The unions deliver Ed Miliband to the throne
Peter Hoskin 5:42pm
In the end, it was all quite exciting. After four months of soporific campaigning, after
a speech by Gordon Brown, after tribute video upon tribute video, it all came down to an astonishingly tense round of results. And Ed Miliband edged out his brother by just over 1 percentage point
overall, 50.6 to 49.4. It may have been the outcome that most punters expected coming into today – but it is not one that many would have predicted, with any confidence, back in May.
Looking at the full voting split, a less flattering picture emerges. David Miliband actually won two of the three voting blocks: the MPs turned out 53-47 in his favour, the members 54-46 likewise. But it was the unions wot won it for Ed: the brothers gave him their votes in a 60-40 ratio. This, as James said during our live blog, is a potential Doomsday Scenario for Labour. Yep, their leader achieved his mandate courtesy of the block that might have its name attached to industrial action in coming months. Try selling that one to the wider public.
So while the support of Unite and Unison, and the leftist rhetoric, may have paid off for Ed Miliband today, he now has a grim struggle on his hands. The caricature – "Red Ed" – has already entered the political lexicon, and he needs to erase it if he's to hoover up the middle class votes that could deliver Labour back to power. He has the capacity to do so, I'm sure – especially if he follows the example set by his brother over the last few weeks. But capacity is as nothing if it remains untapped.



Previous






Tarka the Rotter
September 25th, 2010 5:59pm Report this commentSince the Milibands like to play the family card - and I have to say the BBC coverage on this aspect was nauseating - let's not forget Grandpa Miliband helped Trotsky liquidate White Russians opposed to Communism and Pa Miliband spent most of his adult political life working to overthrow the political system of the country which gave him shelter from the Nazis... a dynasty to be proud of...
The Cat in the Hat
September 25th, 2010 6:01pm Report this commentLabour bankrupted the nation.
You cannot be our salvation.
Don't put your head in the sand,
Mr Edward Milliband.
The future is blue with a hint of yellow.
And there is nothing you can do, however much you bellow!
strapworld
September 25th, 2010 6:02pm Report this commentThank goodness this non event. Five candidates we could all forget easily and the most nondescript gets the job. Son of parents who are committed communists, brother of banana man, tool of the unions.
Perhaps now Coffee House will concentrate on Coalition politics?
Perhaps you could offer Richard of York a guest spot so we can all have a good laugh?
Fex Urbis
September 25th, 2010 6:04pm Report this commentThe fact that the buffoon Kinnock looked so delighted tells you all you need to know about Red Ed. PMQs is going to be fantastic, Dave and Cleggy must be pissing themselves laughing already!!
Silent Hunter
September 25th, 2010 6:05pm Report this commentLabour can hardly call this a 'ringing endorsement' of Ed, when only the Union vote got him the job - the rest of the Labour fellowship clearly wanted 'David' to win.
Now that's not exactly a recipe for harmony within Labour ranks.
JOANNE KAYE
September 25th, 2010 6:05pm Report this comment"Those wonderful folks who will bring is strike after strike'? What rubbish. Union members voted individually in this ballot - they are the wonderful folks who work in our hospitals, drive our ambulances, look after old people, help our children across the road, deliver our post, work in our schools and they do these jobs day in day out and around the clock. I suppose that as just as we should expect nothing from a pig but a grunt, ordinary working people should expect nothing but contempt from writers in The Spectator
Will J
September 25th, 2010 6:12pm Report this commentNotice you filed it under David Mills instead of Milliband - has he been forgotten so soon?!
WetherspoonThree
September 25th, 2010 6:13pm Report this comment'It was the unions wot won it for Ed'..well so it seems but I understand that only 10% of the union college decided to vote for any candidate including Diane Abbott(still complaining she lost because she didn't have enough dosh to fight her campaign!).
The real story is the failure of the Labour Party election process which arguably has produced an unelectable leader. Anyone, who in his acceptance address, can list all the failures of our society, just a few short months after 13 years of Labour mis-rule and not smile at the sheer absurdity of it all is doomed in my opinion.
Call me Infidel
September 25th, 2010 6:27pm Report this commentThe bruvvers will of course demand a return on their investment.
Moriarty
September 25th, 2010 6:27pm Report this commentHe won on the back of the Bob Crow vote.
Tories need to say that again and again and again.
Mike
September 25th, 2010 6:55pm Report this commentThe "Bob Crow" vote rather than the support of Labour MPs and members handicaps Red Ed from the start, the intercine warfare from the Blarites who will be frankly livid that their man lost will drive Labour into civil war.
Paddy
September 25th, 2010 6:55pm Report this commentEd Balls said "if he had a few weeks longer to campaign he may have won".
Does this mean he could have broken - sorry twisted a few more arms?
Joe
September 25th, 2010 7:13pm Report this commentWhile criticism of the manner of Ed Milliband’s victory is certain, it is misdirected by all other than firm defenders of the Electoral College voting system. It is true that is older brother won two of the Electoral College sections by small margins and that Ed won just one, that of the trade unions and affiliated societies. However to use this to suggest his victory was unrepresentative is to misunderstand the nature of the electoral college system and in particular the value upon which the Labour Party invests in its three voting bodies. The bare facts given here obscure the fact that Ed won more votes than David and that arguably in a more fair voting system would have achieved a less ambiguous victory.
Though this may not go any way to dampening critics of the new party leader or answering the questions he will face if and when the unions react to the Coalitions cuts to public spending, it seems predictable that a large portion of the criticism that will undoubtedly come Ed Milliband’s way will be misguided. The main criticism of the election seems to be the lack of weight given to members of the constituency parties and the comparable power of ‘The Unions’ and MPs, in actual fact a union member is the least powerful voter in a Labour leadership contest. The real issue then, is not that Ed’s victory is unrepresentative but that his victory was won with the support of a potentially unpopular strand of the party. Here then lies the real problem with the election; what relationship does the Labour Party want with its affiliated members.
http://www.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/6306398/the-unions-deliver-ed-miliband-to-the-throne.thtml
Stewart
September 25th, 2010 7:50pm Report this commentIf Ed Milliband has any sense he will ignore the unions right now and start off on the right foot with the public by appointing as inoffensive a shadow cabinet as possible. He needs to unite the parliamentary party and sort out their message as soon as possible. An election is likely a long way off so Labour can start saving now and planning on how to attract non Union money for when they decide to move back towards the centre. There is nothing for him to gain by paying back the unions now. He can do that if he gets Labour into power. If Labour membership is up since the election, it will likely take a spike again now that there is a new leader even if it isn't the one the majority of the membership voted for. The unions should be kept at arms length right now by the Labour party if they want to stand a chance of winning.
JohnBUK
September 25th, 2010 8:23pm Report this commentJoanne Kaye, so the union people work all day, day in day out! What the F... do you think the people here do then? Then having done all that their pay is taken from them by Bruin and hosed liberally around the State urinal the past 13 years for absolutely nothing - except the biggest debt we've ever seen, pensions destroyed, no police on the street etc etc.
logdon
September 25th, 2010 8:46pm Report this commenthttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJRjJjlkbRM&NR=1
Something to look forward to every week on Newsnight?
Following the election and the relentless BBC coverage of Labour, almost as if they hadn't lost, my relationship with that programme has been terminated.
For similar reasons Today, PM or Radio Four in general has superglued their locks into my psyche.
Now we've got them rooting for this imbecile who just can't get it through his head that the days of spending other peoples money until the overdraft threatens our entire economic world standing are over.
My only hope is that this bug eyed Marxist zealot does not somehow win over the people of this country.
It is now up to the media including the Spectator to expose, expose and expose again.
Never must Britain be allowed to be spun into the ghastliness of another Labour victory.
logdon
September 25th, 2010 9:09pm Report this commentBefore the nitpickers descend,'have'.
Nicholas
September 25th, 2010 11:39pm Report this commentJoanne Kaye - you should put those heroic stereotypes on a poster with a great red flag unfurling in the background and a slogan exhorting the workers to destroy the imperialists of the Spectator's Coffee House.
" . . . the wonderful folks who work in our hospitals, drive our ambulances, look after old people, help our children across the road, deliver our post, work in our schools . . . "
But not a word from you for the truly heroic young men and women fighting New Labour's wars, eh?
Phil
September 26th, 2010 1:13am Report this commentJoanne - You are Sally Bercow and I claim my £5.00
Frank P
September 26th, 2010 1:22am Report this commentEven Kevin Maguire is calling him Red Ed, already. Perfect!
A shadow-cabinet job for Bob Crow perhaps? What a carrion!
Sarah AB
September 26th, 2010 7:16am Report this commentJoanne - I also thought there was an odd assumption in this article (given that union members rather than leaders voted) that you couldn't be reading this and also be in a union. If it had been a block vote system then it would have been a fair point as, certainly in my union, the membership seems much less to the left, and much more strike-averse, than the leaders.
Alan Edwards
September 26th, 2010 9:45am Report this commentDavid Miliband and Ed Miliband, sounds like Tony Blair and Gordon Brown with their roles reversed. I see Ed has studied from the Ian Paisley school of politics, the better man does not neccessarily get the top job. Red Ed now partners Red Ken in London politics, fortunately the futures Blue with a hint of Yellow chaps!
john nunnerley
September 27th, 2010 9:45am Report this commentHello All,
Well the commies are really trying hard, now the we as the people, are we to be told the the milliband brothers were brought up as future leaders in there late grandfathers way of thinking, as a out and out communist.
Jill D Gregory
October 1st, 2010 1:32pm Report this commentI was under the impression that the Banks instigated the depression and that the vote from the Unions was votes from ordinary working people. Give Ed a chance he hasn't even started yet and the bigots are having a go.
Back to top