Project Merlin may not wield a magic wand
Peter Hoskin 1:49pm
Are Project Merlin's lending targets just a myth? On the basis of today's figures it's still rather hard to tell. The arrangement between the government and the banks did yield
£214.9 billion of gross lending to businesses in 2011 — against a target of £190 billion, and a 20 per cent increase on 2010. But net lending also declined in every quarter of the
year. And the target for lending to small businesses of £76 billion was missed by £1.1 billion.
The banks have put this shortfall down to fewer small businesses coming forward for credit — and there's actually some truth in that. This survey suggests that small businesses did indeed withdraw their begging bowls as the year progressed. Although, in truth, some of them were put off more because they expected to be refused by the banks than because they didn't want to borrow.
The government, of course, regards this as a major, ongoing problem. Which is why it's eager to replace Project Merlin with its new Credit Easing Scheme later this year, to ensure that businesses
still have ready access to credit. Their policy is, in effect, to close the gap between the two lines for the UK in this eye-catching chart released last year:

But I do wonder: rather than being a problem to be feared, might that gap be more a natural correction following years of easy credit and over-dependency on debt? It's a question that few
politicians ask, as they bluff and bluster about lending targets. But they should, not least because its answer could determine whether they're boosting the economy or merely wishing forward
another bubble.
That survey I mentioned above contains some useful correctives to the predominant idea that businesses are gagging for credit. Did you know, for instance, that ‘Most SMEs were “happy
nonseekers” who had not sought, or felt the need to seek external finance in the previous year’? Or that ‘34 percent of all SMEs can be described as completely disengaged from
borrowing (they have not borrowed, have not wanted to borrow and are happy to have no plans to borrow in the immediate future)’? Or indeed that:
Of course, this doesn't mean that there are no concerns around lending to businesses. A loan can make all the difference between an entrepreneur succeeding or not starting up in the first place. But let's not assume that today's £1.1 billion lending shortfall will be a disaster for the economy — nor that the answer is more cheap money. These things are worth questioning at least.‘79 per cent of overdraft applicants and 63 per cent of loan applicants were successful with their loan/overdraft application. 16 per cent of overdraft applicants and 31 per cent of loan applicants ended up with no facility at all. This is the equivalent of 2 per cent of all SMEs being unsuccessful with an overdraft application and 1 per cent of all SMEs being unsuccessful with a loan application.’



Previous






telemachus'
February 13th, 2012 2:27pm Report this commentA natural correction after years of easy credit
OK then Pete why quantitative easing if not to line the pockets of the greedy bankers?
It doesn't add up...
February 13th, 2012 2:32pm Report this commentThe idea that banks are the only possible or desirable
It doesn't add up...
February 13th, 2012 2:33pm Report this commentsource of funds for businesses seems a quaint affectation of Cable's.
It doesn't add up...
February 13th, 2012 2:33pm Report this commentI wouldn't want to borrow from a bank until
Jedi Joe
February 13th, 2012 2:34pm Report this commentVery, very good article Peter. This is the most balanced piece I've heard about the state of buiness lending in the UK for a while.
Given the new capital requirements and the bank levy on short term lending, I'm fankly impressed that the gross lending targets were met. It's not the job of the banks to force businesses to accept credit, or to subsidise them with below-market rates.
I'd like to point out though that gross and net lending to manufacturing firms barely grew through out the bubble period, as most of the business lending then went into real estate and financial firms. As manufacturing is usually capital intensive, export orientated and high growth, this is probably an area that the government should be targeting their credit easing initiative.
It doesn't add up...
February 13th, 2012 2:35pm Report this commentbanks have sorted out their balance sheets.
It doesn't add up...
February 13th, 2012 2:35pm Report this commentPlease fix your software
Hugh Barnard
February 13th, 2012 3:46pm Report this commentIn fact, an additional tool for this would be credit clearing and services barter between SMEs. There are existing systems for this. Reduce the dependency on banks who are often greedy, unrealistic and [much worse] fair weather friends pulling the plug at the worst moment. Don't feed the bankers! There's a reason an investment bank was called a 'merchant' bank, it was in better hands then about 500 years ago.
Mr Danger 1
February 13th, 2012 3:49pm Report this commentShall we tell the Dragon's Den that they have to approve 10% more entrepreneurs this year? Maybe the DriveSafe Glove will have a chance.
Or maybe government targets for lending growth are silly.
Jez
February 13th, 2012 3:57pm Report this commentI've been trading as an independant now for about 60 days.
Four words; 'Cash Flow' / 'Sleepless nights'.
I found the bank to be my best friend, as i haven't borrowed anything to get here.
I'm pretty sure the banks would have previously wasted billions giving to unsustainable business plans in the past- now the crunch is on, then they'd be tempted to tread on the side of caution.
Back to top