Sunday 22 November 2009

Jobs at Telegraph

Tuesday, 15th April 2008

Tax refugees

Fraser Nelson 11:05am

Shire Pharmaceutics, a FTSE100 firm worth GBP5.5bn, is to relist its head office offshore for tax reasons. Global firms (as Shire now is) can report profits anywhere – and Shire will move to Jersey and pay tax in Ireland (where corporation tax is 12.5% for trading income, not 28%). It is a move explicitly “designed to help protect the group’s taxation position”. Shire is fearing a bid from Pfizer, and perhaps quitting the UK tax system is a form of defence. This fits a trend. Hiscox and Amlin have already switched. Amazon recently headed to Ireland.

 

Businesses do not petulantly say: we’ve had enough of Brown, we’re off. This likely represents a ten-year forecast of what Britain will be like, and (I suspect) involves the conclusion that things would not get much better under the Conservatives – but will get better in our competitor nations. CityAM broke the story – read it here, and Shire’s statement here.

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (15) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

C Powell

April 15th, 2008 11:23am Report this comment

A pity the rest of us can't do the same!

Tom

April 15th, 2008 11:26am Report this comment

Yahoo! upped sticks and has gone to Switzerland too.

David

April 15th, 2008 11:32am Report this comment

Problem is, where do you stop? We reduce taxes to 10%, then somewhere else reduces to 8% and so on.

Andrew

April 15th, 2008 12:10pm Report this comment

David - You call it a problem? I say thank god we have competition among the taxers.

Madasafish

April 15th, 2008 12:19pm Report this comment

Eventually some politician is going to have no choice but cut back the welfare state. I reckon in 2011. Benfit systems do not work.. in the long term.

See F Field.

Requires courage: so that rules out Labour.

Ian C

April 15th, 2008 12:38pm Report this comment

Chickens, home and roost come to mind!

EyeSee

April 15th, 2008 12:42pm Report this comment

David, OMG! If that happened the State would have to shrink too. We wouldn't be able to afford Management Consultants, spin doctors, Quangoes, EU directives. Unless politicians do what they currently do and only cut back on front line services, so no doctors, armed forces etc. Someone ought to control these politicians and convince them to reduce the burden of the State on our shoulders. How could we do that?

THX1138

April 15th, 2008 12:49pm Report this comment

Maybe the NHS should reduce it's spend with Shire accordingly.

Tom

April 15th, 2008 2:08pm Report this comment

You're getting there David!

David

April 15th, 2008 3:18pm Report this comment

I see; so cutting doctors, nurses, education, welfare services, no problem. fine.
In fact, let's just go straight to zero tax.

Sebastian d'Anconia

April 15th, 2008 5:27pm Report this comment

David, as tax is reduced so people keep more of their own money and invest in their own communities and there will be far more and better doctors, nurses, education etc. People paid better, and doing a better job. The idea that if government didnt provide public services then no one would is a joke.

C Powell

April 15th, 2008 5:46pm Report this comment

No David: you're wilfully misunderstanding. Cutting nurses is not good; cutting management consultants, managers, quangos, etc., is absolutely fine, indeed desirable. We'd end up having better services for less money (does anyone really think that all the managers etc has made anything better?) and be able to keep more of our own money. And the problem with that is what, exactly?

Max Kaye

April 15th, 2008 6:16pm Report this comment

Management consultants, NHS advisors, diversity officers and the like canbe turned into productive members of society -- especially if converted to Bio-fuel or Soylent Green.

Chris H

April 15th, 2008 6:35pm Report this comment

Zero corporation tax is not the same as zero tax.

Corporation tax should be zero because people pay taxes not corporations.

Studies show that about 10% of corporation tax is actually paid by the owners in the form of lower profits. 60% of the tax is paid by employees in the form of lower salaries, while 30% is paid by customers in the form of higher prices. Even when it comes to that 10% of corporation tax paid by owners a signification portion is coming out of pension funds.

Tim Carpenter

April 16th, 2008 8:11am Report this comment

Even better, Chris, to tax spending, not income.

Corporation tax should be 10% and later 5% to attract companies to list and book their profits in the UK. It is just common sense. The lower the tax, the more companies relocate, the higher the income from that tax.

Tim Carpenter
LPUK www.lpuk.org

Post comment

Back to top

Tag Cloud

Coffee House archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

      GASCONY

GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +

BIG SAND STEEL BAND

IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel

BOSC LEBAT, Tarn et Garonne.

BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors