Lansley offers reassurance
Peter Hoskin 7:05pm
After Gove, a minister whose agenda has gone less smoothly — and it showed. Andrew
Lansley's speech to Tory conference was part re-re-restatement of the case for reform, part massage for any residual tensions left over from the summer. Here's a five-point summary of the things
that stood out to me:
i) An appeal to NHS workers. Lansley began not just by paying extended tribute to NHS staff, but by encouraging everyone else to do the same. "I want to thank them," he said, "and I know we all want to thank them" — to which the audience duly responded with applause. Although this was designed to sweeten some of the less romantic rhetoric later on, it was still telling that Lansley should be quite so effusive at the start. There does seem to be growing concern among some Tories in Manchester that not enough is being done to reassure public sector workers, let alone attract their votes.
ii) Spending, spending, spending. One for the folder marked 'Unsurprising': Lansley made free and frequent mention of the Tories' plan for real-terms spending increases in the health budget. And he stretched the point even further: "Labour's plan would have meant cutting the NHS by £30 billion [by 2015]," he said, "Just think about the damage that would do." We don't need to dwell on the problem that equating "cuts" and "damage" might create for the Tories, but it is worth returning to Andrew's post from earlier. Fact is that, on current trends, the Tories' health spending pledge is looking very precarious indeed. Lansley may require more money from the Treasury if he isn't to break it.
iii) Labour, Labour, Labour. Of course we ought to expect a flurry of attacks on Labour at Tory conference, but Lansley's speech still stands out as one of the most pugnacious so far. The Opposition were mentioned a good dozen times, and in particularly unequivocal terms. For instance: "Labour and their trade union puppet-masters can push out their ludicrous lies all they like, and we will fight back with the facts."
iv) Not much policy… Which is understandable enough, given that the Health Bill is still crawling through the legislative chambers
v) …but a few treats for patients. Among which was the announcement that 50,000 more people will be given their own "personal budgets" for healthcare, through which they will have more control over their own treatment. As I've suggested before, the expansion in these personal budgets is one of this government's great, unheralded decentralising acts — and one that could also save the Exchequer some cash. Expect to see them deployed more extensively in the years ahead.



Previous






daniel maris
October 4th, 2011 8:57pm Report this commentWell might there be concern. If you impose a two year freeze with 5% inflation, increase pension and NI contributions massively, reduce state benefits, increase working age and sometimes working hours, and then threaten with redundancy as a final insult...what else should you be but worried. If Labour had a real Leader you'd be very worried.
glenlivetguy
October 4th, 2011 10:49pm Report this commentBut there is no choice.This year even after the freezes and small cuts and asking public sector to go some way to fund their unrivalled pensions...we will borrow £150billion i.e. add to the National Debt...more than the total annual cost of running the NHS in 2011.I call it immoral that we are asking our kids and their kids to pay for our health service today. Brown should be put on trial for financial mismanagement as sadly it will take a 5 year parliament to get even the Labour inherited structural deficit under control.
Verity
October 5th, 2011 1:37am Report this commentWelcome back, Pete!!!!! Hooray!!!!
Verity
October 5th, 2011 1:43am Report this commentGlenlivet Guy ... "sadly it will take a 5 year parliament to get even the Labour inherited structural deficit under control."
If the Tories, under posh socialist Dave Blancmange, even have the nous and the will to get it under control.
TrevorsDen
October 5th, 2011 7:16am Report this commentMr maris - Brown pledged in his manifesto to make 20 billion savings in the NHS budget - 17%. And on top of that labour were not going to ring fence health so their 'cuts' would have been deeper.
No one disputes that even standing still is a problem. The 20 billion savings are still going ahead.
The real question is wh,y if Brown thought it OK to make 20 billion savings to the NHS budget, did he spend the money in the first place?
Vettekulla
October 5th, 2011 9:11am Report this commentLansley must have been hugely cheered by the gibberish those so-called 400 health experts wrote to The Telegraph. I haven't read such gobbledegook as this since working for the United Nations over 20 years ago:
'sustained development of shared knowledge, understanding and trust across the different elements of the health care system, local government and communities - vital for the building of participatory and integrated responses to rising unemployment, youth alienation, fuel poverty, social inequality and homelessness'
Wow! Silly us - we thought the NHS existed to look after our health not to run the entire country, but then it does employ well over 1.2 million healthocrats so they have to find something to do.
Back to top