Subscribe to The Spectator

Saturday 26 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Friday, 24th February 2012

Transcript: Grayling on work experience

Jonathan Jones 12:51pm

On the Today Programme this morning, Employment Minister Chris Grayling defended the government's Work Experience programme in light of the recent controversies around it. Here's a full transcript of the interview:

Evan Davis:
Well how can work experience get such a bad name? A string of high profile companies have pulled out of one government scheme providing work experience for young people. The latest, retailer Poundland, has announced it is suspending its participation in the scheme although it’s not quite clear which scheme it is, because there are several government schemes for getting people, long-term unemployed or young, into work. Let’s see if we can clarify what is going on with the Employment Minister, Chris Grayling. Good morning to you.

Chris Grayling: Hello there.

ED: Let’s just go through this. There are two schemes, there’s a work experience scheme which is kind of voluntary for young people but if they are on benefits they are often told they’ll lose their benefits if they don’t enter it, correct?

CG:
No, I mean there is a work experience scheme, it’s voluntary. If you are a young person looking for work, the Job Centre Plus advisor will talk to you about which area you might be interested in going and working in. Let’s suppose you want to go and work in the care sector, they’ll find you a work experience placement in the care sector, you’ll go and meet the employer, if you’re both happy with that and the employer is willing to take you, then you’ll start the placement. You’ve got a week to change your mind …

ED: You’re not paid though for the placement?

CG:
You continue to get your benefits and you get your travel expense and so forth.

ED: So you don’t have to take it, you can say ‘no, I don’t want to do that, I don’t want to work’?

CG: You don’t have to take it.

ED: And they never say you’ll lose your benefits if you don’t?

CG: The only circumstances in which you can lose your benefits, and the reason we’ve got a sanction in place, is really if you walk out much later in the time you’re there without good reason. We’ll investigate and if there’s a problem you can face the same sanction you’d get for not turning up for your fortnightly signing on at the Job Centre.

ED: So it is an entirely, entirely voluntary scheme, that one?

CG: Entirely voluntary.  

ED: Then the other one, which is the work programme for the long-term unemployed, not just the young but long-term unemployed, and that one has work experience built into it which is or can be compulsory?

CG: Well this is a bit of a red herring. The only scheme that we have at the moment that involves mandatory activity is a short term scheme operated by Job Centre Plus called Mandatory Work Activity and it is really aimed at people where a Job Centre Plus advisor feels a bit of… somebody’s job search has gone off the rails, either they’re not trying or they are really kind of out of sorts. They can be referred for a month’s full-time community work. It is absolutely clear that that work is carried out on community benefiting projects out there, it might be helping a local sports club with youth outreach work, it might be environmental work. There is no circumstance in which we would mandate any individual to take part in work activity for a big company, that doesn’t happen.

ED: Okay, so there was the case of Kate Riley who was dispatched to Poundland to work unpaid and who was suing and saying it was bad for her career to have to do that. What scheme was she on when she was sent off there?

CG:
Well I think it’s a very difficult one, the Kate Riley case, because we strongly dispute the nature of her complaint.

ED: Which scheme was she… she was under the impression she was being forced to do it, whether or not she was, so which scheme was that?

CG: She was referred to a work experience placement which she completed and it is a matter of record that no complaint was made by her until after she had completed her placement and…

ED: That wasn’t the work programme, that was the work experience programme?

CS: That was the work experience programme.

ED: Okay, that is the one that a lot of employers have said they want to leave. We’re not quite clear whether Poundland is leaving that one or the other one…

CG: I’m not entirely clear either. I mean, you’ve got to understand…

ED: Why do you think all these employers are saying we don’t want to have anything to do with it? They are saying we don’t want to have people thinking that we’re employing slave labour.

CG: What’s happened in the last week is we’ve got a lot of companies who are very jumpy. They are under pressure from a big internet campaign that is being run by an organisation that is a front for the Socialist Workers Party. Now the high street retail sector is going through a rough time at the moment, if you are running a company and you are getting strings of emails attacking you, it is very unsettling. It’s a false campaign. Let me give you an example, my own email address was hacked by this organisation and used to lodge a complaint with Tesco so I don’t accept that the scale of the campaign is very large, it is a small number of activists who are deliberately targeting these companies and trying to destabilise them.

ED: Do you know, I think there is a more deep-rooted scepticism about these schemes. I am going to read something which I think the Prime Minister said yesterday which  gets to the nub of this, because it is a very interesting thing he said, 'Put a young person into college for a month’s learning, unpaid, is hailed as a good thing. Put a young person into a supermarket for a month’s learning, unpaid, it’s slammed as slave labour', Mr Cameron said. Do you really think there is a kind of equality between putting someone unpaid into college and the learning experience, using his word, they get working unpaid in a supermarket?

CG: Well let me ask you a question. We are very hung up at the moment on retailers and supermarkets, if we put a young person for a month into a technology company to get experience, most people would say that’s a good thing. Now a work experience scheme covers technology companies, covers care companies, it covers manufacturing companies, it also happens to cover retailing. Now retailing is one of our biggest areas of employment in the UK, some of our supermarkets are some of the biggest employers in the country, they have hugely diverse career opportunities. If you are the manager of a big supermarket you are running a business of tens if not hundreds of millions of pounds. Somehow, for some reason, there seems to be a view that a career in a supermarket is a bad thing. Now that’s just…

ED: But the amount that you are going to learn stacking shelves is not going to be very great if you aspire or have ambitions to go well beyond that. It’s been over-sold hasn’t it? I mean calling it a learning experience matching going to college, that’s a very, very strange way of framing it isn’t it?

CG: Well you are assuming that all somebody does when they walk through a door of a supermarket is told there’s a trolley, stack the shelves and of course the work experience scheme is much more than that. Typically…

ED: What do you learn when you go and do work experience in supermarket?

CG: Well you learn how a major retailer works. In most cases most retailers will get somebody working with different departments in the store, they will typically have somebody mentoring them to show them different parts of how the business works, the logistics part, the customer service part, some of the back-up, IT part. You know, these are big businesses with big career opportunities and  if you are interested in a retail career, if you are unemployed and you think it might be an option for you, surely…

ED: If you are stacking shelves you’ll pick up the skills you need?

CG: But you say if you are interested in stacking shelves but what about if you are interested in becoming a store manager of a supermarket? All the big retailers, take John Lewis... John Lewis, every one of their staff starts working on the shop floor. Now surely – from chief exec, HR and so forth, what’s wrong with that? I mean it’s the front line of a retail business, that’s what happens.

ED: What record, what data have you to suggest that these schemes gets people off benefits? I mean I’ve got a graph in front of me from a group called Inclusion who’ve tried to look at the benefit, the record of people on those schemes relative to the ones who are not on those schemes and it seems to suggest that the kind of propensity to stay on Job Seekers Allowance is more or less the same for both groups.

CG: Well that’s not our experience. I mean the first thing…

ED: You’ve got data on that have you?

CG: The data we’ve got so far for the work experience scheme, which is now a few months old, is that the young people who go through the scheme, eleven weeks after they’ve started, eleven weeks after the first day of their work experience, around 50 per cent are off benefits and we know that a large number of those young people actually are staying on in employment with the employers who give them the placement and that’s surely a good thing. Now we’re now crunching further numbers and all of the evidence we can see is that this does better than simply leaving people on JSA. It actually helps more young people get into work.

ED: I come back then to why employers who can presumably see that this is a good scheme, if it’s as good as you say it is, who know that it isn’t slave labour, who know that it’s voluntary as you say it is voluntary, why would they all then be leaving the scheme? They’re not going to be cowed by a small group of Socialist Workers sending them emails.

CG: Well as we sit here today we’ve got more than 100 organisations with national partnerships with us. Not one single company has withdrawn. There is lots of gossip around, lots of suggestions. Take a practical example, Sainsbury’s are alleged to have pulled out of the scheme. Sainsbury’s have never been part of the scheme but Sainsbury’s made it very clear publicly that they run their own work experience scheme so they’ve not needed to join ours, they run a big work experience scheme.

ED: Good point, now while you’ve mentioned Sainsbury’s I just wanted to mention one other thing because Sainsbury’s have actually said something else. They have actually been hassled by a company called A4e, their local store managers, even though they have never been part of this scheme, they have actually had to write to their branches in order to prevent – and this is quoting from their own statement ‘that our branch managers do not inadvertently participate in work experience schemes’.They say ‘we don’t work, we never have entered into partnership with A4E, despite this their representatives have continued to approach our stores at local level. We’ve had to remind our managers that they should only use our existing programmes.’ This sounds like a very odd way for an organisation working on behalf of Job Centre Plus to be behaving.

CG: Well there was an incident that we picked up last year from a local manager in the A4e organisation. We stamped on it very, very quickly, it shouldn’t have happened, both A4e accepted it shouldn’t have happened, Sainsbury’s said it shouldn’t have happened. In any big programme, the work programme, the work experience programme, the other things we’re doing encompass a large number of people in a large number of places. You’ll always have little glitches but we dealt with that one very quickly at the time.  

ED: Let me just ask finally, you still have confidence in A4e on the contracts that it is still bidding for and that it already has?

CG: Well I always very clearly take the view that anyone, whether it is an individual or an organisation is innocent until proven guilty. We have been very clear that we will watch very carefully what happens in the police investigation. If there is any evidence of systemic fraud in our relationship with A4e we would not hesitate to terminate our contractual relationships with them.

ED: Okay, Chris Grayling, Employment Minister, thank you very much.

Filed under: Chris Grayling (49 more articles) , DWP (7 more articles) , Employment (149 more articles) , Job Centres (2 more articles) , Jobs (23 more articles) , Today programme (31 more articles) , UK politics (5409 more articles) , Unemployment (92 more articles) , Welfare (256 more articles) , Welfare reform (43 more articles)

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (27) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Nicholas

February 24th, 2012 1:12pm Report this comment

Another mealy mouthed, utterly inarticulate cabinet minister who joins Lansley in being incapable of robustly defending, promoting and advancing conservatism convincingly but instead comes across as a repressed and stutteringly incompetent public school boy totally out of touch. Watching these idiots constantly wrong-footed and outmanoeuvred by cynical lefties on QT is desperately depressing.

stabledoor

February 24th, 2012 1:31pm Report this comment

@Nicholas Did you read the transcript or listen to the interview? ED was pushing the line that work experience in retail only ever involves stacking shelves and sneering at the people who do it. Chris Grayling gave a good robust defence of the whole program and came over very well - you must be wearing some very strange blinkers

Nicholas

February 24th, 2012 1:35pm Report this comment

stabledoor - yes, I did. It probably came over well to people like you but that was not my point.

Mark Pasola

February 24th, 2012 1:36pm Report this comment

A minister clearly on top of his brief. Impressive.

Russell

February 24th, 2012 1:37pm Report this comment

Clear concise honest replies by the Minister totally proving that the organised anti brigade and the Guardian/BBC are trying to destabilise or wreck good schemes to help unemployed people purely to give labour some political points.

Makes a nice change from the liars and spin of 13 years from labour.
Labour were, and still are the party of liars, hypocrits, bullies, thugs who will do and say anything to get their grubby hands on power and access to the taxpayer money trough.

nolan walker

February 24th, 2012 1:40pm Report this comment

I agree Nicholas.
How about:
'Well Evan, you see these shelves stackers are ultimately able bodied, capable of work and yet withdrawing money from the same pot that is there for the infirm and vulnerable in their community. So if they can contribute in anyway to the economy (stacking shelves for example) then it enables the community to have more money to pay for old people’s heating in the winter and things like that. Tell me Evan why would you or they be against that?'
he could then add ‘You ridiculous institutionalised leftist’, or words to that effect.

Nickle

February 24th, 2012 1:47pm Report this comment

Lets make work for welfare compulsory.

That puts an end to it.

You get your rent, schooling for your children, free health care, plus money for food and clothes etc, in exchange for working on a scheme. 3 days a week minimum, leaving you two days a week for job interviews etc.

Private Schultz

February 24th, 2012 1:58pm Report this comment

Yup, I'm with you Nickle.

Lonesome Dave

February 24th, 2012 2:02pm Report this comment

I heard the interview and it reinforced how unpleasant Evan Davis is towards coalition but particularly Conservative interviewees.

His constant interruptions, false giggles and sneering tone are rather bloody rude, frankly.

Perhaps a spell stacking shelves in the real world may improve both his manners and his outlook - but somehow I doubt it.

EdinburghEye

February 24th, 2012 2:12pm Report this comment

So, Nickie, for all those single mothers out there - who exactly is going to pay for the childcare while the mothers are in a full-time job with no pay? What about people are jobhunting and have other caring responsibilities - sick partner, elderly parents? They can provide the care for free themselves, or the state can provide it, but if they're not in a paid job they can't pay for it themselves.

Are carers now going to come from unpaid labour schemes? How is that going to drive up standards of care - already low by European standards?

Thinking it's OK to force people to work for free if they haven't got a job, is one of those silly ideas that if you think about it properly, you realise why most countries gave up using workhouses & suchlike schemes.

wmcht

February 24th, 2012 2:28pm Report this comment

Despite all the hadwringing on the left they actually want unemployment to rise (why weren't they bothered when it rose to 2.5m under labour). What really scares them is the fact that these policies are working.
The Government should also consider reducing minimum wage for young people as they mostly live at home.

JohnOfEnfield

February 24th, 2012 2:36pm Report this comment

...followed up by an interview on WatO with a jolly SWP member who INSISTED this was all about "slave labour". A very gentle interview - I am sure he will be back on for another easy ride.

No mention of the BBC's own "slave labour" internships.

Bizarre - in the extreme. Remind me - do I pay for this standard of interview(a clue - I am well under 75 years of age)?

Mike Barnes

February 24th, 2012 3:10pm Report this comment

Deary me. Blaming the Socialist Workers Party, and accusing people of hacking his emails. How desperate can you get.

I read the facebook wall of Tesco. They were real people complaining about the scheme. I saw hundreds if not thousands of comments get deleted over the course of the day. It was not an organised SWP campaign.

perdix

February 24th, 2012 3:45pm Report this comment

The truth about the schemme should be advertised in each major daily paper (even if we have to give some money to The Guardian, the top lefty stirring rag).

Freddo

February 24th, 2012 4:04pm Report this comment

Well, the SWP say they're organising it - so who should we believe?

Dimoto

February 24th, 2012 4:06pm Report this comment

That's the trouble with TESCO, Mike Barnes.

They set their business strategy according to "Facebook Wall" comments.

Probably why their customers are deserting in droves.

Verity

February 24th, 2012 4:10pm Report this comment

Nickel 1:47 pm. V sound. Obviously, there will be some cases in which it would be impractical, but by and large, it demonstrates to people who may feel otherwise, that money isn't free of the cost of producing it ... i.e., work.

FF

February 24th, 2012 4:21pm Report this comment

I think Evan Davis' questions were fine. It's a controversial scheme. Davis put the opposing view to the Minister who can then justify them point by point. This is my take:

1. The scheme is not really voluntary. Grayling appeared disingenuous. It doesn't seem to be totally voluntary despite Grayling's assertions.

2. These schemes are ineffective at getting people off benefits and back to work. Here Grayling did much better with some strong figures, although Davis made some telling points that weren't entirely answered.

Fish

February 24th, 2012 4:28pm Report this comment

Edinburgh Eye, with regard to the people that you describe, are they unemployed and AVAILABLE for work or are they not? If they're not avaiable, they cannot qualify for JSA and cannot be included in the unemployed count. Whilst it is right that the state supports those who cannot work, the tax payer should not have to subsidise those who make unemployment a career choice.

Mike Barnet, so this is not an organised SWP campaign? I suggest (but I am sure you have already) take a look at the 'Right (not) to Work' website and you will see that Tesco is a particular target. McDonalds will be getting the same treatement from this week-end. Also, take a look at the twitterers, you will see that this anti-democratic movement are mobilising their activists, ecouraging participation in media dicussions with links and phone-in numbers to thier soulmates in the BBC and the Guardian.

It is clear that the perpetually sneering Evan Davis hasn't got a clue about the nature of these schemes. The hard left and their mates in the BBC are on the wrong side of this argument.

Oh! and what was the SWP's share of the vote at the GE?

Holly ......

February 24th, 2012 5:07pm Report this comment

Let's see if Ed the great comes out against these pathetic,childish anti work campaigns over the weekend.
Most sane Brits should be VERY concerned that Labour & the left are trying to scupper any economic upturn.
THAT INCLUDES YOU JOURNO BODS AS WELL!!!!!
Any young person being turned down for jobs because of 'no experience' should be counter
demonstrating against these arseholes for scuppering their opportunities.
First it was the bankers,now work experience
schemes....Where are the journo's in defence
of the young people who want to do these schemes...F..ing NOWHERE TO BE FOUND
Give us a post about anything positive Ed Miliband & Co have said to benefit anyone in this country....NOT A FRICKIN' THING....
ZILCH.
Like the guy said yesterday,'How are Ed & Chuck going to feel if Hester leaves RBS'?
The left would love it.
How do Ed & Co think these youngsters feel being stoped from learning something about work life?
The left are loving it.
Let's concentrate on the rest of us for a change.

Sylva Ngen

February 24th, 2012 5:21pm Report this comment

This is a very good scheme which is poorly manage by these guys.

Struggling Chris Grayling was just saying rubbish last night on newsnight.

I believe all of these dead cabinet ministers who can not articulate should go and learn some communication skills.

Well why blaming them when their own Boss David Cameron failed woefully to sell his BIG SOCIETY idea. Lack of articulation full stop.

Fish

February 24th, 2012 5:57pm Report this comment

Holly, you sound really cross.

AntonZ

February 24th, 2012 10:55pm Report this comment

Chris Grayling has denied that the work experience program was mandatory, which is true - this afternoon. But earlier today the DWP 'Work Programme Provider Guidance' told a very different story.The relevant section (which has been removed in the latest version) says:

"Work Experience for JSA Claimants
14. Where you are providing support for JSA participants, which is work experience you must mandate participants to this activity. This is to avoid the National Minimum Wage Regulations, which will apply if JSA participants are not mandated."

The relevant document is here
www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/wp-pg-chapter-3.pdf

The cache copy is here (though I don't know for how long):
cache:http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/wp-pg-chapter-3.pdf

Interestingly the version number has not been updated giving the
impression that nothing has changed, it remains as V2.00. I would have thought the change was rather significant. Surely this is not an attempt to rewrite history to pretend the scheme was voluntary all the time?

Is there no limit to the lies and deception this government spins?

Trapped

February 24th, 2012 11:48pm Report this comment

More reports indicating the workfare scheme was essentially used to displace seasonal work. Honestly, this is going to turn into an almighty mess if it's not sorted out.

Suggestion : Work experience -in the private sector- should be entirely voluntary. However, after a certain time period you should be made eligible to the charitable sector or to the public sector for low skilled work, this benefits society a lot more than subsidising private companies, and still gives the jobseeker similar or comparable experience.

MistyA

February 25th, 2012 9:29am Report this comment

I feel that Chris Grayling presented his case very well. The media is focussing on the supermarkets, but any work experience is a good thing.

That must be why the BBC offer it.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/careers/work-experience

toni

February 25th, 2012 10:42am Report this comment

The Guardian today.
"Jobseekers forced to clean private homes and offices for nothing"

EdinburghEye

February 26th, 2012 10:32am Report this comment

FISH: "Edinburgh Eye, with regard to the people that you describe, are they unemployed and AVAILABLE for work or are they not? "

You're ignoring my point. A person can be available for PAID work - because that will enable them in turn to pay for childcare! - but not available for UNPAID work, since they won't be able to afford a carer.

The notion that the only people who object to forced labour for free are members of the Socialist Workers Party is nonsensical.

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

Tag Cloud

Coffee House archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk