Subscribe to The Spectator

Saturday 26 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Tuesday, 6th July 2010

The malleability of ringfences

Peter Hoskin 9:10am

Rachel Sylvester is on top form in the Times today, and I'd urge CoffeeHousers to delve behind the paywall (or borrow someone's copy of the paper) to read her column.  Its central point?  That ministers are discovering ingenious ways to exploit and undermine the ringfenced health and international development budgets.  The Home Office is saying that drug rehab programmes should fall under health spending.  The Foreign Office is trying to pass off some of their spending as development, and so on.  And, crucially, the Treasury seems to be going along with it:

"The Treasury seems to be tacitly endorsing this approach, with officials emphasising that departmental boundaries are artificial."
As Sylvester says, there's something "absurd" about all this.  After all, the government could have reached the same result by not ringfencing health and international development, and giving the other departments more money to spend on their current responsibilities.  But it also opens questions about intra-coalition relations.  The Lib Dems opposed ringfencing during the election – and with them now heading departments which have barely any crossover with the health and development budgets, they may feel they're losing out on both counts.

Filed under: Coalition (2088 more articles) , Conservatives (2311 more articles) , Health (238 more articles) , International development (69 more articles) , Liberal Democrats (1155 more articles) , NHS (137 more articles) , Public finances (753 more articles) , Spending cuts (626 more articles) , Treasury (226 more articles) , UK politics (5405 more articles)

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (16) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Alexander

July 6th, 2010 9:51am Report this comment

Personally I would welcome this approach. Whenever I have occasion to use the NHS or visit someone in hospital I have been surprised at how "foreign" it is.

OK, we all know the staff is mainly non-UK but so are the patients. I got the distinct impression that a lot of "relatives" come to the UK for treatment. When I was last in hospital, of 12 patients in a mixed ward I was one of two "Brits" in the ward. I formed the impression that the other 10 were not immigrants but were in fact "visitors" to our country. When I subsequently went to out to the out-patient area, the composition of those waiting confirmed these proportions.

True Bred Pomponian

July 6th, 2010 9:52am Report this comment

So the taxes have been imposed and the cuts aren't going to follow. Who'd have thought it?

Arthur

July 6th, 2010 10:13am Report this comment

Isn't this how it should be? It's patently absurd that we are subsidising the Indian space programme (if they'd paint a Union flag on the side of their rocket, maybe I'd be a bit happier). Otherwise, everything the government does to help other countries should go into the DfID pot. That includes the BBC World Service, and anything else that people with better imaginations than mine can think of.

TrevorsDen

July 6th, 2010 10:17am Report this comment

It does not sound like its worth me spending my £1 to me.

charles hercock

July 6th, 2010 10:37am Report this comment

Excellent news.the DoH ringfence given the overall budget is particularly difficult and vire of some Social service and welfare functions will help overall

Simon Stephenson

July 6th, 2010 10:49am Report this comment

"As Sylvester says, there's something "absurd" about all this. After all, the government could have reached the same result by not ringfencing health and international development, and giving the other departments more money to spend on their current responsibilities."

Come off it! Sylvester knows perfectly well that ringfencing's just a soundbite, not a serious policy prescription. She also knows that it is a regrettable part of our contemporary culture that there are vast numbers of people with irrational expectations, and that the only way of dealing with these people's absurd indignation is to quell it with misleading reassurances.

Hell, she's a Blair supporter, and what was his claim to fame if it wasn't applying false meaning to statements about policy in order to manufacture instant approval from the more impressionable members of society?

Naomi Muse

July 6th, 2010 10:50am Report this comment

If ingenuous then these are to be applauded for we will all see them for what they clearly are - freeborn, honourable and free from deception. For that would be new politics.

If ingenious, we may well still laud them and applaud them for their ingeniousness and skillful contriving.

Naomi Muse

July 6th, 2010 10:59am Report this comment

@Simon Stephenson. Are you implying that she's being disingenuous?

Simon Stephenson

July 6th, 2010 11:31am Report this comment

Naomi Muse : 10.59am

Whatever gave you that impression?

yank

July 6th, 2010 12:55pm Report this comment

OK, I wouldn't know a ringfence from a nose ring, but that photograph of Osborne proudly thrusting forward the sacred case reminds me of "Boone" and "Otter" making their case, briefcase and all, in front of "Dean Wormer's" fraternity review commission in Animal House.

Adam

July 6th, 2010 2:22pm Report this comment

A point of order: DFID's budget isn't ringfenced. What's ringfenced is reaching 0.7% of GDP spend as aid by 2013 (according to internationally accepted definitions). So there's nothing odd about other Departments bidding for aid.A point of order: DFID's budget isn't ringfenced. What's ringfenced is reaching 0.7% of GDP spend as aid by 2013 (according to internationally accepted definitions). So there's nothing odd about other Departments bidding for aid.

Michael

July 6th, 2010 4:34pm Report this comment

Clearly the Afghanistan military expenditure can easily be classed as aid.

Tankus

July 6th, 2010 5:25pm Report this comment

"Delving" is not in my vocabulary if money is involved .....

Stephen

July 7th, 2010 12:38am Report this comment

Surely this is just the Government's escape clause out of the NHS ringfencing. They can't cut the budget, but by increasing the number of things the NHS is responsible for and not providing extra money for it, the NHS will have to make cuts to its current services, as though there was no ringfencing in place in the first place.

This means Cameron can continue saying the budget has been ringfenced and so not seen as nasty, but can make the necessary cuts the NHS needs

JohnAnt

July 7th, 2010 1:04am Report this comment

"delve behind the paywall (or borrow someone's copy of the paper) to read her column."
Pay money to read Rachel Sylvester? You're having a laugh.
On the matter - put a stop to this ring-fencing lunacy.
We're already providing International Aid through the NHS. (Go to your local hospital and see.)

Simon Stephenson

July 7th, 2010 8:46am Report this comment

Stephen : 12.38am

Yes, that's about the measure of it.

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

Tag Cloud

Coffee House archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk