The Balls dilemma
Peter Hoskin 12:52pm
How could I have forgotten to mention this in my last post? In that YouGov poll on the Labour leadership race, Ed Balls finished in a resounding last place. Yep,
the former Schools Secretary is stuck on 11 percent of first preference votes – behind both Diane Abbott and Andy Burnham, who are tied on 12 percent, as well as both Miliband brothers of
course. And the news has got Jim Pickard and Mehdi Hasan wondering: just what will Balls do next? Has he given up on winning? Will he drop out of the race
and concentrate on becoming shadow chancellor? I know plenty of Tories who wouldn't know whether to laugh or cry if that turned out to be the case.
But the leading article in this week's edition of the magazine sets out just why Tories should still be worried about Balls. Sure, he's sinking fast in the leadership contest, but, with his attacks
on Michael Gove, he's probably had the biggest national impact of any of the candidates so far. If he can take this strident brand of politics all the way to the shadow chancellorship, then there's
the chance that he could be a powerful and dangerous force in British politics for years to come. As the leader puts it:
As I've said before, Tory supporters might like the idea of Balls dragging the the Labour party down, but there's the chance that he could drag the standard of political debate down with it. That's why we should all remain wary."Ed Balls, easily the most ruthless member of the Labour front bench, and Gove’s nemesis, is ideally placed to continue to exploit [any] weakness. This is why he is likely to play a powerful role in the next Labour opposition, no matter who is the leader. Both Miliband brothers struggle to project purpose or direction, and Balls has plenty of both. His direction is the wrong one, and his purpose is the acquisition of power for power’s sake. But he is likely to remain a formidable figure in British politics — and a force with which David Cameron and his advisers had best learn to reckon."



Previous







Victor Southern
July 30th, 2010 1:07pm Report this commentHe is not Gove's nemesis - he is his stalker. Gove was the nemesis of Balls as his reputation suffered severely from Gove's attacks on him from Opposition.
When this Laboured leadership campaign finally comes to a whimpering end I am sure that Balls will no longer be Shadow on Education.
Cuffleyburgers
July 30th, 2010 1:16pm Report this commentThe Balls dilemma - can generally be summed up by "should I slap his smug chops and then kick him in the eponymous? or kick him first then slap??" - ah, the agony of choice!
TrevorsDen
July 30th, 2010 1:20pm Report this commentCuffley - the dilemma is resolved by spitting in his eye.
immcintyre
July 30th, 2010 2:01pm Report this commentUnfortunately, he bears all the character traits of Brown, which make him project nastiness, arrogance and conceit. The electorate hated Brown and they hate Balls, too!
Ronnie
July 30th, 2010 2:02pm Report this commentHe's a loudmouth with too many enemies to become anything more. Bitterness lies at the end of his tunnel.
Graham Walker
July 30th, 2010 2:13pm Report this commentBalls is second rate loser & nasty with it...very much like Broon. He will quietly disappear off the main scene once Milliband is made leader. The brutish style of Balls is a thing of the past...thank goodness!
J H Holloway
July 30th, 2010 2:42pm Report this commentWill the new Labour leader have the common sense to stick this nasty piece of work (I always think of him as the unacceptable face of public schooling) on the back benches?
charles hercock
July 30th, 2010 2:46pm Report this commentPeter is right.Balls is a very effective opposition tool about whom we need to be wary.He certainly made Gove look inept.They need to get him onto Lansleys Lies perhaps
The Bellman
July 30th, 2010 2:54pm Report this commentThe Balls dilemma. You have a Labour leadership contest but only 4 bullets. Who do you shoot? Balls, four times.
I recognise that this is the sort of cheap comment that I would be criticising if a pinko had said it of Maggie. But it's Friday afternoon, I've had a few cups of coffee and I'm feeling cheap.
Verityred
July 30th, 2010 3:05pm Report this commentThere is a healthy club of people within Labour who loathe the toad that is Ed Balls.
Why waste time on the slug, must be a quiet day and the Speccie staff have finished beating Blackburn for his rubbish posts.
Paddy
July 30th, 2010 3:14pm Report this commentAgree with Graham Walker.
The Laughing Cavalier
July 30th, 2010 3:19pm Report this commentHe was a lousy Education minister and helped the Scotch loon destroy the economy. Neither of the Milliboys will be under any obligation to make this incompetent troublemaker Shadow Chancellor. Assuming he garners enough votes to get himself elected to the shadow cabinet in the first place, shadow minister for paper clips would be a suitable position for him.
TGF UKIP
July 30th, 2010 3:27pm Report this commentWhat I suspect you are saying, Pete, in a round about way, is that the Tories are going to experience from Labour and from Balls in particular, opposition of a level and an intensity that Labour never experienced from your editor's beloved Cam and his equally effete gang.
alexsandr
July 30th, 2010 3:46pm Report this commentSaid it before and will say it again
Balls is in a marginal seat. If he holds any position in the labour party the tories will target his seat to do a decapitation.
Day cant come soon enough......
Liberty
July 30th, 2010 4:10pm Report this commentWhoever wins the Labour leadership should remember the last time a leader allowed an arrogant, demented, ruthless, repulsive bully as chancellor and I am not talking about Hindenberg.
pete-s
July 30th, 2010 4:12pm Report this commentLess popular than Dianne Abbott; that is pretty low on the turdometer.
Dimoto
July 30th, 2010 5:01pm Report this commentBalls will end up as a (highly paid) union general secretary / fixer /plotter.
Like Whelan, it is the only real "career avenue" open to him.
lescam
July 30th, 2010 5:51pm Report this commentMiliband (D or E) should make Balls Shadow Minister for "Sky Diving in Afghanistan".
BillMarden
July 30th, 2010 6:09pm Report this commentTories are afraid of Ed Balls and revert to characteristic personal attacks, because...?
I thought you know for a fact that the coalition has now fiddled it's way into a full 5 year term, and no one from the opposition is going to challenge and tip it over on it's weak foundations?
I thought you know for a fact Ed Balls has not only lost the leadership contest before it has started, but is far inferior to any idiot journalist from The Times who cant add up?
Is the recent collapse of the Belgium coalition government causing a little anxiety, maybe?
Tarka the Rotter
July 30th, 2010 7:08pm Report this commentsorry Bill, but shouldn't that be 'Thought you knew for a fact..?'
Occasional Ostrich
July 30th, 2010 7:36pm Report this commentalexsandr, I was under the impression that the Tories targetted Balls' seat two months ago, in an attempt at decapitation. Didn't work, did it? in a future election I would seriously expect that, in the absence of AV and a redrawing of boundaries, his would be a seat that defied the trend.
Redrawing the boundaries? Thus forcing all candidates to submit themselves for reselection? Now THAT might be a way to go!!!
Frank P
July 30th, 2010 8:32pm Report this commentWhy are we still discussing the losers? It's the so-called winners that we need to be keeping an eye on. They are charged with tilling the scorched earth left by the previous vandals - and so far they seem to be interested more in foreign climes. Understandable perhaps, given the barren landscape here, but they volunteered, so - lets be 'having ya guys! You haven't earned a holiday this year, yet.
Enough of alien ass-kissing Davey boy; somebody needs to plough, fertilise and re-sow here. The geopolitical gravy train comes later, when the local landscape is vibrant with green shoots. Fuck the previous tenants, they are undischarged bankrupts; you are the Official Receiver; we are the creditors who are seeking redress. Where are the spoils from their bust-out stashed? Have you called in the Serious Fraud office yet? Or have they been disbanded? Along with the Public Corruption Squad from the Yard? Makes me laugh. They left a signed confession - "There is no money left!" That's a cough if ever I heard one. Four sacrificial lambs have been stuck up for filching a few bob from the 'exes' tea fund, while the country's top fraudsman ever, the guy that ripped off the entire national exchequer for thirteen years has been allowed to retire to Scotland with his wodge, then has the audacity to piss of to Africa to set up another series of raids on the Public Purse under the guise of another 'saving the world' scam.
FMOBB!
Moraymint
July 30th, 2010 9:25pm Report this comment"Ed Balls finished in a resounding last place. Yep, the former Schools Secretary is stuck on 11 percent of first preference votes"
The man is an absolutely detestable tosser; are we surprised by this?
revolution
July 31st, 2010 5:21am Report this commentBritish people have seen what a balls up him and Brown have made of the country and with his radio face not a chance of becoming leader?
outtolunch
July 31st, 2010 7:52am Report this commentwhen i hear his interviews its just like listening to David Brent in The Office
Roger Davies
July 31st, 2010 8:01am Report this commentSurely 11% means he has passed muster with an "A" Grade? There are no losers in the Labour Party all are winners, even Gordon will come out of his 13 wasted years smelling of roses,
Ken
July 31st, 2010 8:05am Report this commentWhat Frank P said and in spades.
In addition why does anyone think the current crop of Liebour infants brawling in the playground around a bent banana are in anyway suitable to be leaders of anything.
Standards have clearly fallen off a cliff.
DeeJay
July 31st, 2010 2:18pm Report this commentI must admit, I am surprised he garnered less of a following than Diane Abbott, but this is the Labour Party and all political activists are, by definition, 'nuts' whatever party they support. Perhaps it's the wild eyes; that sweaty, slightly scary countenance or perhaps, that defensive, truculent attitude he adopts whenever he is asked to explain his views. Or perhaps its because he seems to take himself too seriously and appears to be without humour...
Or simply, that once he decided to admit it, few could really believe that he was a Norwich City supporter..
Ann Wright
August 1st, 2010 12:28pm Report this commentSurely, the reason Ed Balls is sinking fast in the leadership polls is that he's too reminiscent of Gordon Brown. Gordon who?
David Booth
August 2nd, 2010 7:46pm Report this commentNext career choice for Balls E. ?
Large glass of whisky and a loaded pistol.
Back to top