, along with possibilities like John Reid, Alan Johnson and Jack Straw . . . all with the whiff of yesterday's men.

I guess this is pretty typical of long-lived governments (and with other, special considerations for New Labour in 2008): damaged older figures and younger folks who just seem unlikely.

EyeSee

April 14th, 2008 6:44pm Report this comment

Another non article By Matty, just to end up mentioning that Brown will be running for re-election. Is the Guardian not looking for someone of your talents.

Pete

April 14th, 2008 7:48pm Report this comment

Perhaps the thing we least expect is what Brown will do - call a general election now. What's he to lose? (Apart of course from the election itself which the majority say will happen whenever he calls it.)
Clinging on to the last will just re-inforce the ditherer/frightened loser image - plus things may be very much worse on many fronts by then.
Call an election now and Brown could at least dispel the clinging to high office at-all-costs charge. He could make out he's not scared; always believesd in getting a mandate and is a true democrat - and that he'd always intended calling an election this year. Some might find that plausible. Plus most nuLabour dissenters still don't know why they should vote Conservative or even what their policies are. In 2 years the Tories may well have published clear, popular policies that show a real choice from nuLabour. Now though, conservative policies are largely unclear to the public (and the party I suspect).
Brown might just have enough man in him to go to the polls sooner rather than later.

Ian Westbrook

April 15th, 2008 10:18am Report this comment

"Trust me: Gordon will lead Labour into the next general election."

And lose. By a landslide...

Post comment

Back to top

Tag Cloud

Coffee House archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

      GASCONY

GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +

BIG SAND STEEL BAND

IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel

BOSC LEBAT, Tarn et Garonne.

BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors