Miliband is trapped in his own foggy argument
Peter Hoskin 1:50pm
With one well-timed jab in PMQs, David Cameron turned much of this week's political
debate – in domestic terms, at least – into a debate about Ed Miliband's leadership. And how is Miliband responding? Predictably, for the most part. His celebratory speech in Feltham
and Heston this morning reduced down to the claim that the result 'offers a verdict on the Government's failed economic plan'. And his interview in today's FT covers much of the same territory.
But the FT interview is also revealing in one particular regard: it demonstrates, once again, how Miliband is caught in a strange, undefinable strategy somewhere between attack and defence. This was, if you remember, a feature of his first speech as Labour leader – and here it crops up again. In his rush to criticise the Tories, he lambasts their deficit reductioneering as 'too far, too fast'. But, in a counter-rush not to sound too left-wing, he also admits that 'We are not going to have lots of money to spend ... It's not going to be a situation that we saw after the 1997 election where we had big investment in the public realm.' And he even chucks in the Blarite rallying cry, 'Efficiency and reform will be essential right across every area.' These may all be reconcilable positions, but when uttered by Miliband, and coupled with his party's thin policy offering, they come across as neither here, nor there.
On reading all those snippets, part of me felt slightly sorry for the Labour leader. In a clumsy, accidental sort of way, he is actually highlighting that there isn't as much fiscal difference between Labour and the Tories as Ed Balls would have you believe: both would restrain their spending, both would cut. But then I noticed him suggesting that Labour would 'pay down the debt' – when, actually, by any measure, the Darling Plan proposed nothing of the sort – and the sympathy vanished. Miliband's is a foggy, nebulous position. Labour MPs might well ask whether it's going to get them anywhere.



Previous






Frederick James
December 16th, 2011 2:08pm Report this commentOne begins to wonder whether Ed Miliband does actually think that reducing the deficit means the debt is being paid off. He does not have a numerate background, but it's a bit chilling if he doesn't even understand that much.
Surely it could not be deliberate obfuscation.
Dave B
December 16th, 2011 2:16pm Report this comment"he is actually highlighting that there isn't as much fiscal difference between Labour and the Tories"
Both parties are irresponsibly ignoring the government's overspending problem.
sandy
December 16th, 2011 2:19pm Report this commentHe's doing a great job,just the kind of leader Britain needs the Labour party to have.
Heartless P.
December 16th, 2011 2:21pm Report this comment... Miliband's is a foggy, nebulous position ... sort of, - to push metaphors even further, - lost in space?
Heartless P.
December 16th, 2011 2:25pm Report this commentAfterthought - is he serving onions with it by any chance? attracting the Northern climes an' all?
Halcyondaze
December 16th, 2011 2:27pm Report this commentOver-grown leftie student union rep. Or adenoidal half-wit. You decide.
E Hart
December 16th, 2011 2:34pm Report this commentWell said. Labour is Coalition-lite. This is a lions dressed as lemmings moment. The whole of the Western World has bought the myth of expansionary austerity. This will lead them all into another recession. It remains to be seen whether they will conclude in their collective delusion that they should cut still further to get out of it. The EU countries have an excuse - they are tied into the Euro. Britain and the US are sleep-walking voluntarily into this whilst controlling their own currencies, interest rates, printing presses etc. Expansionary austerity has never worked nor can it work; it will merely result in very high unemployment and depressed aggregate demand.
The difference between the Coalition and Labour is that the former proposed to slaughter the recovery more quickly.
David Ossitt
December 16th, 2011 3:09pm Report this commentsandy
“He's doing a great job,just the kind of leader Britain needs the Labour party to have.”
As one who is to the right of the blessed Margaret, Genghis Khan and Attila the Hun, I could not agree with you more.
I sincerely hope that he leads the Labour party for many a year.
Cell time
December 16th, 2011 3:14pm Report this commentYour headline is an apt Euphemism.
Pettros
December 16th, 2011 3:34pm Report this commentI predict Lab will ditch Ed in the middle of next year....Mrs Balls will come in, hoover up the vast amount of people with left leaning tendancies (just by not being David Cameron and being a women). In 2015 again Tories will be denied a clear majority.
Jeremy
December 16th, 2011 3:36pm Report this commentEd Miliband:
"It's not going to be a situation that we saw after the 1997 election where we had big investment in the public realm."
In other words, after the Tories left office in 1997, Labour spent-and-bankrupted the country.
fergus pickering
December 16th, 2011 3:38pm Report this commentI assumed that andy was being ironic. He was, wasn't he?
jon dee
December 16th, 2011 3:58pm Report this commentWhatever the buzzwords and populist rhetoric his scriptwriters provide him, he just looks and sounds, dopey.
graham
December 16th, 2011 4:22pm Report this commentEd Milibandwagon is useless. He lacks gravitas, a sense of humour & an opinion. I try & listen to him but I soon get bored & tune out. He is a boring man who lacks a real political poistion. He is all over the place on every big issue. The man is a loser...he can't last much longer if the left want to win the new election!
sandy
December 16th, 2011 4:49pm Report this commentThink about it Fergus,think about it.
Cynic
December 16th, 2011 4:50pm Report this comment"Miliband's is a foggy, nebulous position. Labour MPs might well ask whether it's going to get them anywhere." Rest assured, you can fool some of the people all of the time - unfortunately.
Cynic
December 16th, 2011 4:53pm Report this comment"Mrs Balls will come in, hoover up the vast amount of people with left leaning tendancies (just by not being David Cameron and being a women)." So are you saying, Pettros, that the left will vote for anybody, irrespective of merit, as long as they aren't male or Tory?
whatawaste
December 16th, 2011 5:03pm Report this commentThe PLP and trade unions have chosen badly. Darling would have made a good temporary Leader of the Opposition. As a lawyer he is well spoken and unlike many on the shadow bench can think on his feet, something Cameron does well to Ed's detriment.
Darling could well be remembered as "the best Labour leader that they never had". The other problem with Ed now is that he lacks respect from his own shadow cabinet.
Forlornehope
December 16th, 2011 5:58pm Report this comment@whatawaste - Darling seems to be an intelligent and decent man. In fact his proposed strategy for dealing with the deficit was not that different from Osborne's. Had he become leader of the Labour party, the faithful would have shredded him something that he knew perfectly well. He's better off out of it.
Tarka the Rotter
December 16th, 2011 6:37pm Report this comment"Mrs Balls will come in, hoover up the vast amount of people with left leaning tendancies..." Do you mean she'll do the shake and vac to put the freshness back into clapped out marxism and fabian control-freakery? Should be entertaining...
Simon Stephenson.
December 16th, 2011 8:56pm Report this commentPettros : 3.34pm
"Mrs Balls will come in, hoover up the vast amount of people with left leaning tendancies"
This is possible, but she won't do it by being straight or honest with the public about the sort of outcomes they can look forward to under a government controlled by neanderthal Statists unable to see any path for society outside the failed theories of 80 years ago. No, she'd have to be a con-artist on the same level as Mr Blair, able with a straight face to link a Labour government with the sort of prosperous well-being and contentment that she knows is nothing other than 100% fantasy.
Can she pull this off? I don't think so.
Ed P
December 16th, 2011 9:10pm Report this commentIn what should be a solidly Labour seat they neither shone or motivated the electorate to actually bother to vote. Ed Mediocreband (Lukewarm from It ain't half hot mum?) is a gift to the Tories - long may he "lead" Labour.
David Lindsay
December 16th, 2011 9:54pm Report this commentEd Miliband is not who the Blairite media wanted, so never mind opinion polls, even actual votes for a party led by him do not count.
Labour's fifth by-election win in succession since Ed Miliband became Leader. An 8.5 per cent swing from the Conservatives to Labour.
But none of that counts, because, rather poignantly today, he is The Wrong Brother.
Michael Dixon
December 16th, 2011 10:35pm Report this commentFor their policy on housing Miliband, when he became leader of the Labour Party, asked his then Shadow Minister,(since changed-again),to present a comprehensive policy review by 2012. So for two years housing policy, as an example of others no doubt, has been a blank piece of paper. In many ways that accurately describes Miliband and his Party, which is why he and they are in trouble.
Nobody really has clue, as the article indicates here, what Miliband and Labour believe in or stand for.
Nicholas
December 17th, 2011 4:05pm Report this commentHa ha ha! Pettros' fantasy of a Labour Mrs Thatcher, the indomitable Yvette Cooper, with the intellect of a second rate, student union, protest monkey and the authoritarian instincts of an East German Stasi leader.
Really, really funny that leftist clowns still believe this guff. "Game changer", eh, Pettros? Ha ha ha!
Back to top