Subscribe to The Spectator

Saturday 26 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Tuesday, 6th September 2011

The reformist case for Clegg

James Forsyth 1:21pm

One ally of the deputy Prime Minister suggested to me yesterday that the press was missing the most significant aspect of Clegg’s speech on education: Clegg acknowledging that free schools would now be a permanent part of the educational landscape. This ally argued that this was a big deal given that a year ago Lib Dem conference had voted to boycott these schools.

The Lib Dem leader is considerably more liberal than his party. This means that he sometimes needs, so the argument goes, to sweeten the reformist pill with some Lib Dem rhetoric. Hence the emphasis on free schools being fair schools in yesterday’s speech.

But this internal Lib Dem party management is frustrating for Conservative ministers. They complain that it often leads to concessions which undermine the effectiveness of a whole policy.

Filed under: Coalition (2088 more articles) , Conservatives (2312 more articles) , Education (349 more articles) , Free schools (31 more articles) , Liberal Democrats (1155 more articles) , Nick Clegg (705 more articles) , UK politics (5407 more articles)

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (9) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Andy Carpark

September 6th, 2011 1:29pm Report this comment

Brian Blessed is a hairy man. But IDS is a noisy man.

Publius

September 6th, 2011 1:38pm Report this comment

"The Lib Dem leader is considerably more liberal than his party. This means that he sometimes needs, so the argument goes, to sweeten the reformist pill with some Lib Dem rhetoric. Hence the emphasis on free schools being fair schools in yesterday’s speech."

Oh, please! Is not Clegg the man who promised to be honest with the voters?

Instead his spinners are spinning to you, Mr Forsyth, who is now spinning to us.

Austin Barry

September 6th, 2011 1:42pm Report this comment

"They complain that it often leads to concessions which undermine the effectiveness of a whole policy."

That's an almost perfect definition of a 'coalition'. The apposite synonym would be 'eunuch'.

MilkSnatcher

September 6th, 2011 2:21pm Report this comment

So Nick Clegg is either dissembling to his own party or genuinely opposing free schools - or both. Hasn't he been found out a few times before like this?

William Blakes Ghost

September 6th, 2011 2:27pm Report this comment

Indeed the Libdems seem to be a roadblock to doing anything becoming the epitome of the establishment maintaining the status quo.

Of course all the time the country is sliding into an economic morass but hey what do we care as long as the weirdie beardies and sandal slappers convention are happy......

Salopian

September 6th, 2011 2:28pm Report this comment

One of the less endearting (actually very few) characteristics of some coffee housers is their apparent lack of any sort of empathy.

So c'm on guys hands up those who'd be happy to be in Clegger's shoes. He's got Granny Williams and Grandad Campbell with their collective amnesia that

1 the LibDems have got into power with fewer seats than they had in the previous Parliament
2 if the coalition fails then the LibDems will be ysterday's party for a political generation

And then there are the aparatchiks with ambitions to take over from Clegg but with absolutely no idea what they'd to - would any one of them want to be Deputy PM? Would the Tories let Big Dave give it to them?.

Clegg, Alexander, (Laws in the background) and one to others have got more then any of the above or Kennedy could have ever imagined.

Clegg's couldn't have got more and could have got a whole let less and still felt satisfied.

So good'on\'yer Cleggers lad. Don't let the dynasaurs (or some ot the Coffeehousrs) get you down

Frank P

September 6th, 2011 2:42pm Report this comment

THe question that needs to be answered is : "Is five years of no government (aka The Coalition), better than what would have been another five years of Barmy Bruin's bluster. On balance, the former, I suppose. But it's a damn close run thing.

disenfranchised

September 6th, 2011 4:06pm Report this comment

supposing that more of "barmy bruin's bluster" would be slightly less preferable than what we have under this coalition is even more barmy than barmy bruin. barmy in the extreme.
no matter what we have now - and my god, it's bad enough - nothing could ever be as bad as the total nightmare barmy would undoubtedly have got us into by now.....

Nicholas

September 6th, 2011 8:52pm Report this comment

Trouble is Frank that the current cock-up government + the leftist undertow almost guarantees another Labour government, whatever they call themselves this time, finishing the job of turning us into East Germany circa 1960.

As for Salopian, words almost fail me. Empathy? For this opportunistic fake? Christ, no wonder this country is so buggered up.

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

Tag Cloud

Coffee House archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk