26 versus 1 — really?
Mats Persson 7:34am
Judging from much of the coverage in UK media, you would be forgiven for thinking that Britain is
on the fast track to becoming the North Korea of Europe — eccentric and completely isolated from the rest of the world. Indeed, the media narrative over the past couple of days has largely
treated the agreement reached at the summit as concrete, supported in full by everyone apart from Britain. Or ‘27-minus’, as Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso put it.
The reality, of course, is quite different. Leaving aside whether Cameron could have played his cards better (he could have), as Gideon Rachman pointed out in yesterday’s FT, ‘the picture of an isolated Britain’ will become blurred as the rest of Europe grapples with the Merkozy deal.
So let’s have a look at the level of support in cabinets and parliaments around Europe, for the deal’s main points: fiscal integration, stricter EU budget rules and sanctions, new rules for the euro’s permanent bailout fund (the ESM) and fresh cash contributions to the IMF.
France. For all the Sarkozy rhetoric, his main rival, the Socialist candidate Francois Hollande, leading him by 18 per cent in a hypothetical second round clash, has said that: ‘If I'm elected president, I'll renegotiate this deal...to add to it what it lacks today’, being particularly critical of constitutional limits on budget deficits.
Germany. Scratch the surface and the Germans aren’t overwhelmed either. In addition to the deal being seen as an insufficient to solve the crisis, the Bundesbank has warned that the proposed new IMF contributions could take Germany above the ‘bailout’ ceiling established by the Bundestag.
Denmark. The Merkozy deal appears to have split the newly-elected Danish centre-left coalition. Danish Foreign Minister Villy Søvndal (of junior coalition partners the Socialist People's Party), and PM Helle Thorning-Schmidt ( Social Democrats) have been accused of contradicting each other over whether the pact could restrict the government from pushing through its economic programme. The agreement is now pending analysis and approval in Folketinget, which will also consider whether a referendum is required (it’ll most certainly be avoided). A poll this week found that 54 per cent of Danes want the pact to go to a public vote.
Sweden. The Swedish minority government looks unlikely to get the necessary majority to get the package, as it stands, through the Riksdag. The leader of the opposition Håkan Jurholt has warned against becoming euro members ‘via the backdoor’. The centre-right coalition remains split on the issue, with PM Fredrik Reinfeldt saying that it would be a ‘bit strange’ for the country to join. Meanwhile, Swedes are becoming increasingly sceptical. A fresh poll out this week shows that over 80 per cent of Swedes would vote ‘No’ to the euro in a referendum, compared to 42 per cent two years ago, while support for EU membership has dropped from 55 per cent to 47 per cent in a year.
Poland. Opposition parties Democratic Left Alliance and the Law and Justice parties have warned that the deal would violate the Polish Constitution, and therefore needs a two-thirds majority in both houses of the Polish Parliament, which is far from guaranteed. Law and Justice has even threatened to over-turn the agreement once in power (which, it should be said, can be a while). The government maintains that the pact actually won’t impact on Poland until it joins the euro.
Finland. The Grand Committee in the Finnish Parliament has launched an inquiry into whether the country’s Prime Minister Jyrki Katainen potentially over-stepped his mandate in the negotiations in Brussels last week. In its current form, the deal is unlikely to pass Parliament as the majority rule for the activation of the ESM (meaning Helsinki will be stripped of its veto over future bailouts) will require a two-thirds majority in the Parliament to be compatible with the country’s Constitution. Such super-majority looks unlikely since the main opposition parties the Centre Party and the Finns (previously ‘True Finns’) both oppose the deal.
Czech Republic. Prime Minister Petr Necas told the Czech press, ‘It wasn't possible to sign up to this international agreement for a number of reasons. But the main reason was this – nobody knows what's in it’, saying that the deal will need approval form his Parliament. In addition, the Czech Finance Minister Miroslav Kalousek yesterday said that the suggested additional IMF contribution is ‘extremely high,’ estimated by the Czech Central Bank to be equal to 10 per cent of official Czech reserves, something echoed by Czech President Vaclav Klaus.
