Tackling poverty
Fraser Nelson 12:12am
Today’s march on poverty – with church leaders at the front; Gordon Brown giving the sermon – overlooks an important point. Thanks to global capitalism, we are living in a golden age of poverty reduction: never in human history has the West’s wealth been shared more quickly with the developing world, and to such incredible effect. According to the World Bank, the number in extreme poverty has dropped from 40% in 1981 to 21% in 2001. Poverty has fallen most where capitalism has done best. That is why the bulk of the drop in world poverty is done by India and China. “China prices” mean cheap goods for us – but in China it means 400 million fewer people in poverty, according to the World Bank.
Brown occasionally calls for a Marshall Plan for Africa. But the aid poured into the continent has amounted to about a dozen Marshall Plans over the last few decades – without free trade and with continued bad governance, it doesn’t do any good. So its poverty levels have risen from 41% to 46% over the same period. To Brown’s credit, he also denounces the scandal of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) – the white man’s shame – set up to stop African farmers tackle poverty by trading with us. Aid certainly puts food into hungry bellies, and can work up to a point. But the lesson of the last two decades is that trade is a far the most powerful tool. Anyone serious about ending world poverty should make this the primary focus. So it is thanks to global capitalism, not state aid, that the demand on the banners held today – half poverty by 2015 – will likely be met. The best thing G8 leaders can do to promote this is drop their tariffs.
P.S. The common riposte to this from Christian Aid etc is “they may be getting richer in India, but inequality is getting worse”. But of you look at global populations (as opposed to countries) then inequality is lower today than at any point since 1910 according to research by Surjit Bhalla, an Indian economist.



Previous








Verity
July 25th, 2008 12:37am Report this commentI totally agree with your points about Africa, Fraser.
No Marshall Plan. After sixty years of independence, they don't have a pot to piss in due to their passive acceptance of corruption. So a huge no to any more aid. Of any kind.
I also agree with your CAP point. I have argued on other blogs for around three years that we must let the Africans in to try their hand. The protectionism of CAP is disgusting.
Let African businessmen and women have an equal right in the marketplace. Let them try their hand in our markets! This is the way for African countries to find their feet. Free enterprise. Not charity.
But if the ghastly construct of the EU denies them the opportunity of free trade, we have to ask why.
So, I'm asking: Why?
hysteria
July 25th, 2008 1:27am Report this commenti think you know the answer verity!
Verity
July 25th, 2008 3:26pm Report this commentOld fashioned protectionism. The undemocratic EU doesn't like competition and freedom of choice. Besides, the French farmers wouldn't agree to it.
simon
August 27th, 2008 2:47pm Report this commentBrazil would be the best example of what capitalism can achieve in reducing inequality.
Back to top