Subscribe to The Spectator

Saturday 26 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Tuesday, 31st January 2012

Freedom for Shetland!

Fraser Nelson 6:20pm

If Scotland can claim independence — and a 'geographical share' of the oil regardless of population — then why can't Orkney & Shetland? It's the Up Helly Aa festival in Lerwick tonight, where men dress up as vikings and set a longship ablaze. Not a very Scottish festival, but when your nearest city is Bergen how Scottish do you feel? Laurance Reed, a former Hebridean resident (and ex-MP), has a piece in this week's magazine pointing out that, by the Salmond doctrine, there is nothing to stop the Scottish islands breaking off, claiming the oil wealth and becoming the Dubai of the north. His piece is below.

Freedom for Shetland!, Laurance Reed, The Spectator, 28 January 2012

On Tuesday night in Lerwick, capital of the Shetland Islands, hundreds of men dressed as Vikings will parade through the centre of town, carrying torches to set fire to a wooden long ship in a festival known as Up Helly Aa. All will march to a repertoire of battle songs, with blood-curdling lyrics. ‘Our galley is the People’s Right, the dragon of the free’ runs the main hymn of the evening. ‘Sons of warriors and sages: when the fight for freedom rages, be bold and strong as they!’ And not even Alex Salmond would be bold enough to suggest that they are singing about Scotland.

The people of Orkney and Shetland share little of Salmond’s enthusiasm for independence, as was reflected in the 1997 devolution referendum. It is hard to join a tide of Edinburgh-focused nationalism if your nearest city is Bergen. And if Scotland does vote to secede from Britain, might it be the start of a further unravelling? On what grounds could you stop Orkney, the Shetlands, even the Hebrides claiming their own independence? And what effect would this have on Scottish oil revenues and the ability of Edinburgh to pay the pensions which London no longer funded?

The Shetlands were pawned by King Christian of Norway centuries ago, and no one has bothered to ask lawyers how a claim to independence would work. But the Salmond principle is clear: if a country votes for separation, it should be granted it — together with a ‘geographical share’ of the oil revenues decided by drawing an imaginary border across the North Sea. Using such methods, Salmond is laying claim to 90 per cent of the oil revenue. Were the Orcadians and Shetlanders to do so, then Lerwick (pop 7,000) might well end up as the Dubai of Europe.

And what of my former home, the Hebrides? The people of the islands were, after all, separate from Scotland for hundreds of years — first under the Norse and then the Kingdom of the Isles. They have their own language, their own culture and their own outlook on life. If a government in Stornoway, on the Isle of Lewis, elected to go its own way and laid claim to its share of the continental shelf in the vicinity of Rockall, the gaeldom could also live quite comfortably on oil and gas revenues.

If oil and its riches can transform the fortunes of the Scottish National Party and destabilise the United Kingdom just a few decades after its discovery, what makes us think that the people of the Hebrides will not be changed by the black stuff? Wait until the oil price goes through the roof as the result of demand in Asia, making the exploitation of the Hatton/Rockall Basin profitable. The Icelanders and the Faroese may soon scramble for the riches.

The notion of Scottish independence throws up all sorts of other difficult questions. If England voted to leave the European Union, and a separate Scotland chose to stay, some form of physical border would have to be built between us to control trade and the movement of people. Would there be frontier police examining papers at checkpoints on roads leading south into England? Or customs officials on the night sleeper to Inverness?

All this is conjecture, but that is the point. We don’t know what will happen if a Pandora’s box of secession is opened. And if Salmond is a champion of separatism, may we ask whether on his latest trip to China he had an opportunity of raising with his hosts the question of Tibet? Or are we to understand from his silence that a separate Scotland — with, we are told, its own defence force — would defend its own freedom but never  come to the defence of anybody else?

Once, Europe consisted of hundreds of polities: Italy, as a country, is no older than the London Underground. The idea of nationalism is a relatively modern concept. If this trend is to reverse, with the focus on what divides us rather than what unites us, then who is next? The Bretons in France, the Basques and Catalans in Spain, the Northern League in Italy and the Flemish in the cockpit of Europe. And we must not forget the Principality. Wales is an old country. She was a nation when the Scots were still on their way from Scythia. Not to mention Cornwall, which has its own flag, anthem, history — and nationalist movement.

