Rory Sutherland's fortnightly column on technology and the web
What has parking to do with technology? Just wait and see. Payment by mobile phone (a concept pioneered by companies such as Verrus.com and RingGo and common in Westminster) will be revolutionary. It allows anyone efficiently to charge for parking without the expense of running meters or ticket machines. Better still, it makes it possible to vary pricing, with an easyJet-style approach to balancing supply and demand. (Shoup recommends prices flex to keep 10 to 15 per cent of parking bays vacant at any time.) It can even tell drivers where parking is available.
Together with pay-as-you-drive insurance plans (a Norwich Union idea described at www.snipurl.com/paydrive) and schemes such as www.streetcar.co.uk, this illustrates that technology can transform the efficiency of car-use, meaning the price of using a car will become better aligned with its social costs.
The greatest benefit may come from GPS. Not only in cutting atmospheric pollution (by routing people around congestion) but visual pollution too. By 2018, with GPS in all cars, we can get rid of all modern metal road signs, restoring British towns and countryside to a tasteful, Betjemanesque state. I am, so far, the only person to propose this. Perhaps it’s one for Mr MacKenzie’s next manifesto?
Rory Sutherland is vice-chairman of Ogilvy Group UK.
More articles from: Rory Sutherland | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
The present Queen succeeded to the throne 60 years ago…
The City is used to ignoring MPs, because they don’t matter. Or at least they didn’t
It’s not strange that bankers have so much more money…
Ancient and modern: Call that a spectacle?
The Grand Olympic Opening Ceremony will apparently inform us ‘who…
I write this having just returned from the BBC, where…
The Wiki Man: The best thing since wheeled suitcases
I had a Land Rover Discovery once. It was expensive…
1 Terry shouldn’t be captain, but that should be Capello’s decision to make - Rod Liddle
2 Snow? What snow? - Rod Liddle
3 JFK: The Nastiest President of the Twentieth Century? - Alex Massie
4 Do we really need to know more about Gary Speed’s death? - Rod Liddle
5 Scottish Labour Embrace the Logic of Independence - Alex Massie
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Rory Williams
May 18th, 2008 12:47am Report this commentYou may be interested to read about one Hans Monderman (http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,448747,00.html), a civil engineer from the Netherlands, who has also suggested removing all traffic signs. A few places have even tried it. His motivation is not so much aesthetic as practical: he believes that drivers will drive more safely if they are given full responsibility for their decisions, instead of relying on engineers to tell them what to do. Efficient social self-regulation.
I have also just written a post on the parking theme, with some thoughts on how the recently developed concept of "New Mobility" might improve the efficiency of how we use cars and transport infrastructure. (http://www.carbonsmart.com/carboncopy/2008/05/paving-paradise.html)
Rory Sutherland
May 21st, 2008 12:32am Report this commentI have read a little about Monderman: from what I hear the removal of signs causes people to drive with far greater consideration and courtesy than before.
It has always struck me as odd that the free-market US is so disdainful of roundabouts (which are a self-regulating solution) preferring the far more dirigiste, interventionist traffic light.
Back to top