Brown loses another popularity contest
Fraser Nelson 1:13pm
It goes from tragedy to farce. Madame Tussauds has decided against having a Gordon Brown waxwork amongst its world leaders - he dithered over whether to sit for its sculptors and they got fed up waiting for a reply. "Since then we have had no response and, reflecting the climate after the Government's performance in the recent local elections, our guests have become decidedly split about whether we should feature Mr Brown at all," general manager Edward Fuller said.



Previous

Comments
Chris Blore
May 6th, 2008 1:24pmPoor old Gordon. It can't be nice knowing that you're on your way out and soon to be forgotten, especially after all the effort and years of backstabbing it took to get there!
Tiberius
May 6th, 2008 1:29pmCan we really have any confidence in a man who dithers over a wax dummy? He has his finger on our nuclear button!!
Trumpeter Lanfried
May 6th, 2008 1:30pmTee hee.
Michael Sweeney
May 6th, 2008 1:31pmFine Fraser. The Conservatives scored a significant victory last week and Brown is clearly on the ropes. But this type of facetiousness is just kicking a man while he is down. Labour looks like it is imploding. No need for this nonsense. After Ashley, Harris and Williams in last week's Guardian, this type of comment doesn't reflect well on the Westminster media class. I'd prefer you to focus more on Conservative contradictions than whether Tussaud's have decided against a silly waxwork.
Nick Kaplan
May 6th, 2008 1:54pmI think the sculptors at Madame Tussauds should make a wax model of Brown, we could put it in number 10, and it might be a more effective decision maker than the real thing!
Austin Barry
May 6th, 2008 1:55pmPity. Tussauds could've charged 10p a pop for people to stick pins in the Great Leader's "I feel your pain" effigy. Gordon: Caledonia's Saint Sebastian.
Ted Tedford
May 6th, 2008 1:58pmMichael Sweeney: I think people who have had Brown's jackboot on their throat for the past eleven years should be allowed to gloat. It might be unseemly, and it might not be magnanimous, but it is an entirely human reaction to the circumstances, and there's nothing wrong with indulging it. It's less damaging than taking to the barricades or armed insurrection. And at least it is not of the same order of viciousness of much left-wing sneering and triumphalism during the last decade.
(Although this *is* an old story: the Telegraph first ran it in March.)
Austin Barry
May 6th, 2008 2:03pmMichael, as our American chums say, "lighten-up, dude".
John
May 6th, 2008 2:03pmMichael, don't be so bleeding pompous.
If ever there was a man who deserved to be kicked when down, it's this pathetic coward, bully and liar and fifth-rate 'intellect' who has been shafting us for 11 years.
Another brilliant laugh at the expense of this disgraceful gang - I love it!
Mr Angry
May 6th, 2008 2:07pmKicking a man when he is down Michael ? This unreconstructed socialist is destroying our country !
Are you referring to the same media class that repeatedly reported on Brown's towering intellect whilst ignoring all his well known character flaws etc in the weeks leading up to him becoming PM ?
slothrop
May 6th, 2008 2:09pmIsn't this the second time Madame Tussauds have tried to get some easy PR out of having a pop at Brown? weirdly significant in a way that even corporate PR types are using him as a whipping boy.
Oscar Miller
May 6th, 2008 2:14pmIf Tussaud's made this decision last March, maybe they should be employed by the pollsters. Looks like they have their finger on the pulse of public opinion.
salieri
May 6th, 2008 2:21pmNoble sentiments, Michael, but I'm with Ted and Austin on this one. A little comic relief is welcome after what we've all had to endure for so many years of gloom. The intriguing question is why Tussauds wanted to create a waxwork when we had one already.
A. McB.
May 6th, 2008 2:23pmKicking him when he's down??? He is "down" by his own fault -- therefore deserves to be "down" and moreover, to be kicked while there! Let there be no misunderstanding that we might feel sorry for him and that he "deserves" yet another chance. He really ought to go. Before we're ALL down.
David
May 6th, 2008 2:30pmPerhaps they should try an abstract approach to portraying Gordon, based not so much on the moral compass as on the triangulating compass. This would present a new and welcome challenge for Tussauds. Given that Gordon`s triangulation is leading him into an ever decreasing circle, if Polly Toynbee in today`s Guardian is to be believed, this would surely be a surefire crowd puller.
Alex
May 6th, 2008 2:31pmLOL. It would have been a waste of money anyway, since they would have to bin it in May 2010.
Besides, surely they want to have waxworks of personalities people want to see, no?
Phil
May 6th, 2008 2:34pmMichael Sweeney - you need to relax.
Mike
May 6th, 2008 2:49pmIt does save them the expense of melting it down in 2010 or putting it into the Chamber of Horrors.
Michael - after 11 years of this awful government, I'm very happy to kick them whilst they are down. Frankly I'll carry on kicking until they are out of office
Water
May 6th, 2008 2:49pmWhat a lapse of judgment by our little Brown aww.
mart
May 6th, 2008 2:53pmI'm with Michael. The Spec is supposed to be "champagne for the brain". This story (and a few of the comments?) are a bit too bitter.
Water
May 6th, 2008 2:59pmJohn Brown is daft in making such a decision, but as for a fifth rate intellectual…that would be you! Calling Brown a gangster hahaha never have I heard such childish drivel!
TrevorH
May 6th, 2008 3:07pmI agre with the critisism about kicking Brown when he is down. You should be giving him a good stamping.
Brown is the man who was plotting to get gullible tories to defect, who for years was planning to depose Blair and was constantly plotting against Blair. he was schemming to pbliterate the tories right from the moment he stood on the doorstep on 10 Downing St.
Why shopuld anyone feel sorry for this tin-pot machiaveli.
idle
May 6th, 2008 3:28pmI assumed that the waxwork was residing in Downing Street and the real thing was skulking around Mme Tussauds, writing about other peoples' courage, or whatever he does.
Water
May 6th, 2008 3:41pmSweeney is absolutely right the general quality of comments has plummeted.
Sweeney don’t calm down and don’t relax your gut instincts are correct! The Spectator used to be a refuge where you could relish the comments that were put forward.
Austin Barry
May 6th, 2008 3:48pmMart, I agree that some of the comments on this thread are bitter and unfortunate, but Brown has engendered such a profound dislike and distrust among the Lobelia-growing classes that one must expect this kind of invective, unhelpful though it may well be. It would perhaps be appropriate and cathartic if, when Brown is finally ousted, he be made to parade through the streets of London so that he may hear the citizens' howls of execration: a modest proposal.
Verity
May 6th, 2008 3:57pmTrumpeter - Seconded!
Michael Sweeny - "But this type of facetiousness is just kicking a man while he is down."
You are right! As Trevor H implies in his comment above, kicking is too mild. He should have a good kicking, and indeed, will be getting one if he clings on until the general election.
I do disagree with Trevor H, though, when he refers to Brown as a "tin pot Machiavelli". Machiavelli was a dazzlingly clever thinker.
Michael Sweeney
May 6th, 2008 4:11pmOh dear. What did I say? Cameron may well have decontaminated the brand, but not some of his supporters. For a moment I thought I'd visited a Respect/SWP thread by mistake.
RW
May 6th, 2008 4:17pmWell, this is disgraceful, refusing such tribute to our revered Prime Minister. A wax image should be made immediately, and then placed with appropriate ceremony in Louis Tussaud’s House of Wax at Great Yarmouth, where the 150-or-so life-sized figures are famous for bearing little if any resemblance to the celebrities they are supposed to represent. We could call it "The Prime Minister Who Wasn't".
Water
May 6th, 2008 4:22pmYou’re right there Verity Machiavelli was a legend. Where as PM B is probably better looked upon as a hebetudinous Lipizzan.
Invicta
May 6th, 2008 4:22pmWell it was hardly challenging for Tussauds to make a waxwork out of a waxwork.
Verity
May 6th, 2008 5:56pmInvicta - V good!
Michael Sweeney writes "Cameron may well have decontaminated the brand, but not some of his supporters."
You "know" that the people who have answered you are supporters of Cameron? How did you conclude this, not knowing us and all?
You have intuited the wrong thought about me, because I disapprove of Cameron and will not be voting Tory as long as he is the Leader.
In addition, I don't recall having given Cameron, or anyone else, permission to be "decontaminate" me.
I would add that a body of political belief, or thought, isn't a "brand", so I find the vacuous pr-speak rather illiterate, as well.
Max Kaye
May 6th, 2008 7:20pmMichael Sweeney, I disagree: There is no better time to kick an overbearing, obnoxious, psychologically-flawed, control freak who lies about everything.
For the past 11 years I've paid outrageous levels of tax because of this man and his cohorts, and as it's unlikely I'll ever get a penny back, I'm relishing this opportunity to dance on his political grave.
John
May 6th, 2008 9:17pm"Sweeney is absolutely right the general quality of comments has plummeted" -
and your comment "never have I heard such childish drivel" is a perfect illustration.
Travis Bickle
May 6th, 2008 10:02pmCouldn't we get a waxwork made and installed in Downing Street, with the "Real Gordon" sent to Madame Tussaud's?
Avana Beach
May 7th, 2008 2:02amMay is simply alive with opportunities to vote. And you can't lose on this one as the options seem to be 'Dummy In 'or 'Dummy Out'
http://www.madame-tussauds.co.uk/GordonBrownVote/