Home > Melanie Phillips

Wednesday 19 November 2008

Dare to dream and make your ultimate trip a reality

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Michael Henderson

Michael Henderson suggests

Email registration

Free weekly email update

Great products and special offers for Spectator readers

Click here for great value events

Click here for exclusive articles, offers, tasting notes and discussion

Media lie, people die

Saturday, 15th March 2008

The ‘Bush/Blair lied, people died’ brigade swung into instantaneous knee-jerk action-replay when the Institute for Defence Analyses, a Defence Department funded body, reported on the results of screening more than 600,000 original captured documents and several thousand hours of audio and video footage from Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, which have been archived in a US Department of Defence database. Thus

Study Finds No Qaeda-Hussein Tie

said the New York Times.

Official US study denies Saddam had links with al-Qaida

said the Guardian, going on:

A US military study officially acknowledged for the first time yesterday that Saddam Hussein had no direct ties to al-Qaida, undercutting the Bush administration's central case for war with Iraq.

But the actual report doesn’t say that at all. Indeed, its reveals the precise opposite. Although its executive summary states:

This study found no ‘smoking gun’ (i.e., direct connection) between Saddam's Iraq and al Qaeda

the body of the report finds significant evidence of highly pertinent indirect connections with al Qaeda affiliates. For example:

Captured documents reveal that the regime was willing to co-opt or support organizations it knew to be part of al Qaeda-as long as that organization's near-term goals supported Saddam's longterm vision…A later memorandum from the same collection to the Director of the IIS reports that the Army of Muhammad is endeavoring to receive assistance [from Iraq] to implement its objectives, and that the local IIS station has been told to deal with them in accordance with priorities previously established. The IIS agent goes on to inform the Director that ‘this organization is an offshoot of bin Laden, but that their objectives are similar but with different names that can be a way of camouflaging the organization.

…Saddam supported groups that either associated directly with al Qaeda (such as the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, led at one time by bin Laden's deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri) or that generally shared al Qaeda's stated goals and objectives.

Woah! Read that one again! Saddam supported an organisation led at one time by bin Laden’s deputy! The abstract of the document explains:

Because Saddam’s security organizations and Osama bin Laden’s terrorist network operated with similar aims (at least in the short term) considerable operational overlap was inevitable when monitoring, contacting, financing, and training the regional groups involved in terrorism. This created both the appearance of and, in some ways, a ‘de facto’ link between the organizations. At times, these organizations would work together in pursuit of shared goals but still maintain their autonomy and independence because of innate caution and mutual distrust. Though the execution of Iraqi terror plots was not always successful, evidence shows that Saddam’s use of terrorist tactics and his support for terrorist groups remained strong up until the collapse of the regime.

Saddam and al Qaeda were not only recruiting from the same terrorist swamp, but it served Saddam’s pragmatic interests to make common cause. Indeed, in addition to providing evidence of actual links between Saddam and al Qaeda affiliates, the report destroys the ludicrous claim that Saddam would not have entertained such links with religious zealots since he was a ‘secular’ Muslim:

A much longer document from 1993… illuminates how the outwardly secular Saddam regime found common cause with terrorist groups who drew their inspiration from radical Islam…The document goes into great depth about Iraq's links to the Egyptian Islamic Jihad and includes a memorandum, dated 8 February 1993, asking that movement to refrain from moving against the Egyptian government at that time.

There was also an

order from the Presidential Secretary to the IIS, directing a task for the Afghan Islamic Party

and the revelation that, in 2001, Iraq was

training Sudanese fighters inside Iraq.

Part of the mind-blowing rewriting of history that has taken place is the bizarre claim that Saddam not only had ‘no links’ with al Qaeda but had ‘no links’ with terrorism at all. This report not only states:

Iraq was a long-standing supporter of international terrorism,

not only provides copious evidence of its links with international terrorism, but also provides the following from July 2002:

We hope for your opinion regarding how to destroy weapons in our embassy in London, which include seven Kalashnikov guns, nineteen other guns with ammunition belonging to them, and silencers.

What was that again about Saddam posing ‘no threat’ to Britain?

So far from

undercutting the Bush administration's central case for war with Iraq

this document in fact shows that Saddam was up to his neck in the Islamic jihad against the west and that therefore the case for removing him (quite apart from the legal case, which in my view was always sound) is thus well and truly proved.

The British and American media, however, have said the precise opposite. When will the shoe drop about these useful idiots, the Islamists’ most important strategic weapon against the west?

Previous Back to Melanie Phillips Next

Blogs: Clive Davis | Stephen Pollard | Americano | Coffee House | Trading Floor

Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (10)

Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Rob

March 15th, 2008 7:55pm

"Woah! Read that one again! Saddam supported an organisation led at one time by bin Laden’s deputy!"......Woah! And the British government supports the State of Israel, led at one time by Menachem Begin, former head of the Irgun terrorist organisation which murdered British citizens. And "actual links between Saddam and al Qaeda affiliates" - does that mean that the United States is a Nazi state because it actually employed and pardoned senior Nazis who happened to have useful rocketry skills? And ooh, seven Kalashnikovs in the Iraqi embassy in London? Golly. That sounds like a major threat. How many automatic weapons do you think we'd find inside the US Embassy if we sneaked inside to look? Or in most British Embassies in Africa or Asia? What planet is Mel living on? Oh, and what were the wicked Iraqis wanting to do with those guns? Destroy them. How threatening. So, nice try, Mel, at finding ways to read the report that contradict what its authors say it shows, but the shoe dropped long ago for all the rest of us who can read.

alan stoddart

March 15th, 2008 8:14pm

The first lines of the executive summary: The Iraqi Perspectives Project (IPP) review of captured Iraqi documents uncovered strong evidence that links the regime of Saddam Hussein to regional and global terrorism.

Saddam flouted UN resolutions for 12 years, the sanctions were going to be lifted (They were largely ineffective in controlling Saddam), If Saddam had been left to get on with things we would now be looking at not only Iran producing nuclear weapons but Iran's enemy, Iraq, trying to get them also...and look how effective we are at stopping Iran. The sanctions in Iraq are estimated to have resulted in 500,000 deaths due to saddam's negligence and diversion of resources. George Galloway likes to say 1 million died. So we have a war that prevented Saddam getting nuclear arms, a war that stopped huge numbers of deaths due to saddam's actions and inactions, we stopped a man that did have links to terrorists and we allowed the Iraqi people to have a say in their own future. Bush is clearly a bad man.

Really it was all done to get American hands on the oil wasn't it?....er..the US has spent probably around $2 trillion on the war...how much oil could they have bought for that? Saddam would have been only too pleased to sell it to them.

And I leave the last word to Dr David Kelly: 'I had no doubt about the veracity of it (the Dossier) was absolute.'...'It is an accurate document, I think it is a fair reflection of the intelligence that was available and it's presented in a very sober and factual way....it is well written.'
"I was personally sympathetic to the war because I recognised from a decade's work the menace of Iraq's ability to further develop it's non-conventional weapons programmes."

Howard

March 15th, 2008 10:09pm

The easiest thing in the world is to re-write the facts. Keep watching Life on Mars and stop writing this rubbish!

J. Kerr

March 16th, 2008 3:50am

The smoking guns! http://www.thexreport.com

Roy

March 16th, 2008 7:29am

It might be in black and white but it will need a sledge hammer or two to drive it home ... I'm thinking.

Mark Eichenlaub

March 16th, 2008 4:24pm

Awesome job Melanie. I am about to post something about this at www.regimeofterror.com. The way the media has handled this has been incredibly dissapointing.

pete woodhouse

March 16th, 2008 11:26pm

Woah! What are you talking about Rob? Woah! What planet(side) are you on? Woah! I'm assuming that your particular shoe dropped on your head!

Ann

March 18th, 2008 7:04pm

"the Irgun terrorist organisation which murdered British citizens" --- what ignorant antisemitic drivel. IZL did not 'murder' anyone. It fought against an illegal foreign invader that had murdered many of the indigenous Jewish population who were fighting for their nation's independence.

Jhoover

March 21st, 2008 6:40pm

The head"Media lie, people die" of this article its misleading or not accurate here. Simplly its not the media who did lied here, its the presedent its a full adiinsatrtion of United State of Amrica from the presedent to CIA to all those who behid the adminstartion same way with PM blair and who is behind his cabnets. These the lairs not the media. the media put what lies those mouth speaks.

Jhoover

March 21st, 2008 6:55pm

Melanie, which include seven Kalashnikov guns, nineteen other guns with ammunition belonging to them, and silencers. Do you know what Israil did to those Iraqi scinetisets in Paris? if you dear about 7Kalashnikov guns in London how many guns Israelis carry around the world to assassinate political and writers and scientists Arab ?