Defining yourself these days as ‘upper class’ is the kiss of death in every walk of life

30 January 2010

Toby Young suffers from Status Anxiety

‘The basic principle of English social life is that everyone thinks he is a gentleman,’ wrote Evelyn Waugh. ‘There is a second principle of almost equal importance: everyone draws the line of demarcation immediately below his own heels.’

That was written 55 years ago and today almost exactly the opposite is true. According to a Guardian/ICM poll published earlier this week, almost no one in contemporary Britain sees themselves as ‘upper class’. The pollsters didn’t ask the respondents to define ‘upper class’, but I wouldn’t be surprised if a majority of people draw the line of demarcation immediately above their own heads. In the course of my life I have come across dukes, marquesses, earls, lords and baronets, as well as princes and princesses, and yet I have only once heard someone call themselves as ‘upper class’. It was such a shock I almost fell off my chair.

These days, being perceived as posh — or, worse, being perceived as someone who thinks of themselves as posh — is deeply unfashionable. I first detected this trend at Oxford in the mid-1980s, where a significant minority of upper-class students began to talk like stage cockneys. I remember one occasion, during the miners’ strike, when I spotted the son of a hereditary peer rattling a tin outside McDonald’s and asking passers-by to ‘spare a few coppers’ in the voice of a Dickensian pickpocket.

At the time, we dismissed this behaviour as ‘street cred’, but in retrospect it was clearly more than a passing fad. They sensed that the majority of undergraduates, being state school educated, disapproved of inherited privilege and camouflaged themselves in order to avoid being stigmatised. ‘I’m with you, comrade,’ was the message they wanted to convey.

1 | 2 Next page

More articles from: Toby Young | this section

Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (1)

Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Post comment

Minnie Ovens

February 8th, 2010 11:20am Report this comment

The major problem with the dissolution of a class system is that it will always be replaced by another.
It's what human beings do.
So the system based upon socio-economics, in other words a manner of life, with its ethics and moral principles, no matter how shallow, has been repplaced by one which is based upon money, clebrity and little in the ways of manners, morality or principle.
You tell me which is best although, personally, I find it a bit repellant that Guy Richie is so unsure of himself that he has to dumb down.
After all, he is a success in his own right.
He doesn't have to become his own characters.
Oh, and by the way, the new class system is just as out of bounds to you and me as the old system.

Post comment