Gove steps in to keep the schools running
Peter Hoskin 12:04pm
A letter is bouncing around Whitehall, and I thought CoffeeHousers might care to see a
copy. It has been penned by Michael Gove, and is being dispatched to all headmasters today. It urges them to Keep Calm and Carry On during the impending strikes over teachers' pensions. "My
view," pens the education secretary, "is that we all have a strong moral duty to pupils and parents to keep schools open, and the Government wants to help you achieve that." You can
read the full thing below.
While much of this missive is dry, dry stuff — certainly drier than Gove's usual prose — it's also quite revealing of the government's approach to strikes. Although Danny Alexander and
Francis Maude are the frontmen in negotiations with the unions, other ministers may have to intervene outside of that, when their territory is at stake. Gove's emphasis in on keeping schools open;
only a week to go until we see whether he and the headmasters pull it off.
Dear colleague,INDUSTRIAL ACTION IN SCHOOLS
You will be aware that the ATL and NUT unions have both voted for industrial action following national ballots. It is therefore likely that action will take place on 30 June.
The source of the current dispute is the Government’s proposals for the reform of public service pension schemes, including the Teachers’ Pension Scheme. The dispute is, therefore, with the Government and not with schools or employers.
The Government has suggested proposals for the reform of pensions so they can be made sustainable and affordable for the future, whilst remaining fair to the workforce and the taxpayer.
I am aware that there are very strong feelings in the teaching profession about teachers’ pensions and I am personally committed to working openly, honestly and constructively to ensure that teachers continue to receive the high quality pensions that they deserve and value. The Government’s proposals on pensions are currently the subject of continuing discussion with national trade unions, including teaching unions. Against this background, the Government’s view is that industrial action, with the attendant risk of disruption to pupils’ education and family life, is not justified.
In the current situation both the public and parents will expect all of us to put the interests of pupils first. My view is that we all have a strong moral duty to pupils and parents to keep schools open, and the Government wants to help you achieve that. I am confident that you will take effective steps to do so where possible and I am aware that a number of our best school leaders are already putting in place contingency arrangements to ensure that their schools remain open, notwithstanding any industrial action taken on 30 June.
In reaching a decision, I know you will also consider the following issues:
— Opportunities to be flexible:
a) There is no statutory requirement to teach the National Curriculum every day of the school year;
b) Changes could be made to the structure of the school day;
c) There are no maximum general pupil-teacher ratios set out in law; with the exception of the infant class size limit; and
d) Senior management and support staff may fall within the definition of a “school teacher” for the infant/teacher ratios.
— Maximising your resources:
a) Seeking information in advance about how many of your staff will be taking industrial action, so that deployment decisions are well informed; and
b) Considering the full range of local resources available to you from within your school staff and the wider school community to ensure that wherever possible your school remains open.
I would also expect you to consider the following issues:
— Whether the absence of any key staff will pose particular risks, and whether there is anything that can be done to mitigate these, e.g. redeploying staff to cover absences; and
— The need to communicate clearly with parents in the event that closure or partial closure becomes necessary.
Further general advice for schools on the issues they should consider in the case of industrial action is available from employers, from headteachers’ associations and from a number of other sources, including the following:
— http://www.bis.gov.uk/policies/employment-matters/rights/trade-unions
— http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/employment-matters/docs/10-923-industrial-action-employer-guidance.pdf
— http://www.lge.gov.uk/lge/core/page.do?pageId=119711
MICHAEL GOVE



Previous






R Whitehand
June 23rd, 2011 12:34pm Report this commentit is good to see that Michael Gove is on the ball as usual. Also his letter is positive and constructive without blaming anyone. Head teachers now know what is expected of them in this situation.
Stepney
June 23rd, 2011 12:48pm Report this commentA* for getting the Government's point of view across.
F for being ridiculously patronizing. The advice section is going to go down like a bowl of cold sick. This is what Heads and Deputy heads do for a living for Christ's sake. They know all this in lumps.
They may as well write back advising him on how to open his briefcase, open a file or use the telephone.
Love him to bits but this, I have to say, is a bit of a boo-boo.
Tim W
June 23rd, 2011 1:04pm Report this commentPleased to see no Health and Safety guff. Good stuff from Gove if a little patronising and bland. Got to make sure teachers are on the wrong side of public opinion.
Ed P
June 23rd, 2011 1:47pm Report this commentOne simple, easy change to union law would stop this unjustified strike (& many more in the future). I suggest 50% of union MEMBERS should be required for a strike motion, not 50% of the returned ballot papers.
michael
June 23rd, 2011 2:26pm Report this commentWith fewer staff. Health and safety/risk assessments become the main excuse for closure.
David Lindsay
June 23rd, 2011 3:11pm Report this commentGove thinks that Shakespeare wrote Great Expectations. If that is how you get an English degree from Oxford, then thank goodness that Andy Burnham got his from Cambridge.
Gove is also an enormous admirer of Tony Blair, David Cameron, and all those Blair veterans whom Cameron would have appointed to his Cabinet if his party had won an overall majority.
Blair, of course, has never heard of either Shakespeare or Dickens.
Ian Walker
June 23rd, 2011 3:33pm Report this commentStepney: if the letter was actually intended for head teachers, you wouldn't be reading it on here.
Alan Scott
June 23rd, 2011 3:33pm Report this commentDear Mr Lindsay,
Please share with us (I for one will pay as long as it's cheaper than valium) whatever you use to induce the mental state which produces such disconnected mutterings.
The Engineer
June 23rd, 2011 3:39pm Report this commentre: David Lindsay - 3:11PM
I don't think anyone has any Expectations from him, other than a heap of irrelevant junk.
However, at least this one was mercifully brief!
Axstane
June 23rd, 2011 3:41pm Report this commentMichael Gove has at no time confused Shakespeare and Dickens nor has he said that he thought Great Expectations was written by Shakespeare. Back in
your kennel and less bloody nonsense please.
David Lindsay
June 23rd, 2011 4:12pm Report this commentIf we still had proper news media in this country, then Gove would have been toast long ago. He is a one-man disaster area whose plain daft flagship policy has so little take-up that it would have been abandoned but for two things: the noisy and rather self-serving support of an apparently irremovable London media ornament, and the fact that the Conservative Party had no other policy on any subject at the last General Election.
Malcolm Redfellow
June 23rd, 2011 9:55pm Report this commentWe know a trifle too much about Mr Gove's mannerisms, thanks to his wife in "The Times".
We also know that he believes in "a rooting in the basic scientific principles, Newton's laws of thermodynamics and Boyle's law."
Tom Chivers, in the "Telegraph", pointed out that confusing Newton with Lord Kelvin is "every bit as ridiculous, to a scientist’s ears (or mine), as getting the Bard and Dickens confused – it may have been a slip of the tongue, but it’s a particularly jarring one. But for some reason ignorance of science seems to be less shameful in certain circles than ignorance of the arts and humanities."
David Lindsay is therefore excused. Gove isn't.
Penalltgwyn
June 23rd, 2011 9:56pm Report this commentI'm a teacher. The goverment wants to increase our pension age, decrease our pension and wants us to take a pay cut (of probably 6%) for the privelage! They also fail to mention that the teachers pension scheme is in surplus. Fair? I don't think so.
Stepney
June 23rd, 2011 10:43pm Report this comment@Penalltgwyn
Your own words condemn thee.
The case rests m'lud.
Chris
June 23rd, 2011 11:51pm Report this comment'all headmasters'? I think you mean 'all head teachers in England.'
Rob
June 24th, 2011 6:12am Report this comment@Penalltgwyn
If your spelling and punctuation are any indication of your teaching ability, I'm amazed you think you're worth a salary, nevermind a pension. No wonder schools are turning out semi-literate kids these days....
William Moore
June 24th, 2011 10:56am Report this commentRob, speling and grammer dont matter anymore.
It's the thought that counts. Or probably not, come to think of it.
penalltgwyn
June 24th, 2011 11:44pm Report this comment@Rob/Stepney
Arts not science I take it!
Education standards are obviously plumetting, as many of the pupils I teach in a state secondary school achieve an A grade in their A level biology. Some even get into Oxbridge. What is the world coming to?
Back to top