Venetia Thompson on how she learnt to fit in with the hard-drinking barrow boys on the trading floor, who live on fish and chips, pickled onions and the most expensive vintage wines
He is sending back a bottle of 1965 Croft because it ‘doesn’t taste right’. I know that the odds of it tasting identical to the bottle we just drank in Pétrus are slim to none even if we were sober. He is miffed at the lack of label and they bring back the cork. I exchange an exasperated look with the sommelier, who woefully nods at yet another example of an Essex wide-boy embarrassing himself, and quietly brings another bottle. Our clients, traders visiting from Germany, continue to puff on their cigars.
More articles from: Venetia Thompson | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Melissa Kite meets Martina Navratilova, nine times Wimbledon singles champion and now pioneer of ‘tennising’ — an artistic technique that creates Jackson Pollock-style patterns
James Forsyth talks to Scott McClellan, former press secretary to the President, about his new book attacking the Bush administration, its methods and its deceits
Lord Lloyd of Berwick says that the government’s emergency legislation to overturn their lordships’ ruling on witness anonymity is part of a ‘gradual usurpation’ of our liberties
In the week of the Spectator Summer Party, Steven Berkoff recalls another of our celebrations at which he sought out the Tory leader and forgave his confusion of Brando and Dean
Rod Liddle says that it helps to be aged between 14 and 30, white and male. Being drunk and argumentative speeds things along. And no public policy seems to dissuade those who do the stabbing
Simon Nixon says trust in the City is at rock-bottom but he sees a glimmer of hope in the rise of boutique banks
Irina Palm
15, Barbican and key cities
Marguerite (Haymarket), The Good Soul of Szechuan (Young Vic), Under Milk Wood (Tricycle)
Peter Jones says the Romans made things work by keeping it simple. Gordon Brown could learn from this world in which complexity was an ill to be avoided not embraced
A speech recorded in Hansard on an unspecified day in the near future
Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £16.
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus or sky hd.
Exclusive web deals and latest ship reviews.
Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £16.
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Philippe P
February 7th, 2008 11:26amWhat a refreshing glimpse into the netherworld of those who neither inherited, nor stole their money. As we're staring down the abyss, people like those described will be our saviours in averting economic melt-down (and enslavement to the Chinese). More of the same please!
Joe Bloggs
February 7th, 2008 4:06pmYou poor girl having to deal with heathens who order Croft in the first place!
Terence Foo
February 7th, 2008 4:10pmFinally, a candid take on the characters driving our economy. Please write something about Gordon Brown.
Karen
February 8th, 2008 4:01pmBrilliant article, told like it really is. Been there many years ago, loved it & would not change the experience for the world. I have never been embarrassed by anything that I have had to encounter since!!
james Sleatdog
February 8th, 2008 4:14pmAs a city worker myself, reading your article was refreshing and well written. Lets us have more
Yvonne
February 8th, 2008 5:21pmHah! This made me laugh out loud - I've just retired after 13 years in the Front Office... it's all just too true!
gerard
February 11th, 2008 9:26amA brilliant little piece in both senses. I suppose she'll never be heard of again, but the girl done well
Jeremy Stubbs
March 7th, 2008 9:38amBrilliant. I hadn't heard of this article until i saw the front page of the Torygraph this morning. Being of a similar age and in a similar line of work, i thoroughly enjoyed the read. Sure it's not the last we've heard of Venetia!
Ram Barkai
March 7th, 2008 9:53amHi, I dont know how to get hold of Venetia, but I respect her courage, intelegnce and her article and I want to offer her a job in Cadiz financial services in Cape Town.
Binsey
March 7th, 2008 10:39amTop Bird!
David H
March 7th, 2008 11:07amReflecting on my 'Behaviour in Work Place' and 'Diversity' training courses, it is refreshing to know that some parts of the City remain, reassuringly unchanged.
J
March 7th, 2008 9:48pmBeing from The City, the other one, across the ocean, the one with the really big buildings, and working in the same field...just so you all know, it's just the same here
Kevin
March 8th, 2008 4:54pmWhat would be more interesting than this anecdotal article would be an explanation of how it is that a collection of inebriated, sleep-deprived individuals manage to accomplish anything profitable to the wider economy. Surely anything that is genuinely productive, such as designing microchips or building (reliable) cars, requires an alert, educated workforce? On a much smaller scale than City trading, some mortgage lenders siphon off money from the productive economy by scaring customers into taking out more insurance than they could possibly benefit from. Some mobile phone salesmen are similarly merely interested in getting you to pay over the odds for a multi-featured "Swiss army" model with all the trimmings, instead of a regular handset that will allow you to make calls. When we talk about the kind of City traders portrayed in this article, are we talking about the same phenomenon, but just involving far larger sums of money procured from corporate suckers by effectively plying their authorised representatives with drink and sex-related activities? If so, is that any more genuinely beneficial to the economy than bribery or money laundering? Surely this takes away money that could be put to more profitable use by corporations in producing products that improve our quality of life, allowing us more time and disposable income to invest in similarly productive work, such as architecture or interior design. Just a thought.
Actual Broker
March 10th, 2008 5:45pmSo basically, a silly little girl from a minor public school in Devon with a very sheltered background, couldn't get a job with a bank, so ended up working for a city chop-shop as a glamourized telesales person. Decent Banks and brokerage's don't employ 'Essex boys' (were they all from Essex?), sounds like you've got a chip on your shoulder and as a result are insecure about your position in the world.....
Kay Vasey
March 11th, 2008 7:57amVenetia, you have a great talent for writing... I think you should join MeshMinds.com - We've got a wealth of like-minded people with excellent creative talents. It would be brilliant to hear from you.
a.n other
March 11th, 2008 2:22pmAmusing little expose. However in comparison to the 'real scams' which are being conducted, the treatment handed down to this junior for her misdemeanor is a bit like giving a life sentense to a 'jay walker'. Countless people are doing the 'items scan' with sales credits and earning huge amounts all virtually without detection.
Lando
March 31st, 2008 4:15pmKevin, with your talk of 'plying corporate suckers out of large sums of money' I doubt that you fully understand what trading/inter dealer broking involves but that's fair enough. IDB's (Inter-Dealer Brokers, almost always incorrectly referred to as 'traders') are middlemen between two different real traders, the latter usually working for investment banks. A trader would deal through an IDB to trade size that he or she would be unable to execute on screen. The broker's job is to find a counterpart who wants to do the opposite to the first trader. The brokers takes no actual market risk themselves - hence they really arent 'traders' per se. To a lot of people this may seem pointless ('why not just get traders bypassing the brokers and talking to each other directly?) but to a big trader trying to move a large position the anonymity provided by IDB's is crucial, hence the commission charged. As for the 'entertainment', brokers know that all else being equal traders will choose to trade with their mates and commission being their sole source of income means they need as many mates as possible!
In any case Kevin, an easy mistake to make, perhaps a follow up from Ms Thompson on how trading actually works would clear up some misconceptions?