Sunday 8 November 2009

Jobs at Telegraph

Thursday, 19th June 2008

Burnham gets more than he bargained for

James Forsyth 4:26pm

Andy Burnham’s comments about David Davis and Shami Chakrabarti were a cheap shot and unworthy of this office. They also typified the cack-handed way in which Labour has responded to the Tories on civil liberties—more on that later.

Davis hit back hard in the papers this morning and Chakrabarti has escalated the issue with a threat of legal action:

"I look forward to your written apology as I'm sure does Mrs Davis. If on the other hand you choose to continue down the path of innuendo and attempted character assassination, you will find that the privileged legal protection of the parliament chamber does not extend to slurs made in the wider public domain."

Having to produce a written apology would be a severe embarrassment for Burnham. It would also be a further indication that he’s another young cabinet minister who isn’t quite ready for prime time.

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (21) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Kit

June 19th, 2008 4:52pm Report this comment

Chakrabarti threatening to use our very illiberal libel laws.

J H Holloway

June 19th, 2008 5:01pm Report this comment

Typical New Lab - smears first, second and third...
Nip over the Guardian to see the mean-minded, twisted, jealousy concerning Boris J's first few weeks in office...

And doubts on who is really nasty party?

john problem

June 19th, 2008 5:03pm Report this comment

'Oh, God. Why can't these young jerks wait until we've seen what they're going to say? Why have a PR dog and bark yourself? Where does Gordon find them? Bloody culture, he's in charge of! Can you believe it? Probably spells it 'kulchur.' What can you expect from a jerk who worked for BP? I'm gonna tell Gordon that this is enough. His young jerks have got to be held on a tight leash or I'm off to work for Mugabe.'

Fergus Pickering

June 19th, 2008 5:03pm Report this comment

I was hard put to remember who Mr Burnham was. But I shall remember now.

Verity

June 19th, 2008 5:13pm Report this comment

Fergus Pickering - Why bother?

C Powell

June 19th, 2008 5:34pm Report this comment

Verity: because this is the man this very magazine described as a future Labour leader.

He should have had more sense than take on someone married to a litigation lawyer at a top City firm.

Max Kaye

June 19th, 2008 5:44pm Report this comment

Burnham? Burnham? Hmmm... is he the one who uses eyeliner?

Kevyn Bodman

June 19th, 2008 6:04pm Report this comment

Andy Burnham's comments are nasty, silly and show very poor judgment.

C Powell

June 19th, 2008 6:10pm Report this comment

Oops sorry: no that was James Purnell. Easy mistake: they all look like identikit teenagers.

Charlie T

June 19th, 2008 6:21pm Report this comment

Burnham is a slimy party hack hopelessly overpromoted.
Still at least he`s consistent in his attacks on individual liberties. He never misses a chance to write letters to the national press trumpeting the stasistate DNA database. In fact he writes so many its a wonder he has time to do anything else.

Athesius the Facilitator

June 19th, 2008 6:22pm Report this comment

Is it just starting to dawn on the great unwashed that the Labour party (especially neo lab)is the nasty party. They have always been nasty. It is born from the fact that they have a chip on their shoulders cos they are ficker than the Tory's. My work pal Anthony the Sensitive thinks they are all a bunch of selfish individuals who put the party and themselves before the country and get their kicks by putting down the hard working tax payer. A dying breed that the burhams of this world do not like. I agree with Anthony on that point.

David C

June 19th, 2008 7:18pm Report this comment

Somebody over at the UK Politics Blog is asking a rather interesting question.

Just how did Burnham know about phone calls?
Late night phone calls?

Hugh

June 19th, 2008 7:51pm Report this comment

Interesting post, but why have you illustrated it with a picture of Ferris Bueller?

David Boothroyd

June 20th, 2008 12:52am Report this comment

David C, when Shami Chakrabarti commented on David Davis' decision to fight for re-election, she said that she had been told about it in a late-night phone call and indeed had tried to talk him out of it.

One wonders why she is threatening legal action as I can't see any defamatory meaning attaching to her.

PS Save Ferris!

Fergus Pickering

June 20th, 2008 3:29am Report this comment

Who the f*** is Ferris Bueller?

Steve

June 20th, 2008 8:28am Report this comment

I can't help feeling that Shami Chakrabarti has gone a bit postal on this one. I think this is a case where outright mockery and derision would be more effective.

Max Kaye

June 20th, 2008 3:56pm Report this comment

Steve - I don't blame her. I wish I had an excuse to sue the bastards. Any excuse. Any of the bastards.

alex

June 21st, 2008 5:26pm Report this comment

So James Forsyth thinks Andy Burnham goes in for 'cheap shots', that are 'unworthy of his office' and executed in manner described as 'cack handed'. Pot and kettle syndrome folks. The reason people like myself respect David Davis, even if I disagree with his views on 42 days, is that he stood up against the dangerously authoritarian strain of hystery emerging in British, and world, political discourse. As the Spectator is leading the charge to re-make the Conservatives as 'the nasty party', and largely succeeding, the actions of a figure like Davis should be seen as admirable by those who really believe in 'liberty', which is a concept that involves more than just the ability of the rich to remain rich. As the Spectator is spectacularly adept at smear jobs are not the venerable Mr Forsyth's comments a tad err.. ridiculous ! Still soon enough your friends in the newly refashioned nasty party will be back in power and all dissent will be dealt with accordingly, in the manner that all tyrants utilise after they have progressed beyond the smear job and propaganda. Roll on ton-of-manure-istan

alex

June 21st, 2008 5:35pm Report this comment

and in case anyone wants to point out that I spelt hysteria as 'hystery', well it does combine the words hysteria and history in a way akin to the Spectator's mixing of objective reportage with wild opinionated rubbish... err the word 'Pilgerite', capital P or small case ?

james

June 22nd, 2008 12:47am Report this comment

to alex,
not pilgerite, perhaps pilgershite?

Ann

June 22nd, 2008 10:39am Report this comment

Sorry to disagree. Doe-eyed Sami herself is part of the nasty tendency. She abuses her position to promote only those 'liberties' that she regards as PC.

Post comment

Back to top

Tag Cloud

Coffee House archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

      GASCONY

GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +

BIG SAND STEEL BAND

IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel

BOSC LEBAT, Tarn et Garonne.

BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors