Trouble with the big society
David Blackburn 10:59am
A gaggle of academics have written to the Observer to condemn the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) for accepting £100m from the
government. The AHRC is conducting research into the big society, and the allegation is that the settlement was conditional, an allegation which is denied. Doubtless the 69 signatories are
dons of the tweedily conservative variety, but their objections perhaps explain why Cameron’s flagship policy is so mistrusted. They write:
‘When academic research is used to promote party political ideologies its quality and value decline. It also threatens democracy and the constitution. While academic work may be partly paid for out of public funds, this ought not to be the same thing as working for the government.’The big society envisages a nation where the government quietly facilitates voluntarism, community and charity to create more efficient public services that are held in direct public ownership, free from the oligarchy of unaccountable bureaucrats. It should be the quintessence of democracy in action. Yet, from this to the forestry furore, it has never escaped the allegation of being an ideological cover for a radically smaller state, a threat to the constitution no less.



Previous






RCE
April 3rd, 2011 11:25am Report this commentSo, during these hard times Cameron & Co can't see the paradox of giving 100m of taxpayers' money to the AHRC in the name of 'smaller government'?
Meanwhile, the redundancy notices for soldiers fighting two underfunded wars are in the post.
david
April 3rd, 2011 11:26am Report this commentThere is one enormous problem with Dave's Big Society, its total BLX.
Dave B
April 3rd, 2011 11:43am Report this commentThe Observer fails to mentions that the Arts and Humanities Research Council
"unconditionally and absolutely refutes the allegations reported in the Observer (‘Academic Fury over order to study the big society’, 27 March). We did NOT receive our funding settlement on condition that we supported the ‘Big Society’, and we were NOT instructed, pressured or otherwise coerced by BIS or anyone else into support for this initiative."
http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/News/Latest/Pages/Observerarticle.aspx
Robert Eve
April 3rd, 2011 11:55am Report this commentWhy should a smaller state need any cover?
It can only be good news.
Rhoda Klapp
April 3rd, 2011 11:56am Report this commentAll enquiries are fixed. Everything is gamed. All statements are truish, but do not reflect all of the truth. And yes, 'independent' opinion follows its funding. I don't think I'm saying anything new here. Who has yet to discover it?
Fergus Pickering
April 3rd, 2011 12:05pm Report this commentThey did not refute the allegation. They denied it. Really such bodies ought to understand the language. Three words - refute, rebut, deny. All different. If you say I am a child molester I deny it. It is an allegation impossible to refute.
TrevorsDen
April 3rd, 2011 12:44pm Report this commentThe Arts and Humanities Research Council was always funded by the government. it was set up by Labour.
No doubt the lefty Observer was happy when it researched into things Gordon brown thought were useful. Hypocritical tosspots.
Martyn
April 3rd, 2011 12:48pm Report this commentThe last report I read from the AHRC indicated that it employs 120 staff to manage just 340 grants. Why is this quango still in existence?
ollie
April 3rd, 2011 12:52pm Report this comment"When academic research is used to promote party political ideologies its quality and value decline."
An interesting comment. Our education system has been subject to left wing ideology for 50 odd years now - which is why millions of people in this country are unemployed and unemployable.
justathought
April 3rd, 2011 1:13pm Report this commentMore money for quangos? Is there any end to this waste of taxpayers money?
If there research is so worthwhile let them publish and sell it on the open market.
Mike
April 3rd, 2011 1:56pm Report this comment"When academic research is used to promote party political ideologies its quality and value decline."
Where does the utter BLX known as man made global warming fit in here?
anne allan
April 3rd, 2011 4:18pm Report this commentMust be some research for £100 million. What a criminal waste of money. How about keeping a few more betrayed soldiers, sailors and airmen?
300 million smackers for a load of washed up academics to come up with the bleedin' obvious.
TGF UKIP
April 3rd, 2011 4:47pm Report this commentSetting aside the staggering figure of £100m of taxpayers money being handed to such a lefty style quango, I'm afraid, David, neither you nor these academics properly understand what the Big Society is all about.
It was nothing less than a piece of pure pre-election genius by my good mate Steve H, designed to make Dave appear the silly arse he transparently is and to reinforce the image of him as a lightweight, PR man much given to stunts and photo ops. Naturally it also had the added bonus for my Labour Mole pal of being a very useful tool for The Swivel Eyed to beat Dave over the head with.
PS Can't help noticing too, David, how on message you are with Big Society becoming, for you, "big society" just as Dave wishes. Looking to join the sinking ship are we?
biggestaspidistra
April 3rd, 2011 6:48pm Report this commentWhat is so difficult to understand about the term 'big society'? Big society=small government. I don't know how anyone could not understand the simplicity of it or, after the last decade, be against it.
Verity
April 3rd, 2011 7:03pm Report this comment"AHRC is conducting research into the big society...". What is this nursery school "big society"? Every society is a "big society". How are taxpayer pounds involved in this worthless "research"?
Seattle is a "big society". France is a "big society". Sydney is a "big society". China is a "big society". All societies over around 50,000 are "big societies". What the hell are these morons a) talking about and b) spending taxpayer money "studying"?
This is such a socialist construct. Why are the Conservatives even in the same room with it?
David Cameron is a nastier piece of work than Tony Blair and Cherie put together and that is going it some. I might even throw in Lord Fondlebum and Jacqui Smith.
Yorkshireblue1
April 3rd, 2011 8:53pm Report this commentAnne, you may think arts & humanities research is a criminal waste of money but the chinese, japanese and other foreign phd students who queue up to pay our university fees to be taught by profs such as my husband clearly disagree, as do the publishers who translate his research funded work so it can be read in every continent.
RCE
April 4th, 2011 10:08am Report this commentYorkshireblue1 @ 8:53
The difference that you state but clearly don't acknowledge is that those foreign students pay their own fees, and by choice.
With regard to this issue, it is economically illiterate and morally indefensible that during a budget deficit even more money is borrowed to pay for this crap whilst sailors, soldiers and airmen who are risking their lives to earn Dave his place in history are being handed their redundancy notices.
William Campbell
April 4th, 2011 11:52am Report this commentThe reason it can't escape the small state accusation, or one of them, is that idiotic 'Big Society [smiley face], not Big Government [sad face]' slogan which proliferated about a year ago. It IS a cover for a smaller state. In fact, it ought to be, logically - if people are doing things voluntarily, we dont need the state to do them. Except working active productive people won't do much more voluntarily because their real incomes are falling and they're working longer than ever.
Thom Brooks
April 4th, 2011 3:39pm Report this commentThere is also a petition calling on the AHRC to remove "The Big Society" from its delivery plans with immediate effect (signed by over 2,500 academics) here: http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/thebigsociety/
Back to top