Hague is an administrative revolutionary, not the second Canning
David Blackburn 3:36pm
For a man of such rhetorical talents, William Hague’s foreign policy speech was strikingly bland. His eloquence escaped him and he sounded like David Miliband - earnest, conscientious and often unintelligible. The similarity didn't end there. Hague was very pleased with his observation that a multi-lateral world requires bi-lateral relationships; but even David Miliband had grasped that – who could forget his stable shin-dig in India?
Hague’s speech was dominated by the expression ‘network world’ and he said that Britain’s diplomacy must address new strategic needs. In fact, Hague said very little that
was new. Britain’s relationship with America would remain close; European alliances would rest on co-operation not coercion; new bi-literal or ‘network’ relations should be built
or old ones, like the commonwealth, must be re-invigorated; aid is expression of British citizens’ generosity and is the agent of a ‘values based’ approach to the developing
world; finally, security concerns will be addressed by the strategic defence review - strategic failure in Iraq and Afghanistan and fiscal restraint will limit liberal intervention in the immediate
future, but that is born of necessity not choice.
That, essentially, is it. It strikes me as considered continuity, not the ‘new foreign policy’ discerned by some commentators. The body of the speech was devoted to the
coalition’s administrative reforms – the renewal of the FCO, the MoD, DfID and the FCO’s unity of purpose, the creation of a National Security Council. Britain’s foreign
policy has not altered; its execution will change enormously.



Previous






charles hercock
July 2nd, 2010 3:45pm Report this commentHe has lost his edge.His recent radio broadcasts have been lacklustre.Let us get back to the old fire in belly Will Hague.Then the new allies will queue to be entertained
Austin Barry
July 2nd, 2010 4:16pm Report this comment".. aid is expression of British citizens’ generosity .."
No, it's an expression of politicians' misguided largesse with our money....
Cuffleyburgers
July 2nd, 2010 4:19pm Report this commentI imagine that successful foreign policy is not like driving a dodgem and rather more a question of relatively subtle tweaking of emphasis.
For instance there is no point to my mind in going to Brussels with all guns blazing and swinging handbags. There needs to absolute firmness though when the foreign johnnies mess around with our sovereignty and our city.
Hague and Cameron are still being floppy - no need for raised voices, as largest or second largest net contributor carry a big stick - they must not be afraid to threaten to wield it or indeed actually to wield it.
Hugh Downman
July 2nd, 2010 4:33pm Report this commentAdmittedly I say this as a Labour voter, but I do wonder when the penny will drop and Conservatives will come to recognise the very ordinary talent that is William Hague (after-dinner speaking apart).
I am still amazed that he was allowed to run such an ill-judged campaign at the 2001 election. The issue is not whether one believes we should have gone into the Euro - actually he was probably right about that - but that he focused the whole election on a narrow bid to 'save the pound', union jacks and all, when time and again voters at general elections have shown they are little concerned with Europe. General elections are a political party's (& esp opposition's) great moment to seize the country's mood and I always feel that Hague squandered his opportunity cheaply by
More recently, the furore over Lord Ashcroft's tax status reminded me of Hague's disastrous term as Tory leader. Given the continuing questions about Lord Ashcroft's status throughout the 2000s, how on earth can William Hague not have checked up on him? Surely he (or at least someone senior in the party) must have felt it was their duty to be informed about the facts of his tax status - if for no other reason than that (though it didn't turn out this way) the facts might've provided them with a better means of rebutting the constant media questions, given that the Tories' non-answers were only fuelling speculation about the situation.
perdix
July 2nd, 2010 4:52pm Report this commentI thought it interesting that Lord Malloch-Brown who worked for Gordon at the FCO said on Newsnight that Hague said nothing that D Milliband had not said. Yet DM called Hague's speech rubbish!
Bill Rees
July 2nd, 2010 5:03pm Report this commentWhy does Hague have a reputation as a heavyweight?
What has he ever said or done that was noteworthy?
His leadership of the Tories was embarrassing, other than sometimes when he was facing Blair in PMQ, and even then he rarely beat Blair to the punch.
He looks to me like a politician who has been over-promoted.
In2minds
July 2nd, 2010 5:07pm Report this commentHague said - "European alliances would rest on co-operation not coercion".
But will anyone believe him?
TomTom
July 2nd, 2010 6:20pm Report this commentHugh Downman you make very valid points. Hague is totally overrated. He is a man too close to the smell of money and I was astounded that Blair did not give him some honour for the 2001 Election. It was an insult to Conservative activists and Hague has had a long run with modest talents; his politics got him the McKinsey INSEAD Scholarship; and his politics saw McKInsey assign him as a SpAD to Geoffrey Howe while on McKinsey payroll.
Naomi Muse
July 2nd, 2010 6:29pm Report this commentDon't forget he only started tweeting just before the election, so he's a bit out of date.
Clear as Mud
July 2nd, 2010 7:40pm Report this commentI think something has happened in the Hague inner life at some point in the last few years. For some time he has looked and sounded like someone whose balls are in someone elses vice.
paulg
July 2nd, 2010 8:31pm Report this commentThat was a good speech that laid out a strategic vision of Britains role in the world.
It identified what are strengths are and identified how we can maximise them.
Britain can play an active and full role in shaping the modern world and our values are the values that humanity needs if it is ever to progress. We should never be ashamed of them.
This is where politicians need to be on the front foot as the clowns who inhabit the FCO won't have a clue on seizing the initiative and pressing home the advantage.
Fortune favours the brave and we must look outwards to a world that still remember the British as friends.
Rush-is-Right
July 3rd, 2010 10:46am Report this comment"His eloquence escaped him and he sounded like David Miliband - earnest, conscientious and often unintelligible."
That's because it was written by the same FCO functionary that wrote Millipede's.
Jez
July 3rd, 2010 2:45pm Report this commentHe uses elder statesman like eloquence whilst polishing this turd.
Well done William.
Back to top