From the archives: Are you politically sound?
Jonathan Jones 7:47pmThis evening, we've dug out a fun piece from 2000, in which Matthew Parris gives an A-to-Z of the right-wing alternative to Political Correctness: Political Soundness.
A lexicon of conservative cant, Matthew Parris, 19 February 2000
Are you politically sound?
Are you sound on field sports, sound on the countryside, sound on immigration? Are you sound on the Union, on buggers and on the Common Market? Are you sound on the monarchy? Are you sound on Diana? Are you sound on Enoch, Margaret, Jonathan and Neil?
Ever ready to laugh at others, we on the Right are in danger of losing our ability to laugh at ourselves. As we ridicule the po-faced puritans of the Left, we forget how ripe for ridicule are the sniffy certainties of our own creed. Alert to the pursed lips and whining intolerance of the politically correct, we have lost our ear for the bark of the patriotically correct. But we too, we who are PS — the politically sound — have our thought police, our pursed lips and our mental phrasebook of sound (and unsound) expressions, sound (and unsound) attitudes, sound (and unsound) belief.
General Lee Bhum Suk of South Vietnam used to open press conferences for sniggering journalists by declaring, ‘I am Lee Bhum Suk. Yes, that is indeed how it is pronounced. Please all laugh at my name now, and then we can get on with the press conference.’ So shall we all have another good bellylaugh at the politically correct, agree that they are often silly and sometimes sinister, acknowledge that the Left at least have been laughing at their own idiocies for the last decade or more - and then move on? Perhaps we too are becoming ridiculous and need a bit of joshing.
A final word, then, about political correctness. Contrary to the more spluttering columnists of the why-oh-why? school, PC is almost exclusively an Anglo-Saxon affliction, contracted from the academic world in the United States and not from the political class in Continental Europe where they remain astonishingly politically incorrect. Only recently has the museum in Banyoles, a little town near where my family live in Catalonia, removed the stuffed African from its exhibits.
Perhaps we forget the true progenitor of PC mentality: the Protestant conscience. We overlook the ways in which that keen sense of the appropriate and inappropriate with which all the English-speaking peoples are imbued from the cot can be used as an instrument of conservatism too. We have ceased to notice the myriad subtle ways in which our own PS police patrol language and thought. Here are just a few examples, some dos and don'ts: a first stab at a Politically Sound lexicon
A is for Aids. Do say ‘Aids’ even when this is incorrect. ‘HIV’ is politically unsound, revealing a suspiciously thoughtful grasp of the pathology of the disease. It is politically unsound to sport an Aids ribbon, the wearing of which is dismissed as terribly PC, of course. But I don't see why people have to wear their sympathies on their sleeves. One can care about Aids without advertising the fact. The wearing of a poppy on Remembrance Day is, however, obligatory. One cannot care about the war dead without advertising the fact.
B is for Blood Sports. Don't. The word is deeply unPS. Say ‘country pursuits’ or ‘field sports’. An engulfing concern for ‘the rural way of life’ and ‘rural employment’ is PS. Concern for the coalminers’ traditional way of life is unPS.
C is for Chair. Don't. As unsound as you can get. Always ‘chairman’. Any reference to ‘the Chair’ must be greeted with ‘Isn't that an item of furniture, ha ha.’
D is for Diana. Don’t. Unsound. Silly girl. An awful shame, of course. We support Charles. It is PS to be in favour of the monarchy as a system, but it is not PS to gush about the royal family as individuals, except possibly the Queen.
E is for Europe, or, as the PS like to insist, ‘the Common Market’. Take care, here. The truly PS emphasise how devoted they are to Europe (glories of Florence, Bach, Puligny Montrachet, etc.), which is not to be confused with ‘Brussels’ (in PS usage invariably employed disparagingly) or the single currency. ‘Dear me, the poor old euro seems to have taken another battering on the currency markets today’ must be uttered with apparently genuine concern. The politically sound speaker ‘takes no pleasure’ in the travails of the euro.
F is for Fayed. For the sound, racist language is just about PS in this exceptional case.
G is for Gay. Don't. This must never be used to mean ‘homosexual’. If others fall into such usage, the PS response is ‘Whatever have they done to that good old-fashioned little word “gay”?’, or ‘Can we have our word back, please?’ [But see ‘Queer’.]
H is for Haider. Carefully does it. Sensitive treatment is required of PS speakers. The keynote expression is ‘counter-productive’, implying that attacks on Haider may only increase his domestic popularity. PS speakers are uneasy about the question of anti-Semitism. It is never sound to express anti-Semitism unless the person doing so is himself Jewish, in which case his remarks will be received with some pleasure.
I is for Am I alone? Fundamental to the ‘mindset’ (dread word!) of the politically sound is the shared pretence that we who hold these opinions are somehow a persecuted minority. Phrases such as ‘Dare I say ... ?’ ‘I realise this is an unfashionable thought, but . . .’ or ‘Are we allowed these days to observe ...?’ are useful in this cause.
J is for Jonathan. For the PS, Aitken is a gallant Etonian whose only fault was to be a trifle buccaneering in his approach. ‘Buccaneer’ is also a useful PS word to describe any well-connected right-wing crook. Leftwing crooks are described as crooks. Neil Hamilton was a ‘maverick’. Socialist liars are called liars.
K is for Kilometres. Don't. All metric measurements are unPS, unless used derisively. Make an elaborate fuss about trying to convert petrol prices in litres into pence per gallon. ‘Give 'em 2.54 centimetres and they'll take 1.6093 kilometres, ha ha’ is an endlessly amusing joke among politically sound.
L is for Love-child. Don't. The expression is unPS but, ‘bastard’ being too rude and ‘illegitimate’ being borderline, the sound are left with the unwieldy ‘born out of wedlock’. Having at first objected to ‘lover’ as well as ‘common-law wife’, PS speakers are now objecting to the perfectly useful term ‘partner’, too (‘Are you going into business together, ha ha?’).
M is for Ms. Don't. The politically sound never say Ms except sneeringly, as in ‘Mzzzz, ha ha’.
N is for the Net. Don't. The expression is not PS because it suggests expert acquaintance with information technology, which is unPS. ‘This Internet thingy’ will generally serve.
O is for the Ozone Layer. Don't. The sound doubt the likelihood of ozone depletion or global warming and treat such matters with sceptical levity (‘I'm all for these so-called holes in the ozone layer. Faster tan. And rising sea-levels? Hooray! Drown all those council estates in Middlesbrough, wherever that is, ha ha.’) PS people are suspicious of anything scientists say and which PC people believe. It is not PS to be completely convinced yet of the link between smoking and cancer. Passive smoking does not, in PS speech, exist. Alcoholism is regarded either with levity or as a regrettable condition which can affect sound people. All other drugs must be spoken of with horror.
P is for Pinochet. He did wonders for the Chilean economy.
Q is for Queer. When the word is used to describe homosexuals it is not PS to complain (as PS speakers do in the case of ‘gay’) that English has been robbed of a perfectly useful little word. The sound do not want this word ‘back’; we ‘homosexualists’ (PS-word) can have it for ourselves. Incidentally, ‘sexuality’ is non-PS, as is ‘gender’ and ‘ethnicity’, the correct expressions (in reverse order) being ‘race’, ‘sex’ and ‘which team is he playing for?’.
R is for Race. ‘Enoch was right, of course.’ The sound take care never quite to specify what Enoch was right about. It is seldom PS to express overtly racist views. A politically sound speaker suggests that ‘it is a regrettable fact’ that the British population contains a number of people considerably less civilised than himself. ‘It is a regrettable fact’ finds extensive PS use as a means of distancing the speaker personally from this or that nasty prejudice which he is about to pray in aid.
S is for Scotland. The sound are shifting on devolution and there is at present no agreed politically sound attitude or language. It is PS to express attachment to the Union, but it is now permissible to add that, if the beastly Celts are so ungrateful as to refuse the delights Union offers, then good riddance to them. Overt English nationalism, however, is not quite sound yet. It is suspected of having something to do with football.
T is for Thatcher. She can do and did do no wrong. It is perfectly PS, however, to chuckle that the old girl went a bit batty in the end, ha ha - but only in the context of unbounded admiration for her achievements and personal merits.
U is for Ulster. The politically sound support the Unionists almost without reservation and make no serious distinction between republicanism and terrorism. It is PS to display a remarkably detailed knowledge of Irish history, dropping obscure dates and battles into the conversation and assuming your listener shares your learning. It is PS to feel very deeply about Ireland, expressing sympathy with an intransigent position which the Unionists themselves have long abandoned. It is not, however, PS to go native or talk like one. References to ‘Prods’ can be PS so long as made with jocular affection. We support them from the outside. We do not necessarily invite them to dinner.
V is for Vulcan. John Redwood is a problem for the politically sound. In his anti-Europeanism, his mutinies against Major, his free-market economics and his social conservatism, Mr Redwood cannot be faulted. But as a PS pin-up and possible leader he is somehow just not quite right. He is referred to by the PS with cautious regard. So is the present Conservative leader — ‘but of course he scores well in the House’. It is not PS to mention William Hague's Yorkshire accent slightingly; this is achieved by deploring ‘that nasal voice’.
W is for Wimmin’ — pronounced thus with sneering emphasis whenever the intention is to mock the equal-opportunities brigade or ‘so-called’ feminists. ‘Margaret was a feminist in the best sense, of course. Never talked about it.’ The PS are much in favour of minorities who don't talk about it, ‘thrust it down our throats’, ‘push it too far’, etc. and like to give the impression of being under siege, except when they themselves are mounting the campaign. It is not PS to be a Eurosceptic in the best sense, of never talking about it. In summary, the Left ‘bang on’ about their causes while the sound ‘dig in our heels’ about ours.
X is for Xenophobia. Don't. The politically sound speaker is anxious not to be taken for a Little Englander, which would be vulgar. He is, however, happy to be accused of xenophobia since this gives him the opportunity to protest a passionate belief in free trade with the whole world, which ‘Brussels’ is trying to block. Towards America in particular the PS speaker is ambivalent, affecting huge disdain for American culture (Mickey Mouse, McDonald's, etc.) while confessing a swelling interest in Nafta. He has not seriously tried to reconcile his belief (in the European case) that with economic union must come political submersion, with his implied supposition that we would somehow not be ‘swamped’ by the United States.
Y is for Yah. Do. Though it is important to distinguish PS speech from ‘U’ speech (in Nancy Mitford's sense), the use of ‘yah’ to mean ‘yes’ is a remarkably good indicator of political soundness. That Michael Portillo should recently have interrupted a questioner with ‘yah, yah, yah, yah’ — and nothing else — shows how anxious he is to be thought completely sound. But he may have to do more than this.
Z is for the Zulu Question. PS people have never wholly reconciled themselves to the strange survival of post-apartheid South Africa. Nor, secretly, have they accepted the bona fides of Nelson Mandela (‘that chap who wears shirts on telly, ha ha’). They keep waiting for the whole thing to go off the rails, which of course they will greatly regret, but which will not entirely surprise them. The knowledgably PS way to signal this subtle position is to mention the Zulu Question. ‘Of course, the Zulu nation has not spoken yet, but will. They are fearsome when roused, as we Brits discovered at Rorke's Drift.’ This means ‘I hope it all comes unstuck’.
We have only scratched the surface and, besides, lists can never substitute for an instilled sense of what belonging to a mindset is all about. So let us try to sum up the feeling of being politically sound. The PS mentality combines a secret consciousness of being in the majority with the pseudo-plaintive tone of the put-upon. The PS voice is confident of the sympathy of the pack. It is the whimper-bark of the natural bully, eternally convinced that his victim is picking the fight.



Previous






Heartless Curmudgeon
February 10th, 2012 8:34pm Report this commentBut please Sir, oh Sir please, please, may we have a lexicon of NooLieBOre cant, - the meaningless rubbish spawned by the Hero of the H2B and his sorry crew, - and now, believe it or not, reborn by the H2B and HIS pathetic crew as witnessed a day or so ago with the 'Empowerment' and 'Fairness' meaningless rubbish.
Al
February 10th, 2012 8:37pm Report this commentBrilliant that you have republished this article. I remember it fondly from when it first appeared in the magazine.
daniel maris
February 10th, 2012 8:38pm Report this commentI've got another list...
How politically incorrect can you be:
Introducing a load of hooey as "NHS Reform" which you are then forced to abandon in stages.
Pretending that a meaningless slogan "The Big Society" is a meaningful policy.
Introducing a 1000 pages of bureaucratic nonsense (localism legislation)and pretending it is about empowering the individual.
Allowing the middle classes to open their own aptly named Free Schools as private instutions. This will of course lead to the closure of lots of independent schools in due course, do nothing to raise standards across the board and suck funding out of the state sector as more and more people elect to come into the state sector.
Promising that the private sector would carry the burden of job creation while you slash the public sector.
Chris
February 10th, 2012 8:58pm Report this commentLee Bum Suk (no 'h') was a South Korean politician, not a Vietnamese General. He was one of those assassinated by the 1983 NoKo bombing in Burma. His name was pronounced approximately 'Yee Pam Seok.' But yes, he did introduce himself with the western pronunciation, and the invitation to laugh now.
Kennybhoy
February 10th, 2012 11:36pm Report this commentFlippant supercillious caca back in 2000 and even more so today. PC is no laughing matter.
There is no possible comparison to be drawn between PC and the "PS" as described above. As properly understood there can be no PC without a machinery of enforcement with the ability to impose real sanctions. PC is a totalitarian speech and thought control device. Cross it's enforcers and God help you! How many lives have been destroyed by "PS" enforcers?
Echoing MikeF over on Liddle's "Snow? What Snow?" thread, I deplorr this magazine's failure to comment on the passing of Ray Honeyford. A brave and decent man who's life was blighted by PC. Instead you choose to republish this caca above. You piss on his memory and and you piss on all the victims of PC.
God forgive you.
Fergus Pickering
February 11th, 2012 5:02am Report this commentSorry, Daniel, will you run that one about Free Schools by me again. I couldn't make head nor tail of it.
DavidDP
February 11th, 2012 11:29am Report this commentParris is probably the best Conservative writer in the press today. Absolutely marvellous.
Peter From Maidstone
February 11th, 2012 12:59pm Report this commentFrank P has written a brilliant response to this archived blog post, but it won't post on this site, so read it here...
www.coffeehousewall.co.uk/the-coffee-house-wall-6th-13th-february/#comment-382
daniel maris
February 11th, 2012 1:03pm Report this commentFergus -
I live in London where undoubtedly state secondary education is very poor (thanks in large measure to mass immigration, but other factors as well eg I wouldn't be surprised if teachers are generally much younger in London than elsewhere) and where private education is horrendously expensive.
daniel maris
February 11th, 2012 1:04pm Report this commentFree Schools will be incredibly popular here once private sector parents realise they can get private sector standard education at no cost. Toby Young and others have realised the way to achieve this is to create Free Schools that are culturally hostile to the mass of the population: so it's expensive uniforms, full Latin curriculum and no doubt other ruses like Saturday sports (when poor kids need to work).
Once this starts to succeed more and more kids will come into the state sector, reducing the per capita amount available to all students and also creating financial crises in private schools as their students disappear.
Once again a really well thought through policy!
I've nothing against radical reform of our schools system but this will change very little, except allowing the upper middle classes to have more children.
Michael
February 11th, 2012 3:37pm Report this commentI went off this fellow when I found out he never washed his hair...
Fergus Pickering
February 11th, 2012 6:18pm Report this commentDaniel, surely the upper middle classes having more children and the underclass having fewer would be an excellent thing. There would be fewer children born in poverty, born to fail, born to leech off the state, born to be called ridiculous names like Bromide and Canteloupe. Win-win, I'd say.
Malfleur
February 12th, 2012 1:09am Report this commentWhere does this fit in?
"The term 'racism’ functions not as a word with which to create insight, but as a slogan designed to suppress constructive thought. It conflates prejudice and discrimination ... It is the icon word of those committed to the race game. And they apply it with the same sort of mindless zeal as the inquisitors voiced 'heretic’ or Senator McCarthy spat out 'Commie’.”
daniel maris
February 12th, 2012 1:31am Report this commentFergus,
Sadly, though your mots were bon, I never said that this would result in a reduced birth rate for the underclass...in fact as this would guarantee they remain undereducated, you would be perpetuating the problem of low income large families.
daniel maris
February 12th, 2012 10:51am Report this commentFergus,
Well I agree we should have a list of 200 names from which parents can choose , like in the good old days of the French Republic.
Jez
February 13th, 2012 11:04am Report this commentKennybhoy.
100% true.
They ain't publishing anything like that anymore.
Back to top