Hutton points the way forward on pensions
Andrew Haldenby 6:06pm
John Hutton's interim report on public sector pensions today will go down as one of the
most important moments in the public service reform story. John Hutton doesn't just set out the principles for putting public services on a sustainable footing, although he does do that (by
explaining the inadequate levels of contributions into these schemes). More importantly, he confronts head-on the problem that public sector pensions pose for the opening up of public
services to competition.
One of the key reasons that many companies have waited on the sidelines of the public sector for years is the disparity between public and private pensions. Tony Blair's Prime Ministerial demands for private companies to run existing public services foundered on the cost of the pensions for the staff that they would inherit. The Treasury has promised action on the pensions barrier for years and there has been some reform, as John Hutton notes, but nowhere near sufficient to allow companies into the market. Now John Hutton has brought the issue into the open and will propose solutions. It is a big moment for the Government's ambitions on public service reform.
But public sector pensions are relatively insignificant compared to the state pension. The annual net cost of public sector pensions is in the low billions compared to the £60 billion
cost of the state pension. The Government's decision to increase the state pension in line with earnings rather than prices makes little sense in the light of the ambition to eliminate the deficit
in this Parliament. It is also contrary to John Hutton's principles that pensions should be linked to contributions and that the burden of today's pensions should not fall unfairly on future
generations. Let's hope John Hutton can be persuaded to write a follow-up.
Andrew Haldenby is director of Reform



Previous






JR
October 7th, 2010 6:34pm Report this commentWoh there Andrew. You can't attack the lucky older generation here. They deserve everything. It's the younger generation who should have their benefits cut.
But you are right 2008 UK pensions benefits bill £85m, 2008 UK working age benefits total around £30bn depending if you include tax credits.
Iain Anderson
October 7th, 2010 8:09pm Report this commentWell said Andrew. There's a BIG follow up coming and a need to make an offer to the unions to make this work
Commentator
October 7th, 2010 11:14pm Report this commentHow long before Dave and Osborne decide that all higher rate taxpayers should be denied the old age pension because they should have plenty to retire on once they have paid higher rate tax, university tuition fees and had their savings destroyed by deliberately-engineered inflation?
Bloody Bill Brock
October 8th, 2010 12:03pm Report this comment@Commentator
I don't know about "all HRT payers" losing their OAPs, but certainly those receiving in excess of say £65,000 in pension income dont need the OAP. What small amount of saving that would be made could be redistributed to the poorist pensioners.
It steals Labours clothes and does a bit of good into the bargin.
Back to top