The malleability of ringfences
Peter Hoskin 9:10am
Rachel Sylvester is on top form in the Times today, and I'd urge CoffeeHousers to
delve behind the paywall (or borrow someone's copy of the paper) to read her column. Its
central point? That ministers are discovering ingenious ways to exploit and undermine the ringfenced health and international development budgets. The Home Office is saying that drug
rehab programmes should fall under health spending. The Foreign Office is trying to pass off some of their spending as development, and so on. And, crucially, the Treasury seems to be
going along with it:
As Sylvester says, there's something "absurd" about all this. After all, the government could have reached the same result by not ringfencing health and international development, and giving the other departments more money to spend on their current responsibilities. But it also opens questions about intra-coalition relations. The Lib Dems opposed ringfencing during the election – and with them now heading departments which have barely any crossover with the health and development budgets, they may feel they're losing out on both counts."The Treasury seems to be tacitly endorsing this approach, with officials emphasising that departmental boundaries are artificial."



Previous






Alexander
July 6th, 2010 9:51am Report this commentPersonally I would welcome this approach. Whenever I have occasion to use the NHS or visit someone in hospital I have been surprised at how "foreign" it is.
OK, we all know the staff is mainly non-UK but so are the patients. I got the distinct impression that a lot of "relatives" come to the UK for treatment. When I was last in hospital, of 12 patients in a mixed ward I was one of two "Brits" in the ward. I formed the impression that the other 10 were not immigrants but were in fact "visitors" to our country. When I subsequently went to out to the out-patient area, the composition of those waiting confirmed these proportions.
True Bred Pomponian
July 6th, 2010 9:52am Report this commentSo the taxes have been imposed and the cuts aren't going to follow. Who'd have thought it?
Arthur
July 6th, 2010 10:13am Report this commentIsn't this how it should be? It's patently absurd that we are subsidising the Indian space programme (if they'd paint a Union flag on the side of their rocket, maybe I'd be a bit happier). Otherwise, everything the government does to help other countries should go into the DfID pot. That includes the BBC World Service, and anything else that people with better imaginations than mine can think of.
TrevorsDen
July 6th, 2010 10:17am Report this commentIt does not sound like its worth me spending my £1 to me.
charles hercock
July 6th, 2010 10:37am Report this commentExcellent news.the DoH ringfence given the overall budget is particularly difficult and vire of some Social service and welfare functions will help overall
Simon Stephenson
July 6th, 2010 10:49am Report this comment"As Sylvester says, there's something "absurd" about all this. After all, the government could have reached the same result by not ringfencing health and international development, and giving the other departments more money to spend on their current responsibilities."
Come off it! Sylvester knows perfectly well that ringfencing's just a soundbite, not a serious policy prescription. She also knows that it is a regrettable part of our contemporary culture that there are vast numbers of people with irrational expectations, and that the only way of dealing with these people's absurd indignation is to quell it with misleading reassurances.
Hell, she's a Blair supporter, and what was his claim to fame if it wasn't applying false meaning to statements about policy in order to manufacture instant approval from the more impressionable members of society?
Naomi Muse
July 6th, 2010 10:50am Report this commentIf ingenuous then these are to be applauded for we will all see them for what they clearly are - freeborn, honourable and free from deception. For that would be new politics.
If ingenious, we may well still laud them and applaud them for their ingeniousness and skillful contriving.
Naomi Muse
July 6th, 2010 10:59am Report this comment@Simon Stephenson. Are you implying that she's being disingenuous?
Simon Stephenson
July 6th, 2010 11:31am Report this commentNaomi Muse : 10.59am
Whatever gave you that impression?
yank
July 6th, 2010 12:55pm Report this commentOK, I wouldn't know a ringfence from a nose ring, but that photograph of Osborne proudly thrusting forward the sacred case reminds me of "Boone" and "Otter" making their case, briefcase and all, in front of "Dean Wormer's" fraternity review commission in Animal House.
Adam
July 6th, 2010 2:22pm Report this commentA point of order: DFID's budget isn't ringfenced. What's ringfenced is reaching 0.7% of GDP spend as aid by 2013 (according to internationally accepted definitions). So there's nothing odd about other Departments bidding for aid.A point of order: DFID's budget isn't ringfenced. What's ringfenced is reaching 0.7% of GDP spend as aid by 2013 (according to internationally accepted definitions). So there's nothing odd about other Departments bidding for aid.
Michael
July 6th, 2010 4:34pm Report this commentClearly the Afghanistan military expenditure can easily be classed as aid.
Tankus
July 6th, 2010 5:25pm Report this comment"Delving" is not in my vocabulary if money is involved .....
Stephen
July 7th, 2010 12:38am Report this commentSurely this is just the Government's escape clause out of the NHS ringfencing. They can't cut the budget, but by increasing the number of things the NHS is responsible for and not providing extra money for it, the NHS will have to make cuts to its current services, as though there was no ringfencing in place in the first place.
This means Cameron can continue saying the budget has been ringfenced and so not seen as nasty, but can make the necessary cuts the NHS needs
JohnAnt
July 7th, 2010 1:04am Report this comment"delve behind the paywall (or borrow someone's copy of the paper) to read her column."
Pay money to read Rachel Sylvester? You're having a laugh.
On the matter - put a stop to this ring-fencing lunacy.
We're already providing International Aid through the NHS. (Go to your local hospital and see.)
Simon Stephenson
July 7th, 2010 8:46am Report this commentStephen : 12.38am
Yes, that's about the measure of it.
Back to top