Saturday 17 May 2008

Spectator 180th Anniversary Blog
 

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Peter Hoskin

Pete suggests


Tuesday, 6th May 2008

Brownie No.3 - Gordon Brown's "transitional" 10p tax rate

Fraser Nelson 2:56pm

Your email address:   
Friend's email address:   
   

When Gordon Brown was defending his decision to scrap the 10p tax rate in April 2008, he spoke as if he was avenging a great moral wrong.

“I think I should tell the House that 85 per cent of the benefits of the 10p rate go to higher-rate and basic-rate taxpayers, and that 11 million people, mainly the lowest-income people in the country, receive no benefit at all from it… We are determined to take action, because we are the party of fairness tackling poverty.”

So why did he introduced this 10p tax with such great fanfare in 1999 if it was so regressive? On Sunday 4 May, he told BBC’s Andrew Marr Show:

“Look, nobody's suggesting the 10p rate be brought back.  Not any of the opposition parties, not Frank Field. He knows as I know that it was a transitional measure until we introduced the lower rate income tax and the tax credits.”
A transitional measure? Since when? When this line was first trotted out Peter Bottomley MP asked the House of Commons library to ascertain whether it was true. He has kindly allowed us to reprint their reply here, for our Brownie series. It speaks for itself:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You asked if the Government had presented the 10p starting rate of income tax as a ‘transitional’ measure, prior to the announcement in Budget 2007 that it would be withdrawn from April 2008.

No, it does not appear to have been described this way.  The introduction of a 10p starting rate was a commitment in the Labour Party's manifesto for the 1997 General Election; this stated that, “Our long term objective is a lower starting rate of income tax on ten pence in the pound … This goal will benefit the many, not the few … We will also examine the interaction of the tax and benefits systems so that they can be streamlined and modernised, so as to fulfil our objectives of promoting work incentives, reducing poverty and welfare dependency, and strengthening community and family life.” (New Labour: because Britain deserves better, April 1997 pp 12-13).

The 10p rate was introduced in April 1999.  In his Budget speech that year, Gordon Brown described it as one of a number of “tax cuts to encourage work and make work pay, tax cuts for a purpose” that would “help all middle and lower-income families” and were “being made at the best time for the economy."  The Budget report stated:

4.49 To put work first in the tax and benefit system, the Government will introduce a 10p rate of income tax. From 6 April this year, taxpayers will pay only 10 pence in the pound on their first £1,500 of taxable income. This is the lowest starting rate of tax since 1962-1963, and will reduce the marginal rate of tax from 20p to 10p for 1·8 million people.

4.50 When the 10p rate is introduced, there will be three main rates of income tax - 10, 23 and 40 per cent. Basic and top rate taxpayers will gain £1·15 a week from the change. But those on the lowest incomes (below £8,835) will gain more, because the three rate structure helps to target the gains from the 10p rate on the lowest paid: 1·8 million people, of whom 1·5 million are low paid, will see their tax bill halved, and a further 300,000 people will be taken out of income tax altogether.

4.51 The new 10p band will help to ease the poverty trap whereby people on low pay are discouraged from climbing the earnings ladder. At present, around 700,000 people lose more than 70 pence for every extra pound they earn. After the implementation of Budget 99, this figure will fall by around two-thirds

4.52 Taken with other measures announced since the Government took office, the new 10p band will help to make work pay and ease the unemployment trap. From April 2000 a number of further measures will also help to reward work. (Budget 99 HC 298 March 1999 p60)

When this provision was scrutinised at the Committee stage of the Finance Bill that year, the then Financial Secretary, Barbara Roche, described the rationale for the new starting rate as follows: “Clause 19 meets the Government's commitment to bring in a new starting rate of income tax. It introduces a starting rate band of £1,500, which will be charged at 10 per cent.--the lowest rate for more than 35 years. The new starting rate of tax is part of a range of income tax and national insurance contributions measures designed to complement the national minimum wage by helping to make work pay, to encourage people into work and to ensure that they keep more of their earnings.”(SC Deb (B) 18 May 1999 c247)

In his 2007 Budget speech, the Chancellor set out increases to child tax credits and personal allowances for the over 65s, noting that his aim “in all measures today is a fair system for pensioners and families with children.”  He described the purpose of removing the starting rate, and cutting the basic rate, as follows:

Having put in place more focused ways of incentivising work and directly supporting children and pensioners at a cost of £3 billion a year, I can now return income tax to just two rates by removing the 10p band on non-savings income … With the other decisions I have made today, we are able to hold to our pledge made at the election not to raise the basic rate of income tax. Indeed, to reward work, to ensure working families are better off and to make the tax system fairer, I will from next April cut the basic rate of income tax from 22p to 20p, the lowest basic rate for 75 years. (Budget 99 HC 298 March 1999 p60)
Following this Mr Brown appeared before the Treasury Committee, and mentioned that the starting rate was “in a sense a transitional rate”:

On the personal tax system, it seems to me to have two rates and two thresholds is something that has eluded every government for the last 40 years, even when they have tried to do this ... That is a major change that any Chancellor would like to have done were the resources available to do so ... Because we can provide money through the child benefit and child tax credits, through pensioner tax allowances and through the pension credit, and through the working tax credit, because these three instruments are now available to us, it is possible to move from 22 pence to 20 pence without having a 10 pence rate which in a sense was a transitional rate while we got the new system into being. I believe that over time very few people will want to change this two rate and two threshold system of income tax.
Finally, the term was used in the letter the Chancellor sent to John McFall MP on 23 April 2008, setting out “the work the Treasury has underway in this area” on proposals to help other low paid workers without children and pensioners under 65:

The 10p rate was introduced in 1999 as a transitional measure to help low income households. However, as the tax credits system became more developed and more generous, we were better able to target resources on low-income households. That enabled us in the Budget in 2007 to simplify the tax system by removing the 10p starting rate of income tax and reducing the basic rate of income tax from 22p to 20p.
I hope this material is of use.

Click here for this week's magazine

Blogs: Americano | Trading Floor | Clive Davis | Melanie Phillips | Stephen Pollard

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink  |   Comments (14)

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

Andy

May 6th, 2008 3:41pm

It troubles me that he can stand up in the Commons and tell bold black=white lies like this, without any censure. It means that parliament is not working.

On the other hand, he is making the opposition's job really very easy, so it's hard to complain!

John Backhouse

May 6th, 2008 3:48pm

He's always been a wrong un. On a more serious note, please may we have an article from Matthew d'Ancona explaining how he ever thought this was was decent, honest, truthful, competent and "the most intellectual prime minister". I mean, really.

Robert Williams

May 6th, 2008 3:51pm

Last Sunday, Sky's Adam Boulton was pressing Brown on the intended compensation package. Brown was very specific about the categories who would, or might, be covered. Therefore not all losers will be compensated. Brown waved this matter away by claiming that some losers were HIGH income folk. How does that apply?

Mike

May 6th, 2008 4:09pm

Basically Brown stands up in Parliament and lies, yet there is no accountability or scrutiny. Brown is not called to account of his mendacity. Why not? Has no MP the courage to put down an EDM calling for Brown to correct the record if the speaker will not?

DonnyB

May 6th, 2008 4:13pm

Very appropriate , a transitional tax measure rids us of a transitional PM .

Richard Lowe

May 6th, 2008 4:45pm

Gordon Brown convinced the public - and a pretty good proportion of the media too, not least those of a Conservative bent - for ten years that he was a great Chancellor. This site has done a good job of exposing his “Brownies”; of detailed analysis of the difference between what he says and the truth; of his skill in misleading by clever use of statistics etc.
A genuine query: did previous Chancellors, i.e. the ones under Major and Thatcher do the same thing? Were they as sneakily dishonest? As clever at massaging the message? Or is this “skill” Brown’s greatest contribution to British politics?

Ann

May 6th, 2008 5:15pm

John and Mike: exactly right. This man is a pathological liar, always has been, always will be. He doesn't have an ounce of honesty in his body. Mind you, someone as incompetent and intellectually deficient as McBean needs some skill to compnesate for those failings, and his is brass-neck lying.

Alan Scott

May 6th, 2008 6:27pm

All this look after the poor stuff because I know what being poor is like really makes one gag. Are there not photos of the Manse from which he came, with photos of the terrace houses/tenements/cottages of his father's parishioners? Income tax returns? Scottish Church stipend lists? The will of Brown senior? Enough of this "I know how it feels to be poor" rubbish!

Robert Williams

May 6th, 2008 6:38pm

Mike "Basically Brown stands up in Parliament and lies, yet there is no accountability or scrutiny.

Yes, I was outraged not only by Brown's PMQ lie about inflation, but by the lack of media etc response to the lie. So I was pleased when it was picked up in Brownie#1 "Anne McIntosh: Why is the rate of inflation running at a higher rate now than the one his Government inherited?" When dealing with the master of spin (definitely Brown, not Blair), MPs need to give more care to their questions. Mrs McIntosh's question should have quoted RPIX figures.

Alan Scott

May 6th, 2008 6:40pm

What is the Speaker and his enormous staff there for? If any MP asks to have the record checked, then the Speaker should instruct his staff do it - or himself and them be "retired" forthwith.

Max Kaye

May 6th, 2008 7:23pm

Some immutable facts of life:
1. The sun rises in the east.
2. Night follows day.
3. Gordon Brown is a liar.

Ralph

May 6th, 2008 7:43pm

Apparently capital gains tax taper relief was also considered as a "temporary measure" by this government. Unfortunately the Treasury never bothered to inform investors in business assets during the last ten years that this was the case, until proposing to withdraw the incentive to investment at short notice.

Ben Elford

May 7th, 2008 2:26am

This underlines the culture of mendacity at the heart of this government. One of the worst aspects of Labour's damage to this country over the last eleven years has been that government statistics can no longer be believed, politicians can no longer be trusted and public servants are no longer respected. Specific measures Labour have introduced can be reversed; damage to trust will take much longer to recover.

John of Enfield

May 7th, 2008 8:44am

Mr. Brown is completely Orwellian in his approach to public life. His attempts to re-write history could not be bettered by the Minstry of Truth. It is also not a coincidence that "Newspeak" litters the pronouncements of New Labour. As Orwell pointed out, this is designed to limit our very ability to even think. Brown speaks a particular dialect of of this language which I would describe as "Spreadsheet" Newspeak. So I think this project to highlight "Brownies" is fundamental to the exercise of our democracy. Keep up the good work.

Post a comment

Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

Spectator recommends

Volvo -The Official Site

Request a brochure, book a test drive or find your Volvo dealer.


Spectator classifieds

UMBRIA

UMBRIA, Niccone Valley.Farmhouse Rental. Newly renovated 400 year old farmhouse, high on the south facing slope of Niccone Valley, on

Cornwall.

AMAZING CORNISH HOUSE previously featured in Vogue Living, available to let during the last 3 weeks of August either on a

City Breaks: PARIS and ROME

PARIS and ROME: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.parisreference.com and www.romanreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.