The Balls equation
Peter Hoskin 9:26am
One of the few things that could briefly enliven the Labour leadership contest is if Ed
Balls stood down and gave his backing to another candidate. True, it didn't happen when it probably should have – that is, when all the big unions gave their backing to Ed Miliband. But as
the summer advances without any slip in the Mili-lead, then maybe – just maybe – Balls might start reconsidering his options.
In which case, this insight from Philip Collins' latest article in the Times (£) is worth
noting down:
And it chimes with previous reports that Balls was considering donating his support to David Miliband because it might ensure him a smoother route to the shadow chancellorship. But I imagine there's another factor in the Balls equation: with the race so close, it may be too difficult to pick out the winning brother just yet."In 1999 Mr Balls and David Miliband used to meet regularly in Churchill’s, a café opposite the Treasury on Whitehall, in a forlorn attempt to join up the Government. It left Mr Balls with a basic respect for the elder Miliband that he does not have for the younger."



Previous






Maggie
August 20th, 2010 10:13am Report this commentI'm surprised to find myself saying this but I think Ed Balls has grown in stature since the demise of G. Brown. In contrast to his rival candidates, he seems to have developed an aura of gravitas.
Sally Chatterjee
August 20th, 2010 10:27am Report this commentSo he'll line with whovever's doing well and able to give him a job then?
The Laughing Cavalier
August 20th, 2010 10:34am Report this commentWhy should either of the Milliplonkers bother to give this loser a job?
JohnPage
August 20th, 2010 10:34am Report this commentBalls was dire on Newsnight last night on his special subject, education.
Victor Southern
August 20th, 2010 10:50am Report this commentI am still not going to go behind the Times paywall even if it is plagued here every day, deliberately I suggest.
In particular I would not pay to read about the slow ooze of the "race" for Labour leadership.
strapworld
August 20th, 2010 10:54am Report this commentMaggie finds herself saying that Balls has developed an 'aura'of gravitas!!
I certainly cannot agree with that. He stillcomes across as an empty barrel politicians. Loud and bullying. He would have been better suited as a trades union leader- in the style of Crow or Woodley.
Balls is a throwback BUT, that said, he is far far better than the brothers grimm.
I often wonder who gets the final word. Mr or Mrs Balls?
Verityred
August 20th, 2010 11:06am Report this comment'gravitas'?
Balls is a nasty arrogant thug, which has it's political uses, but 'gravitas', no.
He has his uses in the far from pleasant Labour party but, on radio and tv, comes across as loathsome.
TrevorsDen
August 20th, 2010 11:16am Report this commentGo back on the medication Maggie! Are we saying that his claim that 'there is no need for any cuts' amounts to gravitas?
The problem with balls giving his backing is that
a - it might be the kiss of death
and
b - he by definition will not have much backing to give.
But the sight of the Labour Party reduced to scratching around for Ed Ball's wasted votes is delicious.
TrevorsDen
August 20th, 2010 11:24am Report this commentPS - you cannot help but think that Balls has tied his horse to the wrong wagon. He is playing the role of the traditional left wing union beholden labour leader as opposed to the modernising forward thinking/looking centrist.
Ultimately that wagon was called Gordon Brown. By supporting Brown and conniving at his easy access to the leadership Balls hoped to use that as a platform for himself to dominate the party.
Brown fell flat on his face unfortunately, ironically mostly by following Balls' economic siren voice (greatly aided on
the way by his own incompetence).
Balls has been hoist by his own petard.
JohnPage
August 20th, 2010 11:31am Report this commentA great metaphor-rich comment, TrevorsDen :)
Sir Graphus
August 20th, 2010 11:42am Report this commentLet's lay off Maggie; she's offered an opinion that's quite brave to be posted on this site. To an extent I agree, and I've written before, Balls is an awesomely effective opposition politician. His attack dog mentality, so ill-suited to govt and leadership, is perfect for assaults from the opposition benches.
The question for either Milliband in making Balls shadow chancellor, is the degree to which they're willing to set up recent history to repeat itself.
As for education being his specialist subject, I've never known a minister who was so blatant about his desire to be somewhere else and such complete refusal to take on the brief.
Mary Nash
August 20th, 2010 12:19pm Report this commentThe opposition is scared of Ed Balls. He is brilliant at expressing his ideas clearly and forcefully. The Labour party has a wealth of young,patriotic ,intelligent leaders in Ed Balls, the Millibands ,Andy Burham and Dianne Abbot. All together united they will make a formidable group that will take the fight to this Coalition Govt, win the election sooner than later before this govt dismantle our public services heartlessly.
Simon Stephenson
August 20th, 2010 12:25pm Report this commentSir Graphus : 11.42am
You may be correct in your assessment of Balls as a highly effective opposition politician, but do you ever question what it is that politics has become that such a person can have become effective at it? Has the last 20-30 years not demonstrated with abundant clarity that adversarial politics is completely ineffective once any of the protagonists start using deceit and disingenuity in the formation of their argumentative thrusts.
Is Balls' effectiveness no more than that he is a skilled and shameless peddler of untruths, willing to say anything that might further his chance of prevailing, and that as a promoter of increased human happiness, his talents are about as much use as a chocolate fireguard?
strapworld
August 20th, 2010 12:46pm Report this commentCan anyone inform me if Cameron was ever taught by Ball's father? It may account for Cameron's left wing tendencies!
Paddy
August 20th, 2010 2:00pm Report this commentI've changed my mind about all labour politicians.
They are such fun in opposition.
Simon Stephenson
August 20th, 2010 2:40pm Report this commentMary Nash : 12.19pm
When you were typing out Labour's "August Mission Statement for dissemination through Schools and Colleges" I think you got the commas and the space bar mixed up - see the sentence including " ... young,patriotic ,intelligent leaders in Ed Balls, the Millibands ,Andy Burham and
Dianne Abbot"
Also, for future reference, you may find it helpful to be aware that Miliband has only one l, Burnham has an n in it, Diane has only one n, but Abbott has two t's.
J H Holloway
August 20th, 2010 3:56pm Report this comment'The Labour party has a wealth of young,patriotic ,intelligent leaders in Ed Balls, the Millibands ,Andy Burham and Dianne Abbot.'
Impossible, All the middle class Labour lot are international socialists and by definition do not believe in national borders.
They only believe the idea of an international working class and an international, permanent, ruling class. Why else would David Blunkett have stated that he could not imagine a numerical limit to immigration?
After all, it is not 'immigration' when you don't believe in national borders.
alexsandr
August 20th, 2010 4:08pm Report this commentyeah, Abbott has 2 teas every night. Usually pie and chips.
Jay
August 20th, 2010 4:28pm Report this commentHa ha Mary Nash you describe Abbott "young" - the old bag is close to retirement age.
Brownloather
August 20th, 2010 10:14pm Report this commentIrrelevant. He is and always will be a vicious, odious, deceiptful little bastard.
Major Plonquer 1
August 21st, 2010 7:10am Report this commentThis must be a new definition of the word 'race'. For me the word conjours some associations with 'speed', 'fastness' and 'the willpower to win'.
I don't think the Labour Party would like to be associated with the other definition of 'race'. No. The classification 'species' might be closer to the mark as, for example, the Milibananas are obviously of a different 'species' from the rest of us (what with looking human/mammalian yet lacking a spine).
Am I wandering again? Gin & Tonic, please.
Back to top