Where might the fragmentation of Britain and Europe end? Salmond’s separatists should certainly be invited to tell us.

Laurance Reed is a former MP for Bolton East, and a resident of the Hebridean island of Soay in Loch Scavaig.

Filed under: Alex Salmond (60 more articles) , Referendum (68 more articles) , Scotland (503 more articles) , SNP (220 more articles) , Spectator (337 more articles) , UK politics (5408 more articles) , United Kingdom (11 more articles)

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (75) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

and I'll go to bed at noon

January 31st, 2012 6:45pm Report this comment

This is... beyond pathetic. Can't wait to see Massie eviscerate this one in his ongoing "Better Unionists Please" series.

Minekiller

January 31st, 2012 6:49pm Report this comment

Good article. I imagine Wee Alex and Nicola hadn't thought of this one. Alternatively, The Orkneys and Shetland Islands might vote to remain in the UK and we'd end up with a Northern Ireland-Eire scenario....I wonder then if we'd see the dark side of the SNP emerge?

itsyourself

January 31st, 2012 6:53pm Report this comment

A new low? Possibly? But worse may be to come.

Shakes head in utter disbelief. Wonders if Fraser read the devolution referendum results for the areas mentioned before writing this travesty.

Tom Pride

January 31st, 2012 6:56pm Report this comment

Mischief making Fraser. Tut Tut! As bad as me mentioning Iran World Cup 1978. Duck! Here comes the haggis.

Scott D

January 31st, 2012 7:33pm Report this comment

scare monger scare monger scare monger... yawn

Oskar

January 31st, 2012 7:37pm Report this comment

How very British.

All suggested purely through concern for Shetlanders of course.

Mr Danger

January 31st, 2012 7:39pm Report this comment

Reminds me of an issue that arose in Canada in 1995, when the French speaking, largely left wing province of Quebec wanted to separate. The Grand Council of the Crees in Northern Quebec asked, quite reasonably, how they could (yet again) be 'assigned' to a new country without their consent. And it dealt quite a blow to the separatists.

ThigArLatha

January 31st, 2012 8:09pm Report this comment

I was going to say something but I think I will wait for Massie to put you to the sword.
YET AGAIN.

Rhoda Klapp

January 31st, 2012 8:09pm Report this comment

Every little race or nationality or distinguishable community must be consulted. Except one.

James Sproule

January 31st, 2012 8:25pm Report this comment

The comparison with Canada is extremely apt. Northern Quebec is sparsely populated but rich in energy (hydro electricity in this case). Southern Quebec can come up with any number of plans to spend the money (Quebec is the last home of the true "Dirigiste"). When Canada made noises about accommodating the Northern Quebec Indians in the rest of Canada, the Quebecois said the Province could not be split. The hypocrisy of such a stance, not to mention the threat of loosing the largest source of provincial revenue had a significant on public opinion.
There is a valuable lesson there for the UK.

BasilMetabolism

January 31st, 2012 8:26pm Report this comment

Except AShetland's a county not a country, would be up the creek if Unst got independence from them, and it was developed as a scare story when Scotland thought about independence in the 70s and how many times between then and now - Oh that's right - precisely never.
Reminds us the unionists will try rigging the election like in the 70s then gerrymansdering the borders like in Northern Ireland. We'll take what we came in with as we leave. How those 29 counties evolve after that is a Scottish matter.

Cynic

January 31st, 2012 8:27pm Report this comment

Why does the edge of the light blue area (which I presume means national entitlement) take a dip to the south when the logical extension of the border would go straight on?

Swiss Bob

January 31st, 2012 8:30pm Report this comment

We've got all the gas!

Add the shale and if the Govt isn't completely stupid the UK ex Scotland is set for centuries of cheap clean energy.

David Cockerham

January 31st, 2012 8:35pm Report this comment

There is a serious underlying question here: are there any limits to the right of self-determination, and if so how do you define them? The USA settled the matter in the Pledge of Allegiance - 'One nation, indivisible' and fought a bloody civil war to uphold the principle. The only doctrine we seem to have is that of self-determination, which is handy for defending Gibraltar, the Falklands and Northern Ireland and for recognising that as ancient nations Wales and Scotland can walk anytime they like. But surely only luck (or knowing so far which side their bread is buttered on) has saved the UK from having to define the limits to that right in order to prevent Cornwall, or some other chunk of the country that sees itself as a distinctive culture, from trying to walk. Producing a definition that didn't undermine the self-determination defence of The Falklands etc would be no simple matter.

EC

January 31st, 2012 8:40pm Report this comment

(1)

You got there at last, Fraser!

The Shetland Islanders' have an absolute moral and legal right to self determination which is guaranteed by UN Charter. As incomprehensible as it may be to some, the Shetland Islanders may not trust or want to be governed by Salmond's gang.

John Grundy

January 31st, 2012 8:41pm Report this comment

I read this thought provoking article in the mag - & I believe the comments from the Scot Nats show how vulnerable they are to the "Where does it end?" question

EC

January 31st, 2012 8:43pm Report this comment

(2)
The United Nations INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS

PART I
Article 1

1. All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.

Angles

January 31st, 2012 8:50pm Report this comment

Don't worry Rhoda. To paraphrase the provos (which is not to endorse their methods): our time will come.

ellubo

January 31st, 2012 9:03pm Report this comment

This boring propaganda makes you a Shetland separatist - better watch out or the unionist bogeymen will burn you.

Kittler

January 31st, 2012 9:20pm Report this comment

A small technical problem. Oil is in the continental shelf. Not all islands generate a continental shelf. It requires a land mass. Australia has that but I don't think Northern Isles would.
Evidence. The Channel Isles do not have a Continental Shelf of their own, nor do they create a UK one. The French CS goes out, round and then on behind them, to the centre of the Channel.

Kathleen

January 31st, 2012 9:28pm Report this comment

Fantastic article. Very well written and very logical and sensible points. I do wonder what response Salmond would have to this? More of his blustering bile no doubt. All talk, no substance.

David Graham

January 31st, 2012 9:32pm Report this comment

I live in the Scottish Borders, it is very pro-unionist and very conservative. We won't go along with Salmond no matter what the referendum shows.

John White

January 31st, 2012 9:35pm Report this comment

Partition. How original.

Sandy Jamieson

January 31st, 2012 9:53pm Report this comment

So if the Hebredies are so concerned about Independence, how come Western Isles was the first constituency to electet a SNP MP at a General Election in 1970 and has continued to do for most of the last 42 years

John White

January 31st, 2012 9:54pm Report this comment

How about independence for East Anglia, a unique area sadly neglected and scorned by the London elite - imagine the skyscrapers of Norwich after the Gas wealth came ashore..........

Andy Leeds

January 31st, 2012 10:02pm Report this comment

Let them breakaway from Scotland now and claim 'Enosis' - union with England !!!

John White

January 31st, 2012 10:03pm Report this comment

Additionally we can imagine the disaffected masses of Humberside claiming their mineral rights and continental shelf, then proudly appointing John Prescott as President for life. How many Jags can one man have?

David Cockerham

January 31st, 2012 10:04pm Report this comment

'EC '1. All peoples have the right of self-determination.'. Yes, but does the Convention define 'peoples'? If not, it's pretty meaningless, like much of the rest of the output of the UN.

Kittler

January 31st, 2012 10:11pm Report this comment

Good God EC, that means sharia law is coming to Bradford and..

R Wilson

January 31st, 2012 10:34pm Report this comment

What a synical piece of writing. This stinks of hidden tory propaganda designed to wreck any Scottish self determination. If i was an Orcadian or Shetland islander I think i would rather stick with Scotland than being run by a London egocentric party only interested in lining their own pockets. Lets have a sensible and truthful debate without this nonsense. Personally i'm starting to get fed up with Nelson and his poisoned attitude. Grow up!

Alan Farquhar

January 31st, 2012 10:53pm Report this comment

Not much to say here. Only that this is the poorest and most ridiculous article I've read on The Specator.

RPC

January 31st, 2012 11:45pm Report this comment

Why is everyone ignoring the Vectis question? Freedom for the caulkheads!

Robert

February 1st, 2012 1:36am Report this comment

Shetland is the most pro UK place in the UK in both world wars more men were killed per head of population than anywhere other in the UK

james of Dundee

February 1st, 2012 7:15am Report this comment

Shetland has never been a country...if it was allowed to choose and then chose not to remain part of Scotland then surely it would choose Norway over bankrupt England? The Western isles was part of Scotland when Alba was formed.
Scotland by the same right would be able to canvas in Berwick and Man for return of these territories, and England can put pressure on Germany over the Heligoland islanders right to self determination?

Siôn Eurfyl Jones

February 1st, 2012 7:44am Report this comment

This piece is straight from the whitehal ministry of unionist lies and misinformation handbook. Unionists need to up their game quickly or they will have lost the argument forever.

EC

February 1st, 2012 7:45am Report this comment

Kittler. January 31st, 2012 10:11pm

"Good God EC, that means sharia law is coming to Bradford and.."

Coming? It arrived over 10 years ago, Kittler.

Fergus Pickering

February 1st, 2012 7:52am Report this comment

When I lived in Scotland the local politicians were not at all averse to lining their own pockets. And how many houses has Mr Darling got? Or was it London that corrupted him. When the Irish became independent the local politicians became national. Pillars of virtue headed the sea-green incorruptible government. There was Lemass. There was Haughey. The names roll off the tongue, starting with Hitler-loving de Valera. But the Scots would be different. Of course they would.

The word is 'cynical' by the way, from the Greek which I learned in Edinburgh, though I doubt I should learn it now.

The other thing I learned was that a Scotsman with a grievance is not easily confused with a ray of sunshine and that every Scotsman cuddles his grievance close to his heart. Here's tae us. Wha's like us. You may continue if you wish.

My brother lives in Shetland. Shetlanders, whatever they decide to do, are not Scots. Protestant Ulstermen - now THEY are Scots all right.

Fergus Pickering

February 1st, 2012 8:19am Report this comment

I'm just winding the Scots up because I'm a bit of an arse. I do apologise.

Max

February 1st, 2012 8:31am Report this comment

Divide and rule, an act of desperation Fraser ?

I've waisted 5 minutes of my life reading this supercilious load of old piffle, an embarrassment to the Spectator. You might as well say Normandy should be part of England since it was part of England longer than part of France.

Or East Anglia belongs to Denmark and Cornwall belongs to Brittainy.

michael

February 1st, 2012 8:50am Report this comment

What are we supposed to do with this?
-Go ner ner n ner ner at the Scots?
Well, it'll tie in nicely with the divisive tactics and strategy of AS.

Gregor Addison

February 1st, 2012 8:52am Report this comment

Saved to my "Mad Unionist Propaganda" folder for future reference.

Rab C

February 1st, 2012 9:01am Report this comment

It's not that long ago that Shetland Islands Council were petitioning Westminster to give the Scottish government more control over North Sea oil. Also, the bod who designed the (very popular) Shetland flag also happened to be a founder member of the local branch of the SNP. Draw your own conclusions.

Widmerpool

February 1st, 2012 9:02am Report this comment

An amusing piece Fraser and in this vein somewhat tongue in cheekily could I suggest independence for London!

With a substantial subvention of the income it generates for UK plc also RBS without the dead hand of Government might even be sold at a profit one day!
The following can be considered:
1. A natural London Border the M25!
2. A prospect of a 15% Income Tax Rate No CGT or ITT [cf Hong Kong]
3. Compulsory military service[like Singapore] that might deter some of the rioters
4. Turning the House of Commons into a 6 star hotel financed by a rich Russian or Chinese and pack off the MP’s to Manchester where their anti business outpourings are shared by their neighbours there the BBC and the Guardian!
And Boris for Chief Executive Ha Ha!

Max

February 1st, 2012 9:05am Report this comment

Unionist fear, scaremongering and Paper Tigers

1. England will get the pandas from Edinburgh zoo ! tick box.
2. William Hague, UK embassies will stop advertising scotch whisky ! tick box.
3. Shetland doen't belong to Scotland ! tick box.

It's quite sad and pathetic.

Unionist Lies

February 1st, 2012 9:36am Report this comment

I hate to pull the carpet from under you, but the Shetland Movement has been dead for many years. Hardly anyone in the islands is talking about greater autonomy, let alone outright independence or declaring allegiance to Norway, admirable though the Scandinavian way of life is. Shetland's connections - for NHS services, university/college education and outward migration in general - are with the North of Scotland and the central belt. Oh, and Shetlanders voted 62-38 for devolution in 1997. So perhaps those doing this unionist scaremongering should stop writing all this patronising piffle about people of whom they know very little.

Peter From Maidstone

February 1st, 2012 9:45am Report this comment

Orkney and Shetland were Norwegian until the 15th century. There is no ancient connection with any Government in Edinburgh. In any case, the right to self-determination is not determined by history but by democracy. If the Orkney and Shetland islanders wished to be independent of a Scotland run by Salmond would he allow them to make that choice for themselves?

Scotland may notionally be a country, but it is not really much more than a large county itself.

starfish

February 1st, 2012 9:53am Report this comment

It is interesting how the terms and boudaries of Scottish Independence can apparently only be defined by the SNP

No-one else has a say

Bit like the ANC in the South Africa

Very democratic

Kittler

February 1st, 2012 10:08am Report this comment

Quite right Widmerpool, the majority of the London population not being English, what you suggest is evidently sensible.

Kittler

February 1st, 2012 10:27am Report this comment

Peter, we will worry about the Northern Isles whilst you can concern yourselves about your Northern Cities declaring themselves Islamic Emirates.

Mark

February 1st, 2012 10:29am Report this comment

Islay, with 8 distilleries, could become a crown dependancy like the Isle of Man.

After all, it was home to the Kingdom of the Lord of the Isles, a title still held by the Prince of Wales.

Ian Walker

February 1st, 2012 10:48am Report this comment

You'll be paying the Independent Republic of Kent some hefty toll fees if you want to use our ports for your exports.

Mind you, we'll need the money to afford the War Of Bromley with Widmerpool's London, since some parts of the county are inside the M25......

Wilhelm 1

February 1st, 2012 11:19am Report this comment

London is already a foreign country, it's an African muslim third world slum.

It's got more in common with Soweto than the rest of England.

Steve Tierney

February 1st, 2012 12:13pm Report this comment

I can't really see why some comments are running this article down. It may well be mischief-making, but it's no less valid for that.

I believe there is a shift in public opinion towards smaller states - I think that shift is driven by a desire to "belong" to a nation which has been undermined by international developments over the last hundred years.

I suspect the thrust of this piece is actually correct - it will accelerate and we cannot imagine what the repercussions might be in the long term.

Rab C

February 1st, 2012 12:26pm Report this comment

Peter From Maidstone
February 1st, 2012 9:45am

"Orkney and Shetland were Norwegian until the 15th century"
The Northern isles have been happily Scottish for the past 540 years and show no inclination to unite with Norway -try again.

"Scotland may notionally be a country, but it is not really much more than a large county itself"
Yet more patronizing guff - like, twicw the size of Switzerland, denmark or the Netherlands to name but three. BTW dis you know that England is only a fifth of the size of France? maybe they should annexe it.

EC

February 1st, 2012 12:48pm Report this comment

"The Northern isles have been happily Scottish for the past 540 years and show no inclination to unite with Norway -try again."

"Happily?" Whenever I've spoken to islanders up there they've always been keen to tell me how independent minded they are. If they get a sniff of independence backed by petrodollars then it'll be bye-bye SNP & LIbDems etc. Do you really think that they are going to trust Salmond look after their money and best interests?

Hexhamgeezer

February 1st, 2012 2:01pm Report this comment

Ok,

Can we have an independent Northumbria? We've got more water than we know what to do with. And coal.

Unionist Lies

February 1st, 2012 2:25pm Report this comment

EC, that is simply not the case. There is no unified movement within Shetland for independence to speak of, simple as. In fact, the local council's performance in the past decade has largely discredited the notion of even gaining further autonomy from Edinburgh/London.

EC

February 1st, 2012 2:59pm Report this comment

2½ years is a long time in politics.

gavin

February 1st, 2012 3:08pm Report this comment

The Northern Isles ARE part of Scotland.However, if they wish to leave,there is still a small matter of the dowry to be paid off. With compound interest that will take care of the oil money for some time in advance!

scotto

February 1st, 2012 3:08pm Report this comment

educated at Gresham's School in Norfolk and University College, Oxford.

Reed served his National Service with the Royal Navy from 1956 to 1958, and from 1963 to 1966 worked and studied at Brussels, Bruges, Leyden, Luxembourg, Strasbourg, Paris, Rome, Bologna and Geneva.

So an English former Tory MP (for just 4 years until 1974 in Bolton East)is now telling us what can and should happen to our northern and western isles. Mr Nelson, how low can you go?

El Sid

February 1st, 2012 3:24pm Report this comment

@RabC
Geographical size isn't everything - indeed it can be a hindrance to the development of a national identity. Scotland has about the same population as Yorkshire.

The Northern Isles have been far from happy members of Scotland - along with the Highlands. The Scottish civil war of 1745 is more recent than the Union, and was fought by "rebellious Scots" from the Highlands resisting the imperialists in Edinburgh and their "loyal Scots" from the Lowlands.

There's quite a good argument for the Northern Isles being Crown Dependencies rather than part of Scottish territory.

J. Patrick

February 1st, 2012 4:56pm Report this comment

He's wrong about Wales being a nation before Scotland. Wales is at least a hundred years younger, possibly closer to two hundred, depending whose version of events you accept.

Lachie

February 1st, 2012 5:21pm Report this comment

A thought-provoking article, and the thought it provoked was - "Here we go, the same old poorly written, scare-mongering shit".

Rab the Cairn Terrier

February 1st, 2012 6:46pm Report this comment

El Sid
February 1st, 2012 3:24pm
"Geographical size isn't everything - Scotland has about the same population as Yorkshire."

Google yourself a list of countries by population size - Scotland isn't even halfway down the list, and is above such well-known failed states as N Zealand, Denmark (yes, them again) and Norway. One of the attractions of an independent Scotland is the good balance between population and available resources. Left on its own England is the most overcrowded country in Europe.

"The Northern Isles have been far from happy members of Scotland - along with the Highlands."

Highlands were solidly SNP in the last Scottish election. None of my Orcadian or Shetlander friends (and there are many) talk of their islands seceding from Scotland.

"There's quite a good argument for the Northern Isles being Crown Dependencies rather than part of Scottish territory."

If the argument is so good, how come the islanders aren't arguing for it?

Styles

February 1st, 2012 9:07pm Report this comment

I was born and live in Shetland. We the natives feel in many regards more Norse than Scottish, due to our very different heritage. It is felt that the SNP favour the central belt and Western Isles, they dont care about us, but do want our oil resources to pay for everything.
Us being controlled by Westminster or Hollyrood, its all the same, they all seem the same long distance away.
Ask a Shetlander what nationality he is and he will say he is a Shetlander foremost, not Scottish or British.

Amicus Alba

February 1st, 2012 9:10pm Report this comment

Good article that outlines "what's good for the goose" and is true to a large extent. However if the 'continental shelf' has any validity it would be just mischief making with a sense of humor. These islands have always been anti Independence and I suspect our bulbous chinned FM would happily allow Shetland / Orkney to leave.

And boy do these Nats get uppity and intolerant when views contrary to theirs are espoused!

Shetland Resident

February 1st, 2012 9:43pm Report this comment

I'm an Englishman living in Shetland. The idea that Shetlanders would choose to stay in the UK is comical. Shetland Islanders are a conservative bunch and they have strong ties with the Scots upon whom they depend in many ways. Independence from Scotland seems a bit far-fetched and even the scenario of Shetland seeking union with Norway or to become an autonomous Nowegian overseas territory is more likely than an kind of union with an ailing, distant and disinterested England. Let's face it, sharing the oil and and gas wealth with Scotland with its small population will make Shetlanders more prosperous than propping up the English economy. Goodbye Scotland Shetland!

wee shetlander

February 2nd, 2012 4:25pm Report this comment

Shetland has not had a happy relationship with scotland. Ask the shetlander how the scots abused their ancestors. Don't assume that they will be keen to trust an independent scots goverment.

There is a large english population living up here so don't assume anything. If you could be bothered to look Tavish Scott lib dem ex leader had a very nast scare in the last ballot.

R.G. Bargie

February 3rd, 2012 3:11pm Report this comment

If the Shetlands and Orkneys want independence they are as entitled to pursue it as anyone else. All they need to do is the same thing the SNP had to do - form a Northern Isles National Party, stand in elections, get voted in until such times as they can legitimately demand a devolved Parliament, achieve a majority in that Parliament, pass a referendum bill and secure a Yes vote.

Until such times as they take at least the first of those steps, articles like this will remain the tedious and hackneyed scaremongering they are.

If there was a demand for the Northern Isles to run their own affairs, why would they wait for Scotland to become independent first? Why aren't they asking for it now?

Stergios

February 4th, 2012 9:26am Report this comment

The UK has recognized the independence of former federal entities such as Moldova, Georgia, and Croatia, but has refused to recognize the independence of self-proclaimed independent regions that have been formed within those countries such as Transnistria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Serbian Krajina.

The borders of federal entities are deemed unviolable in case of a breakup of the federation, the UK Government has taught us.

So, in case Scotland decides to become independent, the UK is obliged to accept the decision of the Scottish people and recognize their independence without the usual "divide and rule" treacheries that have earned it the nickname of "perfidious Albion".

Tammy_Tinky

February 6th, 2012 12:03am Report this comment

The Uk is going to the Falkands 8000 miles away to protect our oil interests there .

Whats to stop it making the Shetlands and Orkney a British Protectorate ?

Salmond could hardly stop the Royal Navy , and it would take away halve the oil revenue !
making him "prey for Wind " from those infernal turbines .
To generate the revenue , to pay the benefits for his new found "Tartan Army "

Kavi Ugl

February 7th, 2012 11:18am Report this comment

I'm from Shetland, and there's a low-level animosity against the SNP, rising from a feeling that it rewards those Scottish constituencies that returned an SNP MSP and penalises those foolish enough to return a Labour or Lib-Dem MP. Our antipathy towards the SNP was reflected in last year's election results, when the (parachuted in) SNP candidate came in a poor third behind a single-issue independent.

hearts upwards

February 9th, 2012 9:19pm Report this comment

Heres to the oldest national flag on this planet , Scotlands Saltire, being raised in all of Scotlands officialdom instead of the replacement Butchers Apron.

Thormod Morrisson

February 25th, 2012 10:09am Report this comment

The writer takes it upon himself to speak for Orkney and Shetland. According to him, governmental distance geographically is an issue. Most of the people I know don't feel isolated or wrongly done by with regard to a government based in Edinburgh, but by an English government in London that has absolutely nothing to do for their interests. The writer is trying to use the islands to fabricate a weak unionist argument. And if he is so proud of being Hebridean in culture and harking back to the Kingdom of the Isles, then he should know that it was not one bit subservient to a London government, nor prepared to write like a base toadie for it.

Gareth

March 19th, 2012 1:45pm Report this comment

Nice to see the usual cut n' paste retorts from the SNP acolytes littered with the SNP-prescribed words: ' negative, scaremongering, etc' Nearly as funny as Salmond's 'independence is a natural step' argument. Surely unity is the 'natural order' - after all we evolved from blue-green algae to multi-cellular organisms? I wonder which part of my anatomy will declare independence soon as it's 'part of the natural order?'

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

Tag Cloud

Coffee House archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk