Ed Balls’ contract with the Labour Party
David Blackburn 4:29pm
Ed Balls has produced a contract with the Labour party. Three things strike me about it. First, he emphasizes broader consultation and promises a greater role
for activists and local representatives. These political impulses are championed by the coalition – an indication that Cameron and Clegg’s partnership is beginning to change Britain
party political landscape. Second, Balls is a proud friend of the trade unions and wants to restore the link between Labour and the unions, perhaps to redress Labour’s chronic financial position. Third, like Ed Miliband, he has adopted Harriet Harman’s goal of
having women as 50 percent of the shadow cabinet. Here are his pledges:
‘These are my pledges to every party member – if I’m elected hold me to account for them:
I will lead a responsible but effective opposition to the Tories and Lib Dems. I will lead from the front and ensure the whole party from the shadow cabinet and PLP to every councillor and party member plays their part in shortening the life of this coalition and exposing the unfair decisions they are taking.
I will increase party membership and strengthen Labour’s link with the trade unions – not just nationally but in every constituency and union branch. We should extend the £1 youth membership rate to every affiliated union member joining Labour for the first time. And as the first Co-op MP to stand for Labour leader, I would build a closer relationship with the co-operative movement too.
I will give Party Conference back to members. Our Conference must be reinvigorated as the debating chamber for working people in our country. We must not go back to the 1980s, but nor should we repeat the mistakes of the second term when the Labour government neglected its base and often sounded like it was attacking trade unions and the public sector.
I will reform our party’s policy-making process by consulting members on how our National Policy Forum needs to change. On some policy areas – Iraq, tuition fees, agency workers, housing, and fair migration – we lost touch and lost our way. That cost us the trust of voters. I will listen to members about what we got wrong and what needs to change for the future.
I will drive a culture change in our party to support greater representation of women at every level. I support the goal of having at least 50% women in the shadow cabinet and in Parliament too. But we will only achieve this with greater representation of women in local government and our party structures.
I will set up the party’s first-ever Diversity Fund to help all those who are under-represented get selected, including BAME groups, disabled people and those from ordinary backgrounds.
I will end undemocratic imposed selections and start the selection of candidates much earlier. We must start campaigning now in the seats we need to win – and be ready for a general election whenever the coalition falls apart.
I will support all our candidates, councillors and CLPs to win again. Labour faces crucial elections in the next two years, where we must take on the Tories, Lib Dems, nationalists and the BNP. They’re not simply a platform for winning again at the next general election – we need Labour in local government, the Scottish and European Parliaments and the Welsh and London Assemblies to deliver for our constituents.
I will nurture talent in our party and help our youth and student movement grow by giving Young Labour a full time member of staff and keeping all three Labour Students sabbaticals.
I will bring our party closer together by including our leaders in local government and the European Parliament in the shadow cabinet and giving our leaders in Scotland and Wales a place on the NEC.’



Previous






Paterson
August 22nd, 2010 4:49pm Report this commentNot a single pledge to improve the lot of the people. Why do these pledges matter to the electorate?
Dennis Churchill
August 22nd, 2010 4:58pm Report this commentWhat if there is a conflict between politically correct quotas and the views of local activists?
ajs
August 22nd, 2010 5:22pm Report this commentYes, no mention of the country or the people of it, just the usual focus on the Party, Unions etc. Not surprising, but clear evidence of what really matters to these power-obsessed, blinkered maniacs. When will our people see through all this? Maybe too much to hope for, with education ruined and perhaps irretrievably so.
Tendryakov
August 22nd, 2010 5:35pm Report this commentCan anyone tell me what BAME means?
Culverin
August 22nd, 2010 5:41pm Report this comment@ajs
Electing a leader of a party is a party event so of course it's going to be focussed on the interest groups of the Labour Party rather than going to the wider nation.
When Labour have a leader it'll be focussing outwards again, rest assured.
Marcher Baron
August 22nd, 2010 5:44pm Report this commentHow does he square having 50% women, a diversity fund and letting the grass roots have their say on candidates? Through re-education camps? Mind you, in all of that he's signally ignored that it is we, the voters, whose interests he fails to mention, who will make or break him and his party.
Alan Douglas
August 22nd, 2010 6:24pm Report this comment"having at least 50% women "
Errrrr ... would that not be just as "unfair" as have the present 50 % + male membership ?
And what would bhe do with a shadcab of 23 members, 12 men, 12 women and Peter Tatchell ?
Alan Douglas
BAME
August 22nd, 2010 7:20pm Report this commentMy guess for BAME is:
Bastards Arseholes Midgets and Ed Balls
TrevorsDen
August 22nd, 2010 7:38pm Report this commentBalls is shaping up to be a poor man's John Prescott.
Never mind what 'BAME is ... Balls seems to think that 'ordinary people' need help from a 'diversity fund' to progress in the Labour Party!
Chuck Unsworth
August 22nd, 2010 8:24pm Report this commentDo these 'pledges' have any meaning at all? What happens if Balls does not keep his word - as so often before?
Tendryakov
August 22nd, 2010 8:29pm Report this commentOf course, the people are crying out for more diversity. Isn’t language a wonderfully flexible thing? “Those from ordinary backgrounds”. Now who could that be, I wonder? Guardian readers? Non-Guardian readers? Daily Mail readers? Gillian Duffy? People who despise Gillian Duffy?
Simon Mennie
August 22nd, 2010 8:57pm Report this commentTendryakov
Black Asian Ethnic Minority
Tarka the Rotter
August 22nd, 2010 9:03pm Report this comment"I will give Party Conference back to members".
Not 'I recognise the primacy of Party Conference and the role of the membership'
Ah the Divine Right of Balls
Paul
August 22nd, 2010 9:22pm Report this commentBAME - isn't Balls covered in the B and A of your acronym?
Naomi Muse
August 23rd, 2010 8:07am Report this commentHe don't make sense at all.
Also, he does not promise to work in consensus cabinet government or to work for the best for the electorate.
He is getting further and further from reality.
Moraymint
August 23rd, 2010 8:52am Report this commentEgocentric claptrap.
What about me, the taxpaying voter being fleeced by our political caste? Where do I fit in to Balls' vision?
Hugh Janus
August 23rd, 2010 8:59am Report this commentIt is a tragedy that the odious and repulsive bully-boy Balls is standing for the leadership of a political party and, potentially, as PM of this country. I find it difficult to imagine anything more depressing.
Chris lancashire
August 23rd, 2010 9:26am Report this commentIt is depressing to think that, having got rid of the worst tribal politician (who wrecked the UK economy) in decades, his minime will most likely be around for another 10-15 years. True, he's unlikely to lead Labour (unless he's got a new band of thugs to help him, as he did Brown), but British politics would be so much more pleasant if the likes of this pillock weren't around.
oldtimer
August 23rd, 2010 10:04am Report this commentBAME = Balls against Middle England.
alexsandr
August 23rd, 2010 10:05am Report this commentEr. who are these grass roots members? I thought they were leaving in droves.
JohnAnt
August 23rd, 2010 5:16pm Report this commentBalls to help Labour Party contract.
Seems plausible.
Luddite
August 27th, 2010 7:00am Report this commentNice one Ed!! The same usual ball's. So the much insulted white working class, don't even get a look in.. Mr Ball's without their support Labour will stay in the political wilderness. New Labour's love affair with Islamic-fascism combined with New Labour's open door immigration policy buried Labour. How's about saying sorry for thirteen years of betrayal.
Back to top