Boston must go
Sean Martin 12:45pm
The QCA has at long last pulled the plug on ETS over the SATS marking debacle with the company being forced to pay back the remaining four years of its contract payment.
It is good news that the taxpayers won’t have to pay ETS £19.5 million over the next four years but it can’t hide the fact that someone at the government end should be held responsible for this cock-up. After all, they signed a £156 million contract with a firm whose record should have set alarm bells ringing.
Ed Balls should take the blame but he won’t, arguing that his department had passed responsibility for the contract to the QCA. Ken Boston, the QCA chief executive, doesn’t have anyone else to blame and so he should start clearing his desk.



Previous






David C
August 15th, 2008 1:21pm Report this commentBalls the courageous:
"A big boy did it but I scared him off".
Pffut.
Nicholas
August 15th, 2008 1:56pm Report this commentBoston should go and so should Balls. The man is an incompetent buffoon. He won't of course. New Labour don't do resignation - at least not in England.
Dave Rogers
August 15th, 2008 2:13pm Report this commentTo be fair to 'lads mags' Gove, despite that speech last week does seem he has got his act together on this one. he was chirping about this in May. he's dealt a blow to Balls here, which as we all know means a blow to Brown.
Mac
August 15th, 2008 2:37pm Report this commentThere's plenty more Balls pending; the destruction of the independent and grammar schools in the name of 'equality' and 100% As at A levels for all.
David C - Tsk, tsk, gramer and speling? Surely,
"a big boy dun it?" Innit?
Marian C
August 15th, 2008 2:41pm Report this commentEd No-Balls should be sacked with immediate effect and so should the other joker Ken Boston. It is an absolute disgrace that nobody is being held responsible. Whoever, signed the agreement/contract with ETS should be named and shamed.
David C
August 15th, 2008 4:05pm Report this commentSoz, Macs
David Parker
August 15th, 2008 4:10pm Report this commentMost Government departments are useless at contractual negotiations, its not their money so why should they care?
One of the problems is that many career civil servants sniffily regard commerce as something rather vulgar and infra dig. Few of those engaged in the legal departments of the various ministries are of the same calibre as the lawyers employed or retained by major contractors in the private sector: consequently, again and again, we see examples of the taxpayers being taken to the cleaners.
Ultimately is is, of course, the relevant Government Minister who, rightly, carries the blame. But this will never solve the problem unless the civil servants in responsible positions are themselves made to be more visably accountable and their careers and salaries more closely linked to their personal performances.
albert, son of a gypsy.
August 15th, 2008 4:28pm Report this commentOur Man of Courage - the Prime Minister, who, if medals for hiding in a bunker were handed out, would get the VC!, set the trend for this discredited Government. They never ever resign. They are never,ever, to blame. That is why they have tried to set up so many quango's between them and the public.
They believe they are untouchable. Wait until the General Election! then they will find they are very much touchable and their arses will never sit on Government benches again. Indeed I doubt if they will sit on Palace of Westminster Benches again.
Should, in that happy event, Brown make the likes of Balls and wifey and co Lords and Ladies in the Upper House. I do hope Cameron has the good sense to 'modernise' the House of lords and kick out Prime Ministerial Appointments!!
Tankus
August 15th, 2008 8:03pm Report this commentIf Balls isn't responsible , then why are we paying him ?
Coito Ergosum
August 15th, 2008 8:06pm Report this commentI quite agree that one might blame Ed Balls first and think about it afterwards, given his appalling track record.
But thinking about it afterwards, it looks like a classic case of the Treasury insisting on the absolute lowest tender, probably overruling objections from anyone who actually knew anything.
Cogito Ergosum
August 15th, 2008 8:42pm Report this commentCoito, cogito.
Sorry for the typo, ladies and gentlemen.
DB
August 15th, 2008 8:57pm Report this commentCoito Ergosum
Sex - that's all you ever think about.
Trumpeter Lanfried
August 16th, 2008 12:44pm Report this commentMaybe no one can be persuaded to take the contract on next year?
Good-oh!
Back to top