Subscribe to The Spectator

Saturday 26 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Friday, 20th January 2012

Cameron's capitalism

Fraser Nelson 9:31am

Ever since Ed Miliband’s ‘predatory capitalism’ speech at the Labour Party conference, the future of capitalism has been a subject that has much occupied our MPs. Clegg made his speech on Monday, and Cameron delivered his yesterday. I have had plenty to say about the coalition government’s inadequate economic policy, and its inability to stoke growth. But Cameron’s speech was impressive, and it’s worth going into in some detail. I look at it in my Telegraph column today.

Much rot is spoken about capitalism. It is not an ideology, there is no rule book you can tweak: it is simply the name given to the system where people trade with each other the world over. There are as many types of capitalism are there are countries: the very word is good for making speeches, or selling books, but not much else. Cameron is a proudly post-ideological leader, which is why his speech made so much sense. If you talk about capitalism as an ideology, you’re getting it wrong. The phenomenon being described is, basically, human freedom: belief in capitalism is belief in mankind. And it’s something that Conservatives have in spades.

Cameron started with an analysis of what happened, which is crucial. Many on the left talk as if capitalism has failed somehow, but, as Cameron said, we have just witnessed a crisis of government. Rather than regulate the banks, Gordon Brown entered coalition with them. The inept regulatory structure that he personally drew up allowed banks to take risks in London that would have been illegal in Wall St. Greed was a factor: Brown’s greed for tax revenues meant he asked no questions and every bonus was split 60/40 with the British government. It was a joint racket.

The great irony behind Brown’s excuse, that ‘it started in America’, was that America’s problems started in London. It was the London AIG, Lehmans and MF Global which were taking the most risks with the CDSs — doing so to escape the eye of Federal regulations. To an extent which has still not been been properly appreciated, Brown’s London was the contagion. (Those with strong stomachs should read this analysis by ZeroHedge.) Countries with properly-regulated system (Canada, Australia, Sweden) saw no banks collapse at all. Cameron put it well: Brown entered a ‘Faustian Pact” with the banks — and it wasn’t capitalism, but the most dangerous kind of corporatism.

Crucially, as Cameron pointed out, the issue was wrong-touch regulation, not right-touch regulation. There was plenty of red tape, as anyone who tried to open a bank account found out. But if you wanted to led unsecured billions to a Russian who had a small chance of paying you back, or re-hypothecate assets of 300 per cent of the collateral, then fine. As Cameron said: ‘Small companies were strangled in red tape while the banks were allowed to let rip.’ And how.

And the solution? Cameron says he wants less regulation. He doesn’t conflate the banking blow-up with a failure of capitalism, and says that what’s needed more are virtues that people, not governments, possess: ‘Intelligence; ingenuity; energy; guts,’ and the state can only do so much. ‘While of course there is a role for government, for regulation and intervention, the real solution is more enterprise, competition and innovation.’ Labour’s instinct would be to produce an Ingenuity, Energy & Guts Bill (2012). Cameron says different. ‘I believe that open markets and free enterprise are the best imaginable force for improving human wealth and happiness. They are the engine of progress, generating the enterprise and innovation that lifts people out of poverty and gives people opportunity.’

The part of Cameron's speech that Nick Clegg wouldn’t and couldn’t say was a paean to entrepreneurs. ‘I admire more than almost anything the bravery of those who turn their back on the security of a regular wage to follow their dreams and start a company. If you take a risk, quit your job, create the next Google or Facebook and wind up a billionaire, then more power to your elbow.’ That’s the idea, anyway. But the fate of the Adrian Beecroft’s proposals give an example of just how hard it is for pro-entrepreneur policies to pass the various layers of this warring coalition.

Meanwhile the 50p tax is pretty much here to stay, a massive ‘keep out’ sign to today’s globalised entrepreneurs. The regulatory burden is getting bigger at the behest of Brussels and the tax burden is also growing to pay for a deficit which is now being halved in five years, worse than the four years that Alistair Darling planned.

There is a strong case to reset growth policy in the next Budget. If George Osborne were to do so, he should read and re-read Cameron’s speech about capitalism. The government has the agenda. Now all it needs is the policies to match.

Filed under: Banks (134 more articles) , Business (165 more articles) , Coalition (2090 more articles) , Conservatives (2313 more articles) , David Cameron (1912 more articles) , Economy (1023 more articles) , George Osborne (799 more articles) , UK politics (5408 more articles)

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (37) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Nickle

January 20th, 2012 10:09am Report this comment

What about preditory statism?

Such as 225,000 pounds of government debt per taxpayer.

Ah yes, we don't want to talk about our mistakes, so lets attack someone else as a distraction.

Sir Everard Digby

January 20th, 2012 10:16am Report this comment

So, Cameron is saying that interfering politicians are part of the problem and a big part. Is he proposing de-regulation or more interference?

The less contact with the state legislature,the better.That's where the dead hand is applied.

Dan Grover

January 20th, 2012 10:18am Report this comment

Sounds nice. But like you said, unless he can strongarm George (who I suspect is rather on board but has to deal with the realities of it in a way that Cameron doesn't) into actually altering our policy to be coherent with this view, it's little more than rhetoric.

Rhoda Klapp

January 20th, 2012 10:22am Report this comment

He cannot deliver less regulation. He cannot deliver stasis in regulation. He cannot stem the flow of regulation from the EU which does not even go near parliament, he cannot prevent the courts from interpreting regulation as they like.

He can, however, make speeches about it. And having made the speech, like his predecessor Mr Blair, he thinks he has finished. Done what was required. It really will not do. How about some action? Or will that require the agreement of the business minister, at least. Who is that again?

PayDirt

January 20th, 2012 10:25am Report this comment

Maybe you are confusing the market economy with Capitalism? You managed to talk about Capitalism without mentioned who owns the etc etc.

Andy H

January 20th, 2012 10:43am Report this comment

Good speech or bad speech, I am a firm believer of actions speak louder then words.

WHEN will Cameron start to deliver?

My vote is completely remove Employers NI and make it more affordable to employ people, and limited out of work benefits to encourage people back into work.

Bob Dixon

January 20th, 2012 10:46am Report this comment

Blimey,Now we have it. Does this mean Blair & Brown can be put into the Tower of London to await Her Majesty's pleasure.

niav

January 20th, 2012 10:54am Report this comment

I am hugely annoyed by the sheer hypocrisy of Cameron.

Not only the 50% tax is here to stay (in fact, more like 60%) once you take into account the NI. Look at the ripoff rate to capital gains on shares.

Everything this person has done has been anti-business. If you think the business tax rate cut would result in a effective reduction of tax paid, you paid no attention to changes in investment allowances - I recommend reading the PwC worldwide study on effective tax rates, just to see what this government is doing to business.

This character is shamessly promoting a open culture of looting higher earners and productive people. He calls it "fairness".

I'm not sure what kind of entrepreneurs would buy into his shameless lies - the stupid ones, surely. And those won't invent any Google.

Ian Walker

January 20th, 2012 10:54am Report this comment

"Cameron says different. ‘I believe that open markets and free enterprise are the best imaginable force for improving human wealth and happiness. They are the engine of progress, generating the enterprise and innovation that lifts people out of poverty and gives people opportunity.’ "

And that is why he gets my vote.

Austin Barry

January 20th, 2012 10:54am Report this comment

To avoid the EU’s absurd tsunami of pointless, anally-retentive, anti-business regulation we should abandon the listing, Costa Packet monument to Germany’s genocidal guilt, and head for the blue water of regulatory, fiscal and political autonomy.

Cue some Elgar.)

Jeremy

January 20th, 2012 11:09am Report this comment

Fraser Nelson:

"Cameron says...that what’s needed more are virtues that people, not governments, possess: ‘Intelligence; ingenuity; energy; guts...’"

Not much good if every time somebody shows some intelligence, ingenuity, energy and guts they are promptly arrested by the Americans through the open door of the Extradition Act - and with the supine collusion of the British government.

"...and the state can only do so much..."

Well it could make a good start by simply protecting the basic rights and freedoms of the British people.

michael

January 20th, 2012 11:15am Report this comment

Same old story .... 30 years ago it was demonic directors. Having been politically legislated out of management MD's have become invisible so the new toxic scape goat is the CEO.
What's the next name for the 'big bad fat cat boss'?

Q. And why do failures get such big pay off's?
A. Responsible capitalism ... It's nigh impossible (i.e. a damned sight more time and money) to sack em.

eh-up.

strapworld

January 20th, 2012 11:16am Report this comment

Yesterdays speech. Most likely in the shredder by now Mr Nelson.

Tell me please how many speeches has our PR Prime Minister made and how many have been acted upon?

Or am I correct in believing that it is all just words?

ROJ

January 20th, 2012 11:18am Report this comment

"Much rot is spoken about capitalism. .... it is simply the name given to the system where people trade with each other the world over." Well, another name for that is market economy, and when someone begins by referring to the market economy as "capitalism" it's more likely than not that what follows will be rot.

Pitman

January 20th, 2012 11:31am Report this comment

A thoughtful article, with some excellent conclusions. I do however find it iritating that commentators frequently refer to Darlings plans to halve the defecit in four years. He reckoned without a collapse of the Eurozone economies and with earlier US growth. If his plans were modeled onto the current economic climate we would find his timtable had extended significantly. Nonetheless the articles gives the lie to those who somehow think that a trading nation can pull up the drawbridge and live in a cosy bubble!

mattghg

January 20th, 2012 11:52am Report this comment

Typo:

'Cameron pointed out, the issue was wrong-touch regulation, not right-touch regulation'

Presumably you mean 'not light-touch regulation'.

kevin

January 20th, 2012 11:53am Report this comment

This Government are all capitalists, All they think about is How they can make cuts, They haven't any morals there planning to take money from the sick and disabled for gods sake what next kids piggy banks and for what so they can cut taxes for the rich company owners, All these savings will end up in rich peoples banks and will create more jobless as more shops close.

JohnPage

January 20th, 2012 12:40pm Report this comment

All Cameron's trying to do is neutralise the contributions to this topic of Miliband & Clegg. A hymn to entrepreneurship from a former TV company spin doctor? Oh please.

So these words written for him have a political purpose, but have no effect in the real world. Deregulation? Dream on.

It's sad to see Fraser duped by such tawdry spin.

Heartless Curmudgeon

January 20th, 2012 12:41pm Report this comment

Cameron's capitalism . . . is, like much else about the guy, a complete sham.

And PLEASE, - avoid portraying him against our National Flag. It is an affront.

MilkSnatcher

January 20th, 2012 12:59pm Report this comment

I find myself agreeing with every comment here: Cameron cannot actually do anything because to do something positive for the entrepreneurial class in this country will immediately be branded "unfair" by the Guardian, the BBC, the LibDems, the Unions (oh one and the same: can we have a collective noun for that lot - Rhoda how about it?) and result in a droop at one apex of his cherished triangle. How about getting HMRC off the backs of new business by being able to strike a 5-year tax deal, like in NL, which is only a 40 minute flight away (and only 3 hours from Birmingham with HS2.....)

Publius

January 20th, 2012 1:05pm Report this comment

"Much rot is spoken about capitalism. It is not an ideology, there is no rule book you can tweak: it is simply the name given to the system where people trade with each other the world over."

Quite frankly, Mr Nelson, this is twaddle. Merely glossing over distinctions and eliding ideas reduces your analysis to lazy sloganeering. Fine for some Telegraph puff-piece perhaps, but an insult to intelligent readers.

daniel maris

January 20th, 2012 1:19pm Report this comment

He's turning the country into a nation of princes and paupers. He's selling the seed corn to the Chinese. And he is allowing mass immigration to destabilise our society.

Fail, fail, fail.

Fatbloke on tour

January 20th, 2012 1:20pm Report this comment

Trevor

The SpeccyLand economics fairy tale factory must be working overtime.

Good to see the ZH article you push is big on Canadian banks and their precarious financial health due to some of the crap they are holding.

Their time will come.
You on the other hand are doing punditry by numbers.

Bickers

January 20th, 2012 1:27pm Report this comment

More PR blatherings from Cameron. Surely, he must by now know that our problems can be traced to Government (all levels in the UK & EU)
If Cameron wants growth then he needs to start by demolishing large parts of the State and all the red tape that's strangling business. If that means leaving the EU, sacking tens of thousands of non productive public sector 'managers' and scrapping the blood sucking, anti business, barking mad Climate Change Act then so be it; just get on with it before the UK reaches the point of no return. Business will do the rest.

It's not rocket science!!

Trapped

January 20th, 2012 2:07pm Report this comment

And all the while in the background the bank of England continues to loan banks money in the form of liquidity easing at rates that the ordinary customer will never see. If you want to start responsible Capitalism, the first thing to do is to make the banks responsible for their own failures, which Labour should have done, instead we had a privitasation of the profits and a socialisation of the debt. Nothing new from Cameron on this one.

Bill W

January 20th, 2012 2:14pm Report this comment

The prospect of reinstating my cancelled subscription to The Spectator fades ever further into the gloom.

This organ is now just propaganda. As is the DT. Engaging with either of them is futile.

Rhoda Klapp

January 20th, 2012 2:56pm Report this comment

1. OK, I've had my usual moan, thanks to the CH for the sounding board. Now I'm going to come at it from another direction. Is Cameron unable to act, unwilling to act, or trying to act and being frustrated by friction and stodge? I've always thought unwilling, and occasionally unable too. It must be hard, when everything you try is squashed by the unimaginative useless bastards on all sides, when every initiative is misinterpreted and misrepresented by your opponents in the cabinet and the media (what, there is an opposition too? Well, well). But what is the result?

Rhoda Klapp

January 20th, 2012 2:56pm Report this comment

2. Nothing gets done. Nothing changes. You are trying to survive from week to week, just to keep in power. You think it is a victory when you can stay out of trouble for a day or two. But at the end of it all, are you having any fun? Are you getting any satisfaction? I can't see how. And when you finally have to put it up to the people, what are they going to make of your failure to deliver anything you said you would (and they WILL be able to penetrate the spin of making the record look decent, and any twisted cherry-picked statisitic you drag out)?

Rhoda Klapp

January 20th, 2012 2:57pm Report this comment

3.
Well, you are going to lose the election. Losing is awful, you'll lose the leadership too, you'll lose the limo and the keys to Chequers and have to make do with the fortune they all seem to make. But winning? You keep the baubles, but you have to suffer the job again. 24/7 placating moaners and pundits. Some prize.

Rhoda Klapp

January 20th, 2012 2:57pm Report this comment

So, either way, the reward for not doing anything is failure and the censure of history. No amount of speeches will ever get anything done. So act. Doesn't matter who you offend, this is the only way to succeed. Doesn't matter if you don't follow anybody's script, action is needed. We are in schtuck, and more of the same will not fix it. Act. If anybody on your side won't go along, fire them. If the lib-dems won't play, ditch 'em, and go it alone. If the BBC and the Guardian readers throw up their hands, go on the telly direct to the people and tell them the truth. Whether it all works or it doesn't, it's something. Not just drifting along down the river with our future.

DavidDP

January 20th, 2012 3:08pm Report this comment

"looting higher earners and productive people"

We've a huge deficit to pay off, mainly caused by those higher earners and "productive people" (both politicians and financiers).

Better they pay a bit more than place the burden on the rest of us hard working schmoes for whom having to pay higher taxes makes more of an appreciable effect on our disposable income.

George Shepherd

January 20th, 2012 3:16pm Report this comment

C'mon Fraser get a grip

Cameron's guff about moral Capitalism was designed to negate Red Ed's similar load of guff on the same subject

Job done - strategic stalemate - item ticked off on the grid for this week

On to next week's topic

TomTom

January 20th, 2012 3:16pm Report this comment

Capitalism requires CAPITAL. Just go around Northern towns and see how shabby a lot of industrial units are, retail units, and manufacturing sites - shortage of capital to make them grow. Yet CAPITAL is poured into the black hole of Banks who hoard it and engage in Extortion with anyone who wants to build a business as oppose to houses.

This is the Quick Buck Society for fast easy money rather than patient building of real business. Cameron doesn't care about real businesses, he is another coupon-clipper who thinks business is only about rewards not effort.

Britain is a Socialist Republic with Work taxed and Indolence rewarded and index-linked with the best pay and job security in the upper echelons of the public sector. It has NEVER been so rewarding to work for The State

Jeff J

January 20th, 2012 5:09pm Report this comment

Rhoda, I practically worship the electronic ground you walk on and I know what you're trying to do but you're making the mistake of assuming that he has got an idea in his head. The man is an empty suit and destined to be a footnote in history.

His judgement stinks and I've stopped counting the bad calls he has made; some of them have damaged the fabric of this country. The collapse of morale in the Armed Forces and Police being prime examples.

The less he does the better as far as I am concerned.

Andy H

January 20th, 2012 5:12pm Report this comment

@ Rhoda

You have nailed the situation precisely.
How will history judge say Maggie and Blair.
You may not have agreed with her, or liked her, but Maggie acted.

Blair was always trying to pretend everything was all ok and did nothing (apart from spending all the money).

Will they ever make a film about Blair?
If they do, it will end up with him being shot.

niav

January 20th, 2012 6:18pm Report this comment

"We've a huge deficit to pay off, mainly caused by those higher earners and "productive people" (both politicians and financiers)."

Politicians, productive? At what? Lies and expense claims?

Why is the government taxing to death, you know, engineers and doctors? Small business owners? Did they produce the deficit, really?

This country punishes the hard-working and the entrepreneurial through confiscatory taxation, and savers though currency debasement. The productive get to pay 50-60% income taxes, then council taxes, then road taxes and fuel duty taxes, TV taxes, inheritance taxes, 20% VAT, and more taxes.

And Mr. Cameron's administration only made things worse, to the benefit of the usual suspects: politicians - who get to play with more and more public money, public sector parasites, welfare spongers, crony capitalists, global warming quacks who didn't hear the average temperature hasn't changed in the past 10 years.

This is Cameron's capitalism. Looks a lot like big government, big tax, big spending (i.e. waste), paternalist state.

Deepsnoozer

January 20th, 2012 7:11pm Report this comment

"I have had plenty to say about the coalition government’s inadequate economic policy, and its inability to stoke growth.. Is there any proof of this? Hyperlink possibly??

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

Tag Cloud

Coffee House archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk