In defence of technocrats
Daniel Korski 5:28pm
Is Mario Monti's administration in Italy democratic? Is Greece's new government? To
some, especially in the blogosphere, it is the exact opposite: a technocratic and undemocratic government foisted upon Italy and Greece by (circle as appropriate) Angela Merkel/Nicolas Sarkozy, the
Bilderberg Group/EUSSR, etc.
But nobody forced Silvio Berlusconi to resign. Nobody sacked him. Under pressure by the markets, he chose to resign. He could have stayed and nobody denied that he had a constitutional right to do so. It would have cost Italy dear, but he could have stayed. In addition, Monti was appointed to the Senate by the Italian president who himself is elected by Parliament in a joint session of the Chamber and the Senate, integrated with 58 representatives appointed by the twenty Italian regions. That's a lot of democratic mandates.
Further, Professor Monti's government will rely on the votes of the elected parties including Silvio Berlusconi's PDL. They are installing him and they can remove him at any time. They will also have to approve any reforms. The new Italian PM knows he relies on them — and their mandates — only too well. He has repeatedly underlined this in his public statements.
And this is key. The political parties are opting for a technocratic government because they dare not instigate the reforms they know are required. They want to rule, but not govern — and a technocratic interlude allows them to do that. Cowardice? Yes. An indictment of Italy's politics? Yes. Undemocratic? No.
What of elections? Right now in Italy, nobody seems to want elections; neither the PDL nor the DP, nor the President and the new PM. If more than 80 per cent of the legislature do not want elections and chose to install a technocratic government, how is that undemocratic?
Finally, most Italians I've spoken with — including officials, politicians, businesspeople, journalists and analysts — seem happy to see the end of bunga bunga politics and want to be saved, not go to the polls. They may change their minds as the Monti government begins its reforms. The political parties may yank their support. Eventually, elections will happen. But, for now, the majority seem to accept the course followed as necessary and democratic. So should outsiders.



Previous








adrian drummond
November 17th, 2011 5:34pm Report this commentWhat twaddle...
Mycroft
November 17th, 2011 5:44pm Report this commentGood effort to defend the indefensible; something has plainly gone very wrong with Italian democracy. Thank God that a similar arrangement is simply unthinkable in this country!
reynard
November 17th, 2011 5:47pm Report this commentWe realise you are a wind up merchant and are probably good business as far as traffic to the blogs is concerned.
But the answer to your opening gambit is no.
fergus pickering
November 17th, 2011 5:47pm Report this commentGood Heavens, I don't care what Italians do. They can elect Mussolini, who might be a better bet than this 'technocrat'. Would you define technocrat? What particular skill does he have except picking up a large salary for doing bugger all. All EU technocrats know how to do that, certainly.
TomTom
November 17th, 2011 5:59pm Report this commentDemocracy is a bit of a sham really Daniel. Mussolini ran Italy for years and de Gaulle was almost a Fascist himself. Europe has a long tradition of non-democratic government; think of Franco and Salazar. It may be that the wheel is turning and we are returning to the old ways in Europe
London Calling
November 17th, 2011 6:00pm Report this commentPapandreou’s calls for a Referendum = Goodbye Papandreou’s, and is replaced by unelected Eurostar = Goodbye Democracy…
Berlusconi calls the Euro a failure since Italy Joined = Goodbye Berlusconi. and is replaced with unelected Eurostar (without not one elected politician present) = Goodbye Democracy…
All in the name of preserving the Euro = European Dictatorship…
London Calling
November 17th, 2011 6:02pm Report this commentTesting 123...
Its way past the point of being accused of being sceptical…the facts speak for themselves…whatever the UK does, it must do so quietly, rewards for solutions only exposes your possible options allowing the opposition to counteract…
In the words of Lord Judge to the EU/ECHR two days ago…Don’t push your luck…
Lord Chief Justice 'fears EU may stop our judges defying Strasbourg'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2062029/Lord-Chief-Justice-tells-ECHR-dont-push-luck-new-rights-showdown.html#ixzz1dz7jRYmD
Phil
November 17th, 2011 6:06pm Report this comment"If more than 80 per cent of the legislature do not want elections and chose to install a technocratic government, how is that undemocratic?"
What do you think the "demos" stands for?
David Lindsay
November 17th, 2011 6:11pm Report this commentGeorge Osborne is a member of the Bilderberg Group. So there we have it. That, and that alone, is why this fabled body receives practically no coverage. If it will stoop to allowing him into it, then it cannot have anything of any real interest or importance to cover.
Frank P
November 17th, 2011 6:15pm Report this commentThe arrogance of you and your Europhile bureaucratic toadies (a.k.a. - new ephemism - 'technocunts') is breathtaking, even though we have grown to expect it from you.
"Eventually, elections will happen, but for now the majority seem [sic] to accept that the course followed as necessary and democratic. So should outsiders."
How could you possibly know without an election, you twat? The risible nonsense of that statement and final imperative is rich even for you. No doubt you're from the Cameron school of thinking on referendums.
Liz Brown
November 17th, 2011 6:15pm Report this commentSo, noone forced him to go but I didn't see much supportfrom other EU leaders help him to stay and how very convenient that Monti just happened to be waiting in the wings.......
You can't call an election if there is no Opposition and who in the Government (unelected technocrats the lot of them) will vote themselves out of a sinecure?
What will happen, however, is that when the Italians waken up to the extent of the takeover and the facts of the austerity measures, then we will see just how thrilled your new happy Italians really are
Jon Rosenberg
November 17th, 2011 6:18pm Report this commentJust because the Italian legislature and political parties have acceded to demands of the European elites, does not make the situation democratic. After all if a man holds a gun to your head and make demands of you it's not generally considered that your subsequent statements are reflective of your own free willed volition.
salieri
November 17th, 2011 6:19pm Report this commentGreat post, if it had only been the first paragraph. Didn't we just know the second would start with 'but'?
Frank P
November 17th, 2011 6:19pm Report this comment"Nobody forced Berlusconi to resign'. Bawaaahahahahahaha! Oh what a whimsical wanker you are Daniel!
Falco
November 17th, 2011 6:22pm Report this commentAh yes the old "Democracy is difficult, lets try one of the forms of despotism instead." argument.
Andy Carpark
November 17th, 2011 6:22pm Report this comment'including officials, politicians, businesspeople, journalists and analysts'
Korski, If you have ever met anyone who is NOT an official, politician, businessperson, journalist or analyst, I will eat my hat.
The logic of your penultimate paragraph could also have been used to defend the indefinite prolongation of the Rump Parliament.
RocketDog
November 17th, 2011 6:26pm Report this commentIf more than 80 per cent of the legislature do not want elections and chose to install a technocratic government, how is that undemocratic?
Vox Populi? I don't think so
M42
November 17th, 2011 6:49pm Report this commentD.K. - Barking.....Completely and utterly barking.....
Publius
November 17th, 2011 7:10pm Report this commentBy Korski's formula, Hitler too was democratic.
Andy Leeds
November 17th, 2011 7:19pm Report this commentI sometimes feel a bit sorry for Korski. He does get a lot of stick here. But God's Death is the man a complete idiot ? Within the last two weeks we have witnessed two 'coups' in Europe. I did not think I would ever live to see this, and it makes my blood run cold. Berlusconi was, for all his faults, the democratically elected leader of the Italian Government. George Papandreou was the democratically elected leader of the Greek Government. No matter what you think of either of them we should set much more store by elections. We need to be wary of those who set aside such things merely because they do not serve their purposes. Europe has a bloody history of such things. The fact Korski seems to throw in his lot with these would be tyrants is a despicable.
James
November 17th, 2011 7:26pm Report this comment"Under pressure by the markets, he chose to resign."
Pressure? What pressure?
Market prices on bond yields are a reflection of confidence and risk, that's all. They don't exert political pressure in the same way that Merkozy can.
Mary C
November 17th, 2011 7:29pm Report this commentIn Italy and Greece you have coalitions cobbled together with policies no-one voter for supposedly to fix a national economic .Just like the UK.
In2minds
November 17th, 2011 8:01pm Report this comment"most Italians I've spoken with — including officials, politicians, businesspeople, journalists and analysts" -
The great and the good, just like DK! So bollocks to the ordinary voter?
Mudplugger
November 17th, 2011 8:30pm Report this commentAin't it just like buses......
You wait more than 60 years for a Gauleiter to come along, then a whole cabinetful arrives at once..
jheath
November 17th, 2011 9:08pm Report this commentSo the politicians may be useless and corrupt etc.etc., but their technocratic advisers and EU commissioners do not seem to have given good advice. The central bankers have fed the political overspending and overborrowing, and none have resigned in outrage. But then they become the new masters of the universe.
If Cameron ever gets stroppy with the EU will we get a technocrat? Or will Mandelson or Clegg suffice?
Dimoto
November 17th, 2011 9:42pm Report this commentWho can blame the Italian politicians ?
They are having what will be a deeply unpopular programme of austerity, imposed on them by Merkozy, which will not solve the fundamental problem of loss of competitivity.
The politicians are basically saying: OK, you force us to do this, then YOU take the responsibility.
And when the population start getting restless, who will deal with them ?
What mandate will the police have Mr Korski ?
George Stewart
November 17th, 2011 9:47pm Report this commentBy this logic;
Quadafi was the democratic leader of Libya.
So is Assad in Syria.
Saddam Hussain in Iraq.
When direct democracy is short circuited, trouble will happen.
Cynic
November 17th, 2011 10:09pm Report this commentGiven that Berlusconi did resign (did he do it willingly or was he forced?), there should have been an election. That would have been democratic. There wasn't. Somebody unelected was parachuted in to take control. What's democratic about that? Even Gordon Brown was elected by the voters of Kirkaldy before the backroom deal.
anon
November 17th, 2011 10:33pm Report this commentNobody forced the Hungarian government out in 1956 they could've stayed, of course. Same with the Czech government in 1968. The people were happy when they saw the Soviet tanks coming to restore order. Really they were. The Politburo in Moscow said so and I've no reason to disbelieve them...
fergus pickering
November 17th, 2011 11:21pm Report this commentTomTom, I resent, on behalf of the people of France, the description of the General as almost a fascist. He and Mrs T would have got on famously. On second thoughts, no they wouldn't.
Foundavoice
November 18th, 2011 2:33am Report this commentEx-civil servant and current European Council on Foreign Relations Senior Policy Fellow Daniel Korski comes out in defence of EU technocrats.
Quelle surprise.
He conveniently ignores the meeting between Mer-Kozy, the IMF and ECB to provide a co-ordinated political and market based attack on Silvio.
But what's the point in arguing with the man? He's not honest enough to state his vested interest in the article.
michael
November 18th, 2011 6:49am Report this commentTechnocrats = bankers... well who better to tax the poor to give to the banks.
D. Singh
November 18th, 2011 7:17am Report this commentSir
Has Mr Korski failed to study Plato’s ‘The Republic’ and its thesis for rule ‘by the Guardians’?
Mr Korski would do well to study Sir Karl Popper’s ‘The Open Society and its Enemies’?
It is now only a matter of time before Jews and practising Christians, on the continent of Europe, reach for their passports.
Tarka the Rotter
November 18th, 2011 8:34am Report this commentIn defence of democracy...does anyone know if we can use these e-petitions to hold the likes of Blair and Brown to account for the damage they've done to the constitution of this country and for engaging in war under false pretences? We are far too passive - time to unleash the demos, don't you think?
oldtimer
November 18th, 2011 9:39am Report this commentPure spin. And no mention of the manipulation of, and intervention in the Italian bond market by the ECB, nor of the arcane activities of the Frankfurt group in and around the G20 meeting.
Thomas Paine
November 18th, 2011 10:39am Report this commentQuite. The kneejerk foaming at the mouth over these events gives the right a bad name. There's plenty of real stuff to criticise relating to EU behaviour without indulging in fantasy.
Richard Bates
November 18th, 2011 12:16pm Report this commentA sensible piece - certainly compared with much that has appeared in the British press. Worth adding that the Italian constitution lays down that recourse to an election when a government falls is the last, and not the first, resort. The President is obliged to consult all the party leaders to see if there is a possible alternative majority. Normally this would be led by a politician, but that is by no means obligatory, and there are at least two recent exceptions (Ciampi and Dini in 1993 and 1995). In this case they obviously recommended Monti as someone with sufficient authority and broad-based approval. One of the reasons, of course, is that none of the parties wants to have to put its own name to the difficult economic decisions that they have been putting off for decades.
Of course, the anti-EU brigade, who are so vociferous in the British press, won't care tuppence for these considerations. But what has happened this week is absolutely in accordance with due democratic process in Italy.
Jonathan Woolf
November 18th, 2011 12:20pm Report this commentI know the Spectator employs Korski for the same reasons the Telegraph employ Riddell, to wind us all up and get traffic. But sometimes I wonder if his articles aren't actually written as satire by Messrs Nelson and co.
The new regimes now in power in Greece and Italy were installed by France and Germany, under cover of the EU, and are led by dyed-in-the-wool Eurocrats. And not just any Eurocrats, but an ex-ECB deputy and ex-Commissioner. That these regimes are therefore a result of an EU coup is beyond doubt.
Just like the recent military regimes that deposed politicians in Pakistan and Thailand, to take a couple of recent examples, these EU juntas are getting an initial welcome, or so it seems (based on some pretty thin or anecdotal evidence). I suspect this won't last much beyond their first act of austerity. Then it will get interesting - will we see French and German troops on the streets of Athens and Rome, to help "maintain stability" and "ensure compliance with the bailout terms"? Because none of these EU juntas have their own tanks and soldiers.
John Bowman
November 18th, 2011 2:03pm Report this comment"But nobody forced Silvio Berlusconi to resign. Nobody sacked him."
Nobody forced Socrates to drink hemlock. Nobody killed him.
Castor de Boberis
November 18th, 2011 3:44pm Report this commentDemocracy is not so much about what is often the myth of people power exercised through the opinion of a numerical majority but rather lies in the separation if the three powers.
Frank P
November 18th, 2011 8:45pm Report this commentJohn Bowman
But Socrates never simulated sex with a traffic warden and got himself posted on You Tube either John:
However the peripatetic old pouftah would probably have romped in the showers at Penn State University though.
Frank P
November 18th, 2011 8:47pm Report this commentJohn Bowman
I tried to post the link - but the software spat it out. Just go to You Tube, enter Berlusconi + Traffic Warden + simulated sex
Back to top