Hungary. Hungarian PM Viktor Orban will let the Hungarian parliament decide whether to agree to the deal, although with his Fidesz party enjoying a solid two-thirds majority, he could in theory easily push it through should he want to.
Netherlands. The situation is not fully clear, with the Social Democrats appearing to have backtracked on their previous request for early elections to be called if further transfers of sovereignty to the EU were to take place under last week’s agreement. With the Social Democrats, the government would have the majority needed to push through the agreement.
Ireland. Ireland will decide whether it needs to be put the agreement to a referendum when the details of the agreement are clearer (probably March), with chances for a vote seen
as 50-50. Deputy PM Eamon Gilmore also said that ‘I believe there will be a lot of discussion on that between now and March. I will be surprised
if Britain is not involved in that discussion’.
Estonia. The Finance Ministry has said that the country will not
contribute to the agreed €200 billion IMF capitalisation, even though the country is a member of the eurozone.
So is it fair to reduce this myriad of opinions and political positions to a 26 versus 1 discussion? You decide.
Mats Persson is director of Open Europe.
Every morning Open Europe produces a round-up of news from all around Europe. If you would like to receive the press summary by email, please sign up here. For live updates from around Europe, follow Open Europe on twitter, @openeurope



Previous






Ben McGinn
December 14th, 2011 8:10am Report this commentYou've left out the dismissal of the IMF funding part of this "non-agreement" by the US, China and Japan.
This so called agreement will never make it to the statute books.
David L
December 14th, 2011 8:32am Report this commentInteresting, and not surprising. Need to take account of Germany's ability to bully heavily indebted nations, such as Hungary. But the national political dimension over the next few weeks and months is going to be fascinating. And if there are to be referendums, then the euro will run out of road. Despite the awful economic shock that would cause, I'm beginning to think that may be the best outcome in the long term.
JohnOfEnfield
December 14th, 2011 8:38am Report this comment..and even if it were unanimously approved "tomorrow" it will certainly not save the Euro. See Anatole Kaletsky in the Times(£) today.
"The Emperor has no clothes!" (Sorry Angela).
Kennybhoy
December 14th, 2011 8:58am Report this commentDavid L on December 14th, 2011 8:32am
Unusually coherent and rational post Young Maister! Interesting times indeed...
Andy Leeds
December 14th, 2011 9:21am Report this commentThe Euro is and always has been a load of rubbish. These idiots are so determined to save it they will happily destroy the European economy and Democracy to do so.
Luke
December 14th, 2011 9:22am Report this commentOh thats even more tragic. Cameron has thrown away many of britain's best EU alliances to opt out of a deal that may never even happen
backs to the wall
December 14th, 2011 9:22am Report this commentThe EUSSR does have its dissidents then.
Its a fair bet that Merkozy know who they are and what they are going to achieve sometime before they themselves do
So maybe this treaty is merely a punt attempting to kick the euro can off the pitch and into the stands, instead of endlessly dribbling it around the centre circle.
-It's very likely to hit the post and
rebound.
Julian F
December 14th, 2011 9:30am Report this comment"Leaving aside whether Cameron could have played his cards better (he could have)"
Could he really? Seems to me that Cameron got exactly what he wanted from this affair: political kudos; a defining moment in his premiership; a renewed lead in the opinion polls; humiliation of the Lib Dems; confusion in the Labour Party; comfortable victory in a parliamentary motion to commend his actions; spared the discomfort of having to debate and defend an unworkable and unpopular Treaty amendment; looked up to by the smaller non-Euro Member States who are now thankful that he secured them a cooling off period; Europe on notice that the UK is no longer a push-over; and almost a guarantee that the French and Germans will come crawling back with concessions when they have got over their initial misplaced anger.
Couldn't have played it better, as far as I can see.
TomTom
December 14th, 2011 9:39am Report this comment"You've left out the dismissal of the IMF funding part of this "non-agreement" by the US, China and Japan."
Or the fact that the Bundesbank is opposed without Bundestag approval and will only fund the General Agreement to Borrow and not any Special Facility and only if the UK agrees to contribute
disenfranchised
December 14th, 2011 9:44am Report this comment27! twenty seven countries! and they'd have another twenty for us to fund if they weren't such total basket cases (there are countries in worse shape than greece). they'd make europe stretch to the pacific!
the sole thing that sustains me, that gives me hope when i look at their ugly mugs - god, they're an ugly bunch - is the quite beautiful nigel farage giving them some reality to chew on.
if there's one thing an EU nutter hates, above all else, it's a bit of reality shoved down his throat, especially from a bloke who can tie all of 'em up in knots.
god bless nigel farage.....
RKing
December 14th, 2011 9:44am Report this commentHas anyone asked the BBC don't they make the decisions in this country???
sandy
December 14th, 2011 9:50am Report this comment"Is it fair...."?
Depends on whether or not you're the BBC.
Andrew Fletcher
December 14th, 2011 10:06am Report this commentAs the Times reports today Cameron will be ambushed by the Sceptics at the Eurozone bail out fund vote in February
The PM is now firmly in the pocket of the 81 and has no choice but to do as he's told by them
It will indeed be an English Spring
All the sound folk on here should get in touch with the 81 and support their efforts to keep Cameron in line (remember he is a Wet at heart and will try to wriggle off the hook at the earliest opportunity)
The Wets will squeal about party unity but with Ed Mili as leader Labour will pose no threat - Now is the time for action
Make sure Cameron stays a puppet of thew 81
Nicholas
December 14th, 2011 10:20am Report this commentThe usual scripted propaganda from Labour and the BBC where they try desperately hard to seed the same soundbites in the public consciousness (Campbell, pre-1997) might, in the longer term, look very foolish. But whether they will ever be held to account for it remains doubtful. Labour are past masters at ducking their responsibilities and shifting blame. But they need to be nailed and nailed good over this and many other crimes.
Cameron needs to tackle the BBC, if not directly, at least by creating a cogent counter to its pro-Labour, pro-EU nonsense.
Julian F
December 14th, 2011 10:35am Report this commentLuke 9.22am: "Oh thats even more tragic. Cameron has thrown away many of britain's best EU alliances to opt out of a deal that may never even happen".
The point is that this deeply flawed Treaty amendment probably would have happened if Cameron had signed up, because they would have achieved unanimity at the Summmit. What Cameron has done is buy the other states time to review their positions. Some are already beginning to state their gratitude to him for this (not that it's reported on the BBC). New Europe will end up on the UK's side and old Europe (France/Germany) will come crawling back when they realise their errors. Win-win for Cameron. The more I think about all this, the more impressed I am by the PM. As Boris said, he "played a blinder".
Frank P
December 14th, 2011 10:35am Report this commentJulian F
Seems like a good summary of outcomes as far as it goes. Trouble is you still haven't addressed the pachyderm in the parlour: a referendum on repatriation of powers and annulment of the Human Rights nonsense that is rendering our judicial system virtually redundant.
At best the Euro project limps on, even though we have set an example of 'defiance' that may become contagious.
And the jihad in all its overt and covert determination rolls on.
That's all apart from the uncomfortable reality of the LimpDem Party having its legs around Cameron's neck, a la the 'Old Man of the Sea' fable. Is it likely that he can get through the turgid political waters flowing between now and 2015 with that to contend with? I doubt it! The last question is even more important - where have the 'Great and the Good' invested their money? When money talks, bullshit walks.
Lance Grundy
December 14th, 2011 10:42am Report this commentBut anyone taking their news from the BBC wouldn't know any of this.
Brownloather
December 14th, 2011 10:43am Report this commentRegardless of what the other european nations think or do:
We never pay anyone eurogeld
No matter how trifling the cost
For the end of that game is oppression and shame
And the nation that plays it is lost.
Apologies to Rudyard but he summed it up nicely for me.
Malcolm Porter
December 14th, 2011 10:49am Report this commentSome idiots suggest that Britain is, or will be marginalised, are we not marginalised by being at the table at 26 to one? Nah, out of the EU will give Britain 100% control of its own afairs, not a lot wrong with that!
disenfranchised
December 14th, 2011 10:53am Report this commentthe bbc, rabid tribalists relentlessly playing out their shameful political agenda at the public's expense.
having finally reached tipping point and given up on them completely a while ago - i could take no more. it had got to the point where i was seeing a political message in the weather forecast - i find life without them quite blissful. of course, there are perhaps one, maybe two things, without political messages that i'm forsaking, but ho-hum.
now all i have to do is get the missus off the ludicrously-inclusive archers, and my grandchildren, the poor little conditioned mites, off the pc-frenzied cbeebies.....
Frank P
December 14th, 2011 11:08am Report this commentLance Grundy
BBC - Brussels Broadcasting Conspiracy?
Mycroft
December 14th, 2011 11:16am Report this commentExcellent informative post, I hope you'll be posting regularly here on European issues.
Ian Walker
December 14th, 2011 11:55am Report this commentJulian F - excellent summary. In particular, Cameron's turned the divisice 'Eurosceptic' issue into a much more unifying 'hate the French.'
Valerie T
December 14th, 2011 11:56am Report this commentCzech Finance Minister Miroslav Kalousek may have described the contribution as "extremely high," but he says he wants to help negotiate it down, not to avoid paying it altogether. Kalousek says the country can't afford to reject the EU crisis plan, and that it's a foreign policy decision, not a budgetary one.
Andy Carpark
December 14th, 2011 12:13pm Report this commentLance Grundy - Are you that bloke that interviewed the Sex Pistols?
Forlornehope
December 14th, 2011 12:19pm Report this commentYesterday Die Welt was reporting that a majority of Germans now think that Germany would be "better off out" to coin a phrase.
Perry, a Heartless (Romantic) Curmudgeon
December 14th, 2011 12:21pm Report this commentPLEASE! - will someone (it should be the H2B) DO something about the Biased Bullsh*t Co-operative - in that if I wanted the Socialist-PC-Grauniad perspective on the world I would buy the necessary papers!
I DO NOT expect to be forced to pay a Telly Tax to have such baloney rammed down my throat!
mattghg
December 14th, 2011 12:28pm Report this comment@Julian F
Some are already beginning to state their gratitude to him for this (not that it's reported on the BBC)
Could you please provide a source for this? I'd like to be able to direct other people in its direction.
Terrible BUt True
December 14th, 2011 1:35pm Report this commentOi... have a care!
Much more of this 'wrong kind of facts on the line', and you'll have the DG of the BBC claiming you are out to get them, and their narrative, along with other rabid low lives from the print world, like the Daily Mirror.
I think he's miffed 'cos folk are starting to notice, well, that Aunty is beginning to 'whiff' a bit in public.
Russell
December 14th, 2011 2:28pm Report this commentNick really should have said "I agree with Dave" on Friday and left it at that.
David L
December 14th, 2011 2:52pm Report this commentThe BBC has received lots of complaints about its biase coverage of the euro crisis, in response ro which its Director of News, Helen Boaden has posted a reply on the BBC's Editors Blog site, saying (I paraphrase) 'I have concluded that our coverage has not ben biased because I say so'.
Cutting the licence fee further would be a welcome tax cut for a struggling nation. Failing that, then how about independent handling/scrutiny of complaints of political bias? One for "Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt".......
Julian F
December 14th, 2011 3:06pm Report this commentmattghg: Actually I must credit the BBC with the following report: " "Thank you, David Cameron," thundered the headline in Saturday's Magyar Nemzet, a daily newspaper close to the governing centre-right Fidesz party in Hungary."
It is be found at this link:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-16136207
Kristo Miettinen
December 14th, 2011 3:12pm Report this commentNo, the UK isn't on track to become the NK of Europe, but rather the USA of Europe - the stodgy and necessary backstop that can and will veto the bad ideas that nobody wants to implement but everyone wants to pander with... the one that gets universally pilloried in public but selectively appreciated in private.
Julian F
December 14th, 2011 3:17pm Report this commentAnd my apologies to the BBC for unfairly maligning them (on this one point...)
oldtimer
December 14th, 2011 3:38pm Report this comment@Frank P
..or British Brainwashing Conspiracy
Terrible But True
December 14th, 2011 3:53pm Report this commentDavid L - hidden away a bit, isn't it?
She says a lot of things that appear based for substantiation on her saying them. Good job she's not in charge of too much that depends on judgement or trust.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2011/12/the_challenge_of_reporting.html
Cynic
December 14th, 2011 5:57pm Report this comment"A poll this week found that 54 per cent of Danes want the pact to go to a public vote." If the Danish MPs are anything like our lot, that's guaranteed not to happen, then.
Marcher Baron
December 14th, 2011 6:01pm Report this comment"A fresh poll out this week shows that over 80 per cent of Swedes would vote ‘No’ to the euro in a referendum, compared to 42 per cent two years ago, while support for EU membership has dropped from 55 per cent to 47 per cent in a year." That bears out what my Swedish friends have been telling me. Sweden voted no to the euro but I note that the government didn't get an opt-out from Maastricht!
Cynic
December 14th, 2011 6:05pm Report this comment"But the main reason was this – nobody knows what's in it’ ..." If that's true and people did blindly sign up, one wonders about their competence for office! Who in their right mind signs up for something unknown. What the heck might be in the small print?
John Emsley
December 14th, 2011 6:26pm Report this commentAs so often happens, a few days reflection puts things in a better perspective. The Westminster bubble has had its flurry of narcissistic posturing and the press has been able to flash some lurid headlines.
Calm down dears....
As this (sound) article sets out, the UK is most certainly not in a 26-1 situation as has been depicted over the last few days.
Cameron should have been better briefed and his team should have been more on board BUT the deal on offer to save the euro was and isn't on. Other countries are coming round to Cameron's (however trigger happy) view.
In addition, to watch Clegg and Huhne systematically destroy the LibDems credibility in five days is simply fascinating......
Let's just say 20-7-for now-shall we?
AliC
December 14th, 2011 10:10pm Report this commentWe can only pray that Dave continues to tell the Euro 'emperor's new clothes' brigade to 'Jog on'.
Dimoto
December 15th, 2011 2:14am Report this commentOne of the more outrageous aspects of this mess, is the disgusting role played by Lagarde.
Newly appointed, over the protests of much of the world, she appears to think her job at the IMF is to be bag-woman to Sarkozy.
She constantly steps outside her mandate, until brought to heel by the US.
And WHY was she allowed to be "present at the summit" which was supposed to be for EU leaders only ??
A very bad decision by the FO/Cameron to back this conniving wretch.
Who will be first to censure her, Geithner maybe ?
Matthew
December 15th, 2011 6:23pm Report this commentVery good article.
So why the hell did they all sign up?!
Phil Richmond
December 16th, 2011 5:17am Report this commentI dont think the British people have realised yet that the goal of Brussels is to do away with the Nation states. i,e Britain ceases to exist as a sovereign country. The real danger is that 100% of the Lib-Dems/ 90% of the Labour Party and the Tory leadership are in favour of this. Quisling scum all of them.
Custom Floor Mats
January 17th, 2012 2:27pm Report this commentOh, really! Thanks for the article.
Back to top