Europe bubbles to the surface in PMQs
James Forsyth 1:57pm
A particularly fractious PMQs today. Ed Miliband started by asking questions about Liam Fox which, frankly, seemed rather out of date given that Fox has already resigned. Cameron swatted them away fairly easy, mocking Miliband with the line "if you’re going to jump on a bandwagon make sure it is still moving".
But when Miliband came back on the economy, Cameron was far less sure footed. The Labour leader had one of those great PMQs facts: despite the government having issued 22 press releases about the regional growth fund in the last 16 months only two firms have received any money for it. A visibly irritated Cameron then said that all Miliband "wants to do is talk down the economy" which drew hoots of derision from the Labour side. After this, Cameron couldn't regain his usual command of the chamber for the rest of the session.
But perhaps the most significant moment of PMQs today came when Cameron was replying to a question about the backbench motion on a referendum on the European Union. Cameron implied that in the next parliament there would be opportunities both to repatriate powers and for a referendum. This seemed to inch the Tories closer to a position of promising renegotiation followed by a referendum which would, I expect, be enough to prevent a major rebellion next Thursday. Certainly, Downing Street does seem to be backing away from the confrontational talk of a three line whip against the motion that it was indulging in yesterday.



Previous






toco
October 19th, 2011 2:18pm Report this commentA clear victory for David Cameron.It is a bit rich for Red Ed to question Cameron on the economy when he has never applied for a job not even as a paperboy.He needs to apply for a job experience position before playing with the grown-ups.
Michael
October 19th, 2011 2:28pm Report this comment"Cameron implied that in the next parliament there would be opportunities both to repatriate powers and for a referendum"
He clearly still takes us for fools.
strapworld
October 19th, 2011 2:32pm Report this commentOn matters EU and a referendum. IF Cameron and his left wing liberal government demand a three line whip to vote against the motion for a referendum I believe that will create a swelling in the membership of parties opposed to the EU. It will also prove to everyone that Cameron dows not believe that the people should have any say whatsoever on the EU.
I do not trust Cameron and also William Hague on the EU. Both have proved to have lied to the people.
I do not expect the motion, if debated, to get a majority. There are too many A listers posing as conservatives on the backbenches. Time for a new party.
Jayu
October 19th, 2011 2:51pm Report this commentFraser, give a little credit to Milband. At least he is asking questions about Fox/Verity. Something both Cameron and yourself failed so miserably to do.
Peter From Maidstone
October 19th, 2011 2:52pm Report this commentstrapworld, I agree. It is time for a Real Conservative Party.
strapworld
October 19th, 2011 2:54pm Report this commentI think conservatives should read and John Wards blog and his expose of Cameron's recent 'untruths' on land! In particular 'England'
The question has to be can we believe anything Cameron says?
Tiberius
October 19th, 2011 3:05pm Report this commentJayu: have you committed a Freudian slip, or is there more to the former defence secretary's resignation than we so far know?
wrinkled weasel
October 19th, 2011 3:05pm Report this commentThere are no longer many, but the few who resign on matters of principle. I would have thought that the EU issue was one of them. That a Conservative PM is intent on whipping members not to vote in favour of a referendum -which is, after all, a vote about a vote - is beyond my comprehension.
Will there be no member of the government, not one, who will take a stand and vote for what he believes in? Or shall we, as Strapworld and others assert, find that Cameron's Tories are deserted at the next election for a party that will take the will of the people seriously?
PayDirt
October 19th, 2011 3:16pm Report this commentThis is supposed EU referendum split along national lines, such that Scotland could vote to stay in EU while people of England could decide to opt out, likewise Wales, Cornwall, Brixton...
London Calling
October 19th, 2011 3:19pm Report this commentA Freudian slip by Cameron in the House today…”power from Westminster - to Brussels” , he quickly corrected himself, although he was right the first time, the truth finds a way of slipping out on the right occasion…
PayDirt
October 19th, 2011 3:22pm Report this commentSorry I forgot Northern Ireland, perhaps they'd vote to be whatever Scottish majority happened to be.
London Calling
October 19th, 2011 3:25pm Report this commentPS…
No bubbles rising to the surface on Europe in the above clip you provided James…or did they go flat?
TrevorsDen
October 19th, 2011 3:48pm Report this commentThe notion that this is a left wing liberal government is a joke.
Its a Tory LD coalition, but it is no more left wing than Mrs Thatchers first administration.
You cannot vote in out unless you know what 'out' means. This is where the out argument begins to fall apart. The EU will not go away and will still influence us when and if we are ever 'out'.
The biggest bugbear that arouses people, the ECHR, is nothing to do with the EU. We actually wrote it.
Verity
October 19th, 2011 4:07pm Report this commentTiberius - Thanks! First good laugh of the day!
Writeangle
October 19th, 2011 4:13pm Report this commentThe EU is fatally wounded now with multi-trillion euro debts there is no way of paying back. It always had low growth but huge areas of the EU now have high unemployment and none of the elite have any idea how to fix it because they are by nature politicians and therefore clueless about economics finance risks technology and markets- all of which you need to be excellent in to get high growth.
Hexhamgeezer
October 19th, 2011 5:00pm Report this commentCameron and his fellow Euroloons are utterly terrified of a debate on Europe.
While they've got the msm in their pocket there should be enough avenues available on the www to get a proper airing of the issue.
We can stop those Little Euroloons in Fortress Brussels hampering our trade with the rest of the world for a start and make a start on reducing our permanent trade deficit with the restrictive EU bloc. We can take back VAT policy (and no Tobin or similar tax), trade regulation, employment policy immigration, energy policy, industrial policy, regional policy, agricultural policy (including fisheries) re-orientate it all in the UK's interests and save billions in internal regulation.
So what if we have to comply with EU rules on trade. They will have to abide by ours.
It is striking how even the most ardent Euroloons quickly resort to lies and nebulous concepts when backing that restrictive anti-democratic regime. Or how feeble the known advantages are - Visa free travel, big fkg deal, Peace In Europe (what? without half a million US/UK tanks and soldiers it really would have been the EUSSR).
As someone once said - Bring It On
Russell
October 19th, 2011 6:18pm Report this commentI sent my LibDem MP an e-mail explaining my position regarding an EU referendum and expressing my view that MP's who refuse to let the electorate have their say will find themselves jobless at the next general election.
Much to my amazement, my LibDem MP says he will vote for a referendum and supports a renegotiated contract.
Even Camerons seat will not be safe if he whips tories to vote against a referendum, likewise Miliband and Clegg.
Sean O'Hare
October 19th, 2011 7:34pm Report this comment@Russel
The fact your Lib Dem MP will vote for the referendum is very interesting. My MP Duncan Hames (Lib Dem Chippenham) tells me he will vote against. It would be great if you could ask your MP t contact mine at clue him up on what demoncracy is all about.
ex-Tory Voter
October 19th, 2011 8:45pm Report this commentI emailed my (Conservative) MP re my disquiet at the possible whip. All I've received so far is a standard acknowledgment. Since he only sent me a bland reply which effectively said no, but not in so many words, to my request that he sign the People's Pledge I'm not holding my breath that he won't vote against. This from an MP who professes to be EUrosceptic.
Back to top