In Iran, Twitter has been a technological Scarlet Pimpernel
I would like to take this opportunity to apologise unreservedly to Twitter. Like many of my colleagues, I unfairly characterised it as a vacuous expression of our narcissistic age. In fact, it turns out to be the most effective tool for advancing freedom and democracy since the invention of the internet. In Iran, the anti-government protesters have been circumventing President Ahmadinejad’s efforts to stop them organising by communicating via Twitter. Not only that, but they have been using the social networking site to file pictures and news reports, documenting the government’s brutal attempt to suppress the protest. If President Ahmadinejad falls and Mousavi is installed in his place, this will surely come to be known as the Twitter Revolution.
The Pavlovian reaction of all dictators when faced with a democratic challenge to their authority is to clamp down on communications. Television news is censored, opposition papers are shut down, visas for foreign journalists are withdrawn, internet access is blocked. In this way, they hope to isolate their enemies and stop the protest movement from growing. It has the added benefit of enabling them to beat, torture and kill their opponents.
This is exactly the playbook that President Ahmadinejad has been following since it became clear that millions of Iranians do not accept the results of last Friday’s election. Text messaging services have been shut down and mobile phone transmissions and access to hundreds of websites, including Facebook, blocked. Newspapers are confined to reporting his 66 per cent victory at the polls.
More articles from: Toby Young | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
The present Queen succeeded to the throne 60 years ago…
The City is used to ignoring MPs, because they don’t matter. Or at least they didn’t
It’s not strange that bankers have so much more money…
Ancient and modern: Call that a spectacle?
The Grand Olympic Opening Ceremony will apparently inform us ‘who…
I write this having just returned from the BBC, where…
The Wiki Man: The best thing since wheeled suitcases
I had a Land Rover Discovery once. It was expensive…
1 Terry shouldn’t be captain, but that should be Capello’s decision to make - Rod Liddle
2 Snow? What snow? - Rod Liddle
3 JFK: The Nastiest President of the Twentieth Century? - Alex Massie
4 Do we really need to know more about Gary Speed’s death? - Rod Liddle
5 Scottish Labour Embrace the Logic of Independence - Alex Massie
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
John Keenan
June 18th, 2009 5:03pm Report this commentIt’s a nice article Toby, but I think it’s overcooked. Much of the on-the-ground opposition seems to have been generated through old media – word of mouth. We media types in the west might get excited by the idea of a ‘Twitter revolution’ but we should tread with caution. Vote rigging aside, Ahmadinejad is genuinely popular with the poor, mainly rural, people – and they don’t have iPhones
Back to top