Subscribe to The Spectator

Saturday 26 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Wednesday, 1st February 2012

The view from the Institute for Fiscal Studies

Peter Hoskin 11:48am

It's the halftime coffee break here at the launch of the Institute for Fiscal Studies' Green Budget, so I thought I'd send CoffeeHousers a quick update. But first, just to be clear, that's green meaning green, not green meaning environmental. This is the IFS's annual, different-hued version of the Treasury's Red Book. It's their overall take on the economy and public finances.

So far, there has been little that will surprise or disconcert George Osborne as he prepares his own Budget: the picture is expectedly grim. As John Walker, chairman of Oxford Economics, put it in his warm-up routine on the general economy, 2011 was ‘disappointing’ and 2012 will be ‘another difficult year’. Lending is weak; business confidence is fragile; unemployment is set to rise; and, by Oxford Economics' forecasts, the economy will grow by only 0.3 per cent this year, as opposed to the official figure of 0.7 per cent. And that's even assuming that the eurozone manages to discover a cure for its current malaise, rather than just breaking up. ‘There are significant downside risks to our forecasts,’ admitted Mr Walker. And if the eurozone does experience a middling sort of collapse, then he thinks that our own economy could shrink by up to 3 per cent around 2013.

But it's not all doom and dreariness. For instance, Mr Walker said that our corporate sector is in a ‘very healthy financial position’, albeit because those companies are sitting on their cash rather than splashing it around in the wider economy. And he pointed towards strengths in the US and in emerging economies.

The public finances produced a similar picture: prevailing grimness with a few fleeting bright spots. Of course, we already know about most of the bad stuff. That's our pile of debt, and the deficits that are contributing to it. While the good stuff appeared in some of the IFS's forecasts. Thanks mainly to underspending departments, they reckon, the government could borrow £2.9 billion less than expected this year. Tax receipts might also be higher in the medium term.

Even so, the IFS stressed that George Osborne doesn't have much room for manoeuvre. Even if economic growth wavers just a little bit, then the Chancellor could break both of his fiscal rules. If the eurozone cracks, then, well, I'll blog that blow-up later.

A chart that particularly caught my eye was one setting out how much fiscal consolidation there is ahead, and where it will fall. We've got just 27 per cent of the tax hikes to come, but 88 per cent of the total spending cuts – including 88 per cent of the remaining cuts to benefits. The politics of that will be something to see.

Anyway, I shall return to my cup of joe, and then to the second-half of this show. Expect more detail, and a few scary charts, later.

UPDATE:
My more detailed thoughts here.

Filed under: Budget (194 more articles) , Deficit (42 more articles) , Economy (1023 more articles) , Eurozone (100 more articles) , George Osborne (799 more articles) , Growth (182 more articles) , IFS (35 more articles) , Spending cuts (627 more articles) , UK politics (5408 more articles)

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (8) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Heartless Curmudgeon

February 1st, 2012 11:58am Report this comment

All well and fine, even somewhat encouraging, - just so long as 'green' bears no relationship whatever to the ridiculous 'green' aspirations of the H2B.

Rhoda Klapp

February 1st, 2012 12:11pm Report this comment

It's not all about debt, deficitsm tax and spending. The government is doing nothing to boost the economy. Probably they don't know what to do, possibly they are dismissing as unthinkable options which might make a difference. I can't escape the uncomfortable unformed thought that they are so proscribed by the conventional that they really cannot do anything at all but wait for someone else to recover. This is the time for boldness, and this bunch of chickens are not up to it.

Rhoda Klapp

February 1st, 2012 12:11pm Report this comment

or possibly IS not up to it. One or the other.

Scotty

February 1st, 2012 12:44pm Report this comment

Interesting the comment that this government cannot improve growth - for sure the lasty government not only did not grow the economy it ruined it - so which is the lesser of 2 evils - the perception by some what biased comments that the current government which is trying to deal with a world wide economic crisis is failing, whilst the previous government which acted during a boom (end to boom and bust jokes not really needed) and bust us.
Nah, I'll stick with the current team, I never want to see labour let loose to destroy our economy again.

Trapped

February 1st, 2012 2:20pm Report this comment

88% left of the benefit cuts to come. That'll be worth seeing. Considering Housing benefit is now in the process of being stripped as far as it can go. JSA is already at that point, and ESA isn't far behind. I'm not exactly sure what they can do, one option would be to means test -everything- and get rid of contributory benefits altogether. That MIGHT have a substantial impact but I could imagine the uproar from the Mail crowd.

Dimoto

February 1st, 2012 2:48pm Report this comment

Why is there a blog post on this left-wing think tank guess, yet nothing on positive manufacturing indicators (actual numbers, actual news - remember those) ?

Dimoto

February 1st, 2012 2:50pm Report this comment

The IFS (presumably with a straight face), even recommends the Balls' "medicine" - cut in VAT, NI, helpfully reported by the Balls little helper in the DT, the Aldrickbot, as a triumph for Balls.

Since Robert Chote left, the IFS has abandoned even the pretence of being neutral.

Why are you giving credibility to this Tosh ?

daniel maris

February 1st, 2012 4:15pm Report this comment

...sorry something went wrong there I was making my usual point that if you have 0.3% grwoth in your output but 0.5% growth in your population (due to mass immigration mostly, as we have) then you have NOT got per capita growth, you've got a per capita recession.

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

Tag Cloud

Coffee House archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk