"The worst-written memoir ever twittered by a serious politician"
Peter Hoskin 10:53am
That's how Bruce Anderson sums up Tony Blair's book in a caustic piece for the magazine.
Here's the whole review for the benefit of CoffeeHousers:
UPDATE: Iain Martin disagrees, and says Blair's memoirs are a cracking read.'It is bizarre. As he often demonstrated in the House of Commons, Tony Blair knows how to use words. He could also have mobilised a team to help him write his memoirs. Instead, it is all his own work, and the words mutinied. This book is not just badly written. it is atrociously written. For almost 700 pages, Tony Blair stumbles between mawkishness and banality.Prime ministers send soldiers into combat. Some of those soldiers are killed. That is a subject which would lead the least sensitive of men to reach into their souls and craft language out of emotional depth. This is Mr Blair's version. "The anguish remains. The principal part of that is not selfish. Some of it is, to be sure. Do they really suppose I don't care, don't feel, don't regret with every fibre of my being the loss of those who died?' Yes, they do. They know that the "every fibre" line is a thoughtless cliché. Many, many of the fibres of his being were otherwise engaged.
This is not just a pedantic point. If Tony Blair was to write on this topic, he was obliged to write sincerely. The passage continues: "And not just British soldiers but those of other nations...' He then proceeds to list them, as if anxious to leave no-one out. He concludes: "I am now beyond the mere expression of compassion. I feel words of condolence and sympathy to be entirely inadequate." There, we can agree. His words are not only inadequate. They are a pathetic, tin-mouthed babble, and anyone who can refer to a "mere expression of compassion" has a tin-mouthed soul.
This does not prevent him writing about religion. He tells us that for him, it has always been "a passion bigger than politics". Alastair Campbell once said "We don't do God". Judging by these pages, his wariness was justified. Mr Blair certainly cannot do passion. 'So that's my new life", he tells us at the book's end. "What makes me optimistic? People. Since leaving office, I have learned one thing above all: the people are the hope". You could not make it up.
It is as if Tony Blair set out to do the parodists' work for them. Apropos of the UK's Olympic bid, he tells us that: "We also put David Beckham into the mix. David is a complete pro - he did what he was asked to do with no messing about and generally sent Singapore into a twitter, which is exactly what was required'. Twitter is the word; reading this guff, one has to remind oneself that this man is trying to describe an important premiership. Instead, he has produced much the worst-written memoir ever twittered by a serious politician. It will inflict lasting and deserved damage upon his reputation.'



Previous







Arthur
September 2nd, 2010 11:24am Report this commentI love the way he describes how he lied to both sides during the NI peace negotiations, and then imagines that he could EVER be trusted by anyone in a serious negotiation, ever again. I thought the man was supposed to be intelligent?
denis cooper
September 2nd, 2010 11:31am Report this commentPlease, enough about bloody Blair.
Rob
September 2nd, 2010 11:33am Report this commentThat photo is fake, or staged at least. First, the book in the photo is paperback, whereas it has only been released in hardback and electronic versions so far. Second, the title reads 'Memories', not 'A Journey'. A pre-release mock-up, perhaps?
Dave B
September 2nd, 2010 11:33am Report this commentWas Mr Blair's period in office "an important premiership"?
He was quoted yesterday as saying he thought New Labour would come to be seen as "a great reforming government". I don't see it. Other than 10 years of laws-for-headlines, what did they achieve?
Richard of York
September 2nd, 2010 11:35am Report this commentOwn goal or faux pas
should it not read in A caustic piece?
This coming from a foriegner with poor spelling....hang your head Mr Hoskins.
Vulture
September 2nd, 2010 11:54am Report this commentIt's all about Me. Or rather, him.
An ego the size of the Albert Hall enclosing a brain that's rather smaller.
Can we now hope that him and his loathsome, greedy spouse can leave us alone for a very long while and withdraw to one of their nine properties, there to stew in their own rancid juice. I do hope so.
Chris
September 2nd, 2010 11:54am Report this commentDorky, wtf are you on about?
Norman Dee
September 2nd, 2010 11:55am Report this commentHaving a coffee after shopping at Leclerc, I looked up to see copies of "Voyage" by Monsieur Tony Blair on sale at their book shop, it will be interesting to see how many fly off the shelves here in rural France
dearieme
September 2nd, 2010 12:03pm Report this commentAnderson complains about bad writing and then perpetrates this horror: "Prime ministers send soldiers into combat." No, Presidents send soldiers into combat. Prime ministers send them into action.
dearieme
September 2nd, 2010 12:05pm Report this comment" I thought the man was supposed to be intelligent?" What on earth gave you that impression?
Richard of York
September 2nd, 2010 12:12pm Report this commentPeter
sneaky correction without aknowledgement of your error....honourable journos are rare but even more so on the spectator it seems.
ollie
September 2nd, 2010 12:28pm Report this commentThis is further evidence that the left wing brain cannot produce craft. Blair is at least the soulless automaton Brown was.
Austin Barry
September 2nd, 2010 12:42pm Report this commentI was appalled by Blair's lauding of his friendship with the evil Adams and McGuinness.
What kind of acrobatic moral accommodation brought him to that point?
A rather sad and pathetic man, really.
Barry Bilge
September 2nd, 2010 12:42pm Report this commentIn light of Blair's revisionist history on Diana and Dodi, and similar questionable claims regarding his knowledge of where the UK economy was going, perhaps we should also look at his claim that he was moments away from ordering an RAF jet to shoot a passenger plane down.
His version of events is that the 'fighter jet was airborne' and awaiting his decision. The RAF have scrambled many times since September 2001 in response to bomb threats, communication problems and to intercept Russian bombers and they scramble two at a time.
Marcus Cotswell
September 2nd, 2010 12:58pm Report this commentMatthew Parris has it right in The Times today: it reads as if Blair narrated it into a dictaphone and someone's just written it up verbatim. It's a stream of consciousness with no serious attempt to impose formal sentence structure on it.
It comes as no real surprise that the man can't write - he is and was, first and foremost, a performer rather than a scribe. It is a pity, though, that his publishers saw fit to adopt such a light-touch editorial approach.
Tankus
September 2nd, 2010 1:14pm Report this comment@dearieme "" " I thought the man was supposed to be intelligent?" What on earth gave you that impression?""
$60m in the bank in 3 years and not getting trialled in the Hague in the process !....successfully deceived a large element of the public for 13 year's
Not a total muppet , perhaps
AndyinBrum
September 2nd, 2010 1:20pm Report this commentSo god told him it was the right thing to do to invade Iraq. How is that different from the suicide bomber who has been told by god to use his Semtex vest in a crowded tube.
Oh wait, none, it's deluded messianic horse shit
Robert Eve
September 2nd, 2010 1:35pm Report this commentWhat reputation is that?
Tiberius
September 2nd, 2010 1:38pm Report this commentDidn't someone once say that Christ was either the Son of God or a madman? For many the jury is still out.
As for Blair, can anyone be in doubt?
Maggie
September 2nd, 2010 2:52pm Report this commentHe suffers from the same delusions as Cherie. He thinks everyone experiences life, and makes the same responses to situations, in exactly the same way as him. Cherie presumed to give advice on how to conduct themselves to Sarah Brown and Michelle Obama, both of whom knew far better than Cherie how to behave.
Blair is an example of how not to do things but he presumes he is some sort of role model for world leaders. He is completely insane.
john mounsey
September 2nd, 2010 3:19pm Report this commentI thought Richard of York had quit these shores to put up deckchairs in Florida. Plainly he's back and the sun must have gone to his head because his two comments posted on this site make no sense at all. Happy daze, Richard?
Marcher Baron
September 2nd, 2010 3:38pm Report this comment"That photo is fake, or staged at least." Just like the whole Blair charade, Rob.
Fiona
September 2nd, 2010 3:51pm Report this commentI suppose any old twit can win three elections in a row, but it takes a real man, a man of vastly superior intelligence and talent, to churn out a comment piece or a book review.
Isn't that right, Bruce?!
Maggie
September 2nd, 2010 4:43pm Report this comment"Fiona", Tony Blair won three elections because the Tory Party kept installing unelectable leaders - just like the Labour Party are about to do now. It wasn't due to a belief in his competence or his imagined popularity. If there'd been any half decent alternative the electorate would have been off like a shot.
Baron Pippin II
September 2nd, 2010 5:05pm Report this commentthe man ranks amongst the best actors in a country that breeds such creatures in their thousands, his placing amongst politicians doesn’t bear thinking about, it’s below the bottom end of the scale. His winning for the first time counts for little. Brown or a cuddly fluffy monkey would have done it, too, what with the disreputable Tories running out of steam on policies, taking off their pantaloons far too often. Bribing the electorate with fake economic growth enabled him to win again twice, we are about to pay dearly for the insanity of the ‘no boom or bust’ years, of which he and the other Scottish political no-entity were the architects of.
for him, the Labour party was but a conduit for his and his hideous wife's only ambition in life – personal enrichment. He would have flogged his mother if there was a market for mothers of spinning, mendacious, morality devoid, greedy actors. It wasn’t going into Iraq to topple a tyrant, he should apologize for, it was his lying about why we should go in that’s unforgivable.
and don’t let me start on his Christian faith.
Fiona @ 3.51:
yap, that’s right, just scan the above, will you please.
Simon Stephenson
September 2nd, 2010 10:08pm Report this commentFiona : 3.51pm
Bruce Anderson has been writing for a living for a good many years. Tony Blair hasn't.
I would have thought the Anderson was well qualified to comment on Blair's competence in writing a book, even if he is not qualified to comment about his competence at winning general elections. Wouldn't you?
Or has Blair become to you so much of a deity that you think it's impossible for mere mortals to discover anything about him that is deserving of criticism?
Simon Stephenson
September 2nd, 2010 10:33pm Report this commentMaggie : 2.52pm
I think that at some stage in his life Tony Blair has had the realisation that humility is a piece of baggage that, if discarded, can allow a human being to be hyper-effective, and fulfilled as a result of this. Never look back. Never accept the frailty of your own humanity. Never allow yourself to consider that way your own view of the world has been determined may be dramatically different from other people's.
I suspect that Gordon Brown shares much of this pathway to, first, coveting power, and then dealing with it once it has been attained, and that the psyches of these two recent Prime Ministers are far, far away from anything that can be constructed with humility as a required element.
Both of them are irredeemable, and that's just something we will have to live with. Neither of them will ever admit to being fallible, because their characters won't allow them to. We need to ignore their remonstrations because these are not based on objectivity.
ian boyd
September 3rd, 2010 1:14am Report this commentAlways a man to plan ahead, Blair's packaging up in 'A Journey' the first files for his canonization. I think we can assume that the final and compulsory miracle will be that the rat will have gotten away with it all.
Ian Stewart
September 3rd, 2010 9:55am Report this commentYes, Blairs book is bad, very bad. Have you tried wading through Norman Tebbits' apologia? Well nigh impossible, apart from some good descriptions of flying Lightning fighters.
stephen maybery
September 3rd, 2010 2:28pm Report this commentThe Journey, plus a few porkies picked up along the way.
Back to top