Wednesday 19 November 2008

 

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Michael Henderson

Michael Henderson suggests


Thursday, 15th May 2008

Greed or need?

Peter Hoskin 1:30pm

Just to flag up another article from the latest issue for CoffeeHousers.  This one's by Rod Liddle, and he takes issue with the recent deluge of memoirs from Blairite figures.  As he puts it: 

"There is something simultaneously vile and pitiable in the procession of these famous names into their agents’ offices, determined to tell everybody that they were not remotely a party to the bad things that went on, that history should judge them much more kindly because they were on the side of the angels. And then, upon being exhorted with the lure of a few extra thousand quid, cheerfully sticking the boot into their former colleagues, some of whom, for obvious reasons, have a certain limited ability to defend themselves. And at the heart of all these outpourings, of this quick march to the lucrative confessional, is the thing which was at the very essence of Blairism — an infinite, consuming and unquenchable narcissism and vanity."

So what do CoffeeHousers think?  Are all those Blairites treacherous and avaricious?  Or are the memoirs a legitimate response to a decade of being undermined by Brown?  Head over to Rod's article and have your say in the comments section.

Click here for this week's magazine

Blogs: Americano | Trading Floor | Clive Davis | Melanie Phillips | Stephen Pollard

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink  |   Comments (4)

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

mitch

May 15th, 2008 1:59pm

The section in her memoirs on David Kelly's death is particularly odious, even for Mrs Blair; the woman who signed a copy of Lord Hutton's report for Labour party fund raising.

Compare and contrast her behaviour with his family's dignifide silence.

Desperate Dan

May 15th, 2008 3:20pm

Cherie Blair is almost indistinguishable from Heather Mills McCartney. They are both women who would be entirely unknown but for the accident of who they married. Both court publicity then complain about how they are portrayed by the press. Both have inflated ideas about their own worth. Both specialise in spreading malicious gossip about other people in the vain hope that they will be seen, by contrast, in a more sympathetic light. Both are deluded into thinking that anyone outside their immediate families gives a toss about what they think or do.

David Lindsay

May 15th, 2008 5:08pm

How we are all being reminded of just how ghastly the court of Tony Blair was.

As would be the court of David Cameron, with his product-placing wife.

salieri

May 15th, 2008 6:27pm

Come on, Pete, you can't post comparisons between Mrs. B and the ex-Mrs McC and expect the follow-ups to get in beneath the radar. As for my censored response, I plead both qualified privilege and justification.

Post a comment

Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

The Spectator Parliamentarian Awards
Spectator Book Club
The Spectator Billabong
Blog
Spectator recommends

The Captains Choice Tour

Luxury all inclusive travel to remote and exotic destinations.


Spectator classifieds

ROME CENTRE

PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique

City Breaks. ROME and PARIS

ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit  www.romanreference.com  and  www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.

Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).

Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs!  You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other