
Blink and you could have missed it. Today’s Daily Telegraph carried this tiny item (so insignificant is it considered to be that it doesn’t even seem to be on the Telegraph’s website):
A vicar was left seriously injured after he was attacked in his own churchyard by three Asian youths who taunted him about his Christianity. Canon Michael Ainsworth, 57, needed hospital treatment after he was repeatedly hit in the face and body by the gang at St George-in-the-East church in Whitechapel, east London, on March 5. Police are treating the incident as a ‘faith-hate’ crime.We know the faith that was the target of the hate. But which was the faith whose adherents were doing the hating? We all know, even though no-one is saying. Just as under Stalinism, we are now taking it for granted that we must read between the lines.
It so happens that Canon Ainsworth has in the past spoken up in public in defence of maintaining the integrity of Christian churches as places unique to Christian worship. In March 2006, giving evidence to the Commons Select Committee on Media, Culture and Sport, he replied to the suggestion that other religions might use churches as places for their own religious worship:
There are some issues about using Christian churches of all denominations for worship by other faiths but there is very extensive community use by other faith groups in many areas. That is something to be encouraged. If there is very clear evidence that other faith groups are actively looking to use church buildings for worship, and on the whole my experience is that they would prefer to have their own buildings, then that is something that will always be carefully and sympathetically considered but at the end of the day there must be an issue about other faith worship in a Christian church.Was Canon Ainsworth actually targeted for attack?
Blogs: Clive Davis | Stephen Pollard | Americano | Coffee House | Trading Floor
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (18)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Has Bush forgotten his own doctrine?
Britain’s dangerous political vacuum
Sleepwalking into Islamisation
Can we afford to lose this expertise?
Melanie Phillips is a Daily Mail columnist. She also writes for the Jewish Chronicle and is a panellist on BBC Radio Four's Moral Maze. Her most recent book is 'Londonistan', published by Encounter and Gibson Square.
For a complete set of Melanie's articles click here
Great choice of versatile vehicles for the drive of your life..
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus or sky hd.
Huge savings. Lowest prices guaranteed on hotels in Rome. Book online or call now and save.
Great choice of versatile vehicles for the drive of your life..
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Steve
March 15th, 2008 8:45pmHave you no tolerance. Churchyards are offensive to our multicultural friends. So the Canon brought it upon himself. The Archbishop will explain it all to him.
Barry
March 15th, 2008 9:28pm"three Asian youths?" O really? Chinese? Vietnamese? Hindu? Or is this a euphemism, weasel words, for members of the "Religion of Peace" that the media are too cowardly, too PC (the same thing)to name directly?directly?
Commondog
March 15th, 2008 11:01pmThree young Asian men and a baseball bat versus one 57 year old vicar.
The RAF dictated to regarding where they can wear their uniform. (By 'members of the public' as reported by the BBC)
Aah the sweet fruits of mulitculturalism or should it be transculturalism?
Alex Bensky
March 15th, 2008 11:02pm"Asian youths?" Those damn Buddhists.
Roy
March 16th, 2008 5:18amIt was from random attacks like this that people used to carry swords, hidden pistols etc. Perhaps the time has come when at least a knobbly stick would be a good defence. Carried or hidden at strategic parts of a Canon's walk. Personally, with a suitable stick I would be looking forward to an attack.
A.Carter
March 16th, 2008 11:52amYes, you're right, blink and one would have missed it. Just as I had to go to Sky to find out the ethnicity of the 19year old killed in London this weekend, bringing it to nine this year - what was it last year, 20, 25? It certainly didn't allude to the victims ethnicity on the BBC website (but there again it wouldn't would it - everything must be rosy in the garden mustn't it), and even on Sky it simply said 'officers from Operation Trident, which investigates black on black crime, are investigating'. Press self censorship really has hit new Stalinist heights.
stanley Jerusalem
March 16th, 2008 1:04pmNot the England I grew up in and loved. God help you all - no-one else is listening.
Water
March 16th, 2008 8:45pmTo hell with that Asian or not such behaviour cannot be tolerated. As an damn proud British Asian I can tell you with absolute certainty this is in no way indicative of the Asian community. Barry has hit the nail on the head.
Antoine
March 16th, 2008 8:57pmWithout justifying this incident one jot - I do hope that the author is equally concerned by the attack on an Immam in Falkirk a year or two ago, + by the various other indiscriminate attacks on Muslims that have occurred in recent times...
Roy
March 17th, 2008 7:59amThe Imams of Falkirk or anywhere else in Britain should feel themselves very lucky the British people are as tolerant as they are, and would be well advised not to press their luck.
A Chaffey
March 17th, 2008 10:08amSo the article didn't say what the religion of the perpetrators was. Could it be, just maybe, that the writer of the article didn't know? And could it also be that, not knowing, they are the Telegraph were right not to identify them as coming from any particular religious group? I can't help thinking that if they didn't know, then this was the only sensible approach to take. Is MP saying she would have taken a different approach?
Helen Oster
March 17th, 2008 2:27pmWell, what a surprise.............I spend about 1 -2 hours each day, responding to hate-filled diatribes on "Yahoo Answers", from people who apparently believe that ALL the problems in the Middle East are caused by Israel & the Jewish presence. I try in vain to disseminate the facts - that the "Palestinians" as a nation of Moslems, were a creation of Egyptian-born Yasser Arafat, in 1964, with the main goal of destroying the Jewish people living in the Land of Israel. - still the defined goal of Hamas, Hezbollah & the government of Iran today. I offer facts & figures that detail how many disputed pieces of land which are claimed by the "Palestinian" Moslems, were in many cases not owned, but rented from absentee Arab landlords. The land was then purchased by Jewish philanthropists & charitable organisations, piece by piece from these absentee Arab landlords. I try to raise awareness of how the Jewish effort in the 1800s to revitalise the land attracted a large immigration of Arabs from neighbouring areas who were drawn by employment opportunities and healthier living conditions. There was never any attempt to "rid" the area of the few Arabs that there were, or of those Arabs that immigrated into this area along with the Jews. I focus upon how this contrasts with the actions of the governments of Morocco, Egypt, Iran (then Persia), Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon Syria & Yemen, who caused thousands of Jewish people to flee the homes that had been owned & lived in by their families for generations. They ended up in pre-State 'Palestine'. (Even a cursory glance at the general Jewish population of Israel today, reveals a majority of dark-skinned Israelis, bearing testimony to their Middle-Eastern roots). Nevertheless, I continue to read the same messages of hate, every single day. Not just from "Palestinians", but from people who ally themselves with the "Palestinian" cause. In Jerusalem, out walking with my children aged 8 & 10, I've had stones thrown at me by Arab youths, but we've come to not only expect that here, but to expect the face of the civilised world to turn against us. The writing is on the wall for Britain, too. By 2010, if current census predictions are accurate, there will be more Moslems in Birmingham - the UK's second city - than non-Moslems. Maybe in 3 or 4 generations, when ordinary Britons are being accused of having "stolen" a Moslem country, those who are currently blind supporters of Islam & detractors of Israel, will recall how it all began.
A Chaffey
March 17th, 2008 4:16pm"Was Canon Ainsworth actually targeted for attack?" Well not, Melanie, if you believe the report in your own newspaper, the Daily Mail - more a case it seems of mindless individuals under the influence of drink and drugs, attacking someone who confronted them for rowdy behaviour. But hey sow the seed, won't you? Suggest there are organised groups of muslims out there targeting Anglican clergymen "for attack", why not? Of course don't actually say so; you don't have any evidence for it. But hey, sow the seed, eh? eh? This is nasty and invidious stuff.
stanley Jerusalem
March 18th, 2008 2:09pmHelen Oster- well said. It was however Ahmed Shukairy, an Egyptian and Arafat's predecessor, who used the expression "Palestinian people" for the first time in 1964.Before that they were all Arab refugees left to 'rot' by the surrounding Arab nations who had attacked Israel in 1948 and thereby brought about their migration to areas not subsequently under Israeli control.They remain to this day a scar on the face of mostly Arab mankind who steadfastly desist from helping them [ apart from suppling their militant leaders with armaments.]
Ann
March 18th, 2008 6:51pmThe word you are looking for is not militant but terrorist, Stanley. 'Militant' is a cowardly cop-out by disgraceful appeasers like Al Beeb and its ilk, straight out of the Ministry of Truth.
stanley Jerusalem
March 18th, 2008 9:23pmAnn, you are quite right. i was using pre-PC English for which I feel thoroughly ashamed- and youare still right.Perhaps we should all repeat the Mantra - "When they love their kids more than they hate us there will be peace"
Ann
March 19th, 2008 12:21pmRight you are, Stanley ;-) (not sure if smileys come out here, but we'll see). --- While I'm at it: how does get hard line breaks to work? Mine don't.
Parasite
March 22nd, 2008 5:03pmThree Muslims beat up a Christian clergyman. Well done Melanie on spotting a global jihadi conspiracy, eh? Because similarly every time a gang of white lads boozed up decide to indulge in a bit of "P*ki-bashing", that is also part of a wider crusade on the part of the entire white population. What utter rot. And as for Stepney being a "no go" area I invite you out to the East End so you can see for yourself what tripe that is too. Perhaps though you're too paranoid about the colour of other people's skins to come.